well played johnny saks, first you scam ppl, then you poach drexel
Printable View
well played johnny saks, first you scam ppl, then you poach drexel
You can poach people who were let go?Quote:
Originally Posted by fluffer
Jasep, let it go man... haters gonna hate.Quote:
Originally Posted by JasepYou can poach people who were let go?Quote:
Originally Posted by fluffer
not hating,okQuote:
Originally Posted by pikacharJasep, let it go man... haters gonna hate.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jasep
my review of the last show
johnny saks, you really need to work on your delivery as you come across as incoherent at times
you have to be a little more articulate, as you are always searching for the right word(s) to express an opinion. At least drexel who has a habit of bastardizing the english language is at least entertaining
even Tim ( poor mans drexel) has a lot more personality than both you and kevin
the show lacks fluency, this can be improved
want me to go on?
No thanks fluffer
i have listened to all your shows, so im obviously a fan, and appreciate the effort you have put inQuote:
Originally Posted by Jasep
just trying to offer constructive criticism, ok
and please stop being a fuckin pussy and threaten to stop doing your show because of all the haters
trying to help outQuote:
Originally Posted by flufferi have listened to all your shows, so im obviously a fag, and appreciate the effort you have put inQuote:
Originally Posted by Jasep
just trying to offer constructive criticism, ok
I've actually listened to a couple archived shows and tuned in for part of the show live this week. I like the way Jasep questions people, it's more of a Larry King style where he asks a fairly basic question and let's the person answer it how they see fit --after all the guest is who the new people are tuning in for, and what the topics of the show revolve around: Jasep's fans will be their regardless.
All of the shows I have heard were with "friendlies" so there shouldn't be any problem getting them to talk. I mean, I haven't heard him deal with any contentious, hostile, interviewees, so it's hard to say just how hard-hittting and pointed his questions could be, but for the people that have been on he seems to ask pertinent, thoughtful, questions, not to mention he's well-educated on most of the topics discussed.
As far as the pauses and such; who gives a shit! He's hosting an Internet poker podcast not taking over for Conan O'Brien. What do you people expect from these podcasts?????
not if i am strictly a power top, okQuote:
Originally Posted by RichardBrodiesCombover.trying to help outQuote:
Originally Posted by fluffer
With everyone else I welcome constructive criticism and work to correct it, I keep a dialogue with the person after I attempt to make improvements and and always offer up free clothing for helping (see crowe diddly). However, all of your posts are just way to trollish for me to engage you seriously on the topic. I appreciate you listening and I hope you enjoy the show and I can tell you I work very hard to improve my performance.Quote:
Originally Posted by flufferi have listened to all your shows, so im obviously a fan, and appreciate the effort you have put inQuote:
Originally Posted by Jasep
just trying to offer constructive criticism, ok
and please stop being a fuckin pussy and threaten to stop doing your show because of all the haters
If I can make a suggestion to you... If you want to be taken seriously and engage in solid, constructive conversation than change your approach, change your avatar, realize no one cares about your dick, ass, bacne, and no grown man should say *giggling*
+1Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve-O
:this
:to
Couldn't say it any better... it's not like people are waiting 5 mins between segments... wow this isn't CNN, it's FLPR
Thanks Steve. I have only really had on one guest that I genuinely did not like at the time and that was Andrew Badaker, he came up in the game with my co-host and me and him butted heads a bit in the past, other than that I have on guests that I like. I don't feel the need to dig deep and pry, I extend respect to my guests. I am not saying I won't ever pry if I think it needs to be done. Listen the the UCARE scandal show that I did, at one point an employee and freind of the owner called in and me and him had a very animated back and forth and it was probably more the interview style people want to hear.Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve-O
The only interview I regret is Annie Duke because I agreed with her rep before hand not to veer from the questions I submitted, and I wanted to but I was not willing to go back on my word to do it.
BUT THATS MY SCHTICK!!!!...Quote:
Originally Posted by JasepWith everyone else I welcome constructive criticism and work to correct it, I keep a dialogue with the person after I attempt to make improvements and and always offer up free clothing for helping (see crowe diddly). However, all of your posts are just way to trollish for me to engage you seriously on the topic. I appreciate you listening and I hope you enjoy the show and I can tell you I work very hard to improve my performance.Quote:
Originally Posted by fluffer
If I can make a suggestion to you... If you want to be taken seriously and engage in solid, constructive conversation than change your approach, change your avatar, realize no one cares about your dick, ass, bacne, and no grown man should say *giggling*
I HAVE NOTHING ELSE, OK
oh, btw there is a saying about ''striving for excellence'', mr saks
not mediocrity, ok
Tonight is Old School night on Filthy Limper Poker Radio.
