Printable View
Any good Mexican food in SD?Quote:
Originally Posted by Mintjewlips
Quote:
Originally Posted by blake
I'm not "secretly" Mexican wtf, lol, I'm proud of my heritage but, I can't lie to myself and pretend the world works like a Hollywood script written by some naive libtard, I'm not gonna go full Kilgore and post my ID but I'm not hiding in anonymity, people who need to know who I am, know who I am.....js......
Quote:
Originally Posted by blakeQuote:
Originally Posted by Mintjewlips
Quote:
Originally Posted by devidee
Lol what does nita think tho?.....
They can apply for a travel visa at any consulate, and once they enter the country legally may apply for asylum. Or just go to a port of entry. Much easier, safer, and cost effective.Quote:
Originally Posted by gimmickNope. You have to be inside US borders to apply for an asylum.Quote:
Originally Posted by devidee
But the keeeeeeeeeeeeeeeds!!!
https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/r...-united-states
"To obtain asylum through the affirmative asylum process you must be physically present in the United States. You may apply for asylum status regardless of how you arrived in the United States or your current immigration status."
Also...
"Affirmative asylum applicants are rarely detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). You may live in the United States while your application is pending before USCIS. If you are found ineligible, you can remain in the United States while your application is pending with the Immigration Judge. Most asylum applicants are not authorized to work."
...DHS really need to update their stuff.
Quote:
Originally Posted by devideeThey can apply for a travel visa at any consulate, and once they enter the country legally may apply for asylum. Or just go to a port of entry. Much easier, safer, and cost effective.Quote:
Originally Posted by gimmick
I guess the next logical question becomes what % of Mexicans seeking travel visas are approved? I literally have no idea. Logically, if you were looking to come and stay even illegally, if a large % of travel visas are approved, it would be idiotic not to go that route unless the US rejects travel visas from Mexico at a high %.
Like why are Mexicans paying coyotes their life savings to get them and their family across the border in a 130 degree Uhaul if they can just apply for a travel visa saying they are going to Disneyland and then simply stay?
Is the travel visa for a Mexican who isn’t uber-wealthy almost always denied? I’ve seen a multitude of accounts of Mexicans paying like $10k, which is a boatload to a Mexican, to some coyote to smuggle their family across the border under dangerous conditions. Why aren’t they just skipping down to the consulate and getting a travel visa and walking across with no danger? Seems there has to be a catch. And I don’t mind if the US is denying 99.9% of travel visas because I imagine most of the people would be coming to just overstay, but it renders that argument disingenuous if they reject most. If they don’t, it seems retarded they aren’t coming that way already.
As usual, if there is an easy and convenient way, it's being used. If it's not being used, it's probably for a reason. Considering that asylum is life-and-death type of a deal i'd hazard a guess that asylum seekers have looked into the options they have. Tourist visa is the most convenient way. Also impossible for most asylum seekers.Quote:
Originally Posted by BCRQuote:
Originally Posted by devidee
I guess the next logical question becomes what % of Mexicans seeking travel visas are approved? I literally have no idea. Logically, if you were looking to come and stay even illegally, if a large % of travel visas are approved, it would be idiotic not to go that route unless the US rejects travel visas from Mexico at a high %.
Like why are Mexicans paying coyotes their life savings to get them and their family across the border in a 130 degree Uhaul if they can just apply for a travel visa saying they are going to Disneyland and then simply stay?
Is the travel visa for a Mexican who isn’t uber-wealthy almost always denied? I’ve seen a multitude of accounts of Mexicans paying like $10k, which is a boatload to a Mexican, to some coyote to smuggle their family across the border under dangerous conditions. Why aren’t they just skipping down to the consulate and getting a travel visa and walking across with no danger? Seems there has to be a catch. And I don’t mind if the US is denying 99.9% of travel visas because I imagine most of the people would be coming to just overstay, but it renders that argument disingenuous if they reject most. If they don’t, it seems retarded they aren’t coming that way already.
http://www.alllaw.com/articles/nolo/...um-border.html
Currently quite a few ports of entry at the southern border are at capacity.
https://eu.azcentral.com/story/news/...asy/710796002/
I doubt asylum seekers make a huge portion of illegal entries. From the caravan Trump was worried about a while ago 230 applied for asylum at the port of entry.
