Printable View
Harvey Weinstein Paid Off Sexual Harassment Accusers for Decades
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/05/u...legations.html
He paid off actresses that he forced to watch him masturbate.
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/...7368200169.jpg
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/...7368200358.jpg
Makes all the libs look good lol
That's a weird kink. Louise CK got accused of that too, making girls watch him jerk off.
That's it? That's Harvey Weinstein, hey bitch you want the part or not? If he was the manager at Cheap Chili Fry Burger then that would be different. I wouldn't mind having a few beers w Harvey, bet he has some great stories.
There's guys who do that to hundreds of women daily on the webcam sites. They have names Big Dick and have like a rubber dick as their avatar, just kidding BD, sort of.
I guess Gloria Allred scolded her daughter for defending Weinstein, cracks in the shakedown facade folks.
I understand women in the workplace may be bypassed for promos etc. That's why I defend Harvey's fast track promotion program for women. :)
Looks like this will soon spell the end of the casting couch.
Speaking of which, I always wondered if Ryan Seacrest did anything for Merv Griffin. I personally know someone who was a young actor about 40 years ago, and Merv kept inviting him over to his house. The guy actually went there, but only with a few other young guys at the same time, felt uncomfortable, and left.
Clearly Ryan Seacrest, who was known as an incredibly hard worker with a high drive to succeed, didn't feel uncomfortable around Merv.
http://i.imgur.com/j7ytUxS.jpg
Regarding Weinstein, though, this is a tough one for the media to cover because he was a liberal darling and close friend of the Clintons.
Fortunately they don't have to feature the story very prominently, because Stephen Paddock, Rex Tillerson, and Hurricane Nate kindly are dominating the headlines.
apparently his legal team are running not walking away.
There is always one or two cocks to suck to get to the top.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
I don't think there's anything wrong with turning out bitches, more power to this guy. I feel bad for him that this is all public
Who do you have for B'nai B'rith "Man of the Year", Sklansky or Weinstein?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnCommode
Tough to compare these two. None of Weinstein's victims were retarded.
If there's nothing wrong with it, why would publicity matter?Quote:
Originally Posted by Zap_the_Fractions_Giraffe
well it was like an under the table sorta thing, like if i hire a hooker to exchange sex for money it's implied that she isn't going to go to the press and tell everybody. the bargain I'm assuming is that they did sex things, and the girls got roles or career advancement in return and that should have been the end of it. these actresses are prostitutes, everything was voluntary and I feel bad for the hollywood guy that they betrayed himQuote:
Originally Posted by KuntmissionerIf there's nothing wrong with it, why would publicity matter?Quote:
Originally Posted by Zap_the_Fractions_Giraffe
i didn't read any of the articles so I could be wrong fwiw
also, it could be a muslim, christian, republican, democrat, nazi, commie whatever and I would still feel bad for the guy because he's the real victim here regardless of any political bullshit. again, i'm under the assumption that these whore actresses fucked the old man for opportunistic reasons and everything was voluntary
This is actually a fair point, though with Weinstein it seemed to extend beyond the obvious "casting couch" situation.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zap_the_Fractions_Giraffewell it was like an under the table sorta thing, like if i hire a hooker to exchange sex for money it's implied that she isn't going to go to the press and tell everybody. the bargain I'm assuming is that they did sex things, and the girls got roles or career advancement in return and that should have been the end of it. these actresses are prostitutes, everything was voluntary and I feel bad for the hollywood guy that they betrayed himQuote:
Originally Posted by Kuntmissioner
i didn't read any of the articles so I could be wrong fwiw
In the typical situation, some unknown wannabe starlet fucks an influential Hollywood figure, knowing it will advance her career. In such a case, both people are using one another.
However, Weinstein would invite women who were already semi-established to "have a meeting" in his room, and then make his various demands. These women would often be afraid to refuse him, because Weinstein was still more powerful in Hollywood than they were at that point (think Ashley Judd and Rose McGowan).
To me there's a big difference between a woman knowingly fucking a guy to advance her career and one who is on her way up but feels required to fuck some old perv in order not to get derailed. Weinstein was the latter.
The media is getting so transparent with their coverage of these things, though.