We will be joined by guest Co-Hosts Bootsy Collins and John Devine...
We will have poker writer Steve "Steve-O" Ruddock from www.PokerNewsBoy.com on the show to discuss shadiness in online poker rooms (pokerstars vs. Lock) and Mass. Gambling laws that have been passed.
Steve will also play a game with us, Pokers "Mike Walker Game" He will read 5 old school stories from the old Rec.Gambling days and it will be up to the hosts to decide which item is false.
We will be joined by Texas Poker Historian Johnny Hughes to talk about old poker stories and his writing with Bluff Europe and his novels.
Brandon "Drexel" Drexel was scheduled for the show but something came up and he will not be able to participate to an extent but he will try to call in from the road.
Password for the Black Chip freeroll is blindsquirrel
Listen live beginning at 8pm EST.
Jasep - is there any chance you can improve the sound quality on your podcasts. 11kHz mono is 1990s telephone quality.
Can you jump on Druff's setup which sounds 100x better?
Good question.Quote:
Originally Posted by Belly Buster
I am aware of the audio, it sounds like telephone quality because it is telephone quality, Blog Talk does all of their hosting via telephone connections. I went with them because I did not have the technical prowess or the funding to do the show without a third party application... I now do have those things and we are in the process of developing radio and a few other things that will make everyone happy.
We have a May projection date until FLPR as you know it gets completely transformed, I made a decision to do the shows with what I have for now rather than not do them at all.
If anyone doesn't currently listen because of quality issues I ask that you come back and give it another listen in about 3-4 weeks when we roll our a new production.
Good stuff. Look forward to it.Quote:
Originally Posted by JasepGood question.Quote:
Originally Posted by Belly Buster
I am aware of the audio, it sounds like telephone quality because it is telephone quality, Blog Talk does all of their hosting via telephone connections. I went with them because I did not have the technical prowess or the funding to do the show without a third party application... I now do have those things and we are in the process of developing radio and a few other things that will make everyone happy.
We have a May projection date until FLPR as you know it gets completely transformed, I made a decision to do the shows with what I have for now rather than not do them at all.
If anyone doesn't currently listen because of quality issues I ask that you come back and give it another listen in about 3-4 weeks when we roll our a new production.
We are broadcasting live on the air! Listen in at http://tobtr.com/s/3121541. #Poker
Johnny Hughes was EPIC!!!! There is no school like the old school and he is the headmaster
Definitely a good guest. I like old school stories and this guy had some good ones.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bootsy Collins
Johnny is the perfect guest and my advice would be to book him bi-weekly or monthly and just let him tell some old story for 30 minutes. Also, I bought his book on Kindle last night and just a heads-up; it's only like $3.99 for the kindle editionQuote:
Originally Posted by limp donk bingoDefinitely a good guest. I like old school stories and this guy had some good ones.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bootsy Collins
Thanks for having me on last night, it was fun
This is hilarious to me due to the fact that it was discussed and most everyone thought that Laak had the stamina advantage due to when he set the record.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g7iEUiMROts
Yeah I saw this last night after the show was over. I am not sure what the deal was here or if Laak addressed it yet. (i know they said he referenced the 2p2 thread at the table) I'm not sure this was because of him being tired, I just cant see that being the case but who knows...Quote:
Originally Posted by shortbuspoker
it looks like he either felt terrible about slow rolling the kid (which I can't see him doing because no one feels terrible to the tune of 100k)
He was chip dumping to the kid if they were partners and laak was looking to get up, since there is a 20k cap on the buy in here (also not sure this would happen given laaks rep and the fact it was all on TV)
He misread his hand (also hard to believe since he is a high level pro, but phil ivey did it in the main event 2 years ago)
Laak wanted Tony G to lose the side bet on the hand for whatever reason (even though its all on camera anyway)
Or the actual likely scenario......
That wasn't Laak's hand... I don't see any actual footage of his hand in that video, just the graphic on the screen, so I am guessing the production crew put the wrong hand up and then the commentators were given the wrong information.
raising oop with A6, then 4 betting it and finally calling off a shove with it does not seem like something Laak would do, I would guess he had AQ in the hand, but who knows, I also didn't watch the whole 8 minutes so maybe I missed them showing his hand but that would be my theory with the info I took a look at.
