*** Official Flying Stupidity Wagering thread ***

Shouldn't have tossed in that last-minute KC under. That one was crap the whole way.

The other two won easily. Now 17-3 since May 12.

Through 5/23: 58-43-2, +17.311 units

5/24:
at Tampa Bay (Snell) +110 vs. Boston (Porcello) - WON +1.100
Total: 1-0, +1.100 units

5/25:
Baltimore (Hess) at Tampa Bay (Romo) - Under 8.5 -120 - WON +0.833
Arizona (Corbin) +122 at Oakland (Manaea) - WON +1.220
Kansas City (Skoglund) at Texas (Minor) - Under 9.5 -110 - LOST -1
Total: 2-1, +1.053 units

5/24-5/25 total: 3-1, +2.153 units

GRAND TOTAL: 61-44-2, +19.464 units

Overs: 2-3
Spread (-1.5): 2-1
Unders: 36-22-2
Moneyline: 21-18 (a good deal ahead in units due to mostly underdogs)

loving the new avatar tbone

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lol wow

loving the new avatar tbone

---

Did you wear any of these shirts in 1988?

i was 4

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lol wow

i was 4

---

WTF, I thought you were an old man

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lol wow

i was 4

---

WTF, I thought you were an old man

---

He is. He was born in 1984

After you're done going to yard sales today maybe change your avatar?

Avatar isn't changing.

BITE EM BACK!!!!

Here is a Trapper John MD pick for the day (that is, an opposite of the trap line).

Starting in about 20 minutes (1:10pm PDT). Enjoy!

White Sox (H. Santiago) +103 at Detroit (F. Liriano)


Considering Giants under for a bit later today. Stay tuned.

Well that's not a good start.

Candelario homers in the 1st, 2-0 Detroit.

White Sox looking good in the bottom of the 6th, up 7-3.

Decided to pass on Giants under.

However, I am now looking at Dodgers under. Will post between now and game time (which is at 7:10pm) whether I go for it. The line is 7, and I don't particularly like under 7s, but this might be an exception.

White Sox took it down.

One more for the evening, starting at 7:10pm:

San Diego (Lyles) at Dodgers (Wood) - Under 7 -105

Every bookmaker in the world has a footling hardon right now.

If the Rockets pull this off it will go down as a HUGE win

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

White Sox took it down.

One more for okthe evening, starting at 7:10pm:

San Diego (Lyles) at Dodgers (Wood) - Under 7 -105

---

Ok I have missed your streak. Jumping on this one. GL to us.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Charham

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

White Sox took it down.

One more for okthe evening, starting at 7:10pm:

San Diego (Lyles) at Dodgers (Wood) - Under 7 -105

---

Ok I have missed your streak. Jumping on this one. GL to us.

---

If you didn't jump on any part of my 18-3 streak and then lose this one, you might need to quit sportsbetting.

Not the best start.... 2-1 in the top of the 2nd (now top of the 3rd, same score).

Wood isn't looking particularly good. Though in his defense, the 2 runs scored thanks to a 2-run HR by Galvis which kinda just carried down the LF line and barely stayed fair.

But you never know at Dodger Stadium in a night game. The ball dies out there, and neither team has been exactly tearing it up with the bat.

Well, we're fucked.

Sorry, Charham.

In the 5th and and 7 runs already.

This is why I hate under 7 picks. Honestly was very close to skipping this one. You never have much of an edge with under 7.

:gay

Here we go again. Every losing bet you make "you knew you shouldn't have bet", and every bet that would've been a winner that you passed on "you knew you should've bet".

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by spit this

Here we go again. Every losing bet you make "you knew you shouldn't have bet", and every bet that would've been a winner that you passed on "you knew you should've bet".

---

:this

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by spit this

Here we go again. Every losing bet you make "you knew you shouldn't have bet", and every bet that would've been a winner that you passed on "you knew you should've bet".

---

Go up and read. I commented on the "under 7" thing before the game started, and that being the reason I was on the fence about it (this was a few hours before it started, and I hadn't made the pick, but was just stating I might do it.)

"The line is 7, and I don't particularly like under 7s, but this might be an exception."

That was 4 hours before the game. I took another 2+ hours to decide to actually pick it.

They can have my money if it don't hit but I'm not bucking the trend here.

Celtics ML -140/Under 199.5