Look how much more zeal they approached the Bill O'Reilly and Roger Ailes stories, because those two were reviled conservative figures.
I mean, props to the normally-liberal NY Times for being the ones to out this, but they pretty much did so because they had to choose between feminist empowerment and protecting an old, wealthy liberal, and they chose the former.
You can feel the glee coming from the mainstream media when they are detailing the wrongdoing of a conservative. When it's a guy like Weinstein, you can picture them holding their noses and wincing as they write the articles.
There is a big difference between a woman fucking her way to the top and a woman being told fuck me or you don't get the job. In the latter it's still WRONG for the guy to make the demand. A friend of mine's mother was a up and coming star back in the 60's. She had a bitQuote:
Originally Posted by Dan DruffThis is actually a fair point, though with Weinstein it seemed to extend beyond the obvious "casting couch" situation.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zap_the_Fractions_Giraffe
In the typical situation, some unknown wannabe starlet fucks an influential Hollywood figure, knowing it will advance her career. In such a case, both people are using one another.
However, Weinstein would invite women who were already semi-established to "have a meeting" in his room, and then make his various demands. These women would often be afraid to refuse him, because Weinstein was still more powerful in Hollywood than they were at that point (think Ashley Judd and Rose McGowan).
To me there's a big difference between a woman knowingly fucking a guy to advance her career and one who is on her way up but feels required to fuck some old perv in order not to get derailed. Weinstein was the latter.
Of success in Europe. Came to Hollywood, landed a big role opposite a leading man known for sleeping with his costars. She refused his advances, was immediately fired and was
Never able to find work again.
Yes, that was my point.Quote:
Originally Posted by hutmasterThere is a big difference between a woman fucking her way to the top and a woman being told fuck me or you don't get the job. In the latter it's still WRONG for the guy to make the demand. A friend of mine's mother was a up and coming star back in the 60's. She had a bitQuote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Of success in Europe. Came to Hollywood, landed a big role opposite a leading man known for sleeping with his costars. She refused his advances, was immediately fired and was
Never able to find work again.
It seems that Weinstein was in the latter category, who would make sexual demands of existing stars, and then they would feel afraid to say no for obvious reasons.
Your conservobot imagination and spin-fugue is in high gear here. Separate from allegations related to sexual assault/abise, O'Reilly and Ailes are/were despicable people, with the latter damaging the profession of journalism in a manner that hadn't been seen since the days of William Randolph Hearst.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
You can't rape the willing ammirite!!!!
Stereotypes, bruh.
Am I the only person who's never heard of this guy until a week ago?
I'm sure what he did was very sick, but I think this story is getting outsized attention because the people who are most familiar with this guy are Hollywood and DC elites
From Aggressive Overtures to Sexual Assault: Harvey Weinstein’s Accusers Tell Their Stories
https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-...-their-stories
Quote:
“At that point, after that, is when he assaulted me,” Evans said. “He forced me to perform oral sex on him.” As she objected, Weinstein took his penis out of his pants and pulled her head down onto it. “I said, over and over, ‘I don’t want to do this, stop, don’t,’ ” she said. “I tried to get away, but maybe I didn’t try hard enough. I didn’t want to kick him or fight him.” In the end, she said, “He’s a big guy. He overpowered me.” At a certain point, she said, “I just sort of gave up. That’s the most horrible part of it, and that’s why he’s been able to do this for so long to so many women: people give up, and then they feel like it’s their fault.”
http://images.gawker.com/dumdijt6nr3...q_80,w_800.jpg
I wonder what a world would look like without attractive young women and powerful, perverted old men using eachother for their own ends? I am guessing for the truly attractive, ambitious young woman the world will not be as privileged a place. Also, probably not a coincidence all the women talking now are past their sexual prime and have made their $$.
Weinstein does this, he's forced out of his own company.
Trump does this, he becomes president.
