Quote:
I disagree, because there it starts to bear similarity to the faulty ATM situation -- which is actually a crime if you keep the money.
Basically, if you can knowingly trick a financial device into overpaying, I see that as outright stealing. You aren't just using strategy or taking advantage of flawed gaming materials to give yourself an edge. You are actually telling an electronic device, "I know I really won $10, but pay me $100."
The ATM situation may be illegal, I don't think it should be illegal. I find it completely morally right to keep money an ATM pays you in error as long as you don't directly cause the flaw. God knows that there will be situations where a bank makes an error in their favor and innocent customers will never become aware of it. Banks should suffer the financial burden caused by their own mistakes.
There is no way to "trick" a financial device. Machines aren't sentient so they can't be tricked. The flawed machine is exactly like the faulty cards that Ivey took advantage of. The situations are similar and I think Ivey/video poker players are equally in the right, morally speaking.
The key for me is that the player is not CAUSING the fault, which would be sabotage and morally wrong, merely taking advantage of mistakes made by others. I liken it to finding a $100 in the street: someone made a mistake in losing it, but YOU did not cause it. While some would take the money to the police station or donate it to charity, I think keeping it is ALSO morally correct.