I think Druff's view would be (might be?) the majority view, if the extremes could be quieted down even a little bit long enough for us to find out.
Printable View
I think Druff's view would be (might be?) the majority view, if the extremes could be quieted down even a little bit long enough for us to find out.
Fantastic post, Todd.
This is correct. Another reason a complete ban of guns would not work is because such a draconian law would be unconstitutional.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
This argument is a red herring. Today there is no significant domestic movement interested in matching the fire power of the US military. I dismiss the radical fringe wackos, nut jobs and drug cartels because if they ever intended such an assault on the government (as has happened in Mexico), they would increase their arsenals through illegal black market purchases.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Perhaps you meant assault rifles when you wrote 'high-powered weaponry'. That is an issue that could fill a multiple page thread. I would just caution that almost every piece of federal gun ban legislation has at its core the goal to completely ban guns. This is an area of legislative activity where citizens' Second Amendment rights will be best protected by a vigorous gun owners' lobby working with Congress to enact any reasonable restrictions to 'high-powered weaponry'.
Your summary of the Trayvon Martin incident is not supported by the facts and evidence made available to the public.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Martin confronted Zimmerman. Martin assaulted Zimmerman. One witness has already stated this plus there is the 911 call that clearly reveals Zimmerman's cries for help. Then there is George Zimmerman's interview with the police and Sean Hannity.
Your story about what happened is not supported by any evidence. For you to say it probably went down 'pretty close to that' is conjecture, guesswork.
There is compelling evidence that Zimmerman's life was in danger. There is a witness who saw Martin assault Zimmerman. There is the 911 call revealing Zimmerman's screams for help. There are the medical records and photographs of Zimmerman's injuries. There is Zimmerman's story.
You may believe that but you are wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
The most respected research done on this subject was John R. Lott Jr.'s More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws
Even the most ardent anti-gun activists have never been able to refute Lott's research and findings that the more guns law abiding citizens have, the less violent crime there is.
It's required reading for folks on both sides of this debate.
Read the preface here.
Druff good thing you aren't a elected Republican, your statement above would be career suicide. Republicans are not allowed to talk about the need for any new gun laws what so ever. You can't be posting the need for common sense laws regarding guns/ammo and still claim right wing cred. NRA would of given you some talking points about the Colorado shootings, like it would of been prevented if many members in the crowd had guns to shoot the gunmen or they'll bankroll your opponent next election cycle. That's what makes the right wing so dangerous, common sense discussion/actions are prohibited no matter how bad these shooting become.
Druff welcome to the left, gimmee a hug you ol crazy sumbitch,, lol.
FTR: I'm against any new laws at all, you're to the left of me.
I could split hairs with a few of Druff's points, but at the end of the day it is a solid, centrist write-up on gun control.
The broad middle, where most of us really are.
Don't those doors have alarms on them, when they are opened? Did he already know this from a previous visit?
In the future, these doors will have some sort of alarm system on them.
As far as the right to bear arms. I guess L.A. Shootout, Columbine, Virginia Tech, University of Texas all could have been prevented.
The simple truth is you can not fix stupid or crazy or anyone who will die for there cause whatever that may be. I will support the right to bear arms.
It is there to protect us from foreign and domestic terror. If I was in that theater, or even one of those cops he ran in to, I would have shot him down. This guy needs to die quickly and not 14 or 25 years from now. This will cost millions in taxes because of all the appeals and judicial bullshit.
We should put guys like this guy in an arena and let the families of the victims decide how these pieces of shit should die. Use gate sales and pay per view. Then split all the proceeds between the survivors and the families of the deceased.
Almost all theaters have exit doors in them. They are not "emergency only" exits, so no they would have no alarm when opened.
BTW- WTF are all of these little kids doing at a midnight showing of Batman?... 3-month old? seriously?
USA USA USA
Remember this thread next time you accuse me of being brainwashed by the right.Quote:
Originally Posted by FPS_Russia
I can think critically about the positions of both sides of the political spectrum.
I just happen to agree with the Republican side more often.
I actually decided this completely on my own at the age of 12. I watched a talk show where the host was conservative and his guests were liberal (and both sides had a chance to state their points), and most of hte time I agreed with the conservative.
Hey, I don't hate Barry.Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtyB
I saw the video where he shot all those guns.
He seems like a nice guy.
I'd probably enjoy having a drink with him if he could handle a martini better than a Micon punch to the nose BUT I have to call the floor!!!!!!!!!
Druff, DirtyB just cited an Onion link to support his argument!
For those unfamiliar with The Onion, it's the best parody, joke site online.
nm
I shot so many guns I got tired of them...Really liked that M-14 I carried in the bush many years ago as it shot straight and didn't overuse too much ammo...But glad I got rid of all my guns after my divorce some years ago...Otherwise I'd be in jail today for murdering the lawyers involved in the case...
:lol2
But let's get real about wheather they do (guns) the common man any good if he went up against the government with them...In reality a force of 10,000 citizens armed and determinted would stand no chance against a platoon (40 men) of fully armed soldiers...You have no idea of the firepower such a force they could generate against common citizens...
Barry's buddies are also blaming Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin, ban guns in Chicago, ooops they are banned and it's the murder capitol of the country, ban all fertilizer because it can be used in bomb making,Quote:
Originally Posted by JUSTIFIEDhomicideWhat if the shooter had used an explosive or bomb? What would the rationale be then? Why is a tragic shooting always seen as a segway into gun control? People can't quite seem to wrap their heads around the fact that there are sick people that will use any means possible to execute their sick plans with their preferred result to be the highest body count possible. If it wasn't a gun, it would be something else. Federal Building in OK anyone? Seriously, if they want to get it done ---- they do.Quote:
Originally Posted by limitles
Barry and his progressive buddies are so full of shit they can supply the country's fertilizer requirements
From http://abcnews.go.com/US/colorado-sh...ry?id=16834757
"ABC News early Sunday obtained exclusive video and photos of Holmes as a thin teenager in an oversized shirt from a science camp six years ago at Miramar College in San Diego.
"Over the course of the summer, I've been working with a temporal illusion. It's an illusion that allows you to change the past," Holmes said in the video."
Seems like he's probably spent the last 6 years convincing himself that this is possible, and went through with this killing and thought he could then undo it.
And now he's all:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oXV1kDeorWo
What did Jerry sandusky say to the batman shooter?
You didn't pump enough