Printable View
Here's the only issues that matter in no particular order.
1. Require AIPAC and other foreign lobbies to register as foreign lobbies, duh.
2. Require foreign owned media outlets register as foreign. ((They're)) trying to make RT and Sputnik register as foreign media so they can lie us into war without resistance.
3. Stop allowing Israeli citizens to hold office in America until American citizens can hold office in Israel.
4.Stop the Neocons/Jews/Israelis (same thing) from lying us into any more wars.
5. Overturn Citizens United.
6. Remove the Federal Reserve, it's the biggest Jewish swindle in the history of mankind.
Until these happen American voters will remain powerless.
Factoid: Israel has no extradition treaty w the United States, Sonatine isn't that strange?
can you explain what you mean about the federal reserve? what is citizens united?Quote:
Originally Posted by FPS_Russia
The world really is in mortal danger with him in power, isn't it?
You just fucking know the history books will say that WW3 was triggered because a parody twitter account was taken seriously by the then sitting president.
Citizens united lets anyone donate as much as they want to whoever they want and not have to disclose it... It’s how the Koch brothers control the majority of republicans. You no longer need $10 from a million people, you can get $100,000,000 from one donor. It goes against the main purpose of a democracyQuote:
Originally Posted by blakecan you explain what you mean about the federal reserve? what is citizens united?Quote:
Originally Posted by FPS_Russia
yeah i know what citizens united is. fps is far and away the worst poster in the history of these forums and i hope that by engaging him, i can completely fuck up this thread even more, thereby making enough people complain that even druff would ban him.Quote:
Originally Posted by El GalloCitizens united let’s anyone donate as much as they want to whoever they want and not have to disclose it... It’s how the Koch brothers control the majority of republicans. You no longer need $10 from a million people, you can get $100,000,000 from one donor. It goes against the main purpose of a democracyQuote:
Originally Posted by blake
Quote:
Originally Posted by blakeyeah i know what citizens united is. fps is far and away the worst poster in the history of these forums and i hope that by engaging him, i can completely fuck up this thread even more, thereby making enough people complain that even druff would ban him.Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gallo
i actually assumed you just encouraged him to troll me.
you do realize that like 5 players were kneeling, the most prominent being kaepernick, who is now unemployed, right?Quote:
Originally Posted by SrslySirius
these protests (currently) have ZERO to do with social justice, racism or police brutality. the second trump opened his fat mouth to his redneck base, saying he would fire the NFL "sons of bitches" who knelt during the anthem, i knew that every team would protest cause it has now become a symbol of protesting trump, himself, and the fact that he is such an embarrassment
warriors head coach steve kerr:
Quote:
How about the irony of, ‘Free speech is fine if you’re a neo-Nazi chanting hate slogans, but free speech is not allowed to kneel in protest?'” Well, you know what else is disrespectful to our flag? Racism."
https://www.mediaite.com/trump/steve...r-flag-racism/
https://media.giphy.com/media/3ov9jV...bTj2/giphy.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by blakewarriors head coach steve kerr:
Quote:
How about the irony of, ‘Free speech is fine if you’re a neo-Nazi chanting hate slogans, but free speech is not allowed to kneel in protest?'” Well, you know what else is disrespectful to our flag? Racism."
https://www.mediaite.com/trump/steve...r-flag-racism/
"The Venn Diagram of Facebook friends bitching about kneeling NFL players and Facebook friends who peaked in high school is a single overlapping circle."
Such a stupid distraction. If I was an NFL coach I'd run all my players back into the locker room during the national anthem. There is no way in hell I'd be out there like a faggot with some players kneeling and some players standing. The only other option would be forcing every player to stand which would fuck up your team in every conceivable way.
So, what's happening with the Taliban these days? They are no longer the nightly story.
Never in doubt that such a tweet would rise from the ashes
He's right, listen to this shit on YT, viewers discretion advised. I'm going to bill YT for counseling.Quote:
Originally Posted by blakewarriors head coach steve kerr:
Quote:
How about the irony of, ‘Free speech is fine if you’re a neo-Nazi chanting hate slogans, but free speech is not allowed to kneel in protest?'” Well, you know what else is disrespectful to our flag? Racism."
https://www.mediaite.com/trump/steve...r-flag-racism/
Excuse me while I throw up, this is really evil, not as evil as lying another country into war or what's going on in Palestine, you know what I mean.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KX3uCmbFUFg
Bernie gave a speech yesterday and he vowed zero tolerance for white supremists and neo nazis. I couldn't agree more.
what are you 2p2 names fps russia?
a reminder of something............Impeachment is coming......
18 U.S. Code § 227 stipulates that any federal employee, member of Congress, or member of the executive branch is forbidden from using their position within the federal government to influence the employment decisions of a private business, solely on the basis of partisan political affiliation. The penalty for doing so could result in fines and incarceration of up to 15 years, and anyone who is found guilty of violating that law could even be disqualified from holding office:
(a)Whoever, being a covered government person, with the intent to influence, solely on the basis of partisan political affiliation, an employment decision or employment practice of any private entity—
(1) takes or withholds, or offers or threatens to take or withhold, an official act, or
(2) influences or offers or threatens to influence, the official act of another shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than 15 years, or both, and may be disqualified from holding any office of honour, trust, or profit under the United States.
