:shockQuote:
Originally Posted by Mintjewlips
Printable View
:shockQuote:
Originally Posted by Mintjewlips
Hey, MJLips- make yourself useful and charm this guy into spending a little time with me.
Will Kenneth do? He said he needs a new pillow princess.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kilgore TroutHey, MJLips- make yourself useful and charm this guy into spending a little time with me.
I doubt Kenneth is keen on the usage of his image, maybe I'll send these screenshots to him, obviously i will explain the context to him and that he was referred too as a "n-word"...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kilgore TroutHey, MJLips- make yourself useful and charm this guy into spending a little time with me.
Sure, we're going to need a bottle of whisky, just tell him you're Katherine Heigl's aunt...like really older aunt.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mintjewlips
Once you go black, you never go back.
Is the media really trying to manufacture a scandal over an alleged statutory rape incident that happened 40 years ago. Of course if you just read the headlines you would think the incident happened yesterday. The headlines of course are intentionally opaque about the actual details.
LOL.
Just when you think the media can't sink to a new low.
What is wrong with you guys? Are you some kind of parody account?Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
You might want to go back to your project, "FPS Russia, how does his brain work?"
No, they're reporting on Moore pursuing teenagers when he was in his 30s, and fondling a 14-year old girl. It doesn't matter that it was 40 years ago. That's sick and it's something people should know about him.Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
Stick to sports better, you're better at that.
Fair enough. It just feels real dirty. Guys is running for office and then right before election a story surfaces of events that may have happened 40 years ago. I just don't trust our media at all. They are corrupt and have way too much of an agenda and that isn't a good thing, whatever side you are on IMO.Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkongerNo, they're reporting on Moore pursuing teenagers when he was in his 30s, and fondling a 14-year old girl. It doesn't matter that it was 40 years ago. That's sick and it's something people should know about him.Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
Stick to sports better, you're better at that.
I don't give a shit about Moore one way or another. If he committed sex crimes we should have been made aware of it whenever the media found out. I don't like them sitting on it and waiting till right before an election. It just shows how they have an agenda and can't be trusted at all.
Hong,
I am not going to argue with you about what is right or wrong. You are an partisan tribal ideologue. Whatever your tribe does is right, and whatever the other tribe does is wrong. It is that simple for you.
So what is the point with arguing with someone who thinks like that? Same thing arguing with Mint or Tyde on the other side.
Have you read the article?Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaardFair enough. It just feels real dirty. Guys is running for office and then right before election a story surfaces of events that may have happened 40 years ago. I just don't trust our media at all. They are corrupt and have way too much of an agenda and that isn't a good thing, whatever side you are on IMO.Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkonger
I don't give a shit about Moore one way or another. If he committed sex crimes we should have been made aware of it whenever the media found out. I don't like them sitting on it and waiting till right before an election. It just shows how they have an agenda and can't be trusted at all.
I don't think they sat on anything, they just didn't bother sending a reporter to spend a couple weeks looking for dirt until he won the primary.
You've never heard of an October Surprise? This is as old as the press itself.Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
The motives shouldn't matter. When Wikileaks was dropping bombshells on the DNC, liberals frothed at the mouth about how the leaks were selective and politically motivated. As if we should just ignore it and give everyone a pass. Facts are facts, no matter what agenda the messenger has.
Anyway, it's pretty weird of you to accuse a molestation victim of lying because of some tinfoil media conspiracy.
Nope. That is just not how these things work. But you are going to believe whatever is most convenient for your own agenda, so not going to argue over it.Quote:
Originally Posted by duped_samaritanHave you read the article?Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
I don't think they sat on anything, they just didn't bother sending a reporter to spend a couple weeks looking for dirt until he won the primary.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SrslySiriusYou've never heard of an October Surprise? This is as old as the press itself.Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
The motives shouldn't matter. When Wikileaks was dropping bombshells on the DNC, liberals frothed at the mouth about how the leaks were selective and politically motivated. As if we should just ignore it and give everyone a pass. Facts are facts, no matter what agenda the messenger has.
Anyway, it's pretty weird of you to accuse a molestation victim of lying because of some tinfoil media conspiracy.
I am not accusing any molestation victim of anything. You just made that up yourself. I am being critical of the media. And motives do matter. What else is the media sitting on that we may or may not ever find out about depending on if it ever becomes convenient?
