Printable View
Source? Real Stormy Daniels? Why hasn't Trump denied it? Why pay $130K in hush money to someone you never had sex with?
:desperation
It's odd that Trump will argue or insult or pick on just about anybody on Twitter, but has said nothing at all to or about Stormy. I guess he is hoping the Stormy will blow over.
that bastion of liberal progression, the wall street journal, owned by notorious antifa crisis actor rupert murdoch, just harvested trump's soul:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-tal...ald-1522106407
im pretty sure after an article like that, trump becomes their slave in the afterlife.
The whole Stormy Daniels thing is a big nothing burger. No-one except people who already made up their mind Trump is the anti-Christ, give a flying fuck about this. I don't know a single person who gives a shit about this at all, and I doubt any of you do either. I mean, people might have tuned in to hear the gossip, but no-one is changing their mind on Trump on this. No-one who would have voted for him has changed his mind from this and vice versa.
All the media is doing is making themselves seem partisan and pathetic IMO.
Blow over? Is there any indication that anybody but the media even cares? Like I said, people will tune in to get the gossip, but no-one is changing their mind about him one way or another because of this. He can basically just ignore it and that is that. Nothing to even ignore. It is just a whole lot of nothing.
Like I said, if this was Obama or Bush this would be a story, because they presented themselves as virtuous Presidents, and all indication is they actually were (as far as mattes of infidelity go at least). Trump and Clinton not so much, so no-one cares when their affairs come to light. No-one but the media (mainly the right wing media) gave a shit about Clinton's affairs and no-one but the media (mainly the left wing, aka MSM) gives a shit about Trumps.
In fairness, the Lewinsky scandal was him lying under oath about fucking a staffer in the oval office, up to and including turking her with a cigar then smoking it.
I'm not saying that in and of itself is some sort of hanging offense, I'm just saying that beyond being a federal crime to lie under oath, he absolutely disgraced and desecrated the oval office in many peoples eyes.
And I'm a solid fan of Clinton by and large.
But this Stormy deal, it is nothing near as salacious and tangible as the Lewinsky scandal.
A. That was 20 years ago. Our social mores have changed since then.
B. Drawing a moral equivalence between an middle age reality TV actor having sex with a prostitute (basically) to a sitting president having sex with an intern who was barely legal age in the Oval Office is about as intellectually honest as saying Roy Moore and Al Franken scandals are moral equivalencies.
C. Even at the time if Clinton had just said he did it without all the perjury issues the right wing media would have had their run, but for the most part people wouldn't have cared all that much. They would have enjoyed the scandal, but it wouldn't have affected their views of him or his presidency much.
D. A better equivalent to Trumps indiscretions would be the Jennifer Flowers. Which wasn't that big a deal. It was a drama and people enjoyed the show, but no-one really cared much otherwise.
-The violation of finance law, like Clinton's perjury thing, is just a legal issue. In the court of public opinion no one gives a fuck about either.
If Trump was having sex with an intern in the Oval Office right now, including various acts of sodomy, there would probably be some interest. But an affair he had years ago when he wasn't even in office, where the most salacious detail is some light spanking. Yawn.
i honestly can't wait till dish is forced to suck his first tranny dick
for that reason alone, i'm voting democrat in 2020
If the affair was yesterday I wouldn't care. I don't care about the cover up either. Probably most married men with small children who cheat try to cover it up to the best of their ability. Why is that surprising at all?
Cheating, cover up. I don't care. I doubt you do either. This is just straight politicking.
If you want to talk about his recent political maneuvering, such as all the embargo talk which is tanking the world economy, then that is something I care about.
They would certainly care if it was the black guy
hey so about this whole trump vs amazon thing, isnt that the antithesis of everything the republican party stands for or nah?
THE DEMOCRATS PLAYBOOK
1. manipulate the masses
The Fox News crowd would care, and Democratic supporters wouldn't (assuming it was a black Democratic candidate). That is the point I am trying to make. We only care because we have picked our side and he is on the other side. That is the only reason anyone cares.