why are you using the word "exonerates" when it specifically said DOESN'T exonerate
Printable View
why are you using the word "exonerates" when it specifically said DOESN'T exonerate
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrTickle
Why are u such an easily manipulated drone u cant tell that line is in there specifically so donkeys like u have a counter argument. SO DONT USE IT! But yes they are absolutely drawing dead on obstruction cuz they cant prove any malicious motivation by trump cuz 0 Russian collusion. They can NEVER prove he fired Comey to weasel out of something. Game over, wait for ur next complaining instructions and get ready to follow them to the letter. Kill urself
it is interesting. i always thought that you could obstruct justice even if you weren't ultimately liable for the crime being investigated.Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedishQuote:
Originally Posted by MrTickle
Why are u such an easily manipulated drone u cant tell that line is in there specifically so donkeys like u have a counter argument. SO DONT USE IT! But yes they are absolutely drawing dead on obstruction cuz they cant prove any malicious motivation by trump cuz 0 Russian collusion. They can NEVER prove he fired Comey to weasel out of something. Game over, wait for ur next complaining instructions and get ready to follow them to the letter. Kill urself
but could you be found to have a "corrupt intent", which apparently is the phrase used in the federal statute, if you knew all along there was no crime? maybe not
I'm not up to date on all the lawyerings, but it sounds like a "You're being arrested for refusing arrest" kind of scenario.Quote:
Originally Posted by blakeit is interesting. i always thought that you could obstruct justice even if you weren't ultimately liable for the crime being investigated.Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedish
but could you be found to have a "corrupt intent", which apparently is the phrase used in the federal statute, if you knew all along there was no crime? maybe not
Donald Trump may have acted illegally while trying to thwart a coup based on a complete lie made up by the opposition party.
That's the new Democratic platform?
Yeah, Trump by a landslide in 2020.
Ex-Nevada Dem Assemblywoman Accuses Joe Biden of ‘Blatantly Inappropriate and Unnerving’ Behavior
"I felt him get closer to me from behind. He leaned further in and inhaled my hair. I was mortified. I thought to myself, “I didn’t wash my hair today and the vice-president of the United States is smelling it. And also, what in the actual fuck? Why is the vice-president of the United States smelling my hair?” He proceeded to plant a big slow kiss on the back of my head. My brain couldn’t process what was happening. I was embarrassed. I was shocked. I was confused. There is a Spanish saying, “tragame tierra,” it means, “earth, swallow me whole.” I couldn’t move and I couldn’t say anything. I wanted nothing more than to get Biden away from me. My name was called and I was never happier to get on stage in front of an audience.
https://www.mediaite.com/online/brea...ving-behavior/
Yeah he’s been creepy before. I’m curious to see if he apologizes or denies it with her being a Bernie loyalist. They drag on each other and have a lot of crossover appeal despite one being moderate and one a dem socialist. When you removed Biden from polling
Bernie is the biggest beneficiary. I saw he went down 19c on predictit before this broke so clearly someone got down a few $
he's in a no-win situation as not only is this disqualifying, if true, but denying an accusation like this from a female is also disqualifying in the democrat party.Quote:
Originally Posted by BCR
also there has to be thousands of these accounts ready to come out of the woodwork. we've all seen video of joe doing this at least a dozen times already.
Yeah, I would guess he’s just going to apologize, say it was innocent, and stay retired and not run. It will likely be the end if he sits it out. This is basically a kick in the balls telling him get out now or they’ll be talking about creepy uncle Joe all day. I assume he sits it out. Its probably why he hasn’t announced yet and why Obama threw his people and infrastructure behind beto.Quote:
Originally Posted by blakehe's in a no-win situation as not only is this disqualifying, if true, but denying an accusation like this from a female is also disqualifying in the democrat party.Quote:
Originally Posted by BCR
also there has to be thousands of these accounts ready to come out of the woodwork. we've all seen video of joe doing this at least a dozen times already.
he's come out and said he has no recollection of this (smart that it's not a denial) but that she has every right to share her experience and the country is better for it.Quote:
Originally Posted by BCRYeah, I would guess he’s just going to apologize, say it was innocent, and stay retired and not run. It will likely be the end if he sits it out. This is basically a kick in the balls telling him get out now or they’ll be talking about creepy uncle Joe all day. I assume he sits it out. Its probably why he hasn’t announced yet and why Obama threw his people and infrastructure behind beto.Quote:
Originally Posted by blake
i guess that's the best possible statement he could make. i still have trouble figuring out how he runs as a democrat in the "me too" and virtue signaling age we're in
Tulsi Gabbard comes out and states it's a good thing that the POTUS wasn't colluding with the Russians and Democrats eviscerate her.
