Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Power
Team Retard has been floating the FAKE NEWS that you are a mumbles dupe. Please address this heinous slander, so we can put this whole thing behind us.
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Power
Team Retard has been floating the FAKE NEWS that you are a mumbles dupe. Please address this heinous slander, so we can put this whole thing behind us.
moronQuote:
Originally Posted by devidee
There is no crime of “collusion” in the federal code. The applicable crime is conspiracy under 18 USC Sec. 371.
A popular online poker term from over a decade ago will not be seen in any actual document introduced into federal court by Mueller's team.
meddling is not a crime as well.
conspiring with others to meddle or collude in an attempt to influence the outcome of an election is a federal crime.
now hoist your moran flag high
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatineQuote:
Originally Posted by thesidedish
LOL YES THEY INDICTED TROLLS!!!!!
I said "the extent of the Russia meddling was low grade trolls that nobody cared about" the entire time and u called me a retard
Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedish
those two events had very little to do with each other, in fairness.
the fact that 98% of your online DNA was being generated by russian agitprop was really the root of our response.
The reason the term collusion was so prominent was because networks like CNN and MSNBC used it all the time for months. When it started looking like there was no collusion this past summer, the narrative shift to obstruction.Quote:
Originally Posted by LegallyNonBindingPostsmoronQuote:
Originally Posted by devidee
There is no crime of “collusion” in the federal code. The applicable crime is conspiracy under 18 USC Sec. 371.
A popular online poker term from over a decade ago will not be seen in any actual document introduced into federal court by Mueller's team.
meddling is not a crime as well.
conspiring with others to meddle or collude in an attempt to influence the outcome of an election is a federal crime.
now hoist your moran flag high
This has been one fucking lead balloon. 13 Russians indicted for posting messages on the Internet? No shit they have been meddling in our elections for decades, we do the same fucking thing. It's just most of us did not need Robert Mueller to tell us this.
Basically Rothstein told us there was no collusion and it did not impact the results. Yep, just what Trump has told us for a year now. What a waste of time this whole charade was.
MAGA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatineQuote:
Originally Posted by thesidedish
those two events had very little to do with each other, in fairness.
the fact that 98% of your online DNA was being generated by russian agitprop was really the root of our response.
lol nice try, except it was the other way around and they were trying to copy US trolls and pages poorly
muh Russian agitprop AGAINST Trump...
Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedishQuote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
LOL YES THEY INDICTED TROLLS!!!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedish
glad you got a buzz start early in the weekend.
you are a troll and you are glad trolls have been indicted.
you are an internet troll public servant that worked social media for trump, destroying libtards and the Russians used "low level trolls that nobody cared about"
obv i just misunderstood all your low level trolling.
but what we all want to really know is your answer to this simple question
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
Making false accusations and spreading Fake News is what Team Retard does. Max Power has been accused several times already of being a 'dupe' account by them, Mumblesbadly is just the latest. Max Power is not a 'dupe' account.Quote:
Originally Posted by The_LurkerQuote:
Originally Posted by Max Power
Team Retard has been floating the FAKE NEWS that you are a mumbles dupe. Please address this heinous slander, so we can put this whole thing behind us.
Team Retard just can't stand that a true Republican is in this thread speaking the truth and pointing out they are now working for Russians. Notice how every single one of Team Retard is avoiding the question about Steve Bannon. Team Retard, along with many other so called Republicans are too far gone in their beliefs. All will require Re-education.
Team Retard- MCEC's
Quote:
Originally Posted by LegallyNonBindingPostsQuote:
Originally Posted by thesidedish
Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedish
glad you got a buzz start early in the weekend.
you are a troll and you are glad trolls have been indicted.
you are an internet troll public servant that worked social media for trump, destroying libtards and the Russians used "low level trolls that nobody cared about"
obv i just misunderstood all your low level trolling.
but what we all want to really know is your answer to this simple question
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
nope, no cheating to win
The side dish washer, Max Power would like to point out that when a former Chief Strategist of a presidential administration is questioned by a special counsel investigating criminal charges for 20 hours, let Max Power repeat that, 20 hours, they are not discussing the weather. 20 hours worth of questioning is a clear cut sign to anyone that knows anything about interviewing suspects and witnesses that this is very, very serious. Especially considering he won't answer questions in front of the Senate.
