imagine being a grown adult male obsessing over Trump at 7am on a random autumn sunday morning.
:noose
Printable View
imagine being a grown adult male obsessing over Trump at 7am on a random autumn sunday morning.
:noose
Nice job parroting back Trumps nonsense talking points.Quote:
Originally Posted by mulva
wut a stupid word 'impeachment' is. sounds so powerful and ugly but in reality it means virtually nothing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Daly
guys youre not going to believe this but apparently ben garrrison is anti-vax?
I feel that cartoon raises a lot of valid points. He's changed my mindQuote:
Originally Posted by sonatineguys youre not going to believe this but apparently ben garrrison is anti-vax?
2005: We just want tolerance! 🏳️*🌈
2010: We just want to get married! 🏳️*🌈
2015: Bake the cake, bigot! 🏳️*🌈
2018: Suck the lady's dick, transphobe! 🏳️*🌈
2019: Convicted pedophiles twerk for toddlers in the library under police protection. 🏳️*🌈
And then one day, for no reason at all, the German people elected Hitler.
He went to get pizza you goys!
Pizza!!!
Ha! Ha! Ha!
".... Fox News viewers are spectacularly ill informed about current events compared to people who watch other networks. But according to a recent report, the Fox audience knows less even than folks who don’t watch any news at all."-Rolling Stone 2012
And they've ONLY raised the level of propaganda since then. How many stories of theirs have fallen on their face? (I.E. Seth Rich), yet people still make that their main news source. I don't get that. Chris Wallace's Sunday interviews have been rough on Trump's people lately, though.
Study: Watching Fox News Actually Makes You Stupid
https://www.rollingstone.com/politic...stupid-235770/
CNN operates exactly the same but with a different political view. If you don’t know this by now I don’t know what to tell you.Quote:
Originally Posted by JimmyG_415
Can’t wait for Corruption-fighter Trump to go after the political goons who tried to extort an ambassadorial candidate for a political contribution.
Possible pay-to-play scheme for ambassador role in Trump administration uncovered by CBS News
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/doug-ma...tion-uncovered
Quote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefishCNN operates exactly the same but with a different political view. If you don’t know this by now I don’t know what to tell you.Quote:
Originally Posted by JimmyG_415
Guy is absolutely propagandized bonkers, just look at his avatar. Mumbles is usually the example to use on how to be a perfect wannabe tranny blower slave but only cuz JimmyG is just a super weirdo that goes on irrelevant rants a la FPS Russia that only 1.3 ppl read
edit: misspelled tranny
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimmyG_415
the fundamental belief for the fox / trump cult is that ignorance is god's will, and that anything you say is simply Him speaking through you.
the only other tribe on team retard are essentially finance goons who want to retire rich at 50.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatineQuote:
Originally Posted by JimmyG_415
the fundamental belief for the fox / trump cult is that ignorance is god's will, and that anything you say is simply Him speaking through you.
the only other tribe on team retard are essentially finance goons who want to retire rich at 50.
reily reid is such a smoke
The impeachment hearings you see on T.V. now could go on for months.
https://grrrgraphics.com/wp-content/...t-1024x843.jpg
the wannabe tranny blowers are so full of shit
100% trueQuote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefishCNN operates exactly the same but with a different political view. If you don’t know this by now I don’t know what to tell you.Quote:
Originally Posted by JimmyG_415
CNN is so biased these days that they don't even bother to hide it.
I'm also loving how they don't show the pictures of arrested violent criminals if they're black. You know... to protect all of us potential racists from thinking the wrong thing. Glad they are protecting people from their own possible evil thoughts! Thanks CNN!
you forgot to mention that the dude is equally as bad at politics as he his evaluating nfl talent.Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedishQuote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefish
Guy is absolutely propagandized bonkers, just look at his avatar. Mumbles is usually the example to use on how to be a perfect wannabe tranny blower slave but only cuz JimmyG is just a super weirdo that goes on irrelevant rants a la FPS Russia that only 1.3 ppl read
edit: misspelled tranny
why not just go to the vote now so we can get it over with.Quote:
Originally Posted by TheXFactor
obv they have to manufacturer a bunch of bs disquised as "good enough" or "reasons" or catch some republican in a lie associated with something entirely different.
so this guy is lying right. instinctively changed the subject to say something true and also look like a huge douche in the process is what it looked like to me. what do u say poker players? vs a highly aggresive player like the democrats and the deep state, im calling with bottom pair
the admiral of the navy is filing the paperwork to rescind trump's rescindment of the navy kicking a murdering criminal psychopath out of the seals.
so i think the whole 'the military will back trumps junta in 2020' concern may be a non issue at this point.
Not that I fully trust the source, but I totally have no issue believing that Vindman wasn't exactly an impartial witness:
https://tennesseestar.com/2019/11/05...culed-america/
I like the cut of this Sondland fellow’s jib.
:popcorn
I know that members of this Committee have frequently framed these complicated issues in the form of a simple question: Was there a “quid pro quo?” As I testified previously, with regard to the requested White House call and White House meeting, the answer is yes.
