this is what I do with dupes
you been on it for a while faggot
Today, 02:24 AM
dick
n00b
This message is hidden because dick is on your ignore list.
View Post
Remove user from ignore list
Printable View
this is what I do with dupes
you been on it for a while faggot
Today, 02:24 AM
dick
n00b
This message is hidden because dick is on your ignore list.
View Post
Remove user from ignore list
You gotta be kidding. He's gonna do some reshaping all right. Because after this shit-show, every nazi fuck has come out of the woodwork and now we can do with them what the germans did with the 3rd reich. OUTLAW THEM. that's right. Shit like this wouldn't fly there, because being a racist nazi fuck like most of you Trump idiots here is ILLEGAL there (and before you suggest i move there, go fuck yourself).
I urge you to read up on what happened to the fascists of the 30's and 40's, there's a reason why they're either DEAD, or in the case of Fidel, we put them in so much fucking economic hurt they don't matter anymore.
So enjoy the next 4 years. it SURE AS FUCK won't be 8. Did you see the fucking popular vote? it was BLUE. this country won't be seeing a red president for a long fucking time after this head shaker. Next election cycle, people are going to vote, and they're gonna vote this trash out.
To be fair to Big Dick, he was already eviscerated as the biggest dope in this thread the day after election day. To his credit, he did acknowledge he was a total fucking mong and did acknowledge every prediction he made were spectacularly failed. He has gone back off the deep end recently, which is actually funny for most. When we get tired of watching the same talking heads melt down on CNN every day, we simply come to this thread for a change of pace. It's the gift that keeps on giving.
As Trump puts together what seems to be one of the most radical, extreme right wing cabals in modern times.
Lets remind ourselves we still dodged a bullet. Look how radical Ted Cruz and his supporters really are (coughdruffcough). Cruz knows these guys, this is his base.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVsg7n1N3Bk
Cliffs: They believe Trump and Bibi and all their cronies and left wing, seriously.
The start and then at 16 thru to the end but the whole thing is revealing. He also makes some good points too.
I've had what alcoholics call a moment of clarity.
I thought that the Military Industrial Complex and Israel have been teaming up and fucking the American taxpayers hardcore. But after listening to the complaints from the far right Israel supporters outside of corporate influence aka the MSM it's a bit more complex.
It's pretty clear that the leadership in Israel is loyal to the MIC too, even at the expense of the long term well being of their fellow countrymen. I didn't think the leadership of Israel would put the MIC's goals first too. Then I started hearing about Bibi selling submarines to Germany amid controversy etc. That's why there's never a reasonable solution put up that would endanger perpetual war and defense spending. That's also why Iran must be stopped from getting nukes. It's not because they would use them on Israel, it's because that would make perpetual war to dangerous.
There's no way Iran's as radical as nuclear Pakistan or Saudi Arabia. Pakistan got busted hiding Bin Laden wtf and the Saudi's and maybe even Israel were involved in or knew about 911 and they're all considered allies but we're supposed to be worried about Iran. Don't fall for that shit.
We have to get money out of politics.
The real reason there's a push for anyone but Trump.
Look who else is involved.
2 or 3 days ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJH-fkJQC9k
Article posted on Drudge today:
"U.S. dollar strongest since 2003"
YUP
look he's not even president yet, lets give him a chance is all im saying.
hey jace when its time to get on the frump train we'll let you know
While it might be beneficial for our Secretary of Energy to have not failed general chemistry in college, it's certainly not a requirement. And we know this because Rick Perry didn't not fail general chemistry in college. And he's going to be Secretary of energy. But didn't Obama also have a dumb guy as Secretary of Energy? Not that guy ^ he's clearly very intelligent. But the one before him... the first one?
Oh, well nevermind. I forgot.Quote:
Obama’s first Secretary of Energy was Steven Chu — a Nobel Prize winning physicist who is currently the Professor of Physics and Professor of Molecular & Cellular Physiology at Stanford University. He has a B.A. in Math, a B.S. in Physics, and a Ph.D. in Physics from Berkeley.
http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view5/399...rry-oops-o.gif
But my point stands; Rick Perry doesn't need education for his position. It's called the Secretary of Energy not the Secretary of Education lol. Obviously if it was the Secretary of Education you'd want that person to be educated.
Trump's pick, Betsy Devos, also went to college.Quote:
Obama’s current Secretary of Education, John King Jr., has a B.A. from Harvard, a master’s degree and doctorate from Columbia, and a law degree from Yale.
She has a bachelor’s degree in polysci from Calvin College.
From a conservative talk radio host.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/15/op...f=opinion&_r=0
Quote:
MILWAUKEE — After nearly 25 years, I’m stepping down from my daily conservative talk radio show at the end of this month. I’m not leaving because of the rise of Donald J. Trump (my reasons are personal), but I have to admit that the campaign has made my decision easier. The conservative media is broken and the conservative movement deeply compromised.
In April, after Mr. Trump decisively lost the Wisconsin Republican primary, I had hoped that we here in the Midwest would turn out to be a firewall of rationality. Our political culture was distinctly inhospitable to Mr. Trump’s divisive, pugilistic style; the conservatives who had been successful here had tended to be serious, reform-oriented and able to express their ideas in more than 140 characters. But in November, Wisconsin lined up with the rest of the Rust Belt to give the presidency to Mr. Trump.
How on earth did that happen?