:to
When Hillary Clinton turns on you, a former buddy buddy in Hollywood, you know you've fucked up.. (Now when will HRC return that Million dollars she got from Harvey for the Foundation)
Also story has gotten worse.. Now accusations of out right first degree sexual assault against Weinstein (aka RAPE)
]
In addition Mira Sorvino and Patricia Arquette were severely sexually harassed and when they turned down Weinsteins aggressive advances they were blackballed by Hollywood
Your analogy is very poor, probably because your mind is clouded by your partisan politics. I would equate Trumps misogyny and sexual criminality to Clinton's, and as we can see in both cases society at large is pretty fine with taking it that far.Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkonger
Weinstein's transgressions are more on par with O Reilly's and they both got roughly the same treatment.
This may be a fair statement. I am light on the specifics of Weinstein. But grabbing by the pussy doesn't seem consensual, it seems like assault.Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaardYour analogy is very poor, probably because your mind is clouded by your partisan politics. I would equate Trumps misogyny and sexual criminality to Clinton's, and as we can see in both cases society at large is pretty fine with taking it that far.Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkonger
Weinstein's transgressions are more on par with O Reilly's and they both got roughly the same treatment.
Film fansQuote:
Originally Posted by PLOL
I didn't say it was right, I am just saying we have a certain tolerance for powerful men sexually assaulting attractive young women up to a point. Probably because we implicitly understand that it is just all part of the game that the young women are playing also to get ahead.Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkongerThis may be a fair statement. I am light on the specifics of Weinstein. But grabbing by the pussy doesn't seem consensual, it seems like assault.Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
I think you should educate yourself about the specifics of Weinstein's case. Seems he takes things to a whole other level. But again, it is just part of the game. That is why no aspiring actress is saying anything when she is 22. Only when she is 45 and she no longer is attractive enough to play the game anymore.
wife just left him...wondering the mental calculus that went into that decision...
let's see if I can ride this out and keep on the gravy train...fuck he got shitcanned from his studio...fuck this is gonna look bad for my design business...his withered ass can't do anything to further my career or monetary status, I'm out...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jfmp9Iagxhk
sidenote: DJCRAPS just recently discovered and became an "entourage" mark in the last cpl years LOL WHAT?!?!?
honestly congrats harvey on a phenomenal run
Girl we could pop some champagne and we could have a ballQuote:
Originally Posted by lol wow
We could toast to the good life, girl we could have it all
We could really splurge girl, and tear up the mall
If ever you needed someone, I'm the one you should call
I'll be there to pick you up, if ever you should fall
If you got problems, I can solve 'em, they big or they small
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnhy7vNO0hw
The problem here is that it wasn't just part of the game.Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaardI didn't say it was right, I am just saying we have a certain tolerance for powerful men sexually assaulting attractive young women up to a point. Probably because we implicitly understand that it is just all part of the game that the young women are playing also to get ahead.Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkonger
I think you should educate yourself about the specifics of Weinstein's case. Seems he takes things to a whole other level. But again, it is just part of the game. That is why no aspiring actress is saying anything when she is 22. Only when she is 45 and she no longer is attractive enough to play the game anymore.
These women would already be succeeding, and then he would still put the moves on them, and they had to say yes for fear that he would derail their careers.
That's a different story than the unknown chick who goes to his room figuring that she has to blow the gross old man if she wants to set herself apart from the 10,000 other hot young chicks trying to make it in Hollywood.
And drag a sack full of cash behind herQuote:
Originally Posted by GambleBotsChafedPenis
I am a bit confused on how a woman can state she was raped yet accepted fame and fortune in exchange.
It is hard to get my mind around calling it rape when you knew youd be paid off so you kind of went along with it...but not really but ya did cause he'd hire ya so...kind of not the jogger in the woods who gets jumped and raped at knife point for no financial gain.
See my dilemma, how could a court convict his guy when the women knew why they were "raped" accepted jobs and even dated him after in the open.
A lot of Stockholm syndrome going down there if you ask me, too much to believe.
Overly hands on when unwanted and sexually assaulting, sure he was, rape, meh hard to get that one figured out.
I don't think it is a coincidence that the Jewish owned media refused to publish anything negative against a powerful Jewish Holywood Mogul. They tend to protect each other. Even the Jew who created SNL said they didn't go after Weinstein this past weekend because "it's a New York thing." For those who don't get what he means by that, he means that Weinstein is a fellow Jew and we won't attack him.