She is going to win every state except Texas. You can believe that.
Printable View
She is going to win every state except Texas. You can believe that.
No there's a few other bass ackward places Trump will win. States that get huge subsidies for their ranching and mining and oil drilling from the federal government via taxes on the blue states' productivity and innovation, then turn around and grumble about big government and the welfare state.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sidewinder
:lol
I read that you don't live in the United States, is this true?Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkongerNo there's a few other bass ackward places Trump will win. States that get huge subsidies for their ranching and mining and oil drilling from the federal government via taxes on the blue states' productivity and innovation, then turn around and grumble about big government and the welfare state.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sidewinder
:lol
I'm American and grew up there and vote absentee, but I don't live there currently, that's correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by MintjewlipsI read that you don't live in the United States, is this true?Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkonger
Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkongerI'm American and grew up there and vote absentee, but I don't live there currently, that's correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mintjewlips
This explains your asinine view on the American tax system. Maybe you have just been gone too long.
:lol2
His campaign managers are exasperated.Quote:
Originally Posted by blakeif trump actually had the ability to stay on message, he might have a chance, but yeah his speeches are just so fucking odd.Quote:
Originally Posted by TheXFactor
even yesterday, when he was reading off prepared notes in endorsing paul ryan, he began the whole thing by going on and on about this crying baby he kicked out of one of his rallies. seriously, it was like 15 minutes of it. I'm not a trump fan, but why was bringing this shit up? it was fucking bizarre
I agree that he could have possibly beaten Hillary if he made a transformation for the general election, stopped being outrageous, and stayed on message.
He doesn't seem capable of doing so.
This won't happen again in the US any time soon. The days of 1984 when Reagan won 49 of 50 states are over.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sidewinder
The country is very red/blue divided right now. People are less likely to vote for the other party than they were before.
There will be certain states reliably Republican and certain other states reliably Democrat for the foreseeable future.
Trump could lose a few normally states where he lacks appeal to Republicans, including Arizona, Utah, Georgia, and North Carolina.
I can't believe everyone thinks this election over. I think Trump may make it close after a debate or two.
The GOP est has received so much TPP money (not to mention the GOP LOVES THE TPP). Republicans will turn on Trump again if he starts to make it a close race.
This election's the nuts from an entertainment perspective, there'll never be another this good. (good as in bad)ainec
My "asinine view" is based on FACTS. Blue states are net contributors to the federal treasury, red states are net takers. There are very few exceptions.Quote:
Originally Posted by MintjewlipsQuote:
Originally Posted by hongkonger
This explains your asinine view on the American tax system. Maybe you have just been gone too long.
It doesn't matter where you live you can follow politics on this thing called the Internet.
You got to dance with them what brung you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan DruffHis campaign managers are exasperated.Quote:
Originally Posted by blake
I agree that he could have possibly beaten Hillary if he made a transformation for the general election, stopped being outrageous, and stayed on message.
He doesn't seem capable of doing so.
Is this a saddish dupe he's using to post what he really thinks?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sidewinder
No wonder they kicked out all the mad Bernie supporters, they were filming a Hillary ad.
Team Hillary did a good job on this ad. See, there was no division or protests at the DNC.
Warning: This video may cause you to like Hillary a tiny bit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgNP3g1Lwss
Massive coverup going on of Hillary's declining health.
http://youtu.be/OqbDBRWb63s
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan DruffHis campaign managers are exasperated.Quote:
Originally Posted by blake
I agree that he could have possibly beaten Hillary if he made a transformation for the general election, stopped being outrageous, and stayed on message.
He doesn't seem capable of doing so.
I hate to make a poker metaphor/simile, but Trump is just like an easy-come-easy-go, impatient poker player. He is not suddenly going to get "on message," because let's be honest, he doesn't have a message. Trump had no platform until he randomly started gaining traction and became the Republican front-runner. Then, he just doubled-down on what got him popularity; complaining about Obama and Mexican immigrants. This then morphed into capitalizing on the fear of Islamic terrorism, as disconnected attacks occurred more frequently and publicly in Europe and the US in 2016.
