Printable View
This is true. Another striking thing is look how long some of those investigations lasted. And the Trump nut slurpers are complaining it's been a year already for this one. Boo fucking hop.Quote:
Originally Posted by MumblesBadly
Trump & Co are a gang of criminals, but the graphic showing no indictments, etc. stemming from the Whitewater investigation is far from accurate.Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkonger
Source:
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features...nd-whitewater/
PRESIDENT TRUMP: I said it the other day, yes, she is a low IQ individual, Maxine Waters. I said it the other day. High -- I mean, honestly, she's somewhere in the mid-60s, I believe that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tellafriend
The God King being extremely generous here.Quote:
Originally Posted by blakePRESIDENT TRUMP: I said it the other day, yes, she is a low IQ individual, Maxine Waters. I said it the other day. High -- I mean, honestly, she's somewhere in the mid-60s, I believe that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tellafriend
The problem with this, is that like a lot of the "media reporting" it is true, but is highly disingenuous. Most of those indictments are probably for Manafort's criminal, possibly treasonous, activities that happened mostly long before Trump and possibly independent of Trump and without his knowledge.Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkongerThis is true. Another striking thing is look how long some of those investigations lasted. And the Trump nut slurpers are complaining it's been a year already for this one. Boo fucking hop.Quote:
Originally Posted by MumblesBadly
Trump & Co are a gang of criminals, but the graphic showing no indictments, etc. stemming from the Whitewater investigation is far from accurate.
Source:
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features...nd-whitewater/
The way things are going, it seems very likely a bunch of people are going to be indicted and probably convicted (either in court or plea deals) for a bunch of white collar crimes of varying degree (as Trump and most of us associates are surely white collar criminals), and none of it is going to lead towards any indication Trump was knowingly colluding with Russian agents against the US, and the media through its biased "reporting" is doing its best to obfuscate this very possible reality.
54 documented mistruths spouted by Trump in a week, new record.
Dan Rather on with Don Lemon just slaps donny sideways. Worst Presidency he's witnessesd
http://youtu.be/PjI_wCEsKCw
Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaardThe problem with this, is that like a lot of the "media reporting" it is true, but is highly disingenuous. Most of those indictments are probably for Manafort's criminal, possibly treasonous, activities that happened mostly long before Trump and possibly independent of Trump and without his knowledge.Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkonger
The way things are going, it seems very likely a bunch of people are going to be indicted and probably convicted (either in court or plea deals) for a bunch of white collar crimes of varying degree (as Trump and most of us associates are surely white collar criminals), and none of it is going to lead towards any indication Trump was knowingly colluding with Russian agents against the US, and the media through its biased "reporting" is doing its best to obfuscate this very possible reality.
you should be aware that the new republican public posture here is to back up what rudy said; trump colluded and so what if he did?
which is to say, whatever "media" ship you think is responsible for that narrative was beaten to port by the republicans themselves.
oh also lest anyone forget
It's very sad to see very ignorant people discuss this whole Trump impeachment thing.
- The economy is great.
- It will be proven probably Trump JR did some shady shit and met with a Russian which nobody cares about
- The economy is great
- There will be some angle that Donald tried to protect his kid from prosecution
- The economy is great
This is about the deadest issue you can find with the American electorate outside Global Warming.
The Republicans were late to figure this out in the 90s, now the Dems are: It's the economy stupid.
Also, for all you impeachment hawks it takes 67 Senators to convict, never, never happen.
Suckers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Draymond
Figures you'd believe in Donald Trump
Pathological liar and you believe him??????
Throwing reporters out.....what's next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by limitlesQuote:
Originally Posted by Draymond
Figures you'd believe in Donald Trump
Pathological liar and you believe him??????
Throwing reporters out.....what's next?
You don't live in this country envy boy. Nobody and I mean nobody cares about Canada unless they are flying over it or it's Olympic hockey.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DraymondQuote:
Originally Posted by limitles
Figures you'd believe in Donald Trump
Pathological liar and you believe him??????
Throwing reporters out.....what's next?
You don't live in this country envy boy. Nobody and I mean nobody cares about Canada unless they are flying over it or it's Olympic hockey.
You traitors still treasoning it up in here?
This is your daddy figure-
"I have great respect for the U.K. United Kingdom. Great respect. People call it Britain. They call it Great Britain. They used to call it England, different parts."
-Donald J. Trump
August 2, 2018
https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/sta...66892468789248
He was fucking IN ENGLAND 3 weeks ago. And he doesn't know this stuff. He said this the week after his visit-
"We would make a great deal with the United Kingdom because they have product that we like. I mean they have a lot of great product. They make phenomenal things, you know, and you have different names — you can say “England,” you can say “UK,” you can say “United Kingdom” so many different — you know you have, you have so many different names — Great Britain. I always say: “Which one do you prefer? Great Britain? You understand what I’m saying?"
In the 2 weeks since then, nobody has explained to him very basic things about the United Kingdom, one of our closest allies. Or if they have, he hasn't retained any of that information.
And you worship this guy.
^^^^ lolol
If Trump posted on here anonymously he'd be ridiculed more than Spartard.
:facepalm4Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtyB
Name three respected individuals related to the media over time that you would listen to.Quote:
Originally Posted by limitles
And what American with any means is not selling a book?
In the media business it’s called “doing the rounds” when you’ve just written a book. He needs to sell the darn thing so of course he’s going to claim the Trump Presidency is the worst ever, that’s the nararative he’s selling in his book. Going on CNN and talking about the booming economy, record unemployment and the skyrocketing stock market won’t move units.Quote:
Originally Posted by limitlesName three respected individuals related to the media over time that you would listen to.Quote:
Originally Posted by limitles
And what American with any means is not selling a book?
Answer the question, or do you not know of any?Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99In the media business it’s called “doing the rounds” when you’ve just written a book. He needs to sell the darn thing so of course he’s going to claim the Trump Presidency is the worst ever, that’s the nararative he’s selling in his book. Going on CNN and talking about the booming economy, record unemployment and the skyrocketing stock market won’t move units.Quote:
Originally Posted by limitles
What question?Quote:
Originally Posted by limitlesAnswer the question, or do you not know of any?Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
Name three respected individuals related to the media over time that you would listen to.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99What question?Quote:
Originally Posted by limitles
And what American with any means is not selling a book?
And also for Biff: do you still live in Canada or are you an immigrant?
The first part of his post is not a question it is a request.Quote:
Originally Posted by duped_samaritanName three respected individuals related to the media over time that you would listen to.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
And what American with any means is not selling a book?
And also for Biff: do you still live in Canada or are you an immigrant?
The second part is clearly a rhetorical question.
However, I just wanted to know if limitles realizes that Bernstein was at one time a respected journalist but pretty much everyone agrees he is now just a liberal apologist. The guy wrote an entire book praising Hillary Clinton for goodness sakes.
As far as three journalists I respect I don’t know, I could list a few but they are all conservative leaning folks who you would just bash so what’s the point.
quick reminder folks that the democrats are a joke party and will blow this again
Harris blasts critics of 'identity politics'
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/...olitics-762254
Sen. Kamala Harris accused critics of “identity politics” of weaponizing the term to diminish issues of race, gender and sexual orientation, pressing Democrats on Friday to address those issues head on.
“I have a problem, guys, with that phrase, ‘identity politics,’” Harris told the progressive gathering Netroots Nation, wading into a messaging debate roiling Democrats ahead of the midterm elections. “Because let’s be clear, when people say that, it’s a pejorative. That phrase is used to divide, and it is used to distract. Its purpose is to minimize and marginalize issues that impact all of us. It is used to try and shut us up.”
Harris, one of the Democratic Party’s top 2020 presidential prospects, said Democrats “won’t be shut up, and we won’t be silenced.”
Do you still live in Canada or are you an immigrant?Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99The first part of his post is not a question it is a request.Quote:
Originally Posted by duped_samaritan
The second part is clearly a rhetorical question.
However, I just wanted to know if limitles realizes that Bernstein was at one time a respected journalist but pretty much everyone agrees he is now just a liberal apologist. The guy wrote an entire book praising Hillary Clinton for goodness sakes.
As far as three journalists I respect I don’t know, I could list a few but they are all conservative leaning folks who you would just bash so what’s the point.
Amazing the dumb shit the media latches onto these days.
This week it was mocking Trump for saying that you need ID to purchase groceries.
Trump isn't exactly the Great Communicator, but clearly he meant here that you often need ID if you use a credit card when purchasing groceries, and was trying to say that it's ridiculous that you need to show ID to make a small credit card purchase, but not to vote.Quote:
Originally Posted by Donald Trump
While Trump definitely didn't put this one eloquently, it's clear to anyone with a functioning brain what he meant. Only a complete moron would believe that Trump was saying that you need to use an ID to buy everyday groceries with cash.
His point actually isn't bad. In support of voter ID laws, he pointed out that it's legal for grocery stores to make you show ID to make a small credit card purchase, and that he finds it ridiculous that something far more important and essential to the country (voting) requires no ID.
Trump says and does so many stupid things. Why does the media take him out of context and harp on him over trivialities?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
why did bush knock down those towers?
