Quote:
Originally Posted by garrett
The logic is pretty self-explanatory. Also in the end, I was right all along about the ROI needed to be profitable to a backer at 50/50 while others were not.
I never played much tournament poker. I played cash games. For a living.
Meaning I supported myself solely through poker, for over a year. I was a professional poker player, can you say the same?
Honestly, I am about to get real here now with you Daredevil.
So you played 'cash games' for 1 whole year, which are completely untraceable OTHER than via your TAX RETURNS!
And you want to go play a big field WSOP MTT. Some of the largest fields in poker, with no evidence of a big field MTT background let alone success. And not think that is lighting fire to a buy in, based off your admission on no MTT background.
lol and you think I am some slimeball/scammer. Do you have a fuckign clue, not everyone here who isn't posting or chiming in like your 5 friends, dislike me. I mean really its like a handful of you all, saying all this bad stuff.
Here I prove you are the least suspect and shady, and you come at me with that. You better step up your game Mr., I played cash games for 1 year 'professionally' (lol) but have no evidence of it is your line to getting a stake, or is it the whole reason you are on radio???
Provide some tax returns, and lets see if you really won, or even claimed, what you claim you won. Through all of this, you are still failing to see or want to understand, I am no fool. You say and post A LOT more foolish stuff than I do. I know that might hurt your feelings but that is the truth!
How you cant fathom this is viewed as a freeroll is mind boggling. If Garrett wins, he doesnt get paid. There is about a 0% chance. But if you win, there is at least a 50/50 chance of you getting paid. Or Garrett is banned. So either way you win. So the only possible outcomes are you lose but dont lose $$, you win and get paid, you win and Garrett gets banned. In none of those scenarios do you lose money. Therefore thats a free roll by definition- you couldnt loseQuote:
Originally Posted by adamantiumMy stance is that he lied, if I knew he was lying or not doesnt really matter does it?Quote:
Originally Posted by jsearles22
And what sort of freeroll was I on? was the rest of the forum collecting the winnings or covering my losses?
Im not sure how asking the forums opinion on staking deals can possibly be considered scamming?Quote:
Originally Posted by garrettHow DARE you call me a scammer when that is the scammiest thread I have read on here ever (aside from all of Jaseps)!Quote:
Originally Posted by garrett
http://pokerfraudalert.com/forum/sho...unknown-player
http://pokerfraudalert.com/forum/sho...unknown-player
And thats coming from a guy who LIED ABOUT ESCROWING!!
You're the self proclaimed best poker player on this site, but with no proven results dude. Why dont you show some proof?Quote:
Originally Posted by garrett
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsearles22Im not sure how asking the forums opinion on staking deals can possibly be considered scamming?Quote:
Originally Posted by garrett
And thats coming from a guy who LIED ABOUT ESCROWING!!
Exactly, I started a discussion about staking arrangements in today's poker environment. We talked about it on the forum, and I disagreed with some people about what was fair. No stake was ever given.
So ironically, I couldn't agree to terms with anyone, so no arrangement was ever made. Whereas, garrett did agree to terms with someone, and then broke those terms, and lied about it.
It's so cut and dry it's amazing that garrett thinks anyone will fall for this misdirect.
You are absolutely lying now with this generic expected response. And you expect us all to just believe this.Quote:
Originally Posted by DaredevilQuote:
Originally Posted by jsearles22
Exactly, I started a discussion about staking arrangements in today's poker environment. We talked about it on the forum, and I disagreed with some people about what was fair. No stake was ever given.
So ironically, I couldn't agree to terms with anyone, so no arrangement was ever made. Whereas, garrett did agree to terms with someone, and then broke those terms, and lied about it.
It's so cut and dry it's amazing that garrett thinks anyone will fall for this misdirect.
From your opening 2 sentences you wrote:
I mentioned on the radio show last night that I will be in Vegas this summer, and while I can't sell "pieces" of myself for the WSOP (since I'm not planning on playing any events), I would be open to people(s) staking me into one.
'I started a discussion about staking arrangements in today's poker environment'
Honestly you wreak of shady!
Garrett, the question we all want answered is what did you get mom with the 63 bucks?