(((fake news)))
This morning at the breakfast table my 7 year old daughter asked me:
“Dad, if Strzok tampered with the 302’s wouldn’t that necessitate Mueller’s investigation immediately being shut down and charges against those Strzok questioned dismissed with prejudice?”
How do I even begin to answer that question?
(((Raising children in Trump's America)))
They only separated kids 5 and up. When they are practically juvenile delinquents. That was in the news few days ago. When Trump administration was still going with the story that it's impossible to keep kids with their parents. The laws that democrats imposed on the poor republicans that forced their hands. Except when they remembered that no such law exists.Quote:
Originally Posted by devidee
(((fake news)))
The policy that Trump administration started in April only applied to some of the kids, because reasons.
Not only were the poor Repiblicans forced into it by the Democrats, they couldn't do anything about it because they only control the House, the Senate, the presidency and the Supreme Court.Quote:
Originally Posted by gimmickThey only separated kids 5 and up. When they are practically juvenile delinquents. That was in the news few days ago. When Trump administration was still going with the story that it's impossible to keep kids with their parents. The laws that democrats imposed on the poor republicans that forced their hands. Except when they remembered that no such law exists.Quote:
Originally Posted by devidee
(((fake news)))
The policy that Trump administration started in April only applied to some of the kids, because reasons.
That is an outright lie. There are kids less than a year old in cages. Trump Hotels=Baby Prisons
http://www.baltimoresun.com/entertai...621-story.html
How is it fake news? like she knew she wasn't going to be separated, that face is pure terror
and will always be associated w/Trump.
Trump will be gone some day, and like Obama, he will be a ghost....
......................& if you are still on the TrumpTrain after this week, you are going to have to explain that to someone you love, someday.
.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gimmickThey only separated kids 5 and up. When they are practically juvenile delinquents. That was in the news few days ago. When Trump administration was still going with the story that it's impossible to keep kids with their parents. The laws that democrats imposed on the poor republicans that forced their hands. Except when they remembered that no such law exists.Quote:
Originally Posted by devidee
(((fake news)))
The policy that Trump administration started in April only applied to some of the kids, because reasons.
the other day a black woman screeched to a halt in the middle of the road at a park I was playing disc golf at, put it in park, got out leaving the door open and car running, and started running and yelling at some other black lady who was at the park about fighting (couldn't understand most of the words, it was basically like "i found you bitch where you gon go now". she's trying to run, but fat. out of the passenger seat comes a kid maybe 12, and out of the back seat a smaller kid maybe 7 and a toddler, maybe 3 or 4. they all go running to catch up with mommy to help fight. her mercury sable is still running in the middle of the road, now empty with 3 doors wide open. the other bitch they were out to jump gets in her Tahoe and drives away as fast as it could, and the first black lady with the kids is all like "oh hell naw" and she starts fatly running back to her car and he little kids follow. I'll cut to the chase: the toddler didn't make it back into the car before she sped off trying to catch the other "lady" to fight her in front of her kids. the look on that toddler's face? it didn't care. thankfully the mom did turn around and remember the kid. she drove off super fast after putting the toddler into the carseatless back seat. she was probably late to work
The part I don't believe is the part about going to work.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zap_the_Fractions_Giraffe
where does a black guys wife hide the welfare check so he can't cash it and buy crack?
under his work boots
[QUOTE=big dick;778723]where does a black guys wife hide the welfare check so he can't cash it and buy crack?
There not married, THERE all baby mommas..
Same goes with Mexicans. There isn't paperwork about there marriages and also with Arabs..
And the stupid Americans who try to live off a paycheck and pay for housing want too raise taxes on themselves..lol
My 7 year old daughter made a comment to me yesterday while we were on the gun range:
"It strikes me as odd that we see children taken from their families at the same time we see other children protesting to take away our guns. If the federales wanted to take me
*Chambers a round*
they'd have to make it past my AR-15 first."
I'm sure they could manage if they needed to.Quote:
Originally Posted by devidee
Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedish
Says the guy who spends everyday giving internet blowjobs to a cheeto dick compulsive liar. Anyhow the above doesn't miraculously wash away the stain of child abuse that's on Trump and his douchebag supporters like you.
