Time to get on the TRUMP train

i was hesitant to bring this up but fuck it:

some very real deal computer scientists / statisticians are saying the results in 3 swing states are sketchy as fuck:


http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/22/politi...lenge-results/


tl;dr: somehow, she only did poorly in areas with electronic voting machines, and the numbers themselves are statistically improbable in the extreme, with trump somehow winning by a very consistent average across incredibly diverse areas. basically for him to have such a smooth, consistent margin is considered... unnatural.


note that the statistics-speak is not my forte but honestly it reads a lot like the superuser hand analysis convos.


oh and lastly, the audit trail used to validate the results does not match the results.


so yeah...

J. Alex Halderman, to be clear, is an extremely made nigga among computer security community and does not sell wolf tickets.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sonatine

i was hesitant to bring this up but fuck it:

some very real deal computer scientists / statisticians are saying the results in 3 swing states are sketchy as fuck:


http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/22/politi...lenge-results/


tl;dr: somehow, she only did poorly in areas with electronic voting machines, and the numbers themselves are statistically improbable in the extreme, with trump somehow winning by a very consistent average across incredibly diverse areas. basically for him to have such a smooth, consistent margin is considered... unnatural.


note that the statistics-speak is not my forte but honestly it reads a lot like the superuser hand analysis convos.


oh and lastly, the audit trail used to validate the results does not match the results.


so yeah...

---

:popcorn

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sonatine

i was hesitant to bring this up but fuck it:

some very real deal computer scientists / statisticians are saying the results in 3 swing states are sketchy as fuck:


http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/22/politi...lenge-results/


tl;dr: somehow, she only did poorly in areas with electronic voting machines, and the numbers themselves are statistically improbable in the extreme, with trump somehow winning by a very consistent average across incredibly diverse areas. basically for him to have such a smooth, consistent margin is considered... unnatural.


note that the statistics-speak is not my forte but honestly it reads a lot like the superuser hand analysis convos.


oh and lastly, the audit trail used to validate the results does not match the results.


so yeah...

---

:lol2

:no

:facepalm4


These must be the same scientist/statisticians that said Hillary had a 98% chance of winning prior to the election.

This is either trolling or just plain delusion.

I've said Hillary should contest the election results, but my premise is that Hillary should contest the election so that irregularities in the election would find election fraud in favor of Hillary.

How hilarious would it be if they actually bite and have it blow up in their gook faces.

deadline for recounts: Wisconsin (Friday), Pennsylvania (Monday), Michigan (Next Wednesday)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mintjewlips

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sonatine

i was hesitant to bring this up but fuck it:

some very real deal computer scientists / statisticians are saying the results in 3 swing states are sketchy as fuck:


http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/22/politi...lenge-results/


tl;dr: somehow, she only did poorly in areas with electronic voting machines, and the numbers themselves are statistically improbable in the extreme, with trump somehow winning by a very consistent average across incredibly diverse areas. basically for him to have such a smooth, consistent margin is considered... unnatural.


note that the statistics-speak is not my forte but honestly it reads a lot like the superuser hand analysis convos.


oh and lastly, the audit trail used to validate the results does not match the results.


so yeah...

---

:lol2

:no

:facepalm4


These must be the same scientist/statisticians that said Hillary had a 98% chance of winning prior to the election.

This is either trolling or just plain delusion.

I've said Hillary should contest the election results, but my premise is that Hillary should contest the election so that irregularities in the election would find election fraud in favor of Hillary.

How hilarious would it be if they actually bite and have it blow up in their gook faces.

---

a perfectly sane response to this entire situation ^

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sonatine

a perfectly sane response to this entire situation ^

---

Perfectly sane would be to accept Donald J Trump as your president and kiss the ring bitch.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mintjewlips

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sonatine

a perfectly sane response to this entire situation ^

---

Perfectly sane would be to accept Donald J Trump as your president and kiss the ring bitch.

---

i think addressing the concerns of people who are authorities in their field before doing so would be prudent, but hey i voted for hilldawg, the fuck do i know apparently.

Tine, Jesus Christ


Go take a break or something

"Computer scientists"




Maybe Druff could chime in on this too. Id like to hear the rest of the opinions of the people who were so correct on this election.

Honestly, i predicted in my head how some of this would transpire



Im surprised we havent gotten to hanging chads yet...

i legit think some of you ditch diggers would suicide if the vote was declared invalid.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sonatine

i legit think some of you ditch diggers would suicide if the vote was declared invalid.

---

Well, several snowflakes have already suicided since election night. Statistically speaking, there may be a few from the other side if things changed. Same thing happened in past elections. Will any come from this forum? Praaaabably not.

HEY,and ditchdiggers? Im offended at that, i work hard every day shaping the water flow. Everyone needs ditches...whos going to dig em...you?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blake

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by snake_in_the_ass

No pain and not poor. Retired at age 30 and live off of passive income. Made my fortune from affiliate marketing & domain names before the competition showed up.

---

rofl yeah a lot of independetly wealthy 30-year olds talk like you

---

Everyone hates n-words, they just won't admit it in public. Same goes for me, I don't say a word about n-words outside of this forum.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yO4xfj0ISoY

https://i.imgur.com/Ezbx7T1.png

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sonatine

i was hesitant to bring this up but fuck it:

some very real deal computer scientists / statisticians are saying the results in 3 swing states are sketchy as fuck:


http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/22/politi...lenge-results/


tl;dr: somehow, she only did poorly in areas with electronic voting machines, and the numbers themselves are statistically improbable in the extreme, with trump somehow winning by a very consistent average across incredibly diverse areas. basically for him to have such a smooth, consistent margin is considered... unnatural.


note that the statistics-speak is not my forte but honestly it reads a lot like the superuser hand analysis convos.


oh and lastly, the audit trail used to validate the results does not match the results.


so yeah...

---

I mean I have so many questions. Like were the machines in rural counties vs populated ones, is 7% statistically relevant with a small voting sample, etc.

Invalidating election results would be the end of the country and it wouldn't end well for anyone living in a blue state.

As long as the myth that she won the popular vote continues we will have issues (not saying 100% she didn't win, but people need to be educated about how vote counting happens and why it is more likely that the election was very close or in favor of Trump slightly).

Also LoL America

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hongkonger

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FPS_Russia

Better than paying Israel $10.5 million every single day for the next decade. They got healthcare for all citizens but we can't afford it.

Since we fund much of their defense we should make sure to at least hear the other side of the story.

---

The U.S. relationship to Israel won't change. Trump has surrounded himself with military advisors and owes a great deal to evangelical Christian voters.

---

It won't change? Even with Hitler in the white house?

http://2d0yaz2jiom3c6vy7e7e5svk.wpen...2.29.45_pm.png

corn of the pop.