Arguing whether or not Kavanugh could be criminally prosecuted is a straw man argument.
Printable View
Arguing whether or not Kavanugh could be criminally prosecuted is a straw man argument.
This guy ain't all up in my feelings amigo but he's clearly all up in yours. You'd be fine seeing him dead because you disagree with him politically?? Do you really mean that or are you being hyperbolic?Quote:
Originally Posted by BCR
Quote:
Originally Posted by tony bagadonuts
Classic BCR, thoughtful, cogent, reasonable, and mature. Probably my all time favorite poster and has been for many years.
Terrible alt, anti-matter, bizarro, liberal facist BCR. Illogical, indecent, and intellectually immature. Doesn't care if this is all a lie as long as the outcome is to his satisfaction.Quote:
Originally Posted by BCR
Keeps simpleton republicans around as pet/friends to be mocked and pitied.
Three cheers for BCR and a big raspberry for bizarro BCR.
Tony I don’t give one fuck if he played grabass with some teenage girl in 1982. I mean, he’s a fucking sicko if he clamped his hand over some girls mouth, but we’re not going to figure that out here.
But this prep school fag can cry all he wants, sing the Georgetown Prep fight song and a few bars of Glory Days about his high school basketball team and whatever he wants and I’ll still gladly step over his rotting corpse and stroll right into the bar.
You know why? Because this motherfucker isn’t going to shed a single tear when my insurance premiums go from $700 to $25k a month given his non-answer(which is a fucking answer) regarding pre-existing conditions. He’s just one rich white prep school boy to me. He won’t be crying like a bitch when he dishes out some ruling for a slum lord that fucks poor people, or hands out the Jesus school vouchers which he’s big on to the detriment of funding for normal kids who don’t want to go to Jesus school. I don’t want his worldview anywhere near the court. I’d rather him go away, but dead is fine too. FBI disclaimer-*That is not a threat*
I’m no different than the litany of Republican senators who said they’d block any Hillary nominee regardless of credentials when it looked like she’d win.
I’m sorry this guy got up in your feelings, or if I’ve disappointed you. This guy will be a justice for the rest of my life. I have no desire to live under his decisions. Unfortunately, he’ll be confirmed, and there won’t be a thing I can do about it besides hope one one right winger on the court drops the next time there is a favorable senate.
This is a huge difference between the left and the right. You lot want your justices legislating from the bench with a utility belt full of preconceived notions and fully formed leftist ideological positions, I want them to carefully consider each matter brought before them on it's own merits. The constitution and precedent matter, not the personal politics of the justices, at least that's the way I think it should be, you clearly do not.
You keep coming back to the "litany of Republican senators who said they'd block any Hillary nominee". It was actually three, Ted Cruz, John McCain and Richard Burr of NC. Chuck Grassley and Mitch McConnell both publicly said bollocks to that idea and McCain walked his comment back.
I don't believe for a second the senate would have kept the 9th SCOTUS seat open for 2-4 years, and frankly I don't think you do either. Yet you continue to use that as cover for your hardline, super aggro, intolerant position on this guy.
Bullshit!!! The entire ediface of corporate rights, i.e. “Corporations are people, too, my friends”, is built on right-wing judicial activism in 1886 regarding a bastardized misreading of the 14th Amendment in a court case involving a railroad company. And it has culminated in the horrific anti-democratic Citizens United ruling, which allows faceless legions of virtually anonymous mega-wealthy donations through SuperPAC contributions to flood and corrupt our elections at all levels of our government.Quote:
Originally Posted by tony bagadonuts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkTb9GP9lVIQuote:
Originally Posted by MumblesBadlyBullshit!!! The entire ediface of corporate rights, i.e. “Corporations are people, too, my friends”, is built on right-wing judicial activism in 1886 regarding a bastardized misreading of the 14th Amendment in a court case involving a railroad company. And it has culminated in the horrific anti-democratic Citizens United ruling, which allows faceless legions of virtually anonymous mega-wealthy donations through SuperPAC contributions to flood and corrupt our elections at all levels of our government.Quote:
Originally Posted by tony bagadonuts
They look like brother and sister so for the Republican party it's more than def true.Quote:
Originally Posted by devideeIs he innocent?
LULLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Sidedishwasher my Mexican nanny is looking for cleaned dishes so if you don't respond soon you'll be apart of the Dump's non working class.
Answer her.
You heard the man, answer her.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam SneadThey look like brother and sister so for the Republican party it's more than def true.Quote:
Originally Posted by devideeIs he innocent?
LULLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Sidedishwasher my Mexican nanny is looking for cleaned dishes so if you don't respond soon you'll be apart of the Dump's non working class.
