Could be an angle shoot....showing the Dems he won't be influenced by the Admin.Quote:
Originally Posted by blake
Naw this is a judge....smart enough to know what he's getting into.
Printable View
Could be an angle shoot....showing the Dems he won't be influenced by the Admin.Quote:
Originally Posted by blake
Naw this is a judge....smart enough to know what he's getting into.
Lol at you geniuses.
You guys do know that all of trumps nominations have and will say whatever it takes to get confirmed right? It's not a new phenomenon.
UH OH
The village idiot is an accurate description of you jewlips.
you do realize that none of the nominees need any democratic votes to get confirmed cause of math, right?Quote:
Originally Posted by Mintjewlips
Lol yes, i said this like 20 pages ago.Quote:
Originally Posted by blakeyou do realize that none of the nominees need any democratic votes to get confirmed cause of math, right?Quote:
Originally Posted by Mintjewlips
Its so funny coming from a guy that doesn't know that 60,771,703 is less than 62,979,879...sick math skills bruh, nita must be proud.
great now michael angelo is questioning my math skills. a new personal low folks.Quote:
Originally Posted by MintjewlipsLol yes, i said this like 20 pages ago.Quote:
Originally Posted by blake
Its so funny coming from a guy that doesn't know that 60,771,703 is less than 62,979,879...sick math skills bruh, nita must be proud.
but your rederick that gorsuch was just saying "whatever it takes to get nominated" doesn't make any sense if you actually understood the math. he doesn't need to bash trump and he doesn't need to persuade any dems. he's got 50+ votes without them and he won't win any dem votes anyway, not that it matters. dems are going to filibuster and mcconnell's going nuclear.
It's laughable that you think that unions no longer serve a purpose. Sure - you may be an ethical business owner who wishes to pay his employees a fair wage. Unfortunately, this is not the case everywhere else. Due to the class struggle, which is inherent in a capitalistic society, workers always get fucked. A big business, whether it be a factory or McDonalds, always wants to increase profits and thereby reduce wages, which are a large expense. Workers on the contrary always want to raise wages. These people who have only their bodies as the only thing they can sell (their labour) need unions to protect them, or the businesses win. Without unions, business ALWAYS wins and the worker ALWAYS loses. You might have a problem with being told how to manage YOUR business, but without unions and the protection it gives to the working class, wages would become a race to the bottom.Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gallo
It is best summed up in Das Kapital by this quote: "The value of labour-power constitutes the conscious and explicit foundation of the trade unions, whose importance for the […] working class can scarcely be overestimated. The trade unions aim at nothing less than to prevent the reduction of wages below the level that is traditionally maintained in the various branches of industry. That is to say, they wish to prevent the price of labour-power from falling below its value."
I recommend you read Das Kapital to get a better idea about this (At least Vol I, which pertains more towards this).
Let me repeat - You may not like being told how your business needs to treat its workers, but without the power of trade unions, you and every other company would be allowed to pay less and less and there would be nothing workers could do about it.
Sessions CONFIRMED as AG
Elizabeth Pocohantas Warren SHUT DOWN and muzzled
You getting sick of losing yet libtards ?
Tyde you fit right in as a Trump supporter. Poor white trash
The problem with the case of an alcoholic worker in Gallo's situation is that the union has no incentive to address the situation if the *company* pays for his treatment. Instead, if the union paid for his treatment, the union members (who are paying the dues to cover such treatment) would be incentized to help him get the treatment or drop him from the union for failing to do so.Quote:
Originally Posted by MrTickleIt's laughable that you think that unions no longer serve a purpose. Sure - you may be an ethical business owner who wishes to pay his employees a fair wage. Unfortunately, this is not the case everywhere else. Due to the class struggle, which is inherent in a capitalistic society, workers always get fucked. A big business, whether it be a factory or McDonalds, always wants to increase profits and thereby reduce wages, which are a large expense. Workers on the contrary always want to raise wages. These people who have only their bodies as the only thing they can sell (their labour) need unions to protect them, or the businesses win. Without unions, business ALWAYS wins and the worker ALWAYS loses. You might have a problem with being told how to manage YOUR business, but without unions and the protection it gives to the working class, wages would become a race to the bottom.Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gallo
It is best summed up in Das Kapital by this quote: "The value of labour-power constitutes the conscious and explicit foundation of the trade unions, whose importance for the […] working class can scarcely be overestimated. The trade unions aim at nothing less than to prevent the reduction of wages below the level that is traditionally maintained in the various branches of industry. That is to say, they wish to prevent the price of labour-power from falling below its value."
I recommend you read Das Kapital to get a better idea about this (At least Vol I, which pertains more towards this).
Let me repeat - You may not like being told how your business needs to treat its workers, but without the power of trade unions, you and every other company would be allowed to pay less and less and there would be nothing workers could do about it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PB-vwLzhRI0Quote:
Originally Posted by MrTickleIt's laughable that you think that unions no longer serve a purpose. Sure - you may be an ethical business owner who wishes to pay his employees a fair wage. Unfortunately, this is not the case everywhere else. Due to the class struggle, which is inherent in a capitalistic society, workers always get fucked. A big business, whether it be a factory or McDonalds, always wants to increase profits and thereby reduce wages, which are a large expense. Workers on the contrary always want to raise wages. These people who have only their bodies as the only thing they can sell (their labour) need unions to protect them, or the businesses win. Without unions, business ALWAYS wins and the worker ALWAYS loses. You might have a problem with being told how to manage YOUR business, but without unions and the protection it gives to the working class, wages would become a race to the bottom.Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gallo
It is best summed up in Das Kapital by this quote: "The value of labour-power constitutes the conscious and explicit foundation of the trade unions, whose importance for the […] working class can scarcely be overestimated. The trade unions aim at nothing less than to prevent the reduction of wages below the level that is traditionally maintained in the various branches of industry. That is to say, they wish to prevent the price of labour-power from falling below its value."
I recommend you read Das Kapital to get a better idea about this (At least Vol I, which pertains more towards this).
Let me repeat - You may not like being told how your business needs to treat its workers, but without the power of trade unions, you and every other company would be allowed to pay less and less and there would be nothing workers could do about it.
Anyone with a brain between their ears knows that no Republicans have the backbone to face up to Trump and therefore Senate hearings are essentially a show trial and everyone knows what the result will be before they even start. Democracy in action.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyde
dear god at all of your lives
also chang you especially have my ire did you retire from draftkings
You just made my case, why delay confirmation by being honest and bluntly stating that you're on board with trump 100%, when you can lie and pander to the silly libtard senators and the neo con senators that could hold up confirmation, after all there will be executive orders that will be challenged all the way to the supreme court and with trumps pick in the supreme court to brake ties in his favor, along with Republican majority in both houses, its pretty much carte blanche for trumps agenda.Quote:
Originally Posted by blakegreat now michael angelo is questioning my math skills. a new personal low folks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mintjewlips
but your rederick that gorsuch was just saying "whatever it takes to get nominated" doesn't make any sense if you actually understood the math. he doesn't need to bash trump and he doesn't need to persuade any dems. he's got 50+ votes without them and he won't win any dem votes anyway, not that it matters. dems are going to filibuster and mcconnell's going nuclear.
And you did post, in bold, with all the confidence of a uninformed lemming, that mitt Romney got more popular votes than donald trump..
:lol2
You think it's good that senators speaking in the floor of the senate can be muzzled? What a retard.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyde
She should have said fuxk off and kept talking.
Gotta have priorities.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
Nordstrom's got off easy. He could have used his "bad" closingQuote:
Originally Posted by hongkongerGotta have priorities.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine