Printable View
Lot's of women like older menQuote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Apparently that pig splitthis fucked or is going to fuck some 78 year old and she isn't getting anything out of it but a 78 year old dick
at least Kamala got a career out of it IF that is why she married WB
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
and he was married which makes her an adultering whore.
and yes, in before Trump is immoral pos too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCRPeople in politics are always fodder. I’m pretty sure Gates received a medal from Bush for his work. He isn’t a politician. People think Bush was an idiot on Iraq. I don’t recall criticism for AIDS funding. So you agree Gates is a force of evil? Interesting.Quote:
Originally Posted by Texter
Thanks for putting words in my mouth...
Anyone criticizing Gates is silly, they do it out of ignorance, just like with Bush...get it?
straight up racist condemns adulteryQuote:
Originally Posted by TellafriendQuote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
and he was married which makes her an adultering whore.
and yes, in before Trump is immoral pos too.
typical right wing bible thumping hypocrite
eat shit dickhead
If you trust Bill Gates? Fine. You want to take a vaccine produced by him? Fine. Just don’t mandate me to.
Personally I think Gates is a megalomaniac with a God complex.
Watch this short interview clip that was filmed in April and watch the way he talks in such absolutes about a New virus we supposedly were just learning about. It’s weird and freaks me out but judge for yourself.
The guy with a massive financial and personal interest in a vaccine outlining his plans to vaccinate the entire global population:
https://youtu.be/xUChdrL6Cd8
Without a preconceived idea about Bill Gates and the virus there is nothing in that clip that is remotely weird.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
Are you surprised that someone of his stature was ahead of the learning curve regarding Covid?
Everyone has great personal interest regarding this virus and it's ultimate effects both short on long term.
Everyone is hoping or working to see it's end and vaccination is the number one tool proven to achieve it.
Bill Gates could produce the cure for all forms of cancer and Team Retard would still cry afoul. It's part of the retardation.Quote:
Originally Posted by limitlesWithout a preconceived idea about Bill Gates and the virus there is nothing in that clip that is remotely weird.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
Are you surprised that someone of his stature was ahead of the learning curve regarding Covid?
Everyone has great personal interest regarding this virus and it's ultimate effects both short on long term.
Everyone is hoping or working to see it's end and vaccination is the number one tool proven to achieve it.
BiffCo being a vaxx skeptic is 100% par for the course.
A sitting GOP representative (Gohmert) mocks COVID, gets it, and then blames it on the mask.
Party of logic tho
Just about zero 29-year-olds like 60-year-old men unless they're using the dude.Quote:
Originally Posted by big dickLot's of women like older menQuote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Apparently that pig splitthis fucked or is going to fuck some 78 year old and she isn't getting anything out of it but a 78 year old dick
at least Kamala got a career out of it IF that is why she married WB
It's not even like Willie Brown looked young for his age. He actually looked older than 60.
The women legitimately into older guys usually like men 10-20 years older. 30+ years is rare unless, again, they're looking for something out of it.
Also, as far as I know, Willie was the only much older dude Kamala dated, and he just happened to be a really influential California politician. What a coincidence!
The reality is that she tolerated his wrinkly 60-year-old dick because she knew it would pay off later. And she was right.
Not wanting to take an unproven vaccine rushed to market for a virus that is less than .1% risk for me does not make me an anti-vaxxer. I believe in the usage of all other kinds of vaccines just not that this one needs to be universal for the entire globe.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sloppy JoeBill Gates could produce the cure for all forms of cancer and Team Retard would still cry afoul. It's part of the retardation.Quote:
Originally Posted by limitles
BiffCo being a vaxx skeptic is 100% par for the course.
A sitting GOP representative (Gohmert) mocks COVID, gets it, and then blames it on the mask.
Party of logic tho
Still dunking on Goehmert? Just make sure to save your big celebration for when he dies.
The only person trying to rush it is Trump because he wants it before election day. The scientists won't let it be released until they test it and it's safe.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99Not wanting to take an unproven vaccine rushed to market for a virus that is less than .1% risk for me does not make me an anti-vaxxer. I believe in the usage of all other kinds of vaccines just not that this one needs to be universal for the entire globe.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sloppy Joe
Still dunking on Goehmert? Just make sure to save your big celebration for when he dies.
no, they're rushing it because it'll make billions of dollars, your post makes no sense because OTHER COUNTRIES are trying to make a vaccine as well and they could care fuck all about trumpQuote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefishThe only person trying to rush it is Trump because he wants it before election day. The scientists won't let it be released until they test it and it's safe.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
Why do I care how it’s rushed or by whom? I don’t care who’s behind it I am not gonna be a guinea pig. During the SARS outbreak in 2004 the first vaccine was a total disaster it actually killed people and they never did come up with a working vaccine. To my knowledge is there even a vaccine for any coronavirus that actually exists and is effective?Quote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefishThe only person trying to rush it is Trump because he wants it before election day. The scientists won't let it be released until they test it and it's safe.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
This may be a moot discussion as I’m not convinced there will ever be a working vaccine.
gimmick, you wanna bring up another hurricane or tornado or some other natural disaster to bolster your non-existent argument?
Because scientists aren't rushing it, this is more conspiracy theory lala land. They'll release it when they think it's safe, no matter if that takes 1 year or 20 years. They don't give a shit if Trump wants it rushed to help his reeelction chances.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99Why do I care how it’s rushed or by whom? I don’t care who’s behind it I am not gonna be a guinea pig. During the SARS outbreak in 2004 the first vaccine was a total disaster it actually killed people and they never did come up with a working vaccine. To my knowledge is there even a vaccine for any coronavirus that actually exists and is effective?Quote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefish
This may be a moot discussion as I’m not convinced there will ever be a working vaccine.
When the BLM riots and massive protests occurred and “scientists” suddenly decided to place politics over public health, that was the day I lost the majority of my faith in “scientists”.Quote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefishBecause scientists aren't rushing it, this is more conspiracy theory lala land. They'll release it when they think it's safe, no matter if that takes 1 year or 20 years. They don't give a shit if Trump wants it rushed to help his reeelction chances.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
Jesus Christ, scientists give their expert opinions on how we should respond to a pandemic. They have no role in deciding what should be done if riots breakout during a pandemic. What the hell are you talking about? They just tell you what the science says, the governments/leaders decide what to do with that information and how to proceed.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99When the BLM riots and massive protests occurred and “scientists” suddenly decided to place politics over public health, that was the day I lost the majority of my faith in “scientists”.Quote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefish
What planet are you on? You don’t think that science has been politicized?Quote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefishJesus Christ, scientists give their expert opinions on how we should respond to a pandemic. They have no role in deciding what should be done if riots breakout during a pandemic. What the hell are you talking about? They just tell you what the science says, the governments/leaders decide what to do with that information and how to proceed.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
The scientists came out and said that “racism was also a pandemic” and not one of them condemned the protests and rioting. Meanwhile Fauci is telling people that Baseball shouldn’t be played this year, there should be no fans in the stands, schools shouldn’t open but now they should, masks don’t work but now they do, sex with strangers is Ok, but handshakes should be forever banished. Not one of them condemned the protests. Some of them actually said the protests posed no risk of spread LOL.
These are the same people who recommended we crush our economy with no data supporting that lockdowns even work.
As an aside, why do governors get to apply “science” only when it suits their interests? You don’t think this raises a credibility problem all around?
But go ahead, put all your faith in fallible humans with fancy degrees who think men can get pregnant, should compete in women’s sports and are diligently applying critical race theory to STEM. It’s gonna turn out great.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99What planet are you on? You don’t think that science has been politicized?Quote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefish
The scientists came out and said that “racism was also a pandemic” and not one of them condemned the protests and rioting. Meanwhile Fauci is telling people that Baseball shouldn’t be played this year, there should be no fans in the stands, schools shouldn’t open but now they should, masks don’t work but now they do, sex with strangers is Ok, but handshakes should be forever banished. Not one of them condemned the protests. Some of them actually said the protests posed no risk of spread LOL.
These are the same people who recommended we crush our economy with no data supporting that lockdowns even work.
As an aside, why do governors get to apply “science” only when it suits their interests? You don’t think this raises a credibility problem all around?
But go ahead, put all your faith in fallible humans with fancy degrees who think men can get pregnant, should compete in women’s sports and are diligently applying critical race theory to STEM. It’s gonna turn out great.