The side dish washer along with Team Retard are now brainwashed and are constantly doing the work of the same Russian trolls that Bob Mueller just indicted.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Power
he's just going to trot jarred out and have him announce he was behind the entire thing thing and that hes very sorry and will never do it again and about 5 minutes after the cell door slams shut behind him, trump's going to grant him a full pardon.
what moron?? what am I brainwashed about nobody knows what they were talking about so what am I supposed to say about it. especially a loose cannon like bannon who knows what hes thinkingQuote:
Originally Posted by Max Power
He'd actually fit right in at PFA.Quote:
Originally Posted by blake
Quote:
Originally Posted by devideemuh Russian agitprop AGAINST Trump...
this is interesting. i'm surprised trump hasn't jumped all over this yet on twitter
it seems like mueller went out of his way to be as nice as possible to trump.
mueller said that the russians communicated with "unwitting" trump campaign personnel (i.e., the campaign didn't know who they were, no collusion.)
the indictment didn't need to spell that out so it's a little curious that it did.
As an aside, I suspect that fetishizing BBC is something that a surprisingly high % of straight men are into. If you go to any pornhub type site, that is overwhelmingly geared towards heterosexual men, you see tons of BBC porn. I don't think this is part of some FPS style Jew conspiracy where BBC porn is being pushed on society as part of some grand scheme of world domination. Rather, I think it is there because the people putting up the porn know their market and that is what the market wants. What this says about society/human nature, I really am not sure. But just because of the sheer prevalence of this type of pornography across the board, it would indicate this fetishization is not even aberrant, but rather the norm.Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkongerHe'd actually fit right in at PFA.Quote:
Originally Posted by blake
Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaardAs an aside, I suspect that fetishizing BBC is something that a surprisingly high % of straight men are into. If you go to any pornhub type site, that is overwhelmingly geared towards heterosexual men, you see tons of BBC porn. I don't think this is part of some FPS style Jew conspiracy where BBC porn is being pushed on society as part of some grand scheme of world domination. Rather, I think it is there because the people putting up the porn know their market and that is what the market wants. What this says about society/human nature, I really am not sure. But just because of the sheer prevalence of this type of pornography across the board, it would indicate this fetishization is not even aberrant, but rather the norm.Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkonger
tell us more about your totally normal, intellectually well rounded opinions about what straight men are into.
Not much more to say. Go to a porn site, look at what is popular, and that is probably what normal straight men are into looking at when they jack off. Off the top of my head you see a lot of big dicks (including a ton of interracial BBC on white girl stuff), a lot of humiliation (going both ways), a lot of fellatio, and a lot of money shots often directed onto the woman.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatineQuote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
tell us more about your totally normal, intellectually well rounded opinions about what straight men are into.
Cant really even explain it, it just is what it is.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatineQuote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
tell us more about your totally normal, intellectually well rounded opinion about what straight men are into.
:shock
And then there’s guys going crazy over squirting camwhores, not realising it’s just piss.
What it says is that men are insecure about the size of their dicks, and there's money in that. Sports cars capitalize one way, Pornhub capitalizes another way.Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaardAs an aside, I suspect that fetishizing BBC is something that a surprisingly high % of straight men are into. If you go to any pornhub type site, that is overwhelmingly geared towards heterosexual men, you see tons of BBC porn. I don't think this is part of some FPS style Jew conspiracy where BBC porn is being pushed on society as part of some grand scheme of world domination. Rather, I think it is there because the people putting up the porn know their market and that is what the market wants. What this says about society/human nature, I really am not sure. But just because of the sheer prevalence of this type of pornography across the board, it would indicate this fetishization is not even aberrant, but rather the norm.Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkonger
Are you saying that all squirting is piss, or that camwhore high-volume on-demand squirting is piss?Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiganer
Because for non-camwhores, squirting is real and it's not piss, but not in camwhore-level amounts. I've seen it up close and personal.
Squirting camwhores isn't a particularly popular genre from what I can tell, more of a small niche thing. I would guess that is not something that arouses a majority of heterosexual men, at least not to the level of watching a guy with a big dick ejaculate on a woman's face, which is so prevalent in porn that it would indicate a majority of "normal" heterosexual men find this arousing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiganer
Anyways, to bring this back to Trump, given his penchant for blurting out things that most people think but are too socially aware to say (because they know it is socially wrong to say it), the BBC comment seems right in line with his character.
So im watching cnn and msnbc while smoking some bad ass kush..
So its not about obama trying to oust NETENIAHOU..
So its not about obama spying on conservative journalist and trump.
So its not about george soros trying to oust politicians all over america and the world...
Or the i.r.s. scandal or fast and furious or thehiati $....
So this whole RUSSIAN brue haha was about A DUPE ON FACEBOOK.??????
LOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLHAHAHAHAHALOLOLLOLOHAHAH ALOLOLOLOLHAHAHA..
Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaardAs an aside, I suspect that fetishizing BBC is something that a surprisingly high % of straight men are into. If you go to any pornhub type site, that is overwhelmingly geared towards heterosexual men, you see tons of BBC porn. I don't think this is part of some FPS style Jew conspiracy where BBC porn is being pushed on society as part of some grand scheme of world domination. Rather, I think it is there because the people putting up the porn know their market and that is what the market wants. What this says about society/human nature, I really am not sure. But just because of the sheer prevalence of this type of pornography across the board, it would indicate this fetishization is not even aberrant, but rather the norm.Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkonger
Jesus, man. This is quite literally you projecting your black cock fascination onto the rest of us. Look up what men and women in the United States actually search for when pornhub etc. release their statistics.Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaardNot much more to say. Go to a porn site, look at what is popular, and that is probably what normal straight men are into looking at when they jack off. Off the top of my head you see a lot of big dicks (including a ton of interracial BBC on white girl stuff), a lot of humiliation (going both ways), a lot of fellatio, and a lot of money shots often directed onto the woman.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
Cant really even explain it, it just is what it is.
Doesn't even make the list of most searched terms. Now I'd wager if there are statistics for gay sites, it's probably near the top.Quote:
Originally Posted by VaughnPJesus, man. This is quite literally you projecting your black cock fascination onto the rest of us. Look up what men and women in the United States actually search for when pornhub etc. release their statistics.Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
https://www.pornhub.com/insights/2017-year-in-review
The U.S. makes up probably 40% of their traffic and is responsible for the vast majority of the content, but these are global statistics.
pretty sure pornhub and other porn sites use tracking software that influences what videos are suggested for you based on what you watch, so yeah verminaard is 100% into black cuckold pornQuote:
Originally Posted by VaughnPJesus, man. This is quite literally you projecting your black cock fascination onto the rest of us. Look up what men and women in the United States actually search for when pornhub etc. release their statistics.Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
and that folks is what a hof thread looks like.
Anything but porn in this thread from here on out deserves insta redQuote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
13! never has so much been owed by so many to so fewQuote:
Originally Posted by thesidedishAre the indictments for anything to do with election collusion? Lol wth why do i have to argue against this, I just want to drink and gamble ffsQuote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
I am very skeptical of this. I know what I search for, and it is a little off the beaten path (pun intended), and it isn't ever what automatically pops up. But I also always search in incognito and/or private mode, so might be harder to track.Quote:
Originally Posted by blakepretty sure pornhub and other porn sites use tracking software that influences what videos are suggested for you based on what you watch, so yeah verminaard is 100% into black cuckold pornQuote:
Originally Posted by VaughnP
As far as what I am into, I never could get into any of the roleplaying stuff. This includes cuckold, incest, babysitter, etc. Because it is so obvious it is all fake anyways. My imagination just doesn't let me suspend skepticism enough to enjoy it.
I have never given out a rep in my life, mainly because I don't even know how and not interested enough to give the minimal effort to find out. But I might have to learn just to follow this advice.Quote:
Originally Posted by The_LurkerAnything but porn in this thread from here on out deserves insta redQuote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaardI am very skeptical of this. I know what I search for, and it is a little off the beaten path (pun intended), and it isn't ever what automatically pops up. But I also always search in incognito and/or private mode, so might be harder to track.Quote:
Originally Posted by blake
As far as what I am into, I never could get into any of the roleplaying stuff. This includes cuckold, incest, babysitter, etc. Because it is so obvious it is all fake anyways. My imagination just doesn't let me suspend skepticism enough to enjoy it.
If one scrolls down, the U.S. statistics are there. Doesn't make that list either. And yes, they 100% give suggestions by using tag based algorithms etc. of videos that you watch just like YouTube.
So like I said he'd fit right in here.Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaardSquirting camwhores isn't a particularly popular genre from what I can tell, more of a small niche thing. I would guess that is not something that arouses a majority of heterosexual men, at least not to the level of watching a guy with a big dick ejaculate on a woman's face, which is so prevalent in porn that it would indicate a majority of "normal" heterosexual men find this arousing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiganer
Anyways, to bring this back to Trump, given his penchant for blurting out things that most people think but are too socially aware to say (because they know it is socially wrong to say it), the BBC comment seems right in line with his character.
TRUMP Poker Fraud Alert
:makeitso
Is that Zooey Deschanel?Quote:
Originally Posted by blakeQuote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
Its over..
All the dems have is some dupes on facebook..
What Mueller is going to do now is save face. Use a whole lot of lawyer hiberbali to call" jay walking!!" By other terms like "wreckless endargement" ..
Its just an act of face saving!! Its over.
Lollollollolhahahahalololololhahalibtards
LollollolhahahahalololololhahalibtardsQuote:
Originally Posted by thesparten
This is only the beginning.Quote:
Originally Posted by thesparten