Conveniently you leave out the next few sentences:Quote:
Originally Posted by garrettYou are absolutely lying now with this generic expected response. And you expect us all to just believe this.Quote:
Originally Posted by Daredevil
From your opening 2 sentences you wrote:
I mentioned on the radio show last night that I will be in Vegas this summer, and while I can't sell "pieces" of myself for the WSOP (since I'm not planning on playing any events), I would be open to people(s) staking me into one.
'I started a discussion about staking arrangements in today's poker environment'
Honestly you wreak of shady!
You see where you is asking everyone's opinion on what would be fair. Its called a discussion. Oh shit, whats that, you mean to tell me he OPENLY ADMITS HE CANT PROVE HE WON AT CASH and therefore him saying it doesnt matter? SCAMMER!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben Affleck superhero
Seriously, Garrett, shut it the fuck down. No one will side with you here, not even Druff. You literally lied about paying money, and you have the audacity to call a guy a scammer for starting a conversation?
Quote:
Originally Posted by garrettAnswer to this, 'Daredevil'. No deflecting from this by searless lol!Quote:
Originally Posted by Daredevil
You are absolutely lying now with this generic expected response. And you expect us all to just believe this.
From your opening 2 sentences you wrote:
I mentioned on the radio show last night that I will be in Vegas this summer, and while I can't sell "pieces" of myself for the WSOP (since I'm not planning on playing any events), I would be open to people(s) staking me into one.
'I started a discussion about staking arrangements in today's poker environment'
Honestly you wreak of shady!
Garrett, this incredibly weak attempt to deflect the real issues at hand here are extremely transparent. No one cares about Daredevil's previous staking thread, and no one sees it the way you do. Simply put, this deflection will not work and frankly only makes you look worse than you already do.
The best thing you could do at this point is man up and admit you are guilty of lying to try to gain immediate action from adamantium. Of course you won't do this because you are obviously a dishonest, alcoholic train wreck who doesn't have the balls to man up to anything, and would rather continue lying instead of facing the obvious truth that is as evident to everyone here. You can write another 100 long winded posts deflecting and lying, it won't matter. Not one person here will be swayed by your bullshit.
You're acting like a 13 year old who thinks he is smarter than everyone and can lie his way out of any situation, when in reality all you're doing is digging a deeper and deeper hole for yourself.
Of course I know you will respond with another typical rant of yours with more deflection, but I'm hoping a miracle happens here and you gain some sort of common sense and man up.
You have to be a man to man up though, and it's very obvious you are just a boy living in a man's body.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaredevilQuote:
Originally Posted by jsearles22
Exactly, I started a discussion about staking arrangements in today's poker environment. We talked about it on the forum, and I disagreed with some people about what was fair. No stake was ever given.
So ironically, I couldn't agree to terms with anyone, so no arrangement was ever made. Whereas, garrett did agree to terms with someone, and then broke those terms, and lied about it.
It's so cut and dry it's amazing that garrett thinks anyone will fall for this misdirect.
What does any of this have to do with you Daredevil?
except that you encouraged adamantium to freeroll Garrett for forum lulz and he did
and everybody thought Garrett would suck and he didn't
Garrett never explicitly agreed to any terms about the escrow.
He told adamantium to trust that he would get paid if he won and then adamantium gave up on his insistence on escrow
Daredevil owes Garrett $50 for the win
adamantium should not be entitled refund of his $50 because he knew what he was getting into
Shut it the fuck down, Vegas.Quote:
Originally Posted by vegas1369
Its becoming more and more obvious as the pages roll on, your little click of like 5 or so PFA posters, plus your dupes, are trying to control this entire mele.
Wrenchjockey the convicted felon. You, handicapme, SrslySirius LOL etc..
Its laughable at this point, you handful of rubes are trying to run a smear campaign on me. Shut it the fuck down is what you all should do. The more it goes on with the 5 or so of you neg reppin me, then being the only ones to respond to this thread+dupes, means you all are WEAK and pathetic!
So I said I would be open to a stake, and then asked about staking in general, and what terms the forum would think were fair. Not just for me but for any unknown player.Quote:
Originally Posted by garrettQuote:
Originally Posted by garrett
Yes if people overwhelmingly agreed with me on fair terms, and someone wanted to stake me, I would've taken a stake.
Again, that has nothing to do with this. And you've made no point here.
Literally everyone in this thread ran out of rep negging Garrett.