:lol2
:applause
Fish you were saying “experts” don’t get involved in telling politicians what to do? You might want to watch this
:
https://twitter.com/NikkiMcR/status/1289358765829918721
"Be as forceful as possible in getting people to wear masks"Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
guy wants total control, and because of idiots like big dick, sonatine, druff, jimmyg, TheXRetard that just do as they're told(boot lickers) they're not gonna stop testing us to see how far they can take control
Scientists said "racism is a pandemic"? What the fuck are you talking about? And why would scientists condemn rioting? They're scientists FFS. Why would you care or want a scientist to condemn rioting? They are supposed to analysis data, why would you want scientists to give political opinions on rioting? Are you drunk? Jim Jordan tried to bait Fauci into giving a political opinion about riots. Fauci didn't fall for the bait and kept his answer general that all large gatherings should be avoided. That's the correct answer for a scientist to give.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99What planet are you on? You don’t think that science has been politicized?Quote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefish
The scientists came out and said that “racism was also a pandemic” and not one of them condemned the protests and rioting. Meanwhile Fauci is telling people that Baseball shouldn’t be played this year, there should be no fans in the stands, schools shouldn’t open but now they should, masks don’t work but now they do, sex with strangers is Ok, but handshakes should be forever banished. Not one of them condemned the protests. Some of them actually said the protests posed no risk of spread LOL.
These are the same people who recommended we crush our economy with no data supporting that lockdowns even work.
As an aside, why do governors get to apply “science” only when it suits their interests? You don’t think this raises a credibility problem all around?
But go ahead, put all your faith in fallible humans with fancy degrees who think men can get pregnant, should compete in women’s sports and are diligently applying critical race theory to STEM. It’s gonna turn out great.
by your logic, why are they giving politicians advice on anything?Quote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefishScientists said "racism is a pandemic"? What he fuck are you talking about? And why would scientists condemn rioting? They're scientists FFS. Why would you care are want a scientist to condemn rioting? They are supposed to analysis data, why would you want scientists to give political opinions on rioting? Are you drunk?Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
They're giving government leadership their expert opinion on what should be done, the scientists have no power to enforce anything. It's up to leadership to decide what to do with that information. It's the same as generals giving their expert military advice about what should be done in a given situation, the president uses that information to make a final decision. Typically many factors need to be weighed that go into the final decision.Quote:
Originally Posted by dwaiby your logic, why are they giving politicians advice on anything?Quote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefish
1. Racism isn’t a public health crisis, obesity is.
2. Shove your vaccine up your ass.
3. Choke yourself with your mask.
4. Scientists are narrow minded nerd extremists.
if we're supposed to be 6 feet apart and wearing masks according to the same experts, why won't they just say rioting and protesting is dangerous and could spread the virus?Quote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefishThey're giving government leadership their expert opinion on what should be done, the scientists have no power to enforce anything. It's up to leadership to decide what to do with that information. It's the same as generals giving their expert military advice about what should be done in a given situation, the president uses that information to make a final decision. Typically many factors need to be weighed that go into the final decision.Quote:
Originally Posted by dwai
why won't they say this?
FFS, ok, then protesting. Why didn’t he give an opinion on protesting? His silence reveals everything you need to know. And yes, racism is being declared a public health crisis by many doctors and scientists across the US.Quote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefishScientists said "racism is a pandemic"? What he fuck are you talking about? And why would scientists condemn rioting? They're scientists FFS. Why would you care or want a scientist to condemn rioting? They are supposed to analysis data, why would you want scientists to give political opinions on rioting? Are you drunk? Jim Jordan tried to bait Fauci into giving a political opinion about riots. Fauci didn't fall for the bait and kept his answer general that all large gathering should be avoided. That's the correct answer for a scientist to give.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
Because that's a highly politicized topic. Fauci already has said that large gatherings should be avoided which covers riots and KKK gatherings. Why would you want scientists to take political stances?Quote:
Originally Posted by dwaiif we're supposed to be 6 feet apart and wearing masks according to the same experts, why won't they just say rioting and protesting is dangerous and could spread the virus?Quote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefish
why won't they say this?
