How many of you freaks have had the foreskin ripped from your cocks when you were born?
It staggers me that you fuckers believe removing what nature intended is actually a good thing.
We need numbers.
Printable View
How many of you freaks have had the foreskin ripped from your cocks when you were born?
It staggers me that you fuckers believe removing what nature intended is actually a good thing.
We need numbers.
Hood-free, homie.
Enjoy your smegma.
Nature also intended for you to die in your 30s from bacterial infections, but now we have antibiotics. Fuck nature.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord of the Fraud
Cut, but I wish my foreskin would grow back, so I would have something new to play with.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sloppy Joe
It rolls in one's finger like a ball of snot.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord of the FraudQuote:
Originally Posted by Sloppy Joe
It rolls in one's finger like a ball of snot.
Giving head to an uncircumcised man is very pleasureable for a woman.
In case anyone was wondering.
I prefer "enhanced" at birth.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SrslySiriusNature also intended for you to die in your 30s from bacterial infections, but now we have antibiotics. Fuck nature.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord of the Fraud
Only a skinless warrior would come up with such an analogy.
Advanced medical science is totally different from something which nature intended.
Always amuses me when straight people act like they know what they’re talking about when it comes to this
Quote:
Originally Posted by PLOL
I'm personally proud of my build up of wet cheese.
Not sure why sexuality comes into this.
OBV. Uncircumcised cocks are gross looking. Or am I wrong? I'm no fag, they look so strange tho
No, you pretty much nailed itQuote:
Originally Posted by SetofKs
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kilgore TroutWhat additional pleasure could a cheese-encrusted flap of skin provide?Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord of the Fraud
Get rid of clitoral hoods too imo. And the clitoris.
Giving head to an uncircumcised man is very pleasureable for a woman.
In case anyone was wondering.
Don’t knock it until you try it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sloppy JoeQuote:
Originally Posted by Kilgore Trout
I am circumcised. I am not going to argue it is good or bad. It is probably one of those things where you are used to what you grew up with and wouldn’t want to change it if offered, regardless of how things started.
If you start out snipped you are good with it. And if you start out anteater you are good with it too.
Doubt this is true. It has been proven that chicks watch porn more than men. Why are there no uncircumcised porn stars? Maybe this is true for you, but it must be very rare.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kilgore TroutQuote:
Originally Posted by Lord of the Fraud
Giving head to an uncircumcised man is very pleasureable for a woman.
In case anyone was wondering.
Do you mean to tell me that amoxicillin literally grows on trees? If you want to live as nature intends, then by all means start a hippy hunter-gatherer commune and enjoy your tuberculosis. I'll be chilling over here with my unnatural air conditioning, mechanized agriculture, synthesized drugs, and man-made technology.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord of the Fraud
I don't have a strong opinion one way or the other when it comes to circumcision. I just think the natural=good argument is horseshit.
Thread is pretty much useless without pics.
Most homophobic thing I’ve read all day. And I’ve been on this site all day.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord of the FraudQuote:
Originally Posted by SrslySirius
Only a skinless warrior would come up with such an analogy.
Advanced medical science is totally different from something which nature intended.
Oh cool another where literally everyone that has the skin thinks those that don't have it are freaks and everyone that doesn't thinks the opposite. I bet doing this thread for the 10th time solves the issue.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PLOLMost homophobic thing I’ve read all day. And I’ve been on this site all day.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord of the Fraud
Break my homophobic comment down into layman's terms, please. Because I don't see it.
I'm a willing learner if that helps?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brittney Griner's Clit
Feel like I've put you in a bad mood. Just make peace with the girl ffs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord of the FraudQuote:
Originally Posted by PLOL
Break my homophobic comment down into layman's terms, please. Because I don't see it.
I'm a willing learner if that helps?
STEP 1: get on your knees
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord of the FraudQuote:
Originally Posted by Brittney Griner's Clit
Feel like I've put you in a bad mood. Just make peace with the girl ffs.
Dear Jesus SanLimitLips of the Fraud
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brittney Griner's ClitQuote:
Originally Posted by Lord of the Fraud
Dear Jesus SanLimitLips of the Fraud
Kilgore, this cunt isn't for turning.
What did you do?
I never had to go through this
https://media.giphy.com/media/JoL413FjT9ZHq/giphy.gif
You don’t support things against “what nature intended”, which is the #1 non-religious excuse for why gay sex is badQuote:
Originally Posted by Lord of the FraudQuote:
Originally Posted by PLOL
Break my homophobic comment down into layman's terms, please. Because I don't see it.
I'm a willing learner if that helps?