Within my State Department emails, there is a July 19 email that I sent to Secretary Pompeo, Secretary Perry, Brian McCormack (Perry’s Chief of Staff), Ms. Kenna, Acting Chief of Staff and OMB Director Mick Mulvaney (White House), and Mr. Mulvaney’s Senior Advisor Robert Blair. A lot of senior officials. Here is my exact quote from that email:
“I Talked to Zelensky just now… He is prepared to receive Potus’ call. Will assure him that he intends to run a fully transparent investigation and will ‘turn over every stone’. He would greatly appreciate a call prior to Sunday so that he can put out some media about a ‘friendly and productive call’ (no details) prior to Ukraine election on Sunday.” Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney responded: “I asked NSC to set it up for tomorrow.”
Everyone was in the loop. It was no secret. Everyone was informed via email on July 19, days before the
Presidential call. As I communicated to the team, I told President Zelensky in advance that assurances to “run a fully transparent investigation” and “turn over every stone” were necessary in his call with President Trump.
lol
Of course you don’t. As a loyal post-truth Republican, you have shown that you are wedded to defending almost any partisan smear of witnesses against Trump in this matter.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
https://youtu.be/zElzeH7xC88
Seriously, man. Have you no shame? Does the truth of Trump’s criminality in his abuse of power as president matter at all to you? Or do you only care that your “side” wins, the law and the Constitution be damned.
what is the republican defense now? giuliani was acting alone? sondland said that giuliani insisted that ukraine "publicly announce" an investigation into the bidens before trump would agree to meet with zelensky. the "publicly announce" part is the most damning part of it, since if trump was really interested in rooting out corruption, a "public announcement" would be the last thing that would be needed. if, on the other hand, you wanted to tarnish a political rival, well...
also amazing that nunes praised sondland before his testimony. whoops
Just about everytime Nunes talks I cringe. If I took everything he says on face value I'd think he's seriously retarded... he just keeps talking shit and quoting all sorts of fake news and pseudo - facts.Quote:
Originally Posted by blake
Condescending, rude cunt.
Okay?Quote:
Originally Posted by blake
This would show that Trump wanted an investigation into corruption in Ukraine prior to the talk about aid.
Sondland admitted later under questioning that Trump had long expressed concern about corruption in Ukraine, prior to this incident.
Sondland also testified that Biden's name never came up, nor did he have any proof that this investigation was about getting Biden in some way.
It's very possible that Trump's actual reason for wanting the investigation in Ukraine to eventually turn back to Biden, but Sondland's testimony doesn't prove that in any way.
sorry I didn’t quote the best part.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan DruffOkay?Quote:
Originally Posted by blake
This would show that Trump wanted an investigation into corruption in Ukraine prior to the talk about aid.
Sondland admitted later under questioning that Trump had long expressed concern about corruption in Ukraine, prior to this incident.
Sondland also testified that Biden's name never came up, nor did he have any proof that this investigation was about getting Biden in some way.
It's very possible that Trump's actual reason for wanting the investigation in Ukraine to eventually turn back to Biden, but Sondland's testimony doesn't prove that in any way.
sondland said Giuliani told him that zelensky must publicly announce an investigation into the bidens but didn’t actually have to go forward with it.
checkmate unless giuliani acted alone
I’m a bit surprised you’re taking the position you are
Ken starr, who has been 100% anti-trump impeachment, said this testimony “doesn’t look good” for trump and called it a “bombshell.”
You appear to only have taken into account the beginning stages of the “continuum of insidiousness”.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan DruffOkay?Quote:
Originally Posted by blake
This would show that Trump wanted an investigation into corruption in Ukraine prior to the talk about aid.
Sondland admitted later under questioning that Trump had long expressed concern about corruption in Ukraine, prior to this incident.
Sondland also testified that Biden's name never came up, nor did he have any proof that this investigation was about getting Biden in some way.
It's very possible that Trump's actual reason for wanting the investigation in Ukraine to eventually turn back to Biden, but Sondland's testimony doesn't prove that in any way.
I didn't see that part. Is there a transcript of that portion yet?Quote:
Originally Posted by blakesorry I didn’t quote the best part.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
sondland said Giuliani told him that zelensky must publicly announce an investigation into the bidens but didn’t actually have to go forward with it.
checkmate unless giuliani acted alone
I’m a bit surprised you’re taking the position you are
But yes, Trump may be forced to eventually pin this on Giuliani, who may or may not be willing to take the fall for him.
fun fact; quid pro quo is literally latin for bribery.
thats what quid pro quo means.
on an iPhone and cutting and pasting is annoying as hell on this, but relevant transcript cites are here along with video of sondland’s testimony on the issueQuote:
Originally Posted by Dan DruffI didn't see that part. Is there a transcript of that portion yet?Quote:
Originally Posted by blake
But yes, Trump may be forced to eventually pin this on Giuliani, who may or may not be willing to take the fall for him.
https://www.mediaite.com/tv/sondland...ve-to-do-them/
we dont have a functional executive branch and we havent for 3 years.
You guys are wasting your employers(for those that are employed) resources and productivity paying attention to this.
Do you not have any shame stealing money from your organization(s)?
I feel as much shame about it as you feel about begging for PFA to fund your Vegas manwhore trips.Quote:
Originally Posted by OSA
https://youtu.be/u_WxJIHuLpwQuote:
Originally Posted by blake
lolQuote:
the democrats hate trump so much they would want to railroad him jaywalking.
even if trump does/did something wrong no matter how minor you can't believe any negative press about it because it's mostly made up or blown well out proportion. all the dems do is cry wolf.
i think many peeps see this as well, not just ardent republicans.
Nice talking point, but they're impeaching him for using military aid to pressure Ukraine to investigate Biden and the DNC.Quote:
Originally Posted by mulva