This is a good point, they were constantly putting the wrong graphics on the screen as far as bet and pot sizes. Also, I've seen Laak play a lot and I have never seen him call a sizable 3-bet with A/6 offsuit, specially so quickly.Quote:
Originally Posted by JasepYeah I saw this last night after the show was over. I am not sure what the deal was here or if Laak addressed it yet. (i know they said he referenced the 2p2 thread at the table) I'm not sure this was because of him being tired, I just cant see that being the case but who knows...Quote:
Originally Posted by shortbuspoker
it looks like he either felt terrible about slow rolling the kid (which I can't see him doing because no one feels terrible to the tune of 100k)
He was chip dumping to the kid if they were partners and laak was looking to get up, since there is a 20k cap on the buy in here (also not sure this would happen given laaks rep and the fact it was all on TV)
He misread his hand (also hard to believe since he is a high level pro, but phil ivey did it in the main event 2 years ago)
Laak wanted Tony G to lose the side bet on the hand for whatever reason (even though its all on camera anyway)
Or the actual likely scenario......
That wasn't Laak's hand... I don't see any actual footage of his hand in that video, just the graphic on the screen, so I am guessing the production crew put the wrong hand up and then the commentators were given the wrong information.
raising oop with A6, then 4 betting it and finally calling off a shove with it does not seem like something Laak would do, I would guess he had AQ in the hand, but who knows, I also didn't watch the whole 8 minutes so maybe I missed them showing his hand but that would be my theory with the info I took a look at.
Laak is also insane/genius enough to play that up as it being truth and let everyone think he is tired/tilted and then start outplaying them, which i guess is what he is doing lately given what i have readQuote:
Originally Posted by Steve-OThis is a good point, they were constantly putting the wrong graphics on the screen as far as bet and pot sizes. Also, I've seen Laak play a lot and I have never seen him call a sizable 3-bet with A/6 offsuit, specially so quickly.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jasep
Also, Steve-O is god and his game last night was fun, I got it wrong as usual
And who got it right?Quote:
Originally Posted by Jasep
Scotty Clarks man crush obvQuote:
Originally Posted by Bootsy CollinsAnd who got it right?Quote:
Originally Posted by Jasep
I finally figured out who he reminds me of. He is a Huey Lewis doppelgänger.Quote:
Originally Posted by JasepScotty Clarks man crush obvQuote:
Originally Posted by Bootsy Collins
Here he is explaining it, but I'm gonig with the Daniel Negreanu train of thought which is "anytime Phil Laak is talking about his hand he is lying"I find it odd that this is the one hand we don't have video evidence of his hole cards...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLCCi6fIIpI&feature=player_embedded
I've mucked the winning hand a couple times but it was in long sessions and I misread the other players cards. Like calling an all in on the river with a low set, and thinking the other player has a higher set. Only to know after it was two pair.
I hope it never happens in a pot this big though lol.
Next question Johnney Hughes, next question.
That guy definitely is a classic. Def good show last night.
I don't ever recall mucking a winning hand, but I've misread my hand a few times and called an all-in, when I didn't have what i thought I had... which is just as bad I supposeQuote:
Originally Posted by TheTemplar
Yea that had happened to me too. I once snap called and all in and said nuts. He looked at me like I was an idiot, as he actually had the nuts lol.
Most people don't.....Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve-OI don't ever recall mucking a winning hand, but I've misread my hand a few times and called an all-in, when I didn't have what i thought I had... which is just as bad I supposeQuote:
Originally Posted by TheTemplar
I was wondering who would catch that :)Quote:
Originally Posted by BetCheckBetMost people don't.....Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve-O
I don't "remember" doing it either but I did flat call a river bet with a straight flush one night when I was drunk because I thought that I only had an 8 high flush.Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve-OI was wondering who would catch that :)Quote:
Originally Posted by BetCheckBet
''This week on Filthy Limper, Johnny and Kevin did what they do best: they examine areas of the poker world that don’t often get the attention they deserve. This week they go old school. I have to admit that I wasn’t overly optimistic that I was going to enjoy the topic. Though I don’t consider myself a historian, I have been around the block a few times.
But I must say that I found myself totally immersed in the interview the guys did with Johnny Hughes. He had great stories about some of the old school cheats and historical gambling legends like Arnold Rothstein and Titanic Thompson. The show is three hours long but even if you can’t commit that much time I recommend checking out the Hughes interview.
I also suggest skipping the first 40 minutes of the show for reasons that would take me an entire article to explain. Maybe I’ll write an opinion piece later in the week if time permits.''
http://pokerfuse.com/features/week-i...dcasts-apr-16/
Spoke to Mike from Pokerfuse about this... He has a tremendously different opinion of online poker than Steve-O does and felt that Steve was either grossly misinformed or intentionally misleading the audience.Quote:
Originally Posted by fluffer