Originally Posted by
DRK Star
Fine,
Gallo. Please explain to the class, how my parents got "ripped off", after reading about the success with the program
then, please explain how you wanted to argue BUT SHE IS NOT A JUDGE, when I was indicating to you that there is likely BIAS in the SD Judge, the Balt Attorney and the Stanford Judge, and how the likely BIAS could affect all the cases, and those people shouldnt be involved (recuse themselves).
Why is the fact that the woman was an attorney, with a VERY likely Bias (based on her own words), not matter in the case?
I will just wait to see that explanation, then I will stfu