Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Will do..... I'll have as much info ready as possible, especially the email dialogue between the FBI and USAO and myself pertaining to Morgenstern case...... its extremely pertinent to show just how imcompetent the FBI agent was during that investigation
Great eye there man. Yes in yesterday’s video the way those 100s were sitting on his hand & his unwillingness to fan it close to camera he is definitely down to using mostly movie prop money. He mixes in a few real 100s but I could tell it was largely paper the money was made out of and not that 25% linen/75% cotton that real money is made from. Of course when he’s going to the bank he’s got to make sure the currency is separated just in case. That is exactly how he would do it. Well done man!Quote:
Originally Posted by Dustin Mc
He’s certainly had money in the past like Biloxi. But the quarantine has hurt him as well as he gave up on people prepaying for coaching. So it’s logical that he is down to the nitty gritty. Where he deserves to be.
Come to think of it he’s really put himself in a corner now with making the coaching a free roll. Most likely after Vegas opens there is going to be a large percentage of his would be suckers not comfortable with flying as of yet. I guess that’s one silver lining to all this misery is the quarantine has made it tougher for scammers to get to separate victims from their money. Sure some huge suckers are still sending money but it’s got to be limited.
:lol2
What a difference a week makes. Youre now a believer its fake. If we can get Dan onboard now and give his opinion that its fake his next podcastQuote:
Originally Posted by JeffDimeGreat eye there man. Yes in yesterday’s video the way those 100s were sitting on his hand & his unwillingness to fan it close to camera he is definitely down to using mostly movie prop money. He mixes in a few real 100s but I could tell it was largely paper the money was made out of and not that 25% linen/75% cotton that real money is made from. Of course when he’s going to the bank he’s got to make sure the currency is separated just in case. That is exactly how he would do it. Well done man!Quote:
Originally Posted by Dustin Mc
He’s certainly had money in the past like Biloxi. But the quarantine has hurt him as well as he gave up on people prepaying for coaching. So it’s logical that he is down to the nitty gritty. Where he deserves to be.
Come to think of it he’s really put himself in a corner now with making the coaching a free roll. Most likely after Vegas opens there is going to be a large percentage of his would be suckers not comfortable with flying as of yet. I guess that’s one silver lining to all this misery is the quarantine has made it tougher for scammers to get to separate victims from their money. Sure some huge suckers are still sending money but it’s got to be limited.
For the record I always thought it was a mix and it fluctuated. When he went to Biloxi I believe he lost 30K+ & I’m sure Rick will provide clarity. Obviously how he was betting is extremely volatile. In Vegas you can have 50K one day & 0.0 the next day.
If we fast forward to today there was something off about the 100’s yesterday. So it’s been a fluid situation in my humble opinion but yes I do agree he is hurting right now.
:lol2
I'm actually coming around to believe Kevin's theory that the money is fake. That video where he laughably withdrew a whopping $2000 from the ATM to "prove the money is real" is really making me doubt he has a real $50k to his name. He could have easily hit the "Show Balance" button which was right in front of his face, in order to prove he had money. He didn't. He withdrew $2000 because that's probably fairly close to his entire roll -- at least his roll in the bank. You don't need to withdraw thousands of dollars worth of $20s to prove anything when the damn machine has a "Show Balance" button prominently displayed!
He did obviously have $36k to lose in Biloxi, but maybe that was the entire roll he Martingaled up previously, and Biloxi was the inevitable day of reckoning where he lost it all back.
So here's the video which Jeff's posted YouTube comments refers to:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0F0W6sUqtQo
Some fake account (probably Christopher) claimed in response that "the baby is covered", but look at this screen shot of 4:58 in the video:
That little sheer hood isn't going to do crap in the hot, early-afternoon Vegas sun in late April. Plus the baby could get dehydrated very easily out there.
The high temperature in Vegas today was 97 degrees, and more importantly, the UV index was between 8 and 9.5 ("very high"), depending upon which exact time of the afternoon he was out there (it peaked at 1pm).
You can see from the lack of long shadows in the video that it was probably around 1pm:
And the better question is.... WHY???
Why the fuck is this guy bringing his tiny baby out to the near-100 degree Vegas sun for this video? His wife and kid have NO PURPOSE in the video. They could have easily stayed home. It's not like there's any doubt he has a wife and kid -- we've seen them plenty of times before. So why drag them along?
It was hard to watch that video without feeling awful for that little baby. Chirstopher, I know you're reading this. Please leave your kid at home next time you do an "outdoor" Vegas daytime video... at least until November.
Unbelievable.
This was allegedly posted by Chistopher Mitchell's wife's ex husband in 2016:
https://gossip.thedirty.com/gossip/c.../#post-2076198
:lol
If Christopher Mitchell is a Professional Gambler I’m a fucking Ballerina. That is a great point Druff, he took that poor kid out at the hottest time of day right in the sunlight for the sake of a good photo op of the Bellagio Fountain. This is a guy whose videos are the antithesis of pithy. Especially with the lockdown if he wanted to go for a walk with his wife & child he could of done his video separately at any other time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan DruffSo here's the video which Jeff's posted YouTube comments refers to:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0F0W6sUqtQo
Some fake account (probably Christopher) claimed in response that "the baby is covered", but look at this screen shot of 4:58 in the video:
That little sheer hood isn't going to do crap in the hot, early-afternoon Vegas sun in late April. Plus the baby could get dehydrated very easily out there.
The high temperature in Vegas today was 97 degrees, and more importantly, the UV index was between 8 and 9.5 ("very high"), depending upon which exact time of the afternoon he was out there (it peaked at 1pm).