So, Trump became popular by not being managed too heavily. It seems Republicans are even getting tired of jerking off to soldiers and talking about god, and Trump capitalized on this by leveling criticism instead of chasing the "family values" Republican base of old.
But I do agree that Trump needs to focus on criticizing Hillary. This is something Ben Shapiro makes a good point about. Trump seems to find himself constantly scattering soundbites about crying babies and random fathers of dead soldiers, but he doesn't go after Hillary enough for the DNC leaks, lying about manipulating and deleting top secret emails, and various other cases of corruption in her past. Trump could turn this into the anyone-but-Hillary race, but is instead allowing the Democrats to turn this into the anyone-but-Trump race.
We shall see... Wikileaks still promised additional releases, which will reveal even more damning information about the Clintons and the collusion between the DNC and the mainstream media. We shall see if Trump capitalizes, because you already know most news outlets are going to bury the story after dismissing it as a Russian provocation.
Do you guys think Druff supports the TPP?
My guess is he's a strong supporter of the TPP but he'll downplay it for obv reasons.. At some point Druff's going to have to come to terms w the fact that him and Hillary are two peas in a pod.
Druff mark my words.
About half way thru Hill's first term you're going to have an epiphany. You and Hillary are politically identical, well almost identical.
ATENTION TRUMP SUPPORTERS:
If you really want Trump to win, perhaps you should step up to the plate and sign up at his website to make recurring donations.
Or not.
http://www.dailydot.com/layer8/cant-...-donald-trump/
P.S. You should probably ignore this article. It's obviously a libtard fabrication. So, jump over to his website and go big with that recurring amount! 'Cause he needs your help to build that wall! https://secure.donaldjtrump.com/donate/Quote:
But to all the unfortunate souls who set up recurring donations to the Trump campaign, good luck. According to one disgruntled donor, there's apparently no way to cancel your contributions to the Republican nominee. He also claims there’s no “cancel” option found on Trump’s website.
The message from the alleged donor, who claimed the Trump campaign has not returned repeated voicemails to cancel contributions, was posted to Twitter on Wednesday by CNN’s Jerry Diamond.
INBOX: Help, I set up a recurring contribution to Trump's campaign & want to cancel it: (cc: @realDonaldTrump) pic.twitter.com/TFOHhdZDlJ
— Jeremy Diamond (@JDiamond1) August 4, 2016
To test this, Mic set up a recurring donation of $1 to the Trump campaign and confirmed that the disgruntled donor was right.
Not only is there no obvious way to cancel payments, but donors also cannot remove a credit card from the system. Instead, there's only the option to switch to another credit card—and no, you can't just type in random numbers because invalid cards are rejected.
Mic reports that the only way to stop recurring donations to the Trump campaign is to cancel your credit card.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FPS_Russia
Druff is obviously a R.I.N.O Republican aka Rockefeller Republican.
I like Ike.Quote:
Originally Posted by MintjewlipsQuote:
Originally Posted by FPS_Russia
Druff is obviously a R.I.N.O Republican aka Rockefeller Republican.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkongerWould be a real LOL for AZ and GA to go Dem. VA is now solidly on the blue side of purple, NC is a perennial swing state. A few election cycles ago both were bright red. Republicans had better pull their heads out of their asses because they have long-term troubles ahead if they stay on their present course.Quote:
No chance GA goes Dem. Will wager $3000 on it giving 3/1 (my $3k vs your $1k for the slow). Action is closed with first taker or at 6:00pm today, whichever comes first.
Watch how fast Hongkonger logs off.Quote:
Originally Posted by TellafriendQuote:
Originally Posted by hongkonger
No chance GA goes Dem. Will wager $3000 on it giving 3/1 (my $3k vs your $1k for the slow). Action is closed with first taker or at 6:00pm today, whichever comes first.
filled as long as trump is candidate, escrow with druff as I have no idea who you are.Quote:
Originally Posted by TellafriendQuote:
Originally Posted by hongkonger
No chance GA goes Dem. Will wager $3000 on it giving 3/1 (my $3k vs your $1k for the slow). Action is closed with first taker or at 6:00pm today, whichever comes first.
