Printable View
no I'm afraid not, and reporting it online and not 24/7 tv airtime coverage is totally different.Quote:
Originally Posted by gimmick
I have no idea what you think is MSM, but Newsweek, Guardian, NBC, MSN, WSJ, BBC, CNN pop-up on the first few pages of google search.Quote:
Originally Posted by dwai
sorry but they're just not reporting on RIOTS
OK. Can you remember the crack years? I'm sorry if you think this means something hella important, but this is nothing compared to 80s and 90s.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99If that article had no effect on you then I don’t know what to tell you. It was a sobering look at the extent of the rioting and the damage done to property and real lives across the country. But if you want to dismiss it because it didn’t give you an accurate account of the monetary total of property damage congratulations on being a soulless robot.Quote:
Originally Posted by gimmick
As far as the Chicago riots, two days ago it was given cursory coverage and then quickly memoryholed as is anything else which is perceived to hurt Biden and the BLM movement.
The kind of chaos we saw in Chicago and ongoing in Portland and Seattle is being normalized by our MSM. I know you think that’s totally cool or just the way it is and not that big of a deal and just totally blown out of proportion by “right wing media”, but to normal Americans it is frightening to watch the breakdown of society and law and order in real time. Anyone truly paying attention recognizes this.
when you have to get riot informant and footage from Andy ngo in twitter, that pretty much ruins your argument right there, media is not reporting on it
WTF are you talking about?Quote:
Originally Posted by gimmickOK. Can you remember the crack years? I'm sorry if you think this means something hella important, but this is nothing compared to 80s and 90s.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
I don't own that. I own you.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99Show me some recent video of the Klan in action doing anything close to what’s happening in Portland night after night. I’ll wait.Quote:
Originally Posted by Walter Sobchak
The Klan is a totally irrelevant organization in the US today. Your beloved Antifa has effectively taken over the entire cities of Seattle and Portland and are reshaping them in a way that will affect them for years or maybe decades. BLM is doing the same in Chicago. Own it.
The people I know in Portland and Seattle are doing just fine. Disturbance contained to a small area. Their cities have not been "taken over" by "Antifa" any more than they have been taken over by the Hamburglar.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gimmickOK. Can you remember the crack years? I'm sorry if you think this means something hella important, but this is nothing compared to 80s and 90s.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
I agree. The Klan and "Antifa" both have very little impact on society.Quote:
Originally Posted by dwaiyeah gotta agree here walt, the klan isn't near this organized or even relevant anymore, fuck the klan, i can't believe people still believe the klan is capable of anything nowadays. Your friends with antifa and BLM, though... they're ruining cities and creating mass anarchy, with their communist and marxist agendasQuote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walter SobchakI don't own that. I own you.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
The people I know in Portland and Seattle are doing just fine. Disturbance contained to a small area. Their cities have not been "taken over" by "Antifa" any more than they have been taken over by the Hamburglar.
That's interesting, the people I know in Seattle are highly concerned. I'm talking Hillary Clinton democrats (one of them cried the night Trump was elected). They say no one goes to the city anymore, it's basically deserted. Seattle used to have one of the best downtowns in the country.Quote:
Originally Posted by Walter SobchakI don't own that. I own you.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
The people I know in Portland and Seattle are doing just fine. Disturbance contained to a small area. Their cities have not been "taken over" by "Antifa" any more than they have been taken over by the Hamburglar.
Point is for scale.Quote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefishSo has the left media blown it out of proportion or not? Hint, it's ok to say yes.Quote:
Originally Posted by gimmick
BTW yes Katrina did huge damage. It was also all over the media covered for weeks. Not sure your point.
I have no idea if left media has blown it out of proportion. I don't watch any tv news. I sometimes read Guardian online. On average they might mention police brutality few times a year.
Oh and if you go by property damage there should have been 1/50th air time for the riots vs Katrina. And for deaths per day 1/30th compared to LA riots.
OBV that's not how news work, but to say FOX and the entire right wing echo chamber have milked a single block in Portland to death, isn't exactly ground breaking.