Congratulations. You just put the New York Times and CNN on the same level of credibility as Wikileaks. The sad thing is at this point they probably are. And that is a big problem for all of us.
Good call, probably best not to argue over an article you haven't read.Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaardNope. That is just not how these things work. But you are going to believe whatever is most convenient for your own agenda, so not going to argue over it.Quote:
Originally Posted by duped_samaritan
If they sat on it, they shouldn't have. But I believe some of the women are just coming forward.Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaardFair enough. It just feels real dirty. Guys is running for office and then right before election a story surfaces of events that may have happened 40 years ago. I just don't trust our media at all. They are corrupt and have way too much of an agenda and that isn't a good thing, whatever side you are on IMO.Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkonger
I don't give a shit about Moore one way or another. If he committed sex crimes we should have been made aware of it whenever the media found out. I don't like them sitting on it and waiting till right before an election. It just shows how they have an agenda and can't be trusted at all.
You said this story is manufactured. Maybe I misunderstood, but it seemed you were implying that it's not true.Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
You accuse others of being partisan, but you sound extremely biased here. Not for a political party, but your resentment of the press clouding your judgment. I agree that sitting on stories is unethical, and it's a problem, but are you really going to give pedophiles a pass just because you learned they were pedos at an inconvenient time?Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
I am not giving any pedophile a pass. If it actually happened (it probably did but we don't know that) this shit should have come out and been investigated whenever it was known about. Instead the media is using it to manipulate an election towards their own ends, and that is not a good thing for any of us IMO.Quote:
Originally Posted by SrslySiriusYou accuse others of being partisan, but you sound extremely biased here. Not for a political party, but your resentment of the press clouding your judgment. I agree that sitting on stories is unethical, and it's a problem, but are you really going to give pedophiles a pass just because you learned they were pedos at an inconvenient time?Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
When I said manufactured I meant the media is manufacturing an environment conducive towards manipulating an election towards their own gain in an very insincere way. Not the story itself is manufactured. We don't know that yet.
And Mintjewlips believes our government isn't compromised by Russia. We believe what we want to believe.Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkongerIf they sat on it, they shouldn't have. But I believe some of the women are just coming forward.Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
But don't worry Republicans. As we sit here I am sure the right wing media is working hard to manufacture something damaging against the Democratic Party in response. Tit for tat.
Not true. I've often disagreed politically with Hillary, Obama, Clinton and other Democrats, and said so. And gave Republicans credit for the good things they've done. I've even voted for Republicans, but not for president.Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
Regarding right and wrong, when they do something wrong they should be held accountable regardless of party. But just because their political opponents say they did something wrong that doesn't mean it's true. Great example is Benghazi, a manufactured scandal that was investigated by 4 Congressional committees and they did suggest changes to SOP going forward but all of them concluded that nobody in government including Hillary could be held responsible for what happened under circumstances and policies in effect at that time. Another example is Hillary's e-mails, which was actual wrongdoing. She handled them improperly but the Justice Department concluded that it wasn't egregious and serious enough to get an indictment from a grand jury. It is super fucking standard to drop a case if these veteran prosecutors decide they cannot get an indictment. It happens every day. It's worth noting and taking into account when forming an overall opinion but not worth getting bent out of shape about. Information should always flow freely, but the level of ire has to bear some relationship to the magnitude of the wrongdoing.
Any guesses on the odds that Moore drops out?Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaardI am not giving any pedophile a pass. If it actually happened (it probably did but we don't know that) this shit should have come out and been investigated whenever it was known about. Instead the media is using it to manipulate an election towards their own ends, and that is not a good thing for any of us IMO.Quote:
Originally Posted by SrslySirius
When I said manufactured I meant the media is manufacturing an environment conducive towards manipulating an election towards their own gain in an very insincere way. Not the story itself is manufactured. We don't know that yet.
Election is Dec 10th, and it would be the dem vs a write-in(Mr. Strange will prob campaign)
Bible thumping dickheads can't keep their filthy paws off of little girls,hypocrites.