No you DID NOT, you implied that you had just brought it up as some sort of 'poker discussion' when it is clear as day, since you prefaced that entire conversation with the fact you would TAKE a stake, what your intent was!Quote:
Originally Posted by Daredevil
I'll agree with you on one thing. This isn't about me. You and garrett keep trying to make it about me. Because you think it distracts from the truth about him being a scammer, and you being.... well I don't even know, a scammers dingleberry?Quote:
Originally Posted by 1marley1Quote:
Originally Posted by Daredevil
What does any of this have to do with you Daredevil?
except that you encouraged adamantium to freeroll Garrett for forum lulz and he did
and everybody thought Garrett would suck and he didn't
Garrett never explicitly agreed to any terms about the escrow.
He told adamantium to trust that he would get paid if he won and then adamantium gave up on his insistence on escrow
Daredevil owes Garrett $50 for the win
adamantium should not be entitled refund of his $50 because he knew what he was getting into
Quote:
Originally Posted by garrettShut it the fuck down, Vegas.Quote:
Originally Posted by vegas1369
Its becoming more and more obvious as the pages roll on, your little click of like 5 or so PFA posters, plus your dupes, are trying to control this entire mele.
Wrenchjockey the convicted felon. You, handicapme, SrslySirius LOL etc..
Its laughable at this point, you handful of rubes are trying to run a smear campaign on me. Shut it the fuck down is what you all should do. The more it goes on with the 5 or so of you neg reppin me, then being the only ones to respond to this thread+dupes, means you all are WEAK and pathetic!
Have you ever admitted you were wrong about something Garrett?
This post above is very typical of someone who needs to justify something in his own head to the point of insanity just to make it fit his side of things.
Fact is there are no dupes, there are more people that just "5" of us, and you are dead fucking wrong here. But go ahead and keep trying to justify this bullshit.
Boy.
Conveniently you failed to mention how he lied 3 times, even insinuating he had backers that didn't want to be exposed.Quote:
Originally Posted by 1marley1Quote:
Originally Posted by Daredevil
What does any of this have to do with you Daredevil?
except that you encouraged adamantium to freeroll Garrett for forum lulz and he did
and everybody thought Garrett would suck and he didn't
Garrett never explicitly agreed to any terms about the escrow.
He told adamantium to trust that he would get paid if he won and then adamantium gave up on his insistence on escrow
Daredevil owes Garrett $50 for the win
adamantium should not be entitled refund of his $50 because he knew what he was getting into
Your argument fails as soon as you decide to leave out important facts just to fit your side of things.
Feel free to throw me that inevitable red rep now considering that is the best retort you will have at this point.
Garrett,
You have said on multiple occasions that you dont care what people think of you, so if everyone here is bashing you, and we repeatedly show where YOU did something wrong, and where YOU are evading answering questions....why are you subjecting yourself to this?
Because I draw the line at people implying I am a scammer, or angle shooter. I play fucking poker and I already know what the label of being a 'scammer' can do to damage your long-run expectation. The last thing I will let happen here, is a group of people who never liked me from the beginning, but do not know me and never have be able to turn that dislike, into making me out to be someone and something I am 100% totally not.Quote:
Originally Posted by DRK Star
That is why I take this entire subject, seriously. I have been their once before, and refuse to ever be labeled something that is not true about me, ever again.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1marley1Quote:
Originally Posted by Daredevil
What does any of this have to do with you Daredevil?
except that you encouraged adamantium to freeroll Garrett for forum lulz and he did
and everybody thought Garrett would suck and he didn't
Garrett never explicitly agreed to any terms about the escrow.
He told adamantium to trust that he would get paid if he won and then adamantium gave up on his insistence on escrow
Daredevil owes Garrett $50 for the win
adamantium should not be entitled refund of his $50 because he knew what he was getting into
The incredible thing about Daredevil is, he has danced around everything asked of him with generic responses. Again that IS something someone with a SCAMMER mentality does.
I already know Daredevil is a fraud. This just further reassured that belief for me. It's incredible he doesn't answer anything levied at him, other than with generic hogwash!
1marley1... when garrett is like "yeah dude totally", its time to reconsider your stance.
Only problem there Garrett is it is true, and none of the long rants you write here are going to change that.
You can't explain away blatant lies that all of us have already seen.
Please tell us again how you saying you had backers that didn't want to be exposed falls in line with the bullshit you are trying to spew here.
Guarantee you avoid that in your next response.
