Quote:
Originally Posted by Tellafriend
One time
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Quote:
Originally Posted by badguy23
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by TellafriendOne time
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Quote:
Originally Posted by badguy23
Why are both lines today +100 under?Quote:
Originally Posted by simpdog
Worth a shot for free
https://www.pgachampionship.com/attend/2021/tickets
Unsure busy golfing and drinkingQuote:
Originally Posted by jsearles22Why are both lines today +100 under?Quote:
Originally Posted by simpdog
1-0 today. Too easy guys get out of debt
Kyle Wright has great stuff but his control is terrible.
Arrieta kinda sucks but I don't trust Wright at all.
Philadelphia (Arrieta) -118 vs. Atlanta (Wright)
Maybe I finally can fade the Rockies successfully.
Seattle (Margevicius) -113 vs. Colorado (Castellani)
This free man on 2nd in extra innings is fucking tilting.
The real system would be taking over 1.5 every 2nd period right?? Give me the stats on that simp.
The real money is taking teams when they go down 2 or 3 goals!! Your 100 bets would of made you over 12k the past 3 days alone
I didn't know they had Golf Courses in Canada thanks for holding our hands next time make sure b4 3 goals r scored in the Blackhawks game They dont count for the under 1st periods and actually you are pounding the overs in those games.
Hey Guys Im taking every Under Dog In Baseball tonight if Giants win I can go 1-4 and still cash.
Thats what im banking on anything else is just a bonus
I wont be able to hold your hands through this cuz Im going to Drink Vodka then Kill a few Canadiens
LOL
This Kershaw fade is a cornerstone of everything we hold dear in the Stupidity Wagering thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by badguy23
My problem I’ve been served notice that I’m in makeup with Tellafriend and I suggested Dodgers and Padres parlay +105.
Being threatened by a lawyer does things to your head.
I prefer he join us Lightning under 1.5 1P but that is a massive attack not a one shot lock.
I just had a flashback to my yute. Remember this from 1991? These guys did the theme to “House” too.
Skip first 00:45
https://youtu.be/PKtTmZnVhhI
Well glad I didn’t see this. NHL. Lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by SanlmarThis Kershaw fade is a cornerstone of everything we hold dear in the Stupidity Wagering thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by badguy23
My problem I’ve been served notice that I’m in makeup with Tellafriend and I suggested Dodgers and Padres parlay +105.
Being threatened by a lawyer does things to your head.
I prefer he join us Lightning under 1.5 1P but that is a massive attack not a one shot lock.
I just had a flashback to my yute. Remember this from 1991? These guys did the theme to “House” too.
Skip first 00:45
https://youtu.be/PKtTmZnVhhI
And -320 and -180 for mlb. No thanks.
You got to keep working Steve Sanlmar Stevens.
I bet on Kershaw.
That’s what we call a moment of clarity.
I need help.
Druff piece of advice Stop betting against the Rockies. Dumb move right now sir.
Giants up 2-0 were still available @ +105. I have eyes and I unwound from my Padres Dodgers parlay with something left over for a shower and a hot meal.Quote:
badguy23: You have until 1am to get even. The books still think SF is gonna lose this game.
I think Maple Leafs win a championship before Dodgers.
Druff you can some how get tied here and seattle is down 4 runs and it will be there first hit..
Gotta love sports.
It wont happen but LOL..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tzfz81sowEE
Nevermind double play I tried for ya its just a bad pick me even flaming cant save it Im glad they were one of my underdogs. Good Luck All
LOL so does Simp Im sure he has a bet on itQuote:
Originally Posted by Sanlmar
Mike Pence
Giants then two juicy Dodgers live
If Dodgers Floro ends top 7th I will hedge a clean (free) +400 cause Giants will be offered +100
Edit
Nope .... you could see the money come in on Giants....It just rose and rose From -125 to -185. I’m married to Dodgers.
Life sucks
U could still get plus 300 top of 9th
Every ones parlays every ones last ditch effort riding on the boys in Blue.
Every underdog covered from the time I posted.
Is this the savor?
Druffs boys got 2 hits but 4 runs.
I say u all are good my track record betting on or against the Giants in my 26 yrs of gambling is really bad
Bellinger is an automatic out with his stupid new stance
Nice win badguy. There was a time I faded Kershaw. Good times
I’ll go dig my grave
I would not hedge here if I had dodgers plus 500
Shit i didnt hedge SF + 270
Thats only cuz I have Sf if u knew the bad beats and the one run games over the yrs I lost with this team u wouldnt either.
Quote:
Originally Posted by badguy23
Can’t hedge. I’m trapped
I think there are legit 10 people who can win the PGA tomorrow. Going to be an excellent end
Nice win badguy.
Woosh
Guys I will be playing putt putt tomorrow with some fat broad and drinking Jack so let Simp and San hold things down.
Boom
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rZEWUCzaDE
Fck Hockey..