LULZ
Just shut that clown party down already.
Quote:
Originally Posted by devidee
Quote:
Originally Posted by blake
Quote:
Originally Posted by devidee
Quote:
Originally Posted by blake
CAN TAKO FALL DUNK A BASKETBALL???
:lol4
FUCKING ALLEY OOP TO THE WHITE HOUSE IN 2020
If you want to see what a Trump 2020 campaign trail will look like, picture the Michigan rally every city he shows up to.
The man is an unstoppable force, his momentum is the equivalent to a comet on a collision course with the DNC.
They should just concede and save everyone the trouble....
Way be way off here but what hurt the N.Y. crimes families big time was the Dons were ultimately guilty forQuote:
Originally Posted by blakeit is interesting. i always thought that you could obstruct justice even if you weren't ultimately liable for the crime being investigated.Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedish
but could you be found to have a "corrupt intent", which apparently is the phrase used in the federal statute, if you knew all along there was no crime? maybe not
the crimes committed under their rule
Look you have 500 plus days left of campaigning. Give that politician all the air time she can get.Quote:
Originally Posted by devidee
In fact I'm thinking of donating to her Patreon page where I'll get the extra back stage photos
https://img.thedailybeast.com/image/...i-tease_smwspt
The “smoking gun” evidence in Nixon’s downfall was the audio recording of him directing his staff to effect the covering up of the Watergate break-in, initially with the payoffs to the burglars’ families, and then getting the CIA to deflect the FBI’s investigation of the hush money trail through a bank in Mexico. But there was no proof available to Congress by then that Nixon ordered the Watergate break-in or even knew about it beforehand. So, he faced certain conviction in the Senate merely on obstruction of justice given that “smoking gun” evidence.Quote:
Originally Posted by blakeit is interesting. i always thought that you could obstruct justice even if you weren't ultimately liable for the crime being investigated.Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedish
but could you be found to have a "corrupt intent", which apparently is the phrase used in the federal statute, if you knew all along there was no crime? maybe not
Here he is with Eva Longoria at the same eventQuote:
Originally Posted by blake
This is disqualifying? Please. Maybe a few years ago it would be but we live in an age where a man can "grab them by the pussy" and still win the presidency. I will say it would be huge problem if he was running against say a President Romney but vs Trump it's nothing.Quote:
Originally Posted by blakehe's in a no-win situation as not only is this disqualifying, if true, but denying an accusation like this from a female is also disqualifying in the democrat party.Quote:
Originally Posted by BCR
also there has to be thousands of these accounts ready to come out of the woodwork. we've all seen video of joe doing this at least a dozen times already.
See Stewart, Martha. Only convicted and sent to prison for obstruction of justice not the underlying crime (insider trading I think)Quote:
Originally Posted by blakeit is interesting. i always thought that you could obstruct justice even if you weren't ultimately liable for the crime being investigated.Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedish
but could you be found to have a "corrupt intent", which apparently is the phrase used in the federal statute, if you knew all along there was no crime? maybe not
it's disqualifying if he wants to be a democrat, because democrats tend to be gigantic pussies. can he win a democratic primary in the me too era?Quote:
Originally Posted by rum dickThis is disqualifying? Please. Maybe a few years ago it would be but we live in an age where a man can "grab them by the pussy" and still win the presidency. I will say it would be huge problem if he was running against say a President Romney but vs Trump it's nothing.Quote:
Originally Posted by blake
i don't know the details of this case, but was there an underlying crime to obstruct, even if she wasn't charged? was anyone charged for insider trading?Quote:
Originally Posted by rum dickSee Stewart, Martha. Only convicted and sent to prison for obstruction of justice not the underlying crime (insider trading I think)Quote:
Originally Posted by blake
According to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Stewart avoided a loss of $45,673 by selling all 3,928 shares of her ImClone Systems stock on December 27, 2001, after receiving material, nonpublic information from Peter Bacanovic, who was Stewart's broker at Merrill Lynch. The day following her sale, the stock value fell 16%.[47]Quote:
Originally Posted by blakei don't know the details of this case, but was there an underlying crime to obstruct, even if she wasn't charged? was anyone charged for insider trading?Quote:
Originally Posted by rum dick
On June 4, 2003, Stewart was indicted by the government on nine counts, including charges of securities fraud and obstruction of justice. Stewart voluntarily stepped down as CEO and Chairwoman of MSLO, but stayed on as chief creative officer. She went on trial in January 2004. Prosecutors showed that Bacanovic had ordered his assistant to tell Stewart that the CEO of ImClone, Samuel D. Waksal, was selling all his shares in advance of an adverse Food and Drug Administration ruling. The FDA action was expected to cause ImClone shares to decline.[51]
Monica Beam, a shareholder of MSLO, also brought a derivative suit against Stewart and other directors and officers of the company. It came before the Supreme Court of Delaware in 2004 and was ultimately dismissed.[52]
After a highly publicized six-week jury trial, Stewart was found guilty in March 2004 of felony charges of conspiracy, obstruction of an agency proceeding, and making false statements to federal investigators, and was sentenced in July 2004 to serve a five-month term in a federal correctional facility and a two-year period of supervised release (to include five months of electronic monitoring).[51]
She still went to prison despite not being convicted of the underlying "securities fraud" charge....