I said it would be LOL. I've never thought GA would go Dem. I'm on your side of this bet.Quote:
Originally Posted by TellafriendQuote:
Originally Posted by hongkonger
No chance GA goes Dem. Will wager $3000 on it giving 3/1 (my $3k vs your $1k for the slow). Action is closed with first taker or at 6:00pm today, whichever comes first.
Hey retard, did I ever say GA would go Dem? No, I didn't. I would never bet on that.Quote:
Originally Posted by DraymondWatch how fast Hongkonger logs off.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tellafriend
I agree GA will probably stay red, unless Trump further melts down or drops out.Quote:
Originally Posted by TellafriendQuote:
Originally Posted by hongkonger
No chance GA goes Dem. Will wager $3000 on it giving 3/1 (my $3k vs your $1k for the slow). Action is closed with first taker or at 6:00pm today, whichever comes first.
The polls suggesting it could go Democat include a Hillary +4 from the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, but I'm not convinced.
I think that was the result of both the Dem convention bump and the stupid argument he had with that veteran's parents.
After the dust settles from these things, Trump will probably get back in the lead and take Georgia by 2 points or so.
Quote:
Originally Posted by monsterjfilled as long as trump is candidate, escrow with druff as I have no idea who you are.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tellafriend
Will do and will agree to stipulation that Trump is the candidate, otherwise action is void. We will both escrow with Druff. Let's agree to each have it to him within the next 10 days.
Trump isn't dropping out.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7102
To: Dillon, Lauren; Miranda, Luis
Cc: Corinne Matti Subject:
Re: Interview request Smaller Group: —We actually do quite a bit with the videos Akshai flags, just not in terms of complex communications products. Here’s what he does — Building The Trump File In Spanish: Akshai has built the research file that will remind Hispanics in 2016 and beyond of the Summer of Trump. Not deploying it during the primary was strategic, as these are some of the best possible punches. Why waste them on a diluted field. This narrative is strong if for the story we walk reporter through the making an oppo video, the moment we’ve been waiting for when we finally begin to deploy this incredible resources that Akshai has built as an invaluable member of DNC’s best-in-politics Research team. Institutional Knowledge in English: The turnover at Univision/Telemundo is really high. Overall institutional knowledge across the local affiliates in particular is extremely rare. Akshai may be the only person on either campaign who knows when, say, Telemundo Wisconsin correspondents move to Telemundo Chicago. This is a big deal for us, not only because it helps us proactively update our spreadsheets, but because the awareness reminds us to reach and congratulate them on their new role and see how DNC can continue to help in their new market. This deepens our relationship with reporters. Discovering News “Scoops” Bilingually: Univision and Telemundo follow, as opposed to make news. When they do make news, Akshai flags it and we collaborate on who from the “Preferred Bilinguals” press list can do the most with a given clip. "Preferred Bilinguals" are bilingual-enough election reporters who publish in English. "Bilinguals Preferred” list familiar with Akshai’s videos. We pitch them as “scoops” and “exclusives” because they haven’t been covered yet in English. The reporter for this piece gets them all the time. We can spin this a number of ways. Ultimately though the angle is the Story of Akshai to debut our latest Donald Trump oppo video. Can that work? Thanks! Pablo
From a leaked email from DNC operatives.
Here is just one example of DNC representatives literally giving some of the MSM talking points and suggestions to spin a story in favor of Hillary. The blatant corruption is so disgusting, the fact that anyone supports Hillary's illegitimate candidacy is disturbing. The myth of Donald Trump dropping out is obviously a fake story, its amazing how anyone can belive that garbage. Trump has literally lost hundreds of millions in potential profits and has spent millions of his own money to run for the presidency. That's like going all in pre flop and walking away from the table before all the cards are dealt.
