Yeah, was an interesting donk v. donk matchup. If Ted Cruz is subtly destroying you in an interview on your own channel maybe its time to reevaluate your life.
Printable View
Even I knew George Best -Northern Ireland
He said of his career: "I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars – the rest I just squandered".
Beautiful.
Back to Trump you wankers
Well, some of the left gets their news from CNN, MSNBC etc, if it weren't for those viewers, the stations would barely have ratings at all. On the flipside, the right...and many many more people go to FOX news, in which FOX blows ratings out of the water compared to the others.
Now, go ahead and tell me im wrong about this one too...because if you want to talk about having no idea on things, when it comes to this thread you are not batting well.
Could take this thread to 1000 pages before dawn by just posting clips of Fox News untruths and general fucktardary.
But the incurable illness of its vast army of drooling spastics means there would be just no point.
Well, 1 - you're a Canadian...not even from this country
2 - you're not ahem...exactly the brightest bulb on the Christmas tree...
Or you would have realized that Trump being Prez or Obama, or Bush, have absolutely nothing to do with Fox News ratings for the most part. It isnt hard to look up and realize that they have been consistently beating the other networks for YEARS.
I didn't say anything about a politicians influence on any news agency. You only have to see it (FN)for a short while to realize they are the slut of the group. Infotainment. But here are a couple of findings among a long list that pull back the covers.
The percentage gaps in viewer knowledge are striking between Fox and PBS/NPR
Content analysis studiesEdit
The Project on Excellence in Journalism report in 2006 showed that 68 percent of Fox cable stories contained personal opinions, as compared to MSNBC at 27 percent and CNN at 4 percent. The "content analysis" portion of their 2005 report also concluded that "Fox was measurably more one-sided than the other networks, and Fox journalists were more opinionated on the air."[45]
Tests of knowledge of Fox viewersEdit
A study by the Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA) at the University of MarylandSchool of Public Affairs, as published in the Winter 03–04 issue of the Political Science Quarterly,[62] reported that poll-based findings[63] indicated that viewers of Fox News, the Fox Broadcasting Company and local Fox affiliates were more likely than viewers of other news networks to hold three misperceptions:[62]
- 67% of Fox viewers believed that the "U.S. has found clear evidence in Iraq that Saddam Hussein was working closely with the al Qaeda terrorist organization" (compared with 56% for CBS, 49% for NBC, 48% for CNN, 45% for ABC, 16% for NPR/PBS).
- The belief that "The U.S. has found Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq" was held by 33% of Fox viewers and only 23% of CBS viewers, 19% for ABC, 20% for NBC, 20% for CNN and 11% for NPR/PBS.
- 35% of Fox viewers believed that "the majority of people [in the world] favor the U.S. having gone to war" with Iraq (compared with 28% for CBS, 27% for ABC, 24% for CNN, 20% for NBC, 5% for NPR/PBS).
In response, Fox News frequent guest Ann Coulter characterized the PIPA findings as "misperceptions of pointless liberal factoids" and called it a "hoax poll".[64] Bill O'Reillycalled the study "absolute crap".[65] Roger Ailes referred to the study as "an old push poll".[66] James Taranto, editor of OpinionJournal.com, the Wall Street Journal's online editorial page, called the poll "pure propaganda".[67] PIPA issued a clarification on October 17, 2003, stating that "The findings were not meant to and cannot be used as a basis for making broad judgments about the general accuracy of the reporting of various networks or the general accuracy of the beliefs of those who get their news from those networks. Only a substantially more comprehensive study could undertake such broad research questions," and stated "that the correlation between viewing Fox News and holding misperceptions does not prove that Fox News' presentation caused the misperceptions[,]" inferring that causality is not necessary to prove correlation.[68][69]
So glad all of trumps crititcs in this thread are eurotards...other than sonatine who sits on his fat ass all day looking for creative ways to be creepier than he is now
jewlips is a douchebag
here i'll make the letters big so you old fuckin geezers can read it without your reading glasses.
HEY MONKEYS WHATS GOING ON. WORLD HASN'T ENDED YET. GO FIGURE THAT OUT. BESTY DeVOS IS SO QUALIFIED. SHE'S ABOUT AS QUALIFIED AS TYDE IS TO RUN A KTICHEN.
GET OFF THE DICKS OF DONALD TRUMP KIDS. SAY GOODBYE. LISTEN, THE CHANCES OF HIM BEING IMPEACHED ARE RIGHT NOW, ABOUT THE SAME AS THEY WERE OF HIM WINNING.....WE THOUGHT IT WASN'T HIGH, BUT TURNS OUT, IT'S HIGHER THAN ME....RIGHT....NOW................................
FUCK YOU AND YOUR FUCKING NAZI THREAD YOU HAVE HERE. YOU NAZI FUCKS DO NOT GET FREE SPEECH. YOU ARE NOT HUMAN BEINGS. YOU ARE NOT AMERICAN CITIZENS. DONALD TRUMP IS A NAZI. STEVE BANNON IS A NAZI. WHEN ALL IS SAID AND DONE, THEY WILL BE TREATED AS TRAITORS TO OUR NATION.
THIS TRAIN IS CRASHING, AND THE REST OF US AREN'T EVEN GOING TO PISS ON THE FIRE.
-best wishes
Larry
In the interest of fair discourse, this SC nominee seems to be a reasonable selection for a GOP justice from everything I've seen. I'm in the Constitution as a living document camp, and find the strict constructionist argument a regressive ideal, but he's certainly qualified, and this is America, thus he has the right to believe the wisdom of 18th century founders superior to a more progressive and modern view of America.
He's certainly not an idiot. He's qualified and properly educated, which is unique among Trump selections to this point. I hope they drag him through a prolonged and labored confirmation, not because he deserves it, but strictly as an obstructionist strategy given the Garland situation. He'll get confirmed. I just hope it takes 18 months.
Trump doesn't care about protest or is apologetic..
He is not rep or dem.
At the inaugural he stated .. HE IS HERE TO restore TGE REPUBLIC OF THEDE UNITED STATES AND CONSTITUTIONAL RULE..