That's what a boy does.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
and i know this
but this daredevil character is very off-putting to me
his insistence of having 'absolutely no bias' on radio was gross
he comes in likes he's a mod or something and set up the match between Garrett and adamantium 'knowing' full well this would be the result
And, the stake line was borderline scumbaggery
So basically Daredevil is speaking on behalf of adamantium.Quote:
Originally Posted by DaredevilFirst of all, he didn't know. No one could know but you. He's says he knew, but what he meant was he assumed. And he was also willing to lose the money if you had actually escrowed.Quote:
Originally Posted by garrettQuote:
Originally Posted by adamantium
Except he didn't win and was thinking he was so slick, this ANGLE would work. Interesting angle-shoot right there.
Daredevil just lol who are you really, and what is the stick up your ass about me so bad for.
Second, this tired excuse of yours that people are just ganging up on you, out to get you, trolled you from day one. It doesn't fly here. Not with me.
I haven't trolled you since day one, in fact I've never trolled you. Even with all this shit you pulled, I've never referenced your "off-felt" issues with your family or anything else about you not relevant to this issue.
I just sincerely feel that you are at best an angle shooting slimeball, and at worst an outright scammer.
I mean read this, in it's truest context, 1marley1 is pretty sharp. Because it does read as if Daredevil is not only aware of, but is also speaking on behalf of admantium. Until we started to get more, and more from Daredevil revealing his hand, I didn't see this at first.
How and why were you so privy to all of this information, and why did you care to the extent you are basically speaking for 'adamantium' here with these posts. And what was it to you, did you think you were cherry picking some awesome player, that would just run over the forum idiot called 'garrett'.
You said: 'It doesn't fly here. Not with me.'
So who the f are you, and what is this entire situation to you. Maybe next time I will just play you!
Oh I get it now... The only thing I remember saying that I have "absolutely no bias" on was the Micon situation. What I said was, I have no personal bias because I've never personally interacted with him. And that is true. Having been around poker for 11 years, and having been on the old site and listening to the radio shows, of course I have some bias. Everyone does. But you're mad because you like him or are friends with him, and didn't like my view. That's fine, but just come out and say it.Quote:
Originally Posted by 1marley1Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
and i know this
but this daredevil character is very off-putting to me
his insistence of having 'absolutely no bias' on radio was gross
he comes in likes he's a mod or something and set up the match between Garrett and adamantium 'knowing' full well this would be the result
And, the stake line was borderline scumbaggery
And I didn't set up the match. It's weird to lie about something that can so easily be disproved. But then I guess that's why you see a kindred soul in garrett.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaredevilOh I get it now... The only thing I remember saying that I have "absolutely no bias" on was the Micon situation. What I said was, I have no personal bias because I've never personally interacted with him. And that is true. Having been around poker for 11 years, and having been on the old site and listening to the radio shows, of course I have some bias. Everyone does. But you're mad because you like him or are friends with him, and didn't like my view. That's fine, but just come out and say it.Quote:
Originally Posted by 1marley1
And I didn't set up the match. It's weird to lie about something that can so easily be disproved. But then I guess that's why you see a kindred soul in garrett.
I don't know, or very much like Micon. i just know you're full of shit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1marley1Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
and i know this
but this daredevil character is very off-putting to me
his insistence of having 'absolutely no bias' on radio was gross
he comes in likes he's a mod or something and set up the match between Garrett and adamantium 'knowing' full well this would be the result
And, the stake line was borderline scumbaggery
without taking a stance on this, i think this communities cumulative exhaustion regarding 408mike 2.0 aka garrett must be taken into consideration.
Druff, how much more proof do you need that this was a complete angle shoot?
Just look at the attempt to deflect here for the last however many pages without actually facing the facts at hand. Typical behavior of a lifelong scammer. Deflect, deflect and deflect some more, but never, ever, face the actual tough questions head on.
If you don't label this guy a scammer now and he pulls some shit in the future you are going to be dealing with a major shit storm. Not trying to give you a hard time here, or anywhere in this thread, just think your judgement on this for whatever reason might be a little off.
Just block Garrett from sending you PM's (cause we all know that will blow up) and please do the right thing here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vegas1369
Vegas1369 are you really trying to beg here, to see how much clout you think you have, and get me banned.
Do you know how big of a scumbag move that is. Unbeknownst to you, quite a few people here know I don't scam. And are probably LOLn at this entire thread. The Las Vegas bartender, with all the opinions, on integrity and right and wrong, trying to spend his entire waking morning, to make me out to be a piece of shit. Yo do not even know me, you dont know anything about me, VERY VERY few people here do. You should know that.
You know if I knew how to make a drink, I would challenge you at your game, when you can play a game of cards, and start to realize how damning these allegations can be to an aspiring player I would start to take you seriously
Until then you are just a Las Vegas bartender, not a poker player, so please just stay out of this!
LOL, garrett is literally hysterical.
It is clear as day that 'FRANKRIZZO' is just some dupe who ran out of red rep on the original account. lol this is how pathetic you all are. Why do you think I believe I can run most of you over. When you resort to this level of stupid, you really dont have much confidence in yourselves, and jsut are looking for that positive reassurance from others.
That isnt healthy when you are jumping on dupes, and circle jerking the 5 or so friends you have on a poker forum. I wont say much more, but that is honestly why I laugh at most of you here, and think you're largely a pool of donks!
so where did we land on the garry vs tine 50 freeroll?
Garrett,Quote:
Originally Posted by garrettQuote:
Originally Posted by vegas1369
Vegas1369 are you really trying to beg here, to see how much clout you think you have, and get me banned.
Do you know how big of a scumbag move that is. Unbeknownst to you, quite a few people here know I don't scam. And are probably LOLn at this entire thread. The Las Vegas bartender, with all the opinions, on integrity and right and wrong, trying to spend his entire waking morning, to make me out to be a piece of shit. Yo do not even know me, you dont know anything about me, VERY VERY few people here do. You should know that.
You know if I knew how to make a drink, I would challenge you at your game, when you can play a game of cards, and start to realize how damning these allegations can be to an aspiring player I would start to take you seriously
Until then you are just a Las Vegas bartender, not a poker player, so please just stay out of this!
It's very funny how you completely avoid my questions before this last post, but then reply immediately to this one.
Please go ahead and attempt to respond to just one simple question without deflecting...
http://pokerfraudalert.com/forum/sho...l=1#post362699
We all know you can't.
Also, two things...
1) You are nothing special at poker. I played poker pretty much for a living from 2003-2007, I barely worked during that period and supported myself playing cash games and tournaments online and on the strip. I did pretty well too, and was able to afford all of the things I wanted at the time, including buying a house. After years of grinding it out I decided I would rather work for a living as opposed to ending up like so many of the regulars I sat next to on a daily basis, all talking about the same tired bullshit of the last bad beat they took, what casino has the best BB jackpot, usual casino gossip, etc.. I decided I would rather be active and on my feet all day instead of sitting at the tables. Eventually working behind the bar became the much better option to me. Not knocking anyone that does decide to play for a living, but it wasn't for me. That said, I still play occasionally. Over the years I have literally seen thousands of dipshits like yourself who think they just need that "one big break" to break through and "make it". 99.99999999% of them fall flat on their face, and the majority of them don't have the personal issues you have, and are much more intelligent. And they still fail! I don't wish bad things for anyone, but just prepare for that reality to hit your angle shooting face hard when you most likely bust out early on day 1 with your stake. Eventually you are going to realize you are a) not good enough to make it in the very cut throat world of professional gambling, and b) you have burned too many bridges to get staked and continue on with this pipe dream of yours.
2) I quit bartending a year ago.
Druff must just be doing this to troll us, he's not that stupid.Quote:
Originally Posted by garrettQuote:
Originally Posted by vegas1369
Vegas1369 are you really trying to beg here, to see how much clout you think you have, and get me banned.
Do you know how big of a scumbag move that is. Unbeknownst to you, quite a few people here know I don't scam. And are probably LOLn at this entire thread. The Las Vegas bartender, with all the opinions, on integrity and right and wrong, trying to spend his entire waking morning, to make me out to be a piece of shit. Yo do not even know me, you dont know anything about me, VERY VERY few people here do. You should know that.
You know if I knew how to make a drink, I would challenge you at your game, when you can play a game of cards, and start to realize how damning these allegations can be to an aspiring player I would start to take you seriously
Until then you are just a Las Vegas bartender, not a poker player, so please just stay out of this!
Garrett, it seems like you are off of your drug binge, so congratulations for that. I'm not sure what role substance abuse had in the repeated assaults on your family but it seems like they bring you to a dark place.