He said ALL LARGE GATHERINGS SHOULD BE AVOIDED. Do you think that includes protesting or not?Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99FFS, ok, then protesting. Why didn’t he give an opinion on protesting? His silence reveals everything you need to know. And yes, racism is being declared a public health crisis by many doctors and scientists across the US.Quote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefish
BECAUSE HE ALREADY ISQuote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefishBecause that's a highly politicized topic. Fauci already has said that large gatherings should be avoided which covers riots and KKK gatherings. Why would you want scientists to take political stances?Quote:
Originally Posted by dwai
Well then why can he specifically reference Baseball, Football The NBA and schools but not specifically protests?Quote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefishHe said ALL LARGE GATHERINGS SHOULD BE AVOIDED. Do you think that includes protesting or not?Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
You sound like his lawyer. You really won’t admit his politics willfully stop him from specifically mentioning protests? Gimme a break.
If lives are at stake why is he letting politics stop him from specifically mentioning it? Shouldn’t scientists be completely objective?Quote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefishBecause that's a highly politicized topic. Fauci already has said that large gatherings should be avoided which covers riots and KKK gatherings. Why would you want scientists to take political stances?Quote:
Originally Posted by dwai
The level of stupid is reaching an all time high in this thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99Well then why can he specifically reference Baseball, Football The NBA and schools but not specifically protests?Quote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefish
You sound like his lawyer. You really won’t admit his politics willfully stop him from specifically mentioning protests? Gimme a break.
Doctors/scientists world wide are encouraging social distancing. Attending a pro sports event is a controlled environment. If the leagues/franchises want to prevent attendance they can and have done so. Not the same for public protests or motorcycle rallies at least not yet.
Scientists/doctors cannot legislate anything they can only offer recommendations.
Scientists base their recommendations on objective facts. Political view points are not part of the equation
How don't you understand by not specifically mentioning it he is being objective and is avoiding the politics? The statement that all large gatherings should be avoided is objective as he can be. If he specifically said people shouldn't practice their first amendment right to protest during the pandemic that would be politicizing it. Your thinking is ass backwards.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99If lives are at stake why is he letting politics stop him from specifically mentioning it? Shouldn’t scientists be completely objective?Quote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefish
OK, what about the right to not wear a mask. He specifically encouraged governments to strongly enforce that everyone wear a mask. You don’t think masks are politicized? He gave an opinion specifically on that. Did you even watch the Tucker clip I posted?Quote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefishHow don't you understand by not specifically mentioning it he is being objective and is avoiding the politics? The statement that all large gatherings should be avoided is objective as he can be. If he specifically said people shouldn't practice their first amendment right to protest during the pandemic that would be politicizing it. Your thinking is ass backwards.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
Who were the only people allowed to gather in large crowds during this pandemic? You don’t think that deserves a direct mention and directive from health professionals?Quote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefishHow don't you understand by not specifically mentioning it he is being objective and is avoiding the politics? The statement that all large gatherings should be avoided is objective as he can be. If he specifically said people shouldn't practice their first amendment right to protest during the pandemic that would be politicizing it. Your thinking is ass backwards.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
He’s literally putting his personal politics over public health by avoiding mentioning the biggest transmission vector during the pandemic. He’s a fucking fraud.
The funniest thing about this guy is he has never once presented evidence or data to back up any of his recommendations we’re just supposed to take his word like he’s a deity.Quote:
Originally Posted by dwai
Total fucking fraud.
It's his professional opinion that people should wear masks. Masks were politicized later, not by him, but by crazy people that somehow think this infringes on their rights. Sidenote, when you come to an intersection with a light do you think the government is infringing on your rights when you have to stop? Now that people can't smoke in doors at a public place, does that infringe on their rights?Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99OK, what about the right to not wear a mask. He specifically encouraged governments to strongly enforce that everyone wear a mask. You don’t think masks are politicized? He gave an opinion specifically on that. Did you even watch the Tucker clip I posted?Quote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefish
You know he first recommended that masks don’t help much at all, right? What changed? Did he ever explain with evidence based science or data? Have you ever seen a study that proves masks work? Have you ever seen a study that shows lockdowns work?Quote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefishIt's his professional opinion that people should wear masks. Masks were politicized later, not by him, but by crazy people that somehow think this infringes on their rights. Sidenote, when you come to an intersection with a light do you think the government is infringing on your rights when you have to stop? Now that people can't smoke in doors at a public place, does that infringe on their rights?Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
His professional opinion is not worth much when he shows no consistency and never shows any evidence or data for his recommendations. If you trust our government to not take a mile after slowly taking inches on our civil liberties I think you are the naive one.