Quote:
Originally Posted by
FPS_Russia
I hope you're right but I disagree. During the cold war Gorbachev and Reagan never played loose with threats of nuclear war. There may be some back channel negotiations and this may be about contracts for the donors but I don't see it. When Gorbachev steps up and starts issuing warnings of the dangers something's up. Saber rattling's not his thing.
Hillary was not going to back down on her NFZ and I'm confident Putin's like fuck it, we have to stand our ground. Neither could of backed down and saved face, it was dangerous collision course.
Then Trump happened.
ntm PNAC and Nuland.
fps, your random nuclear war talk is so crazy but somehow you fascinate me.
in layman's terms, and without posting videos that no one will watch, why don't believe in the concept of mutually assured destruction? what makes you believe that the nuclear triad would fail and that whoever fires first will win?
if you actually
do believe in mutually assured destruction, your rantings just got 1000 times crazier, because if mutually assured destruction exists, then why would hillary or putin or anyone fire first when it would mean certain death for themselves too?
is this like a religious or apocalyptic type thing for you? are the people who post these videos you watch religious?
not trolling, genuinely curious as to how you get to these conclusions