Quote:
Originally Posted by VegasJim
I think he took Seattle at -6 1/2 (local book)
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by VegasJim
I think he took Seattle at -6 1/2 (local book)
Smart... I caught line at -9.5
horrible weekend for football, thankfully I had a bid day playing online poker for the first time in months which more than covered my losses.
I'll root for you because I've got no dog in the fight. With that said, people on here were saying they saw 10.5 some places. I'd take Det +10.5 if I could have gotten it (I couldn't, everywhere I bet had 10)Quote:
Originally Posted by VegasJim
If you like futures, and your bookie (real or fake) is asleep at the wheel, bet the Charlotte Hornets under 32-33.5 wins.
They lost their one guy who plays defense (Michael Kidd-Gilchrist) for 6 months today due to a torn labrum.
Congrats on the 9.5 and of course we are 10 right now. Seattle D looking like it won't give up anything. Come on Seattle put up another 3!!Quote:
Originally Posted by VegasJim
Seattle O gave it up though.Quote:
Originally Posted by CharhamCongrats on the 9.5 and of course we are 10 right now. Seattle D looking like it won't give up anything. Come on Seattle put up another 3!!Quote:
Originally Posted by VegasJim
thats what, 2 fumbles by Wilson in the last 5 minutes? A horribly fumbled punt return.
seems fishy....
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRK Star
Ok time for a D touchdown Seattle. Grrrr Wilson just hold on the the Fing ball.
This is one of the most horribly played games by both teams that I've watched in a while. Lions are terrible but the Seahawks look like a 7-9 team right now if I'm being generous.
Seattle's offensive line is fucking terrible.....and Wilson has been paying for it all game.Quote:
Originally Posted by BeerAndPoker
LMAO. Only the Lions would find a way to fumble right there.
Wow Megatron. That was a TD, body was falling into the end zone, and Cam Chancellor saved it at the very last second
oh for fucks sake....I already lost the -10 bet, the least you could do is let me watch them choke and lose the game OUTRIGHT.
but no....touchback.
Crazy game full of horrible shit!
I haven't seen anything so sloppy since the leaked photo of Hope Solo pussy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeerAndPoker
that was "fishy" as well....
So apparently the Seahawks guy batting the ball out of bounds intentionally was illegal and Detroit should get the ball at the 1/2 yard line. How do they miss that call?Quote:
Originally Posted by DRK Star
Wouldn't be the first time a ref has made a bad call or a no call that gave Seattle the win..Quote:
Originally Posted by jsearles22So apparently the Seahawks guy batting the ball out of bounds intentionally was illegal and Detroit should get the ball at the 1/2 yard line. How do they miss that call?Quote:
Originally Posted by DRK Star
Holy shit. Just saw the replay. The ref in the back of the end zone was staring at KJ Wright as he batted the ball out. The ref didn't miss the call, the ref didn't know the rules.
Back judge is quoted as saying he didn't feel it was overt, so he didn't call it. Many others are saying it was going out anyways so who cares. I disagree 1000%. The last bounce the ball checked up hard. There's a huge chance it doesn't go out without the tap. And it doesn't matter, a rule is a rule.Quote:
Originally Posted by Muck Ficon
SVP is railing in reviewable vs non-reviewable and I agree with him too. It's a turnover, which is automatically reviewed yet this aspect isn't subject to review?? WTF?
Agreed, that ball was probably not going out of bounds. KJ Wright realized that, and that's why he batted it out.Quote:
Originally Posted by jsearles22Back judge is quoted as saying he didn't feel it was overt, so he didn't call it. Many others are saying it was going out anyways so who cares. I disagree 1000%. The last bounce the ball checked up hard. There's a huge chance it doesn't go out without the tap. And it doesn't matter, a rule is a rule.Quote:
Originally Posted by Muck Ficon
SVP is railing in reviewable vs non-reviewable and I agree with him too. It's a turnover, which is automatically reviewed yet this aspect isn't subject to review?? WTF?