I read about the riots in the NY Times, the Wall Street Journal and the Economist. They have the maturity and journalistic integrity to keep them in perspective.Quote:
Originally Posted by dwaiMSM is reporting on peaceful protests, not riotsQuote:
Originally Posted by gimmick
Maybe I should just get my news from that guy on twitter who says a milkshake gave him brain damage? Protip: he was already brain damaged.
Nobody has to get news from him. He's not news. You choose to consume what he says and how he says it because he confirms your worldview. It's more comfortable for you than learning the facts from actual journalists.Quote:
Originally Posted by dwai
BTW your meme posting was in all seriousness quite enjoyable I hope you didn't blow your whole wad in one day.
why do you keep comparing a hurricane to riots and arson and murder?Quote:
Originally Posted by gimmickPoint is for scale.Quote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefish
I have no idea if left media has blown it out of proportion. I don't watch any tv news. I sometimes read Guardian online. On average they might mention police brutality few times a year.
Oh and if you go by property damage there should have been 1/50th air time for the riots vs Katrina. And for deaths per day 1/30th compared to LA riots.
OBV that's not how news work, but to say FOX and the entire right wing echo chamber have milked a single block in Portland to death, isn't exactly ground breaking.
Originally because nightmarefish mentioned that the damages of the current riot season were close to a trillion. The direct property damage of Katrina was 1/10th of a trillion. The current riot damages are between 2/1000th - 4/1000th of a trillion.Quote:
Originally Posted by dwaiwhy do you keep comparing a hurricane to riots and arson and murder?Quote:
Originally Posted by gimmick
I didn't bring up the cost of riots. He did. I just corrected him.
My complaint was that the riots aren't being covered on msm. And your response is to bring up a natural disaster from 15 years ago which did more damage and was covered religiously for weeks on end by msm. It doesn't make sense.Quote:
Originally Posted by gimmickOriginally because nightmarefish mentioned that the damages of the current riot season were close to a trillion. The direct property damage of Katrina was 1/10th of a trillion. The current riot damages are between 2/1000th - 4/1000th of a trillion.Quote:
Originally Posted by dwai
I didn't bring up the cost of riots. He did. I just corrected him.
https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status...90427141365761Quote:
Originally Posted by Walter SobchakI read about the riots in the NY Times, the Wall Street Journal and the Economist. They have the maturity and journalistic integrity to keep them in perspective.Quote:
Originally Posted by dwai
Maybe I should just get my news from that guy on twitter who says a milkshake gave him brain damage? Protip: he was already brain damaged.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefishThat's interesting, the people I know in Seattle are highly concerned. I'm talking Hillary Clinton democrats (one of them cried the night Trump was elected). They say no one goes to the city anymore, it's basically deserted. Seattle used to have one of the best downtowns in the country.Quote:
Originally Posted by Walter Sobchak
Another anecdotal drivel post.
You are mentally challenged
There are 3 million plus residents in greater Seattle and you expect
us to accept you and your "friends" take on the current situation.
Take a huge leap off the fantasy bridge.-
George Floyd was an anecdote on fentanyl.Quote:
Originally Posted by limitlesQuote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefish
Another anecdotal drivel post.
You are mentally challenged
There are 3 million plus residents in greater Seattle and you expect
us to accept you and your "friends" take on the current situation.
Take a huge leap of the fantasy bridge.-
You dumb cunt. Gimmick was simply correcting your oxygen depleted take thatQuote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefishMy complaint was that the riots aren't being covered on msm. And your response is to bring up a natural disaster from 15 years ago which did more damage and was covered religiously for weeks on end by msm. It doesn't make sense.Quote:
Originally Posted by gimmick
costs were in the trillions regarding recent protests.
He was simply pointing out that your delirious numbers were just that
based on the cost of other disasters that occurred within your pathectic
borders
You’re a fucking retard, drunk. Please remove yourself from the grown up threads. You do realize no one wants to have a conversation with your retarded ass, right?Quote:
Originally Posted by limitlesQuote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefish
Another anecdotal drivel post.
You are mentally challenged
There are 3 million plus residents in greater Seattle and you expect
us to accept you and your "friends" take on the current situation.