I saw the movie. Are you arguing the movie portrayed events accurately?Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkongerNot true. I've often disagreed politically with Hillary, Obama, Clinton and other Democrats, and said so. And gave Republicans credit for the good things they've done. I've even voted for Republicans, but not for president.Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
Regarding right and wrong, when they do something wrong they should be held accountable regardless of party. But just because their political opponents say they did something wrong that doesn't mean it's true. Great example is Benghazi, a manufactured scandal that was investigated by 4 Congressional committees and they did suggest changes to SOP going forward but all of them concluded that nobody in government including Hillary could be held responsible for what happened under circumstances and policies in effect at that time. Another example is Hillary's e-mails, which was actual wrongdoing. She handled them improperly but the Justice Department concluded that it wasn't egregious and serious enough to get an indictment from a grand jury. It is super fucking standard to drop a case if these veteran prosecutors decide they cannot get an indictment. It happens every day. It's worth noting and taking into account when forming an overall opinion but not worth getting bent out of shape about. Information should always flow freely, but the level of ire has to bear some relationship to the magnitude of the wrongdoing.
Also, I understand when it comes to foreign policy, especially when you are doing covert shit in enemy lands, shit is a lot more complicated than right or wrong. Maybe an ambassador and some mercs were left to die, and maybe whoever was making the decisions estimated doing so really was in the best interest of our country.
So were clear, it makes verminaard sick to hear about pedophilia but not nearly as sick as manipulating election results.
As opposed to enlightened liberals like Weinstein?Quote:
Originally Posted by big dick
Powerful men molesting children (male and female) is as old as time itself. Trying to portray it as a modern day problem exclusive to one side of our political spectrum is very insincere IMO.
I don't recall using the word "sick" once in this entire diatribe, especially in the context you are attributing to me. Maybe if you want to debate me you should debate what I actually said, instead of just making shit up I said.Quote:
Originally Posted by varys
True. I wouldn't like to see a known molester become a senator though.Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaardAs opposed to enlightened liberals like Weinstein?Quote:
Originally Posted by big dick
Powerful men molesting children (male and female) is as old as time itself. Trying to portray it as a modern day problem exclusive to one side of our political spectrum is very insincere IMO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by duped_samaritanAny guesses on the odds that Moore drops out?Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2V3CfD8TPac
this actually helps him with his (the trump) base. it's just the media making stuff up again in their minds.
I didn't see the movie, I didn't know there was a movie. I read reporting on the investigations.Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaardI saw the movie. Are you arguing the movie portrayed events accurately?Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkonger
Also, I understand when it comes to foreign policy, especially when you are doing covert shit in enemy lands, shit is a lot more complicated than right or wrong. Maybe an ambassador and some mercs were left to die, and maybe whoever was making the decisions estimated doing so really was in the best interest of our country.
Haiku:Quote:
Originally Posted by big dick
Bible thumping dick
Heads can't keep their filthy paws
Off of little girls
-BigDick
Michael Bay film with some notable actors.
It is mostly from the perspective of the American mercenaries and doesn't get into the politics very much. But it is clear they were more or less left to fend for themselves when they thought they had been promised air support. And the theme of the movie was having the ambassador there at all at that time without adequate security was a very bad idea.
So to summarize:
shitty person has shitty takes and watches shitty movies.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UbQdEz_T5AQuote:
Originally Posted by GambleBotsSatire
Weinstein was a Democratic fundraiser. Roy Moore was an assistant District Attorney when he was molesting 14 year olds, and was then appointed Circuit Judge and twice elected Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court. See how there's a huge difference?Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaardAs opposed to enlightened liberals like Weinstein?Quote:
Originally Posted by big dick
Powerful men molesting children (male and female) is as old as time itself. Trying to portray it as a modern day problem exclusive to one side of our political spectrum is very insincere IMO.
And more importantly, the moment women started coming forward against Weinstein, like Anthony Weiner, pretty much every liberal condemned him. Republicans are defending Roy Moore. Tonight Sean Hannity said that a 32 year old trying to fuck a 14 year old is fine because it was consensual. People are citing the ages of married teenagers in the bible.
These are the same people who have the balls to call themselves "values voters", implying that nobody else has any values.
Sean Hannity now having to sink to the lowest depths of defending pedophilia is incredibly hilarious.
He's saying that he misspoke. @15:45:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-l_vEF4skes
I didn't hear what he said on radio though.