DISCUSS
DISCUSS
Nice try, but he's wat too old to be a crack baby. But his mom snorting Tylenol explains a lot.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sloppy Joe
It’s well established knowledge that acetaminophen was developed by a crossdressing commie athiest.
There is good reason why the Amish have flourished.
https://x.com/ericldaugh/status/1970...194856048?s=46
Quote:
Originally Posted by BetCheckBet
Are we sure the Amish just arent pulling a Sparta approach with their autistic kids?
Alternatively, dont just drink raw milk?
get fucking roasted cuba
“They pump so much stuff into those beautiful little babies it’s a disgrace. I don’t see it. I think it’s very bad. They are pumping, looks like they are pumping into a horse. Little child, little fragile child. A vat of 80 different vaccines, I guess. Eighty different blends and they pump it in.”
mom how did we get so rich?
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G1fQnQ1W...pg&name=medium
well desertrunners mom smoked tylenol out of a tin can so he could be a failed fireman turned full time online racist on druffs forum.
then he sued druff for emotional trauma.
Here's what I posted in a different thread.
You'll see as time passes, and the autism issue is better understood, that I will turn out to be correct or mostly correct, just like I was about net neutrality.
--------
What about vaccines causing autism? The "evidence" is anecdotal, and has never been convincingly proven.
"Well, Druff, what about the fact that families who don't give their kids vaccines have a lower rate of autism diagnosed in their children?"
The problem is that these studies do not normalize for parental age and education, which are two big factors regarding autism risk.
First off, it has definitely been observed and proven that older fathers bring a bigger risk for autistic children (especially fathers over 50).
Second, and of course related, is the fact that college educated men tend to get married later than non-college-educated men -- in some cases much later. This leads to a higher percentage of college educated fathers being older, and thus increases autism risk.
College educated fathers tend to be much more pro-vax than non-college-educated fathers. You see where this is going.
The higher rates of autism might be primarily rated to the age of the father rapidly increasing over the past 50 years, and the older fathers are more likely to be pro-vax than the younger ones. This can give the incorrect impression that vaccines cause autism, when in reality correlation does not equal causation.
Strangely enough, I've never before read the above theory. I came up with it myself, but it makes a ton of sense.
Finally, there's a lot of autist/semi-autist dudes out there who have zero game when it comes to women, but are otherwise intelligent and good at making money. These dudes are going to flop with girls in their teens and early 20s (when girls just date the ones they like, and don't worry about the guy's career/money/etc), but then catch up over the years when their money/prestige/success makes them more appealing. So if you take a good-looking, personable dude at age 20 who otherwise isn't very smart or career-oriented, and you take an autist nerd who is likely to have a high income one day but has zero game and isn't attractive, the former dude will do MUCH better with women when young. However, when this same guy is 50 and loses a lot of his looks, and he's sitting there broke, he's not going to appeal much to younger women at that point, whereas the now-rich autist will. This will result in the autist being the one more likely get much younger women at a later age, and father kids with them. Additionally, the guys who had kids young (who are also less likely to be autistic) probably won't want to start with kids again 30 years later, so they are unlikely to end up older fathers. And if there's a genetic component to autism (which I think there is), that could be another factor as to why older dudes have a higher incidence of autistic kids.
Add this all up, and it makes sense why those who choose to vaccinate their kids also happen to see a higher autism rate, even with the vaccine and autism being unrelated.
QED
SFO
Donald providing medical advice was the single most cringe thing I’ve seen since Biden. Similar in some ways frankly.
Words are becoming a challenge too. He’s not the same guy this time around.
He’s like an aging athlete in decline. They still have occasional great days. Muscle memory and all that. Then the difference hits you on a typical day.
Presidency for clicks
This time around?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanlmar
He was giving plenty of batshit crazy medical advice his first time around.
Just a tiny sample
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d57zJr82dhQ
I'm actually surprised that Trump did not know the term "acetaminophen", as I have been aware of it since I was a teenager. I realize that most people know it as Tylenol, but given that it has been around for 70 years (!!), meaning since Trump was 9, you'd think he'd have heard of the actual name of the drug.
In general, Trump has no clue about anything medicine-related, and he should just shut up about that topic unless he's briefed by experts who provide him with specific info he needs to incorporate into a speech. Some people are like that. They just go to the doctor, follow instructions, and don't question anything, nor try to look into exactly the mechanism of the disease and/or treatment.