Answer her.
Good spot to drop in my idea that I'll be slamming H if the dems win the midterms, would see no reason to participate in society if its that easily manipulated
Can a couple people please red rep mumbles for me. I accidentally gave him a green.
Thanks.
That's the ultimate Clinton conspiracy theory. You idiots are way too smart to understand that the Clinton's did a reverse-reverse on you guys. Lose the Presidency and win the House/Senate...duh. Plus, we're going to take down your idiot drunk super beer loving Supreme court appointee.Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedishQuote:
Originally Posted by Sam Snead
Good spot to drop in my idea that I'll be slamming H IF the dems win the midterms, would see no reason to participate in society if its that easily manipulated
You idiots were too dumb to just nominate someone that had a semi-normal view about law/life. Don't ever think you're too good. You're not...that was his problem.
Sam Snead has a point you should listen to him.
Apparently he is no longer a gang rapist. However, he did throw ice on someone once.
So...yeah.
Quote:
Originally Posted by devidee
lol, yep.
Can somebody tell CNN to stop going hard on the story that Kavanaugh once threw some ice during a bar fight when he was practically still a kid.
Like I fully support their campaign to prevent the religious freak from gaining scary power. But c'mon, this line of attack has to be counterproductive in the fight to keep him out.
Also, I'm flabbergasted that there are people on here who are actively rooting for this cunt to rule over them.
What he stands for is outdated garbage and you should be ashamed.
Muslims with whiter teeth is what you are.
Land of the Freaks.
I'm not rooting for him to get confirmed. The last thing we need is for abortion to be illegal.
I mean, just look at the demographics of who is getting the most abortions.
.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam SneadThat's the ultimate Clinton conspiracy theory. You idiots are way too smart to understand that the Clinton's did a reverse-reverse on you guys. Lose the Presidency and win the House/Senate...duh. Plus, we're going to take down your idiot drunk super beer loving Supreme court appointee.Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedish
You idiots were too dumb to just nominate someone that had a semi-normal view about law/life. Don't ever think you're too good. You're not...that was his problem.
NEED H
He didn't note it on his calendar that he threw ice one someone. You remember, start crying...his dad had a calendar too...Quote:
Originally Posted by devidee
Kavanaugh caught lying to Senate regarding foreknowledge of Ramirez accusation. He and staffers texted Yale classmates for support on the matter BEFORE the story broke in the New Yorker.
Text messages between Brett Kavanaugh and his classmates seem to contradict his Senate testimony
https://www.businessinsider.com/did-...amirez-2018-10
As an attorney who believes in a liberal interpretation of the Constitution, I am no fan of Kavanaugh, but stuff that happened in college (unless a serious crime was committed) is not relevant to his nomination. It is the president’s prerogative to appoint someone, if he or she is qualified (which he is), that should be the end of the inquiry. On the other hand, this should only be Trump’s first nomination. Let’s not forget McConnell wouldn’t even hold hearings on Obama’s choice (Garland - a solid nomination) for almost 300 days.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord of the FraudQuote:
Originally Posted by devidee
lol, yep.
Can somebody tell CNN to stop going hard on the story that Kavanaugh once threw some ice during a bar fight when he was practically still a kid.
Like I fully support their campaign to prevent the religious freak from gaining scary power. But c'mon, this line of attack has to be counterproductive in the fight to keep him out.
Also, I'm flabbergasted that there are people on here who are actively rooting for this cunt to rule over them.
What he stands for is outdated garbage and you should be ashamed.
Muslims with whiter teeth is what you are.
Land of the Freaks.
@realDonaldTrump
According to Bill O'Reilly, 80% of all the shootings in New York City are blacks-if you add Hispanics, that figure goes to 98%. 1% white.
My God!
My King.
Ah, nice. The classic druff “shes not even rapeable bro” defense.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99Is that legit her HS yearbook photo? If so....I mean....c’mon.Quote:
Originally Posted by devideeIs he innocent?
LULLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
But what *is* relevant is that he has repeatedly lied to cover up whatever he is clearly embarrassed about. I’ve have modicum of respect for the lying entitled assmunch if he Trump-style fessed up to excessive drinking and belligerent drunkenness back in the day.Quote:
Originally Posted by JayjamiAs an attorney who believes in a liberal interpretation of the Constitution, I am no fan of Kavanaugh, but stuff that happened in college (unless a serious crime was committed) is not relevant to his nomination. It is the president’s prerogative to appoint someone, if he or she is qualified (which he is), that should be the end of the inquiry. On the other hand, this should only be Trump’s first nomination. Let’s not forget McConnell wouldn’t even hold hearings on Obama’s choice (Garland - a solid nomination) for almost 300 days.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord of the Fraud
Because regardless of how trivial his transgressions from back then might be today, his lying under oath to the Senate about not discussing Ramirez’s allegations before they became public, and specifically to attempt to surreptitiously corral potential witnesses to back him up when he publicly denies it, — meaning, he perjured himself *and* attempted witness tampering — should be a death knell to his appointment to SCOTUS.