And liberals are quick to point out how Donald is a conspiracy theorist for pointing out election fraud, when not long ago liberals were screaming conspiracy when the election was stolen from Gore in 2000. Wtf happened liberals? Seems like people have selective memory these days.
They all do that. Duh.
It's as if she got hit by a #TrumpTrain
:popcornQuote:
Originally Posted by Tyde
Yeah, GA will prolly stay with Trump. There are some places there where you can see giant versions of these on plagpoles visible from the interstates.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan DruffI agree GA will probably stay red, unless Trump further melts down or drops out.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tellafriend
The polls suggesting it could go Democat include a Hillary +4 from the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, but I'm not convinced.
I think that was the result of both the Dem convention bump and the stupid argument he had with that veteran's parents.
After the dust settles from these things, Trump will probably get back in the lead and take Georgia by 2 points or so.
Which reminds of the seatbelt road signs there.
Notice the similarity?
Also, notice how disfunctional a seatbelt like this would be?
:facepalm4
http://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/fashion/....w529.h352.jpg
The media keep saying that Trump is a bigger liar than Hillary.
How many of Trump's lies have gotten people killed?
I don't want an ape-like, daughter-loving, 1980's NYC real-estate tycoon as the POTUS, but I agree that Hillary clearly has bigger skeletons in her closet.Quote:
Originally Posted by TheXFactor
I would still bet that Trump has probably had a business meeting on the top floor of an almost completed skyscraper project that involved two henchman dangling a co-investor by his feet over the edge of the building, however I still think Hillary has some (additional) serious corruption allegations that are highly damning and quickly approaching and we are going to see a blatant demonstration of media bias (in the form of her lying being ignored) that will surpass the lead-up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq.
Frankly, even just the comparison of James Comey's testimony in front of Congress with Hillary's past and current statements about her email makes her a bigger liar. Even more damning, in my opinion, is the Loretta Lynch testimony where the collusion between State Department (Lynch) and the Clintons is as clear as day and no one can do anything about it, because the Clintons have appointed, or have great influence over, every person involved in any process that would seek to prosecute Hillary.
the latest blow to donald trump:
Report: CIA Veteran, Republican Wonk Evan McMullin to Enter Presidential Race
http://www.mediaite.com/election-201...idential-race/Quote:
Shortly after MSNBC’s Morning Joe announced that an independent conservative candidate could be launching a presidential campaign Monday, Buzzfeed reported the candidate in question was Republican policy staffer Evan McMullin.
McMullin, who is unmarried and has never held elected office, serves as chief policy director for House Republicans. He is a veteran of the CIA and holds an MBA from the Wharton School of Business. In addition to his eleven years in the CIA, he also worked with the United Nations vetting Middle Eastern refugees and worked for three years at Goldman Sachs.
McMullin reportedly has “the backing of serious Republican donors and fundraisers,” according to Buzzfeed. Aiding his campaign will be Rick Wilson, the GOP consultant who has emerged as one of the most fiery Trump critics this cycle.
Man shot for supporting Trump. Tolerant libs will probably say he deserved it.
http://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2016/...purs-shooting/
Armed drunk rednecks is usually the Republicans' bailiwick.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
oh and if you're wondering why evan mcmullin is getting in the race this late since he won't be on the ballot in half the states, the answer (though he won't admit it) is to swing utah (and possibly ohio) for hillary. mcmullin's a mormon from utah.
you're about to see a lot of electoral analyzes showing that trump could win ohio, florida and pennsylvania but still lose the election if he loses utah.
can't wait to see how many times trump uses the word "rigged" today
So if hills is actually suffering some debilitating illness and wins the election, that means bill will probably be the real POTUS ala Nancy during reagan's final years in office. Frankly I'm not seeing the problem. I rather enjoyed 1992-2000
whole lotta thisQuote:
Originally Posted by hongkonger