Take a huge leap off the fantasy bridge.-
That's all they talk about on fox news.Quote:
Originally Posted by gimmickPoint is for scale.Quote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefish
I have no idea if left media has blown it out of proportion. I don't watch any tv news. I sometimes read Guardian online. On average they might mention police brutality few times a year.
Oh and if you go by property damage there should have been 1/50th air time for the riots vs Katrina. And for deaths per day 1/30th compared to LA riots.
OBV that's not how news work, but to say FOX and the entire right wing echo chamber have milked a single block in Portland to death, isn't exactly ground breaking.
Scare whitey 24/7 thats fox news
You’re scared of a virus that has a 99.8 % survival rate. Go back to the coronavirus thread and hyperventilate some more about 90 year olds dying in Florida.Quote:
Originally Posted by big dickThat's all they talk about on fox news.Quote:
Originally Posted by gimmick
Scare whitey 24/7 thats fox news
:thisQuote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99You’re scared of a virus that has a 99.8 % survival rate. Go back to the coronavirus thread and hyperventilate some more about 90 year olds dying in Florida.Quote:
Originally Posted by big dick
LOL speaking of scare whitey
LOL
Florida sheriff bans his deputies and office visitors from wearing masks on a day his county broke records for Covid-19 deaths
https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/12/us/sh...rnd/index.html
The Republican Senate nightmare is coming true
https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/12/polit...gop/index.html
Lol where do you get these numbers. Do you really suck at math that badly? 1 in 2,000 people have died of the virus. That doesn't mean 1 in 2,000 people who get the virus die. That's like saying cancer has over a 99% survival rate therefore smoking is low risk. Death rate is somewhere around 3%, though of course it will vary based on your age and other factors. And chance of permanent neurological damage is much much higher, even if you don't die.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99You’re scared of a virus that has a 99.8 % survival rate. Go back to the coronavirus thread and hyperventilate some more about 90 year olds dying in Florida.Quote:
Originally Posted by big dick
it's more like 99.9 since we'll never know how many people have had it and recovered this bullshit hoax virusQuote:
Originally Posted by PLOLLol where do you get these numbers. Do you really suck at math that badly? 1 in 2,000 people have died of the virus. That doesn't mean 1 in 2,000 people who get the virus die. That's like saying cancer has over a 99% survival rate.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
There's a pandemic.Quote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefish
But I thought the hoax was we are doing too much testing. Wouldn't that lower the death rate? Btw, thanks for being a loyal listener of the show. I hope you continue to watch!Quote:
Originally Posted by dwaiit's more like 99.9 since we'll never know how many people have had it and recovered this bullshit hoax virusQuote:
Originally Posted by PLOL
Trump told em 99% of people who get covid are just fine and dandyQuote:
Originally Posted by PLOLLol where do you get these numbers. Do you really suck at math that badly? 1 in 2,000 people have died of the virus. That doesn't mean 1 in 2,000 people who get the virus die. That's like saying cancer has over a 99% survival rate therefore smoking is low risk. Death rate is somewhere around 3%, though of course it will vary based on your age and other factors. And chance of permanent neurological damage is much much higher, even if you don't die.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
They tend to believe the guy who has lied at least 20k times that we know about since 2016
I have seen the Infection Fatality rate by multiple sources reported as .1% to .5%. That’s a survival rate of 99.9% to 99.5%Quote:
Originally Posted by PLOLLol where do you get these numbers. Do you really suck at math that badly? 1 in 2,000 people have died of the virus. That doesn't mean 1 in 2,000 people who get the virus die. That's like saying cancer has over a 99% survival rate therefore smoking is low risk. Death rate is somewhere around 3%, though of course it will vary based on your age and other factors. And chance of permanent neurological damage is much much higher, even if you don't die.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
Shouldn’t you be campaigning door to door for Lori Lightfoot?Quote:
Originally Posted by big dickTrump told em 99% of people who get covid are just fine and dandyQuote:
Originally Posted by PLOL
They tend to believe the guy who has lied at least 20k times that we know about since 2016
You're actually both incorrect.Quote:
Originally Posted by PLOLLol where do you get these numbers. Do you really suck at math that badly? 1 in 2,000 people have died of the virus. That doesn't mean 1 in 2,000 people who get the virus die. That's like saying cancer has over a 99% survival rate therefore smoking is low risk. Death rate is somewhere around 3%, though of course it will vary based on your age and other factors. And chance of permanent neurological damage is much much higher, even if you don't die.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
The coronavirus does NOT have a 0.2% death rate, nor does it have a 3% death rate. However, the 0.2% is a lot closer than the 3% (but it's impossible to determine exactly what it is.)
