ok i misunderstood what you were saying. the topics i think will be negative campaign ads against him are his actual positions, not made up talking points.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
ok i misunderstood what you were saying. the topics i think will be negative campaign ads against him are his actual positions, not made up talking points.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
See new TweetsQuote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
Conversation
Jeff Zeleny
@jeffzeleny
NEW: The Iowa Democratic Party did not have advance warning that
@TomPerez
was calling for a recanvass of the Iowa caucus results, two people familiar with the matter tell
@CNN. Perez doesn't point out that the DNC has been running the show in Iowa for the last 48 hours
Obviously need to start embedding tweets after I remember how it’s done
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
AGENDA MUCH?!?
Quote:
Originally Posted by blakeand all of his hot takes will be part of an endless stream of negative attack ads in swing states that, to date, he hasn't faced yet.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
guess what, those negative ads work
Maybe I’ve only selectively seen your posts, but you, from my perspective, seem far more bullish on Biden than anyone on here who isn’t a republican or lean republican.
Honestly, at this point, I’d start pulling for Bloomberg because Biden’s a fail candidate. Biden is one of those stiffs who underperforms polls consistently and generates zero enthusiasm. If I was in the anyone but trump camp, I’d be hoping for Bloomberg.
i was more bullish initially, but, after his debate performances, i agree that biden is a complete fail as a candidate. agree with you on bloombergQuote:
Originally Posted by BCRQuote:
Originally Posted by blake
Maybe I’ve only selectively seen your posts, but you, from my perspective, seem far more bullish on Biden than anyone on here who isn’t a republican or lean republican.
Honestly, at this point, I’d start pulling for Bloomberg because Biden’s a fail candidate. Biden is one of those stiffs who underperforms polls consistently and generates zero enthusiasm. If I was in the anyone but trump camp, I’d be hoping for Bloomberg.
god id love to see bloomberg debate trump.
he'd like the entire front row with billionares then one at a time, ask them their opinions of trump and why they refused to do business with him.
Sure two years ago, but nothing happened. The end result was that every other country got their shit together. Brexit was the second step in how much shit Russia can stir up. Apparently around the 4-5 steps the rest of Europe figured it out.Quote:
Originally Posted by blakei suspect UK was only the beginning for countries dropping out of the EU but i guess we'll seeQuote:
Originally Posted by gimmick
US was roughly the 3rd step where they decided to set themselves on fire and now we're looking at the burnt remains claiming everything is cool.
You need to admit that you have no fucking idea what the fuck "Socialism" is.Quote:
Originally Posted by blake
It's supposed to be an economy controlled by the Government that re-distributes wealth to it's citizens.
Is that what's happening in Russia?
Nope. If you want to do business in Russia you have to give "kickbacks" to a lot of different people. Russian mafia. The Russian Government gives nothing to the people. Putin has stolen over $200 Billion for himself. Russia is a fake socialist country.
China is another fake "Socialist" country.
The people in the Chinese Government have power and control but instead of re-distributing the wealth to the people they pocket it for themselves.
How about Cuba?
How much money did Castro give to the people?
How about Venezuela?
How much money did they give their people?
Don't worry about Bernie being a "democratic socialist".
Congress will block him from giving away anything meaningful. The most he will be able to do is bring health care and prescription drug costs down.
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/39/b1...0ad695231f.jpg
Russia don’t claim to be socialist, do you live in the 1980s?Quote:
Originally Posted by TheXFactorYou need to admit that you have no fucking idea what the fuck "Socialism" is.Quote:
Originally Posted by blake
It's supposed to be an economy controlled by the Government that re-distributes wealth to it's citizens.
Is that what's happening in Russia?
Nope. If you want to do business in Russia you have to give "kickbacks" to a lot of different people. Russian mafia. The Russian Government gives nothing to the people. Putin has stolen over $200 Billion for himself. Russia is a fake socialist country.
China is another fake "Socialist" country.
The people in the Chinese Government have power and control but instead of re-distributing the wealth to the people they pocket it for themselves.
