Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dan Druff
I am okay with anything with a proven, long-term safety profile to be forced on kids.
I am not okay with a rushed vaccine with no known long-term safety profile to be forced on kids.
Are you having a hard time seeing the tremendous difference here?
Note that I keep saying LONG TERM. You can only know the LONG TERM once the long term has passed. This is especially true regarding developing kids. With someone like me, it's much more likely that no short term adverse effects means no long term adverse effects. With kids, there's all sorts of things which can go wrong, so you need to be really careful what you inject into them.
So what are we going to gain from this? If COVID isn't a problem in California schools, why are we forcing this? Shouldn't the past 11 weeks be pretty obvious that a ton of unvaccinated kids together indoors for hours isn't producing a problem?
What's the definition of proven? You do realize your definition is different than mine which is different than an anti vax parent right? So what's defined as proven?
Whatever the definition, you're ok with "proven" vaccines being mandated on children? No parent choice?
Let's say this goes on for 5 more years, so you have 5 more years of data. Will you consider it proven then? Will you be ok with Ben being forced to take it?
It's almost like we should hire some experts to decide what is proven and what isn't.....