http://www.theverge.com/2013/4/30/42...rting-tomorrow
The original programming they have been adding is great but if you lose this much shit your going to have a lot of public outcry
Printable View
http://www.theverge.com/2013/4/30/42...rting-tomorrow
The original programming they have been adding is great but if you lose this much shit your going to have a lot of public outcry
Does 1800 sound like a lot to you? How many titles would you guess that Netflix has available for streaming?
Licensing deals come and go. I was miffed when they lost Stargate, but I understand those deals don't last forever. In the last several months Netflix inked new deals with Time Warner subsidiaries and Disney. They're still spending billions per year on this stuff.
The same thing happens on premium cable networks. This might seem more noteworthy for Netflix because it's mostly known for syndicated shows and licensed movies. Nobody really cares when HBO loses the rights to a particular catalogue of movies, because very few people sign up with HBO to watch movies or even their old shows. Netflix is probably trying to position itself similarly, making its main attraction original hit shows. In the meantime, I imagine their streaming library will remain very robust.
glad i dumped them over a year ago, had signed up with netflix when they first started
even spent $350 for a top of the line blueray player with internetz when they first came out, now they are so cheap it's a jopke but good for consumers
It all depends on the quality of newer stuff they add. They have put a whole lot of junk on their lately except for a few things like House of Cards.Quote:
Originally Posted by SrslySirius
Quote:
Originally Posted by SrslySirius
Its literally 1800+ of their best movies, aka obscure masterpieces that you cant torrent. Did you read the article?
I saw an interesting invterview on Fox Business yesterday regarding Netflix and the recent bump in subscriptions with the show 'House of Cards'. Guy was basically saying that Netflix was a "House of Cards" since they had such a poor structuring deal regarding the show and its rights compared to other broadcasting companies like HBO, Showtime etc. Also talked about how they do a poor job with putting the whole season out at once (ie, I can watch it all for a free trial), they don't own the rights when it goes to DVD, and its already slated to be picked up by broadcast TV since the episodes are made specifically for it but Netflix only owns the rights for 3 yrsQuote:
Originally Posted by SrslySirius
Which article are you referring to?Quote:
Originally Posted by lvpkr1009I saw an interesting invterview on Fox Business yesterday regarding Netflix and the recent bump in subscriptions with the show 'House of Cards'. Guy was basically saying that Netflix was a "House of Cards" since they had such a poor structuring deal regarding the show and its rights compared to other broadcasting companies like HBO, Showtime etc. Also talked about how they do a poor job with putting the whole season out at once (ie, I can watch it all for a free trial), they don't own the rights when it goes to DVD, and its already slated to be picked up by broadcast TV since the episodes are made specifically for it but Netflix only owns the rights for 3 yrsQuote:
Originally Posted by SrslySirius
I'm assuming this one: http://www.foxbusiness.com/technolog...ar-24-percent/
But there's also this one from a day prior: http://www.foxbusiness.com/technolog...eaming-growth/
Neither of them accurately fit your summary.
Check out this article from a month prior: http://articles.marketwatch.com/2013...cials-roku-box
Experts are mixed on Netflix, but I think its simple. They're historically innovative and there's high demand for their product; I envision them continuing to pioneer the future.
You're being overly dramatic. Its literally 1794 titles, the vast majority of them not obscure masterpieces, rather forgetable. Netflix goes on.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
Here's the list, linked from the article: http://instantwatcher.com/titles/expiring/
Blonde and Blonder 2007 PG-13 2.6 expiring May 5 Pamela Anderson, Denise Richards 1:35
:knife
Is there a difference from the apple tv netflix compared to whatever other type of netflix service their is? The Apple TV one has such few new movies it's a joke.
No, I didn't read it.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
limitles, is this true?Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry Highbrow
Quote:
Un Chien Andalou 1929 NR 3.6 expiring May 15 0:16 | play queue
WWE: Bobby The Brain Heenan 2010 NR 3.6 expiring May 15 HD 0:50 | play queue
Breaking the Code: Chris Jericho 2010 NR 3.8 expiring May 15 Chris Jericho HD 1:46 | play queue
WWE: Hart & Soul: Hart Family Anthology 2010 NR 3.7 expiring May 15 1:37 | play queue
WWE: The John Cena Experience 2010 NR 3.6 expiring May 15 John Cena HD 1:56 | play queue
WWE: The Rise & Fall of WCW 2009 NR 3.7 expiring May 15 1:44 | play queue
WWE: Top 50 Superstars of All Time 2010 NR 3.8 expiring May 15 Shawn Michaels, Steve Austin, Big Show, John Cena, Randy Orton HD 3:30 | play queue
WWE: Twist of Fate: Matt & Jeff Hardy 2008 NR 3.8 expiring May 15 Jeff Hardy 5:22 | play queue
May 16
Limitless 2011 PG-13 4.1 NYT Review expiring May 16 HD Cc 1:45 | play queue
http://instantwatcher.com/titles/expiring/2
As long as they still have Doctor Who, it's all good people.
Umm noQuote:
Originally Posted by Vwls
mo money yallQuote:
Originally Posted by Vwls
One of the problems with Netflix is their current selection of movies available to stream online. They are stilli missing numerous classic movies from their streaming library, whether it has to do with a licensing agreement, or they do have the right but are slow to update their library.