It wouldn't be classified as a turnover because Seattle never recovered the ball. It was obvious he fumbled the ball, it was obvious the ball never crossed the goal line. As far as that goes in the NFL...that means there is nothing to review. Complete bullshit, but that's how they will defend it. The fact is, the ref didn't know the rules.Quote:
Originally Posted by jsearles22Back judge is quoted as saying he didn't feel it was overt, so he didn't call it. Many others are saying it was going out anyways so who cares. I disagree 1000%. The last bounce the ball checked up hard. There's a huge chance it doesn't go out without the tap. And it doesn't matter, a rule is a rule.Quote:
Originally Posted by Muck Ficon
SVP is railing in reviewable vs non-reviewable and I agree with him too. It's a turnover, which is automatically reviewed yet this aspect isn't subject to review?? WTF?
http://www.si.com/nfl/2015/10/06/kj-...calvin-johnson
Quote:
And it turns out even Wright didn't know the rule. In his postgame press conference, he told Brian Floyd of SB Nation he intentionally batted the ball because he didn't want to take a chance diving on it. The Seahawks linebacker went on to admit he didn't know the rule.
When a Seattle reporter told Wright what he'd done was illegal, Wright replied, “People do it all the time though ... is that illegal? Explain that to me.”
Conspiracy obviously.
Lions covering but not winning was best for Vegas.
Di Di no hit +165 or better
My guy only has +135, -160 hitQuote:
Originally Posted by Daly
I got it about 50/50 he gets a hit. Small chance he only sees 3 AB's hitting 9th. Not expecting a high scoring game. I still think 135 was playable but 150+ is where the value is.Quote:
Originally Posted by handicapmeMy guy only has +135, -160 hitQuote:
Originally Posted by Daly
This is a spot play. I make no guarantee he doesn't get a hit tonight, but I think if you played it 10 times it would be 5/10.
2 hitter through 6. Di Di won't see another at bat until the bottom of the 8th.......
But of course this Punch and Judy .200 hitting POS has one of the hits.
When good bets go bad... We move on.
That was a tough one, didn't take it just because I wasn't given near the odds you recommended, but would have followed... took the astros pretty large as I just liked the situation. You're up a ridic amount on props, just keep at it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Daly
Thinking of taking Colts +185 on the ML. Almost certain Luck/davis doesn't play, but honestly I kind of see ALOT of value in this play. Anyone have any thoughts on this?
UPDATE (10:41 a.m. ET): Andrew Luck will not start Thursday, per ESPN's Adam Schefter. Matt Hasselbeck will start for the second consecutive week.Quote:
Originally Posted by handicapme
Hasselback isn't 100% either.
Yea that's why I may hold off, but if hasselback does play, maybe it's a sucker bet but I just like the value.Quote:
Originally Posted by simpdogUPDATE (10:41 a.m. ET): Andrew Luck will not start Thursday, per ESPN's Adam Schefter. Matt Hasselbeck will start for the second consecutive week.Quote:
Originally Posted by handicapme
Hasselback isn't 100% either.
Grabbed it at +195, maybe I'm a sucker but I truely don't believe that Houston should ever be giving this much vs any team in the league.
i'm with you on the value. took small action on colts +190Quote:
Originally Posted by handicapme
http://i57.tinypic.com/2rz28zt.png
M Davis Over 18.5 comp -130
Not betting til I get paid for last week. I'm sure its a slow pay, but regardless, locals suck.
Indy +5. Matt Hasselbeck god mode.
you guys are a lock. I bet on Houston. Obv int to ruin that drive.
We been on a lot of the same depressing picks together lately lolQuote:
Originally Posted by DRK Star
Was very pleased watching them get down the field with ease and then Foster misses the easiest catch ever. It was a good pass...smh
Just caught a break at least as that call should have stood. Ill take it though....hopefully they can answer back now.
I'm on fuck Houston tonight. Royals gonna win. Indy gonna cover and likely win outright. And SMU gonna coverQuote:
Originally Posted by DRK Star
Book it bitches