You can see from the lack of long shadows in the video that it was probably around 1pm:
And the better question is.... WHY???
Why the fuck is this guy bringing his tiny baby out to the near-100 degree Vegas sun for this video? His wife and kid have NO PURPOSE in the video. They could have easily stayed home. It's not like there's any doubt he has a wife and kid -- we've seen them plenty of times before. So why drag them along?
It was hard to watch that video without feeling awful for that little baby. Chirstopher, I know you're reading this. Please leave your kid at home next time you do an "outdoor" Vegas daytime video... at least until November.
Unbelievable.
This guy needs a prop in every video & instead of flashing cash he substituted his wife and that innocent child instead. He’s been in Vegas shorter then the last time most of us were able to get a haircut. The wife, child and background were the prop.
[Hey, hey, look at me standing on top of the mountain (in this case next to the Bellagio Fountain) with my family right beside me. I have conquered the casinos & that is exactly why I can help you to achieve the same.]
I strongly believe that when you bring a child into this world you better have both your feet on the ground. Not be some two-bit grifter who doesn’t know when his next mark is going to come around. Christopher, when you read this please don’t use your child in your videos anymore. Maybe you can have the kid stay with a family member until you have your feet on the ground. It’s never too late to start doing the right thing.
It's no theory its Fake, it's a fact. The money he lost in Biloxi was from his 1 on 1 coaching and strategies scams...... he also has done the ATM video 3 different times. One was deleted (shocker) and heres the other one https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14qgHPq7tucQuote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
This queen is so vapid. I’m not even a practicing Christian anymore and I can’t handle his bullshit rationalizing in this video it’s too much. One takeaway is you can see how the real money has imperfections & creases etc. If he reads this he’s probably going to try and make the prop money look a little more worn. If so, have at it hoss...Quote:
Originally Posted by Dustin McIt's no theory its Fake, it's a fact. The money he lost in Biloxi was from his 1 on 1 coaching and strategies scams...... he also has done the ATM video 3 different times. One was deleted (shocker) and heres the other one https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14qgHPq7tucQuote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
But wait there’s more....
Looks like he may have convinced his wife to be more involved. We’ll see how long he sticks with it but it looks like they may be more prevalent going forward unfortunately.
These are just too funny not to share. In today’s “Comment of the Day” Christopher offers his opinion of Mayor Goodman as well as he anticipation of the announcement of when he will be able to begin Phase 1 of the reopening of his scam. He’s getting the popcorn out for the Governor’s decision.
:popcorn
Multi Millionaire that where's same shirts every video #beastmode #baccarat
Pretty amazing that his wife had the baby at all. She's born in December 1975, meaning that she was around 44 when the baby was born. Women who are 43 do get pregnant -- we had a woman on PFA Radio once who had a baby at 44 -- but it's not common. Most women have badly degraded eggs at that point, which aren't viable. The ones more likely to get pregnant are the ones who already had a lot of kids, but Stacy only had one child back in 2007, so that doesn't apply here. Additionally, women over 40 have a better chance of getting pregnant when the father is much younger, but Christopher was 40 at the time. Even the woman on PFA Radio said the dad of her baby was 29.
Guess the kid ran pretty well as far as being born. However, the kid ran really badly to have those two as parents.
Of course he wants the city to reopen. Then he can get back to fleecing suckers for 50% of their "winnings" when he shadows them and shows them how to Martingale.
I read the court documents last night related to the 2017 civil lawsuit that Chris and Stacy filed against Stacy's ex. They were hilarious. I loved how Chris' attorneys repeatedly asserted in the filing that Chris wasn't a gay porn star, and that Stacy's ex was libeling Chris by writing that and stating it in court.
The whole lawsuit was odd. It was suing Stacy's ex for results in legal hearings and court cases, claiming he lied. Ummm... isn't that the entire point of litigation and hearings -- to determine the truth? I've never seen a lawsuit before attempting to sue someone for suffering the endured as a result of court decisions against them (which were not successfully appealed or reversed).
Of course, as Kevin noted, the whole thing was dropped when the defense subpoenaed COLT Studios for info about Chris' films there. How was Chris so stupid to where he didn't believe that would happen? Did he really believe he would win a lawsuit by lying in court that he was never in those films, when it was so easy to prove he actually was?
The funny thing is that Chris can't even own up to the gay porn past because it ruins the entire Christian angle he's trying to sell.
Otherwise he'd just be best off admitting it, and weaving it into his life story. ("At one point, I was in such bad financial shape that I did gay porn despite being straight... but now, 10 years later, I'm long past those days, and look at how successful I am as a pro gambler and businessman! What an inspiring story!")
In 2020, most people aren't going to give a shit if he's a former gay porn star, as long as his gambling advice is good. Hell, if a gay prostitute could actually teach me how to win more money gambling, I'd buy the training from him!
However, since these videos are mostly aimed at older Christian people, he can't admit to his gay porn past, or he loses a large portion of his potential customer base. That demographic wouldn't be as forgiving.
It looks like she’s got a black eye?!Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffDimeBut wait there’s more....
Looks like he may have convinced his wife to be more involved. We’ll see how long he sticks with it but it looks like they may be more prevalent going forward unfortunately.
Reading this made me immediately think of this hilarious clip of Steve Martin from Leap of Faith. Christopher Mitchell ain’t no Steve Martin. Quick context...Liam Neeson plays the Sheriff of this town that the scam preacher Steve Martin is fleecing. Neeson just let the crowd know about the preacher’s criminal past and Steve Martin’s character turns it around like an absolute pro.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NgEOTc2qgVg