Before this year, I thought I had a relatively solid grasp on what conservatism stood for and where it was going. Over the previous decade, I helped advance the careers of conservatives like House Speaker Paul D. Ryan; Gov. Scott Walker; Reince Priebus, the chairman of the Republican National Committee; and Senator Ron Johnson. In 2010, conservatives won big majorities in the Wisconsin State Legislature, and I openly supported many of their reforms, including changes to collective bargaining and expansions of school choice.
In short, I was under the impression that conservatives actually believed things about free trade, balanced budgets, character and respect for constitutional rights. Then along came this campaign.
On the surface, the explanations for Mr. Trump’s improbable win in Wisconsin are simple enough: He won big margins in rural, blue-collar counties and won the pivotal Green Bay area by double digits. But he underperformed Mitt Romney in the vote-rich Milwaukee suburbs and ended up getting fewer votes in victory than Mr. Romney received in his 2012 defeat. Hillary Clinton, however, got about 39,000 fewer votes in heavily Democratic Milwaukee County than President Obama did four years earlier. Democrats simply stayed home, though that is obviously not the whole story.
That is what I saw, and this is what it might mean for the future of conservatism. When I wrote in August 2015 that Mr. Trump was a cartoon version of every left-wing media stereotype of the reactionary, nativist, misogynist right, I thought that I was well within the mainstream of conservative thought — only to find conservative Trump critics denounced for apostasy by a right that decided that it was comfortable with embracing Trumpism. But in Wisconsin, conservative voters seemed to reject what Mr. Trump was selling, at least until after the convention.
To be sure, some of my callers embraced Mr. Trump’s suggestion for a ban on Muslims entering the country and voiced support for a proposal to deport all Muslims — even citizens. One caller compared American Muslims to rabid dogs. But right to the end, relatively few of my listeners bought into the crude nativism Mr. Trump was selling at his rallies.
What they did buy into was the argument that this was a “binary choice.” No matter how bad Mr. Trump was, my listeners argued, he could not possibly be as bad as Mrs. Clinton. You simply cannot overstate this as a factor in the final outcome. As our politics have become more polarized, the essential loyalties shift from ideas, to parties, to tribes, to individuals. Nothing else ultimately matters.
In this binary tribal world, where everything is at stake, everything is in play, there is no room for quibbles about character, or truth, or principles. If everything — the Supreme Court, the fate of Western civilization, the survival of the planet — depends on tribal victory, then neither individuals nor ideas can be determinative. I watched this play out in real time, as conservatives who fully understood the threat that Mr. Trump posed succumbed to the argument about the Supreme Court. As even Mr. Ryan discovered, neutrality was not acceptable; if you were not for Mr. Trump, then you were for Mrs. Clinton.
The state of our politics also explains why none of the revelations, outrages or gaffes seemed to dent Mr. Trump’s popularity.
In this political universe, voters accept that they must tolerate bizarre behavior, dishonesty, crudity and cruelty, because the other side is always worse; the stakes are such that no qualms can get in the way of the greater cause.
For many listeners, nothing was worse than Hillary Clinton. Two decades of vilification had taken their toll: Listeners whom I knew to be decent, thoughtful individuals began forwarding stories with conspiracy theories about President Obama and Mrs. Clinton — that he was a secret Muslim, that she ran a child sex ring out of a pizza parlor. When I tried to point out that such stories were demonstrably false, they generally refused to accept evidence that came from outside their bubble. The echo chamber had morphed into a full-blown alternate reality silo of conspiracy theories, fake news and propaganda.
And this is where it became painful. Even among Republicans who had no illusions about Mr. Trump’s character or judgment, the demands of that tribal loyalty took precedence. To resist was an act of betrayal.
When it became clear that I was going to remain #NeverTrump, conservatives I had known and worked with for more than two decades organized boycotts of my show. One prominent G.O.P. activist sent out an email blast calling me a “Judas goat,” and calling for postelection retribution. As the summer turned to fall, I knew that I was losing listeners and said so publicly.
And then, there was social media. Unless you have experienced it, it’s difficult to describe the virulence of the Twitter storms that were unleashed on Trump skeptics. In my timelines, I found myself called a “cuckservative,” a favorite gibe of white nationalists; and someone Photoshopped my face into a gas chamber. Under the withering fire of the trolls, one conservative commentator and Republican political leader after another fell in line.
How had we gotten here?
One staple of every radio talk show was, of course, the bias of the mainstream media. This was, indeed, a target-rich environment. But as we learned this year, we had succeeded in persuading our audiences to ignore and discount any information from the mainstream media. Over time, we’d succeeded in delegitimizing the media altogether — all the normal guideposts were down, the referees discredited.
That left a void that we conservatives failed to fill. For years, we ignored the birthers, the racists, the truthers and other conspiracy theorists who indulged fantasies of Mr. Obama’s secret Muslim plot to subvert Christendom, or who peddled baseless tales of Mrs. Clinton’s murder victims. Rather than confront the purveyors of such disinformation, we changed the channel because, after all, they were our allies, whose quirks could be allowed or at least ignored.
We destroyed our own immunity to fake news, while empowering the worst and most reckless voices on the right.
This was not mere naïveté. It was also a moral failure, one that now lies at the heart of the conservative movement even in its moment of apparent electoral triumph. Now that the election is over, don’t expect any profiles in courage from the Republican Party pushing back against those trends; the gravitational pull of our binary politics is too strong.
I’m only glad I’m not going to be a part of it anymore.