Not to absolve Trump at all, the problem is our media are so biased and compromised, we don't have a clue what is really going on, or what improprieties/crimes he has actually committed. You could watch coverage of the immigrant border issue on CNN and MSNBC for 200 hours straight and you not only won't have a clue what the truth is, but you will have a very inaccurate idea of what is going on. And this is intentional and it is a huge problem.
Unless you are a left wing (or in fairness right wing) ideologue and have no perception of reality yourself, you realize the media is so corrupt and biased they can't ever be trusted, so you don't know what to believe.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rum dickQuote:
Originally Posted by thesidedish
Says the guy who spends everyday giving internet blowjobs to a cheeto dick compulsive liar. Anyhow the above doesn't miraculously wash away the stain of child abuse that's on Trump and his douchebag supporters like you.
:lol
Why u so offended "not a libtard"
SHOW UR HAND MUCH??
Quote:
Tyde: I hope Trump deports you and your entire family you worthless Mexican POS....now go put on your faggoty brown shorts and get to work. Lowlife beaner scumbag
this makes a lot of sense to me. point blank; if McDoctors are flooding your community with hillbilly heroin with total and absolute impunity, youre going to gravitate towards the 'law and order' candidate. and democrats have never been 'law and order' candidates because at the core of the party lies a certain anti-establishment, anti-authority, counter-culture ethos, which is exactly why bernie technically won the nomination until establishment dems freaked out completely and nope'd his ass off the ticket.Quote:
and for the record i dont think hillary or bernie would have accomplished more than trump has on this front, but of course they would have at least gotten the optics right and not made a joke appointment like conway to head up a fake task force.
like literally for hillary to have done worse, she would have had to dig up tom petty's corpse and appoint it the head of the DEA.
Sometimes I wonder if sonatine believes his own shit.........sometimes........
Isnt the reverse also true?Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
Regardless it was ironic
It's a free fucking country. If they don't want to serve her, there isnthenfucking door. It cuts both ways.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
if you guys arent in this thread to poke team retard with meme sticks, you're not living your best life. thats all im saying.
https://www.indystar.com/story/news/...-now/77290068/
fags ordered rainbow cookies, the shop didn't have rainbow icing, a whole shitstorm happened and the business reputation was severely damaged. i know the founder/owner of this business IRL. not homophobe at all, they tried to destroy his business becasue they didn't make a certain kind of cookie. just look at yelp reviews, people are still leaving 1 star reviews years after the fact
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES FROM ORANGE COUNTY MEMES
approaching washed up status my friend??
Actually, according to SCOTUS precedents, there are “protected classes” of people that it is illegal for a business to discriminate against, such as based on race, creed, etc. But morally repugnant defenders of Trump aren’t such a class.Quote:
Originally Posted by DalyIt's a free fucking country. If they don't want to serve her, there isnthenfucking door. It cuts both ways.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
Quote:
Originally Posted by MumblesBadlyActually, according to SCOTUS precedents, there are “protected classes” of people that it is illegal for a business to discriminate against, such as based on race, creed, etc. But morally repugnant defenders of Trump aren’t such a class.Quote:
Originally Posted by Daly
I must say if u want a play by play, when I saw "MumblesBadly" start a supposed profound thought with "actually the SCOTUS" my face defined disappointment and could have been meme. seriously the epitome of being discouraged at life look FK U
But he's correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedishQuote:
Originally Posted by MumblesBadly
I must say if u want a play by play, when I saw "MumblesBadly" start a supposed profound thought with "actually the SCOTUS" my face defined disappointment and could have been meme. seriously the epitome of being discouraged at life look FK U
Sanders getting kicked out of a restaurant really makes me laugh. It just exposes republicans as snowflakes. All the so called tough republicans now attacking this establishment. They are getting crank calls, fake reviews--etc This should be a non story. Republican playbook 101 come up with catchy names to call people when you resemble what you call others. toughen up buttercup
The article you cited suggests otherwiseQuote:
Originally Posted by Zap_the_Fractions_Giraffe
But what drew attention to the situation was the response from the other owner, who said he did not feel comfortable preparing a special order for a group that endorsed homosexual activity, according to The Star's archives.
/
Exactly. They celebrated when the SCotUS let them refuse service to gay people. People who associate themselves with Trump better get used to this.Quote:
Originally Posted by ltrainkoja
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...&v=3xyPFfozPDE
Luls, the state of the FBI ... and #libtards101