For sure.
100%
Show me how old you are and tell me how you either hate the Beatles and love the Stones, or vice versa.
if you like both, get the fuck out bc there can only be one.
me?
GIVE ME THE ROLLING STONES
Printable View
For sure.
100%
Show me how old you are and tell me how you either hate the Beatles and love the Stones, or vice versa.
if you like both, get the fuck out bc there can only be one.
me?
GIVE ME THE ROLLING STONES
They both suck. Maybe 4 good songs between the 2 bands.
For starters
um 1965ish
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qyclqo_AV2M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWP6Qki8mWc&list=RDBGLGzRXY5Bw&index=2
https://www.yfoutube.com/watch?v=BGLGzRXY5Bw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJDJs9dumZI&index=12&list=RDBGLGzRXY5Bw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DsgWfAilIEM
this may be my favourite https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZDw0uu6UO0
bonus tunes enjoy
dam only two i guess
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lj6y6tohW_0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbmS3tQJ7Os
The correct answer is Beatles > Stones.
The stones were awful musicians and were really only truly great at ripping off obscure black blues artists.
Both are in my top 5 all time favorite bands. But if I were on a deserted island and had to choose between the two I would want the stones with me.
Also check this out:
Led Zeppelin > Stones.
The Stones are a great rock and roll band. The Beatles are on another level. You comepare the Stones to groups like Led Zeppelin. You compare the Beatles to Mozart, Bach and Duke Ellington.
Even the Stones knew the right answer is Beatles > Stones
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usNsCeOV4GM
Zep>Stones>Beatles
Without regard to who was better, I saw this notion expressed once - always stuck with me.
Rock in the mid 60's was a phenomenon of common communication that exploded like the internet today.
Half of all televisions in the US tuned in to the Beatles on Sullivan.
Baron von
The story of Merry Clayton awakened in the middle of the night (by a band she had never heard of) and asked to ad lib some quick vocals is god
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqXyjbgs5rU
fypQuote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
Quote:
Originally Posted by LarryLafferfypQuote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
way to fuck it up Larry
I have no dog in this fight but the Stones are still touring, so
So, Johhny Hallyday > Elvis Presley?Quote:
Originally Posted by nunbeaterQuote:
Originally Posted by LarryLaffer
way to fuck it up Larry
I have no dog in this fight but the Stones are still touring, so
Imagine the demand If John & George were still alive and they announced a one off concert in London or New York.
All records would be broken. The world would stop. Doubt you could get a ticket from unofficial channels for less than 15k, the interest would likely be greater than any sporting event in history.
Could be overestimating, but even now I where live (about 200 yards from Penny Lane) You see japs, yanks and others milling around to look at basically nothing.
Stones couldn't get near the pull of what The Beatles generated.
Like comparing a juicy tight pussy on a beautiful woman to the crusty old clunge on ya grandma.
ffs
Beatles > The Kinks > The Who
Stones are at least 4th place just among British bands.
god damn right they're still touring.Quote:
Originally Posted by nunbeaterQuote:
Originally Posted by LarryLaffer
way to fuck it up Larry
I have no dog in this fight but the Stones are still touring, so
Deep Purple>>>>>>>>>>ZepQuote:
Originally Posted by gauchojake
J Bonham > Charlie Watts
JP Jones > Wyman
J Page > Richards
I do think Jagger is a better showman than Plant but we are talking musicianship, not flouncing around like a flamingo on ketamine.
There simply isnt any comparison.
Its great if you enjoy the Stones more the Zeppelin but thats really not even close to whats being discussed. If me saying the Stones were a better blues ensemble than Zep helps anyone sleep soundly, fine, enjoy, but fuck right out of here if youre saying the Stones were better musicians than Zep or the Beatles.
Hey Jace if you were a Washington wizards player you'd be sadley Beal
Not Bradley but sadly Beal time let that soak in to your lumpy body
Que? Sadley
He's in a bugue state right now gare
To each his own. I'd pick t.a.t.u. or 3LW.Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkonger
shit i didn't mean to red rep you cause.....Quote:
Originally Posted by Brittney Griner's ClitTo each his own. I'd pick t.a.t.u. or 3LW.Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkonger
I hate this question, but if I have to answer it's the Beatles. It's like asking, "what tastes better, beef or Starburst?" The answer is Starburst (The Beatles) but I never feel right saying things like that
Pink floyd >>>> Queen
But its close.
obviously the Beatles.
beatles but it's close
oh for shame. all of you
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
Ayyyyyyy diosss miosesss