A lot of bad health outcomes occur that way, because doctors are often wrong (especially when they see you in a rushed appointment), so it's always good to sanity check what they're suggesting and decide if you agree with their diagnosis and/or treatment, and if you're willing to take the risks or tolerate the side effects. I've been especially diligent about this since I've gotten older and have developed various (minor to moderate) health conditions which I didn't have before my mid-40s.
Anyway, this Tylenol/autism thing is stupid, and RFK Jr. has mostly been the crackpot I expected him to be. He has a few decent ideas (such as removing dangerous additives from foods), but a lot of his theories and beliefs are quackery.
My least favorite things about Trump II have been the tariffs and his appointments of retards/wackos/weirdos to various positions.
Of course, Biden appointed that weirdo "Rachel" Levine to Assistant Secretary for Health, plus did an indirect appointment of luggage stealing freak Sam Brinton, so it's not like he did a lot better in that area.
We should all be listening to real doctors like….Dr. Fauci.
100 pages
So in typical liberal fashion, a pregnant woman just posted this video...
https://x.com/oliviakrolczyk_/status...07966958309404
I wouldn't be surprised if was a scheme by Jared Kushner to short Johnson & Johnson stock on behalf of his Saudi overlords.
Conservatives have been sharing this post like crazy, dated 2017:
https://x.com/tylenol/status/839196906702127106
Tylenol tried to walk it back in a statement, claiming, "The response was incomplete and did not address our full guidance on the safe use of Tylenol which has not changed: Acetaminophen is the safest pain reliever option for pregnant women as needed throughout their entire pregnancy."
The tweet was in response to someone asking a question to Tylenol's account in regards to pregnancy, but that tweet is now deleted, and nobody seems to know what it said.
I still don't understand the clarification. Why did they say in 2017 that they don't recommend taking it during pregnancy if it's safe?
Regardless, I still don't believe this guidance, as there has not been a significant increase in Tylenol consumption during pregnancy during the years that autism seems to have increased. I still believe that it is most related to parental age (which HAS changed very much in recent decades, especially men) and genetics.
The worst thing about politics in 2025 is neither party can make a post like above without the last paragraph. Like it’s impossible. And it’s retarded. Just make a statement on its own merits. Why does it always have to be “BUT Trump” or “BUT Biden”Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
:thisQuote:
Originally Posted by The IconThe worst thing about politics in 2025 is neither party can make a post like above without the last paragraph. Like it’s impossible. And it’s retarded. Just make a statement on its own merits. Why does it always have to be “BUT Trump” or “BUT Biden”Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
I.was nodding my head yes at virtually the entire post druff made,, and the last paragraph...i mean, why even post that at this juncture?
I'm not trying to pick on Druff or anything; like Icon said, I see way too much of this from both sides of the aisle. Hell, I'm sure im guilty of it myself here or there in the past. The way I see it,, it's just that the more I see the division increasing in this country, some of this stuff needs to be toned down.
Druff should organise a class action law suit:
He can slice off 10% from everyone's payout so he isnt running this site at a loss, and half the members here suddently become n-word rich when it pays out.
Your posts in recent years have been very anti-Trump, even though I don't remember you being a liberal before. It's possible you've just moved left due to hatred of Trump, but you've definitely been negative on him and the GOP as of late.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gordman:thisQuote:
Originally Posted by The Icon
I.was nodding my head yes at virtually the entire post druff made,, and the last paragraph...i mean, why even post that at this juncture?
I'm not trying to pick on Druff or anything; like Icon said, I see way too much of this from both sides of the aisle. Hell, I'm sure im guilty of it myself here or there in the past. The way I see it,, it's just that the more I see the division increasing in this country, some of this stuff needs to be toned down.
Now, that's fine... you can have whatever politics you want to have. However, it's not a big stretch for you to nod yes at my criticism of Trump and RFK Jr, so it's not like I was making fair points criticizing both sides, and then you got mad at some gratuitous bash against Biden at the end.
I brought Biden up for a reason. I want everyone to remember that, while many of Trump's appointments were retarded, Biden had the same problem, albeit for different reasons. Trump has become obsessed this time around with appointing loyalists (an issue he didn't have in the first term), and Biden was trying to score woke points some of his appointments.
I wasn't doing a "whuddabout" here, which is why I made sure to first present the fault I found with Trump in this matter, and only mention Biden with one reminder at the end.
I find that if I don't do that, many people will automatically assume that we wouldn't be seeing terrible appointments had Kamala won.