It’s worth noting that U.S. Code specifies that no federal employee is exempt from the law, including the President of the United States.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LarryLaffer
youre a simpleton.
and you left out (deliberately?) the most important part:
"Solely on the basis of partisan political affiliation"
One doesn't need this section of the U.S. Code to impeach a president. In fact, during the Watergate scandal, the special prosecutor investigating whether Nixon should be criminally prosecuted agreed to turn over evidence to the team for Congress members who were working to bring impeachment charges against Nixon versus holding onto to it to use in criminal proceedings. Meaning, impeaching the president is completely separate from criminal prosecution. Hence, the details of the U.S. Code are essentially irrelevant to impeachment proceedings.Quote:
Originally Posted by LarryLaffer
He was so much more coherent back then.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord of the Fraud
Also Trump AFAIK has not taken or withheld or offered or threatened to take or withhold an official act (of government) in connection with NFL employment decisions. There are plenty of reasons Trump should be impeached but this isn't one of them.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatineQuote:
Originally Posted by LarryLaffer
youre a simpleton.
and you left out (deliberately?) the most important part:
"Solely on the basis of partisan political affiliation"
This is true but violating federal law is a good reason for impeachment and is a good guideline for determining whether "high crimes or misdemeanors" have been committed. In other words it's neither necessary nor sufficient, but I wouldn't say it's irrelevant.Quote:
Originally Posted by MumblesBadlyOne doesn't need this section of the U.S. Code to impeach a president. In fact, during the Watergate scandal, the special prosecutor investigating whether Nixon should be criminally prosecuted agreed to turn over evidence to the team for Congress members who were working to bring impeachment charges against Nixon versus holding onto to it to use in criminal proceedings. Meaning, impeaching the president is completely separate from criminal prosecution. Hence, the details of the U.S. Code are essentially irrelevant to impeachment proceedings.Quote:
Originally Posted by LarryLaffer
I would agree that it can help to provide political coverage, but even if the U.S. Code technically allowed the president to do things that are otherwise crimes, Congress can still impeach him/her. And that is a very important political safeguard against the presidency gaining too much power under the law.Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkongerThis is true but violating federal law is a good reason for impeachment and is a good guideline for determining whether "high crimes or misdemeanors" have been committed. In other words it's neither necessary nor sufficient, but I wouldn't say it's irrelevant.Quote:
Originally Posted by MumblesBadly
https://youtu.be/JKhpYlLCRx4
And to think half of the country or more is this dumb
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
Suicide King: And I have my new status update
LMFAO PRETENTIOUS FRAUD HIVEMIND TRASH. ill give u the benefit of the doubt theres something in their air there (ur own farts) and ur too low IQ and don't have the balls to be ur own man
And NFL prime time ratings on Sunday were the worst in 11 years.
Trump has everyone spinning. Gotta admit the guy has some powerful moves
Quote:
Originally Posted by chinamaniac
he was trained by the best
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tellafriend
This isn't a political statement, its her Monica Lewinsky impersonation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by chinamaniac
guy is MAKING AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, had to force the liberals to complain about something and can act like they are taking the moral high ground to believe in the 1st amendment again. but I'm sure it wont last and they will want to ban free speech again when they are getting steamrolled all over the internet in 2018
China and Sidedish do have a point here. He is exposing the snow flakes on both the left and the right with his antics and that is gloriousQuote:
Originally Posted by thesidedishQuote:
Originally Posted by chinamaniac
guy is MAKING AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, had to force the liberals to complain about something and can act like they are taking the moral high ground to believe in the 1st amendment again. but I'm sure it wont last and they will want to ban free speech again when they are getting steamrolled all over the internet in 2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by LarryLafferChina and Sidedish do have a point here. He is exposing the snow flakes on both the left and the right with his antics and that is gloriousQuote:
Originally Posted by thesidedish
to add on that, I can't believe what I'm seeing when I watch libtards in the last cpl days make fun of trump supporters for being hypocrites about things when they've been doing the same things themselves 5-10x over. Human beings really are just absolute fkn retards with amazing egos who only use 10% of their brains
North Korean officials seek meetings with GOP analysts to figure out Trump: report
http://thehill.com/policy/internatio...lican-analysts
4D CHESS MUCH???
Given how aggressive the liberal establishments (i.e. Google, Facebook, College campuses, Antifa) have been in squashing free speech that is not politically correct, and how aggressive liberals are in defending these actions (eg. this thread), it is amazingly ironic how these exact same people are now backing the first amendment to support the demonstrations.
FWIW, I actually support free political speech without having to worry about being fired, including NFL players doing their anti-America shtick and James Demore memo outlining strategies how to increase female participation in tech and Ben Shapiro and Ann Coulter speaking at UC Berkeley.
But that is just me.
At least 6 Trump officials used private e-mail servers for official government business.
Kushner, Bannon Priebus, Cohn, Miller, Ivanka.
LOCK THEM UP
LOCK THEM UP
LOCK THEM UP
Right Trumptards?
The difference is they didn't have the server in their bathroom like a fag you dumbass.
Lol at you spin tards, eat it up idiots, meanwhile, the next pearl harbor is around the corner and you idiots think we still have a democracy......lol.
If another Pearl Harbor or 9/11 happens it'll be because Trump is incompetent and is trying to destroy the government and its democracy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mintjewlips
Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkonger
did they delete them when asked to turn them over and thus making it look like they were doing things they shouldn't be? NO