If the hideous face fits...Quote:
Originally Posted by varysAh, nice. The classic druff “shes not even rapeable bro” defense.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
2 Of Brett Kavanaugh’s Former Classmates Withdraw Support For Him
“We fear that partisanship has injected itself into Judge Kavanaugh’s candidacy,” write Michael J. Proctor and Mark Osler.
:sftrueQuote:
Proctor and Osler were among 23 classmates of Kavanaugh’s at Yale Law School who signed a letter in August pledging their support for his confirmation. At the time, they cited his “exemplary judicial temperament” as a reason for their support. But after watching Kavanaugh’s explosive behavior in his confirmation hearing as he addressed the sexual assault allegation against him by Christine Blasey Ford, the two former classmates say they can’t stand by him in his Supreme Court bid.
“The reason for our withdrawal is not the truth or falsity of Dr. Ford’s allegations, which are still being investigated, but rather was the nature of Judge Kavanaugh’s testimony,” they write. “In our view that testimony was partisan, and not judicious, and inconsistent with what we expect from a Justice of the Supreme Court, particularly when dealing with a co-equal branch of government.”
Definately a cuck if u believed Ford. And tbh definately a cuck if u believe anything the Democrats are trying to do
Quote:
Originally Posted by MumblesBadly
nobody cares, faggot. just stop trying.
A lot of people care, fortunately, and I agree, the last thing I want to seeQuote:
Originally Posted by DJ_ChapsQuote:
Originally Posted by MumblesBadly
nobody cares, faggot. just stop trying.
standing before the court is some wigged out pussy.
Crying? Really?
I bet during the hearing, all 3 of mumblesbadly, sonatine, and limitles got so hard they decided to start a devil's triangle and began boofing each other. You could hear them saying, "Believe all women!", "Trump and Kavanaugh are both rapists!", and "Not my SCOTUS or POTUS!!!"
***SPECIAL INVESTIGATION***
Trump Engaged in Suspect Tax Schemes as He Reaped Riches From His Father
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...red-trump.html
Trump engaged in “dubious tax schemes” and “FRAUD” in the 1990s to grow the fortune he inherited from his father.
* Trump is NOT a “self-made billionaire.”
*** This is why Trump didn’t release his taxes.
https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-1SYmm9HTT...y-photos-1.jpg
some of us care and you're the faggotQuote:
Originally Posted by DJ_ChapsQuote:
Originally Posted by MumblesBadly
nobody cares, faggot. just stop trying.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheXFactor
Never seen such a clear case of disinformation in my life. Shit like that would be enough to make even the Russians blush.
100% that has come from Team Kavanaugh and I fully expect garbage media outlets such as Fox News to run hard with it.
Doubt even the retards over on CNN would nibble on that obvious bait.
edit:
Byron YorkVerified account
@ByronYork
Chief political correspondent, Washington Examiner, Fox News contributor, author of The Vast Left Wing Conspiracy
Haha, fuck sake!
What needs to happen, is a bitch with impeccable credibility (like a judge or something) to come out and tearfully claim that, while in Yale, Kavanaugh drunkenly stumbled into her room and finger blasted her virgin pussy until it began squirting blood.
She would automatically become the hero which America desperately needs right now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheXFactor
The funniest part of all this is he wasn't the only one who did this
:lol4
Quote:
Originally Posted by MintjewlipsQuote:
Originally Posted by TheXFactor
The funniest part of all this is he wasn't the only one who did this
:lol4
he was, however, the one who was stupid enough to run for public office after doing this.
:baddecision
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheXFactor
there isnt a single allegation against him in there. that was a very vague email. or was that the point of sharing it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ_ChapsQuote:
Originally Posted by TheXFactor
there isnt a single allegation against him in there. that was a very vague email. or was that the point of sharing it?
im not sure you understand what the supreme court is or how candidates are vetted, or what vetting is.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatineQuote:
Originally Posted by DJ_Chaps
im not sure you understand what the supreme court is or how candidates are vetted, or what vetting is.
im not sure you understand where "he went to yale, so he must have been there" ranks in terms of LOL.