How about Cuba?
How much money did Castro give to the people?
How about Venezuela?
How much money did they give their people?
Don't worry about Bernie being a "democratic socialist".
Congress will block him from giving away anything meaningful. The most he will be able to do is bring health care and prescription drug costs down.
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/39/b1...0ad695231f.jpg
they are now blaming 4chan, who takes credit for everything and has no clue what this is about, for the Iowa problems
Hmm... Sanders is +140 on my book. Might hedge/offload risk at that price. What is he on other books?
Rightfully so, Sanders has officially announced that he won the Iowa Caucus because of the greater number of popular votes in both the initial count and the realignments regardless of the shady state equivalent delegate count.Quote:
Originally Posted by BCRSee new TweetsQuote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
Conversation
Jeff Zeleny
@jeffzeleny
NEW: The Iowa Democratic Party did not have advance warning that
@TomPerez
was calling for a recanvass of the Iowa caucus results, two people familiar with the matter tell
@CNN. Perez doesn't point out that the DNC has been running the show in Iowa for the last 48 hours
Obviously need to start embedding tweets after I remember how it’s done
https://youtu.be/UI5jnlcdMy0
Now on to crushing the rest of the field in New Hampshire and beyond!
Don't think I'd call that a dirty trick. Literally everybody does this in local races.Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedish
Quote:
Originally Posted by SPIT thisDon't think I'd call that a dirty trick. Literally everybody does this in local races.Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedish
uhhh ya moron, everybody who wants to be a politician is dirty
So what's the issue? Everybody knows you need to collect 2x-3x signature requirements to be valid. And no, the issue isn't using "maiden names and other BS".Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedishQuote:
Originally Posted by SPIT this
uhhh ya moron, everybody who wants to be a politician is dirty
Quote:
Originally Posted by SPIT thisSo what's the issue? Everybody knows you need to collect 2x-3x signature requirements to be valid. And no, the issue isn't using "maiden names and other BS".Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedish
just reminding u Obama is garbage and obv in on all the trump spying muh Russia hoax origins
Bernie is gonna steamroll cuz there are too many ppl running. who will be forced by the DNC to dropout after NH before they should?
Reminder:Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedishQuote:
Originally Posted by SPIT this
just reminding u Obama is garbage and obv in on all the trump spying muh Russia hoax origins
https://www.documentcloud.org/docume...amination.html
Quote:
Horowitz concluded the FBI was legally justified in launching its inquiry into Russia’s interference in the 2016 election. There was no "documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation influenced the FBI’s decision to conduct these operations," the report said.
The 400-page report debunks claims by the president and his allies that political bias played a role in the FBI's decision to investigate members of the Trump campaign for possible coordination with Russia. The inspector general also said there was "no evidence" the FBI placed any undercover sources or agents in the Trump campaign or had them attend campaign events.
Definitely in Bernie's best interest to keep everybody in the race for as long as possible.Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedish
Of course this could lead to a contested convention.
So are all the precincts reporting in Iowa yet or not?
I'm not seeing any numbers where it's 100% reported. Yet Bernie is admitting that he got fewer delegates there (but won the popular vote)?
Is there something I'm missing, aside from the obvious DNC incompetence/corruption involving that situation?
Lol no, the results aren't final and they haven't added any new precincts in 18 hours. Also, there may be inconsistencies in some of the existing totals so they may have to re-tabulate. Total fail. The Iowa Winner on PredictIt is trading right around 50/50.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Okay, I didn't have time to follow this today, so I thought maybe something changed because Bernie made a statement of some sort.Quote:
Originally Posted by SPIT thisLol no, the results aren't final and they haven't added any new precincts in 18 hours. Also, there may be inconsistencies in some of the existing totals so they may have to re-tabulate. Total fail. The Iowa Winner on PredictIt is trading right around 50/50.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
This really is an incredible fail. It's already 3 days late. What a complete disaster.