Quote:
Originally Posted by PLOLYou don’t support things against “what nature intended”, which is the #1 non-religious excuse for why gay sex is badQuote:
Originally Posted by Lord of the Fraud
Could you reword that sentence or make it into threeQuote:
Originally Posted by PLOLYou don’t support things against “what nature intended”, which is the #1 non-religious excuse for why gay sex is badQuote:
Originally Posted by Lord of the Fraud
For those that suck uncut dick on the reg, how do you do it? Is it any diff than cut?
Asking for a friend.
Perhaps it depends upon a woman's preference.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kilgore TroutQuote:
Originally Posted by Lord of the Fraud
Giving head to an uncircumcised man is very pleasureable for a woman.
In case anyone was wondering.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFsQ...ature=youtu.be
Why?Quote:
Originally Posted by Kilgore TroutQuote:
Originally Posted by Lord of the Fraud
Giving head to an uncircumcised man is very pleasureable for a woman.
In case anyone was wondering.
Adults should be allowed to remove bits of their own genitals if they want. They shouldn't be allowed to force the same on their children, unless it's a medical requirement. Simple.
What's more damaging to a child's wellbeing, removing some excess skin from the body or indoctrinating the child with a delusional religious or tribal ideology?Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiganer
It's a Jewish poker forum.
Of course they've all got their foreskins in a pickling jar by the side of their beds.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PLOLYou don’t support things against “what nature intended”, which is the #1 non-religious excuse for why gay sex is badQuote:
Originally Posted by Lord of the Fraud
Interesting. But it's beyond laughable to suggest that I personally don't believe in stuff that nature didn't intend. I'm very progressive when it comes advancing our civilization, and a great believer in personal choice... Though somebody having their foreskin removed at birth is not "personal choice"
Fuckers like SS twisting my comments to make me sound like an ignorant caveman can bore right off too... Using the logic that me questioning the removal of the foreskin at birth is akin to me being against advanced medical science is ridiculous. It's borderline trolling.
Also, people of the same sex being attracted to one another is not going against human nature at all. You and millions of others are living proof of that.
And if you'll allow me to pull the 'I have a black friend' card... Back in 2006 I went on my first gay march in Germany and took an egg to the shoulder from literal Nazis.
Been to ones in London and Manchester too. Three total, and all with the same lesbian friend.... She'd claw your eyes out for calling me a homophobe.
But perhaps he thinks nature did intend for gay people to exist. Don't be one of those guys that puts words into people's mouths and accuse them of being homophobic when he said absolutely nothing of the sort. This kind of bullshit diminishes real homophobia and just gets people to tune such accusations out. Randomly accusing others of homophobia (and racism/sexism) doesn't make the other person look bad, it just makes you look like an asshole.Quote:
Originally Posted by PLOLYou don’t support things against “what nature intended”, which is the #1 non-religious excuse for why gay sex is badQuote:
Originally Posted by Lord of the Fraud
Lol at how people on this forum get offended by everything. It was a pretty obvious joke. You can’t even be sardonic anymore without some retard getting offended. No I know, that probably offends you too.Quote:
Originally Posted by peter mcneilBut perhaps he thinks nature did intend for gay people to exist. Don't be one of those guys that puts words into people's mouths and accuse them of being homophobic when he said absolutely nothing of the sort. This kind of bullshit diminishes real homophobia and just gets people to tune such accusations out. Randomly accusing others of homophobia (and racism/sexism) doesn't make the other person look bad, it just makes you look like an asshole.Quote:
Originally Posted by PLOL
If you can’t understand sarcasm and take everything literally, you should probably leave the internet forever
I really couldn't detect the sarcasm and neither could your target. You should consider the possibility you just suck shit at conveying it?Quote:
Originally Posted by PLOLLol at how people on this forum get offended by everything. It was a pretty obvious joke. You can’t even be sardonic anymore without some retard getting offended. No I know, that probably offends you too.Quote:
Originally Posted by peter mcneil
If you can’t understand sarcasm and take everything literally, you should probably leave the internet forever
I think there are obvious benefits to being cut and uncut. Generally guys refuse to see the benefits/burdens of either depending on what they are. I am cut but made the opposite choice for my son. Cut cocks look way better flacid and hygiene isn't as big an issue. Uncut cocks have many more nerve endings, the ugly skin works as a gliding tool during sex and the head of the cock stays more protected and sensitive.
No reliable studies have been found that prove uncut cocks have a higher success of orgasm especially later in life but that almost seems like common sense to me. Guys with cut cocks like myself usually tilt when hearing this (I used to as well).