Yeah it's every day not every week that he put's his mouth in it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
He's the leader of your country and yet he doesn't know Ireland is not part of the U.K.
Didn't know Scotland voted against Brexit. On and on and on.
And wouldn't the Republicans love to have voter I.D. attached to credit card ownership.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
This is why your site is run at a loss.
You truly believe what he spews. Or, you try and believe it. I am not sure which.
In middle and high school, we had to show ID to vote for ASB / student council. It's ludicrous you don't have to show ID when voting. Might be an unpopular opinion, but I'd also be in favor of requiring voters to not be on any government assistance (like food stamps and whatnot), to prevent the people from voting in favor of giving themselves more free crap at the expense of others.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Fucking Mossad.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatineQuote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
why did bush knock down those towers?
You might just as well said you're a toolbox.....ffs. LOTF is right. Inbred, uneducated fat fucks.Quote:
Originally Posted by RS_In middle and high school, we had to show ID to vote for ASB / student council. It's ludicrous you don't have to show ID when voting. Might be an unpopular opinion, but I'd also be in favor of requiring voters to not be on any government assistance (like food stamps and whatnot), to prevent the people from voting in favor of giving themselves more free crap at the expense of others.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Quote:
Originally Posted by RS_
Of course this is the correct answer. It's too late unfortunately. The framers had it right with their intent: that stakeholders should be the ones making policy decisions, especially when they were the ones paying for them. It is absurd to think that someone who contributes nothing should have the same vote as someone who is contributing to the greater good. Just think that the welfare moms popping 4-8 babies out for checks will have that many more future votes for how our nation will proceed than your family which is smaller b/c you made responsible choices. What a joke we have become. But here we are: handout nation. Human nature will lead us to the inevitable result of bankruptcy, not only in the financial sense but also the moral one.
Quote:
Originally Posted by limitles
Less we forget:
FFS! A credit card can be used at millions of business locations! Heck! They can even used with a device attached to a smart phone! But a citizen can only use their vote in the precinct they are registered to vote. And when someone votes, their name is checked against the voter roll.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Right wingers who hate that minorities overwhelmingly tend to vote Democratic are just putting up costly roadblocks for legitimate citizens to vote, people who were born here and lived without a picture ID card for decades. And the rightwing talking heads who say that it doesn’t cost anything or much to get the paperwork required for someome to get a state-insued ID card are lying through their teeth. They *know* that poor folks face costlu hurdles to getting such paperwork, be it actual money or a lot of time lost from work.
So nobody on social security, Medicare, nobody taking the mortgage interest deduction, no farmers using federally subsidized irrigation, nobody who uses the Internet, nobody working in an industry where Trump has imposed protective tariffs, nobody taking the child tax credit, none of the rich donors claiming charitable tax credits, no real estate industry people taking advantage of their special tax credits (Trump), right? Those are all forms of public assistance. The list is endless. There is not one person in America who isn't on some form of public assistance. There won't be anybody left to vote.Quote:
Originally Posted by RS_In middle and high school, we had to show ID to vote for ASB / student council. It's ludicrous you don't have to show ID when voting. Might be an unpopular opinion, but I'd also be in favor of requiring voters to not be on any government assistance (like food stamps and whatnot), to prevent the people from voting in favor of giving themselves more free crap at the expense of others.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
If it could get any worse/better, Tom Arnold claims to have tapes of Trump and info regarding Russia
and he get's a series on Vice coming soon. He was sued by Cohen/Trump trying to hush him up. I love Tom Arnold
http://youtu.be/p9eWDKh0LU8
im sure when arnold's special airs, roseanne is going to do a live hour long interview on fox about how tom likes a finger up his ass when hes getting blown and take a limo directly from the studio to her new job as white house comms director once its over.
Page 1554 - "Poor people shouldn't get the vote."
ITT, can we say we've heard it all now?
you don't have to come in here spewing the H word and saying racist shit like "n-words are too stupid and poor to get a photo ID"Quote:
Originally Posted by MumblesBadly
let me put it this way: if you don't have your shit together enough to have a photo ID, you don't have the faculties to make an informed decision at the voting booth. if you want fair elections without cheating, fraud or any sideways shit voter ID laws make sense. the idea that voter ID is racist is actually racist. you think brown people are less capable of procuring ID's. that's cool that you think that, I agree, but it's racist as fuck. i thought all the uneducated trash with no money voted for Republicans anyways. let's make voter ID mandatory so dumbass whites with no ID's can't elect Drumph in 2020
We still haven't heard put blacks back into slavery. O/U on that is page 1700.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord of the Fraud