Just realized I totally misread your comment. Ignore my last few posts. Too many mimosas at brunch followed by too many beers while golfing. Pulled a dish on yah.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rum dick
???
I feel like Jewdonk and Joe have a lot in common.Quote:
Originally Posted by rum dickHere he is with Eva Longoria at the same eventQuote:
Originally Posted by blake
Biden should not kiss or touch women that are not his wife.
Obviously, he must end his campaign to be President before it begins.
Trump force kissing other women and grabbing them by the pussy, perfectly okay and natural.
https://thenypost.files.wordpress.co...rip=all&w=1286
http://s23257.pcdn.co/wp-content/upl...76039946-1.jpg
https://fortunedotcom.files.wordpres.../578546650.jpg
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/content/...pg?imwidth=450
Why are we talking about this, isnt it common knowledge creeping up behind girls and smelling their hair is "The Biden"
I honestly think these guys are simply delusional after like 40 years where women swooned and liove that shit, and then they fail to realize they’re now old men and that shit is creeping women out. I really don’t think they are as much predatory as simply still thinking they got it. Like Trump was a tall young decent looking rich dude for a long time. In his mind, he still is. Biden played that whole charming Scranton joe thing for so long that he probably still thinks they are eating it up.
This is Biden as a young dude. I doubt many women recoiled. Like for the average dude, you hit that age after 40 when you do that shit and realize some twentysomething is laughing like who is this old fuck? But when you’re famous and powerful and everyone is kissing your ass all day, I just think it is real easy to stay delusional. I’ve had once beautiful aging women do that shit to me. Kind of hug and flirt and grab and still think they have it, it’s just not threatening being a dude. You just laugh it off.
Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedish
I thought "The Biden" was when you stop short...
There are literally dozens of videos of Biden groping young girls and children, at least two in which another grown man pushes or smacks his hand away. These have circulated the internet for years. They take on a different, much worse look, when someone puts out a statement like this about him being a creepy hair sniffer.
Oi yanks, can’t you all agree that they’re both shitty people and not elect Trump OR Biden? It’s not that hard. The whataboutism does nobody any good.
Clearly Biden isn’t giving up the ghost. Those are some artfully crafted statements from his camp given there are no good statements for that situation. I giggled upon hearing them. He has someone talented on staff, as Joe has never had that deft a touch.
you aren't familiar with the money train that runs American politics are you?Quote:
Originally Posted by MrTickle
the only "viable" 3rd party candidate we had in this country in the last half century was a billionaire (not trump) who could afford to run on his own without donors...so unless steve balmer, bill gates, etc decide to run we are stuck with this muck of shitty 80 year old candidates...it's really fucking pathetic...
couple of bad ass israeli soldiers barging into a school to arrest this 9 year old boy who threw stones at some land stealing jews
https://www.cnn.com/videos/world/201...und-the-world/
I’m very familiar. I don’t mean a third party candidate, I mean another democrat. Maybe Pete.Quote:
Originally Posted by GambleBotsChafedPenisyou aren't familiar with the money train that runs American politics are you?Quote:
Originally Posted by MrTickle
the only "viable" 3rd party candidate we had in this country in the last half century was a billionaire (not trump) who could afford to run on his own without donors...so unless steve balmer, bill gates, etc decide to run we are stuck with this muck of shitty 80 year old candidates...it's really fucking pathetic...