You can't get death rates by simply dividing confirmed cases by deaths, because there are/were a ton of cases which were never officially diagnosed. How many is up for debate, but suffice to say that the number of undiagnosed COVID-19 cases is very high.
Among the reasons:
1) People had trouble getting tested early on
2) Many don't bother to take a test because they feel to shitty too bother, yet not shitty enough to go to the hospital. Others don't feel like putting out the effort looking up how/where to get tested, and even others erroneously fear that it will cost them money.
3) Many are asymptomatic, especially young people. In the past month, I know several people who tested positive while asymtopmatic, and they only took a test because their spouse had it. None of these people developed symptoms, and all were over 40. The number of asymptomatic young is likely very high, especially kids and teens.
A rare big miss for young PLOL.
increased testing led to more "cases" for the media to scare more peopleQuote:
Originally Posted by PLOLBut I thought the hoax was we are doing too much testing. Wouldn't that lower the death rate? Btw, thanks for being a loyal listener of the show. I hope you continue to watch!Quote:
Originally Posted by dwai
Exhibit A opinionQuote:
Originally Posted by Dan DruffYou're actually both incorrect.Quote:
Originally Posted by PLOL
The coronavirus does NOT have a 0.2% death rate, nor does it have a 3% death rate. However, the 0.2% is a lot closer than the 3% (but it's impossible to determine exactly what it is.)
You can't get death rates by simply dividing confirmed cases by deaths, because there are/were a ton of cases which were never officially diagnosed. How many is up for debate, but suffice to say that the number of undiagnosed COVID-19 cases is very high.
Among the reasons:
1) People had trouble getting tested early on
2) Many don't bother to take a test because they feel to shitty too bother, yet not shitty enough to go to the hospital. Others don't feel like putting out the effort looking up how/where to get tested, and even others erroneously fear that it will cost them money.
3) Many are asymptomatic, especially young people. In the past month, I know several people who tested positive while asymtopmatic, and they only took a test because their spouse had it. None of these people developed symptoms, and all were over 40. The number of asymptomatic young is likely very high, especially kids and teens.
A rare big miss for young PLOL.
Exhibit B conjecture
Exhibit C anectdotal
I live in the burbsQuote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99Shouldn’t you be campaigning door to door for Lori Lightfoot?Quote:
Originally Posted by big dick
I do Like Lori though and would probably vote for her if I did still live in the city
Did more testing lead to more sick and dead people ?Quote:
Originally Posted by dwaiincreased testing led to more "cases" for the media to scare more peopleQuote:
Originally Posted by PLOL
noQuote:
Originally Posted by big dickDid more testing lead to more sick and dead people ?Quote:
Originally Posted by dwai
All of this is true and verified to be true, les.Quote:
Originally Posted by limitlesExhibit A opinionQuote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Exhibit B conjecture
Exhibit C anectdotal
The full extent of all of this isn't known, but anyone honest about the situation will admit that there were a ton of undiagnosed cases.
FFS, Druff. The only reason (besides she being a black) that Biden picked Kamala Harris was because she is a darling of the big money Dem donors, and THOSE people are in control of Biden’s agenda. The Dem Party is already signaling that it is calving off influence from the Progressive wing of the party by keeping THE key media outlet that Progressives turn to for updates on politics from being able to have a press pass at the Dem National Convention.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
https://youtu.be/7tL-4UKeb4k
So, your scaremongering of how a Biden Administration will be lead by or significantly bend to the demands of Progressives in the party are ludicrous and malinformed.