You never escrowed. You won your match. You then sent Druff $63 and expected the $50. That's a clear angle shot. No ambiguity.
Not a big scam but certainly in line with your history of low level dealings and overall shadiness.
Why don't you spend some of your time in more fruitful pursuits, such as obtaining employment or getting some exercise?
Quote:
Originally Posted by garrettQuote:
Originally Posted by vegas1369
Vegas1369 are you really trying to beg here, to see how much clout you think you have, and get me banned.
Do you know how big of a scumbag move that is. Unbeknownst to you, quite a few people here know I don't scam. And are probably LOLn at this entire thread. The Las Vegas bartender, with all the opinions, on integrity and right and wrong, trying to spend his entire waking morning, to make me out to be a piece of shit. Yo do not even know me, you dont know anything about me, VERY VERY few people here do. You should know that.
You know if I knew how to make a drink, I would challenge you at your game, when you can play a game of cards, and start to realize how damning these allegations can be to an aspiring player I would start to take you seriously
Until then you are just a Las Vegas bartender, not a poker player, so please just stay out of this!
Name oneQuote:
Do you know how big of a scumbag move that is. Unbeknownst to you, quite a few people here know I don't scam.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vegas1369Garrett,Quote:
Originally Posted by garrett
It's very funny how you completely avoid my questions before this last post, but then reply immediately to this one.
Please go ahead and attempt to respond to just one simple question without deflecting...
http://pokerfraudalert.com/forum/sho...l=1#post362699
We all know you can't.
Also, two things...
1) You are nothing special at poker. I played poker pretty much for a living from 2003-2007, I barely worked during that period and supported myself playing cash games and tournaments online and on the strip. I did pretty well too, and was able to afford all of the things I wanted at the time, including buying a house. After years of grinding it out I decided I would rather work for a living as opposed to ending up like so many of the regulars I sat next to on a daily basis, all talking about the same tired bullshit of the last bad beat they took, what casino has the best BB jackpot, usual casino gossip, etc.. I decided I would rather be active and on my feet all day instead of sitting at the tables. Eventually working behind the bar became the much better option to me. Not knocking anyone that does decide to play for a living, but it wasn't for me. That said, I still play occasionally. Over the years I have literally seen thousands of dipshits like yourself who think they just need that "one big break" to break through and "make it". 99.99999999% of them fall flat on their face, and the majority of them don't have the personal issues you have, and are much more intelligent. And they still fail! I don't wish bad things for anyone, but just prepare for that reality to hit your angle shooting face hard when you most likely bust out early on day 1 with your stake. Eventually you are going to realize you are a) not good enough to make it in the very cut throat world of professional gambling, and b) you have burned too many bridges to get staked and continue on with this pipe dream of yours.
2) I quit bartending a year ago.
lol I could slice you to pieces with this bullshit.
You don't know me, you have no clue about the real world and academic experience I do have. You talk out your ass, a WHOLE lot. Maybe this is why you got busted, but I grind, I dont give a fuck about some one 'big shot'. That right there shows you don't know a god damn thing about me. And fuck Vegas, I would move right back home to NJ and play in Atlantic City.
But this is TMI for your 'all knowing' self. You don't deserve to know more.
LOL!!! Ok Garrett. Where did I say I ever busted? I stopped playing with more than a 20% lifetime ROI.Quote:
Originally Posted by garrettQuote:
Originally Posted by vegas1369
lol I could slice you to pieces with this bullshit.
You don't know me, you have no clue about the real world and academic experience I do have. You talk out your ass, a WHOLE lot. Maybe this is why you got busted, but I grind, I dont give a fuck about some one 'big shot'. That right there shows you don't know a god damn thing about me. And fuck Vegas, I would move right back home to NJ and play in Atlantic City.
But this is TMI for your 'all knowing' self. You don't deserve to know more.
I'll tell you one thing I never had a problem with... Getting $50 together to play a heads up match, or any game for that matter. Simply put, you are a broke dick, angle shooting train wreck who had to accept a stake to play one WSOP event, when poker is long past its hay day. I have accepted ONE stake in my entire life years ago, aside from that I entered every tournament I ever played with my own bankroll. You can't even enter a $50 heads up match without it being a major problem for you. Chew on that fact you POS.
Oh, and as predicted, you completely avoided the one simple question you've been asked over and over in this thread. One last try?
http://pokerfraudalert.com/forum/sho...l=1#post362699