Didn't know Bernie admitted defeat in SDEs. Seems weird since he could still win SDEs. Guess he's just sticking with popular vote, which he'll win, but traditionally the "winner" of Iowa is determined by SDEs
I really think Bernie wins Nevada easily also. The culinary union is sitting it out again and being neutral, and someone needed that endorsement to beat Bernie there. I think Bernie is a heavy favorite, but I don’t see Nevada as the last line like that tweet suggests. South Carolina is the last line imo for a few of them. With how well Bernie polls Hispanics and Nevada being 3-1 Hispanic to black, I don’t see it as much of a contest.Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedish
South Carolina being the first black state is super big for all of them, but really big for Biden and Pete. Biden needs to win the state big and Pete needs to show he can get any support at all.
After South Carolina you’ll have a few different candidates that will either be dead or wasting everyone’s time. If Joe doesn’t win I think he’s toast with no $ and no path. You’ll see Pete is drawing dead. I have no idea who wil drop when, but that’s when you’ll know who should drop. If there is any shot to beat Bernie he’ll have to underperform in SC. I just don’t see it happening in Nevada.
They are now showing 100% just like 10 minutes ago and Pete up by 1.5 SDE. There is still unfixed errors that would have Bernie with a 2 sde flip according to 538 and various Twitter people, and they don’t think the networks will call it because they weren’t fixed, so idk if it’s done. It’s irrelevant except for perception, but if Bernie wants to even fight over it then it could drag on.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Bernie has already addressed that and essentially doesn’t care. See this post from above for details.Quote:
Originally Posted by BCRThey are now showing 100% just like 10 minutes ago and Pete up by 1.5 SDE. There is still unfixed errors that would have Bernie with a 2 sde flip according to 538 and various Twitter people, and they don’t think the networks will call it because they weren’t fixed, so idk if it’s done. It’s irrelevant except for perception, but if Bernie wants to even fight over it then it could drag on.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
https://pokerfraudalert.com/forum/sh...l=1#post878734
WHERE IS THE DOW
Bet $ 1.00 to win $ 1,000.00
Result: Pending
2020 Democratic Party Presidential Nomination - Odds to Win (All Bets Action)
Tulsi Gabbard
07/16/20 12:00 EDT
+100000
There is another Democratic debate tonight from New Hampshire.
In order to secure the Democratic nomination, you need 1,990 pledged delegates.Quote:
Sanders tops New Hampshire polls at 26%, followed by former Vice President Joe Biden (18%), former South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg (16%), and Mass. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (14%.)
So far...(1 delegate has not been awarded yet from Iowa)
Buttigieg...13 delegates
Sanders...12 delegates
Warren...8 delegates
Biden...6 delegates
Klobuchar...1 delegate
Steyer...0 delegates
Yang...0 delegates
https://ca-times.brightspotcdn.com/d...mu-debate2.JPG
Mike Bloomberg will pay you $150 to say nice things about him
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...am-influencers
Nice tie.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CojZBGFXgAAg9pc.jpg
Druff is going love Krystal Ball’s takedown of the liberal elites in the Democrat Party. No spoilers. Just watch and try to keep from yelling “I told you so!”Quote:
Originally Posted by TheXFactor
https://youtu.be/5GFneySIGVg
Who's watching the debate? Lot of energy from Joe
He’s only a 1Q bet - but yeahQuote:
Originally Posted by SPIT this
Sanders is offense and everyone else is reacting
B12 shot?Quote:
Originally Posted by SanlmarHe’s only a 1Q bet - but yeahQuote:
Originally Posted by SPIT this
Sanders is offense and everyone else is reacting
Jesus, even Steyer is firing
I was wondering like everyone elseQuote:
Originally Posted by SPIT thisB12 shot?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanlmar
Warren is AWOL
Yang: Donald Trump is not the cause of all our problems but rather a symptom.
He’s right. The rise of populism following 2007 crisis
It’s pick your brand of populism time. Sanders or Trump.
this feels like the first real debate.
peter butta is like a cross between wally cleaver and bugs bunny
and i just like to add like all the candidates...trump is bad