Im a way better gambler pissed off and when i dont give a fuck.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cC33gH6RE5k
That won’t be necessary.Quote:
Originally Posted by KryptI can venmo you some money if your kids need to eatQuote:
Originally Posted by Tellafriend
San this chip porn is for you.
I think C Champ at 10-1 or better is a very reasonable price today
1-0 so far today on unders
Edit 2-0 now. There was a disallowed goal even.
Edit 3-0 perfect day.
I’m still scarred and scared by this ^^^^^Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanlmar
2-0 today 1P unders
It’s never under til it’s over
Still ain’t saying shit about shit since we have one more game to go, but I see you over there simp...Quote:
Originally Posted by simpdog
Unders something like 28-12. Or if you just did them all and didn't listen about Hawks, 28-15.
Overs 3-0 on Hawks.
If you're losing on NBA, MLB, etc. your account still should be positive over the past week.
These aren't -170 or -200 overs that we were taking. A lot of these are -110, -120, -130.
It’s okay to name namesQuote:
Originally Posted by simpdog
Thank you for being persistent with messages and stuff. I was slow to get on board
Saved me
quick wrap on the PGA...thesis was correct more or less...Quote:
Originally Posted by GambleBotsChafedPenis
tiger did put together very nice 1st and 4th rounds, which sandwiched inconsistency in his 2nd and 3rd...thesis was correct that he probably wouldn't be too consistent, but the books didn't give that "tiger discount" to me, which hurt overall profitability...dont know if i'd make these bets again at the prices...really sucks to have to lay over $1.75 to bet on a thesis...i 100% wouldn't lay $1.88 on rory against anybody...all the talent in the world, but he can just as easily fire a 64 as he can a 77...only bet i'd probably make again would be brooks at $1.67...got fucked on morikawa...that was initially listed at something like -154 and by time i got to betting it, it was -188, so that was a large mistake...
made a little more than 2.5 units betting against tiger...the bet on sergio was a mistake with the sizing...should have only been a half unit...
spieth was all over the place too...horrid 1st and 3rd rounds with good 2nd and 4th...only ended up making 1 unit betting against him as i bet him over 70.5 in the 2nd round which didn't come in...
all in all a profitable tourney...probably wont be looking at any more golf until winged foot in september...always great to make money while watching insanely good golf...
really funny that i see this article after i make the post above...
this is why i will damn near always feel comfortable laying a price with brooks in a major and i will damn near never lay one with rory again...
https://www.espn.com/golf/story/_/id...dustin-johnson
SAN FRANCISCO -- Rory McIlroy took issue with Brooks Koepka's comments following the third round of the PGA Championship in which he noted that Dustin Johnson "only'' had a single major to his name as he assessed his own chances at winning a third straight Wanamaker Trophy.
Asked about it Sunday following a final-round 68, McIlroy said he was not impressed.
"It's a very different mentality to bring to golf that I don't think a lot of golfers have,'' said McIlroy, who has won four major championships but none since 2014. "I was watching the golf last night and heard the interview and was just sort of taken aback a little bit by sort of what he said and whether he was trying to play mind games or not.
"If he's trying to play mind games, he's trying to do it to the wrong person. I don't think D.J. really gives much of a concern [to] that. But just different. I try to respect everyone out here. Everyone is a great player. If you've won a major championship, you're a hell of a player. Doesn't mean you've only won one: You've won one, and you've had to do a lot of good things to do that.
"I mean, sort of hard to knock a guy who's got 21 wins on the PGA Tour, which is three times what Brooks has.''
Johnson took a 1-shot lead into the final round. His lone major title came at the 2016 U.S. Open. Three previous times he held the 54-hole lead in a major and did not go on to win. He captured his 21st PGA Tour title -- only Tiger Woods and Phil Mickelson have more among active players -- in June at the Travelers Championship.
Johnson was not able to hold onto the lead Sunday, unable to overcome a 6-under 64 from Collin Morikawa. The 23-year-old became the third-youngest player to win the tournament in the stroke-play era. Johnson finished tied for second after shooting a 68. Koepka fared much worse, shooting a 4-over 74 to end tied for 29th.
Koepka and McIlroy twice dueled last year, with Koepka prevailing at the WGC-FedEx St. Jude Invitational and then McIlroy winning the Tour Championship, where Koepka finished fourth.
Koepka said last fall he didn't see the two players having a rivalry.
"I've been out here for what, five years?'' Koepka said. "Rory hasn't won a major since I've been on the PGA Tour. So I don't view it as a rivalry.''
When sizing up the final-round leaderboard, Koepka said he liked his chances at pulling a PGA Championship three-peat ... in part because he knew those he was competing against were not as seasoned as him and that Johnson's lone major title was four years ago.
Koepka has won four majors and for the second year in a row was trying to win the same major for the third straight year.
"I like my chances,'' he said. "When I've been in this position before, I've capitalized. I don't know, he's only won one. I'm playing good. We'll see.''
nugget:
Lakers & Suns unders game and 1Q?
just saw this one...dont tend to do much NBA betting pregame so dont want to sway you on the LAL game either way...Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanlmar