My book has Indiana +1 -110. Know nothing about this, but gonna fireQuote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Printable View
My book has Indiana +1 -110. Know nothing about this, but gonna fireQuote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
well at least you didn't have to sweat missing the top of the market on albot, san...
i allowed myself to get suckered in to the KC-SF teaser, which is looking quite good right now (34-7 SF), but still feeling like a sucker for not betting both faves SU or parlaying.
think the tease was the way to go over parlaying SU...Quote:
Originally Posted by gut
err i meant betting both at -7.5Quote:
Originally Posted by GambleBotsChafedPenisthink the tease was the way to go over parlaying SU...Quote:
Originally Posted by gut
although here comes GB....
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanlmarAight Krypt, I’m getting pissed.
I took this couple days ago
Lanovic v Kyle Edmunds 9pm
It is now +127 —> +171. Kyle Edmunds is a slow witted player who didn’t look good against big ol’ Isner. Kid needs to only play grass or clay.
You have, no doubt, recognized my brand as ridiculing stupid sharps when they disagree with me and I use sharps to confirm my handicap. Give me credit for not blind following them.
In this instance, the sharps are the dumb money. Feel free to unload.
I’m officially annoyed now. Why do I have to correct all these mistakes?
Why was match canceled? Can't find on open bets wtf
be willing to bet the chair suspended it...think I read on the bottom line on ESPN that they have discretion to do that with the wildfires...Quote:
Originally Posted by SpookygookQuote:
Originally Posted by SanlmarAight Krypt, I’m getting pissed.
I took this couple days ago
Lanovic v Kyle Edmunds 9pm
It is now +127 —> +171. Kyle Edmunds is a slow witted player who didn’t look good against big ol’ Isner. Kid needs to only play grass or clay.
You have, no doubt, recognized my brand as ridiculing stupid sharps when they disagree with me and I use sharps to confirm my handicap. Give me credit for not blind following them.
In this instance, the sharps are the dumb money. Feel free to unload.
I’m officially annoyed now. Why do I have to correct all these mistakes?
Why was match canceled? Can't find on open bets wtf
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanlmarAight Krypt, I’m getting pissed.
I took this couple days ago
Lanovic v Kyle Edmunds 9pm
It is now +127 —> +171. Kyle Edmunds is a slow witted player who didn’t look good against big ol’ Isner. Kid needs to only play grass or clay.
You have, no doubt, recognized my brand as ridiculing stupid sharps when they disagree with me and I use sharps to confirm my handicap. Give me credit for not blind following them.
In this instance, the sharps are the dumb money. Feel free to unload.
I’m officially annoyed now. Why do I have to correct all these mistakes?
perfect time to bet him now then?
he is +390 on live betting and the match is in rain delay... he's down 5-2 in the 1st set but they go best of 5 sets don't they? so plenty of time for a comeback?
I spent most of the game regretting the Pacers -1 pick and it covered by 9.
oooooooookay
yup 5 sets in the majors...Quote:
Originally Posted by rollinx420Quote:
Originally Posted by SanlmarAight Krypt, I’m getting pissed.
I took this couple days ago
Lanovic v Kyle Edmunds 9pm
It is now +127 —> +171. Kyle Edmunds is a slow witted player who didn’t look good against big ol’ Isner. Kid needs to only play grass or clay.
You have, no doubt, recognized my brand as ridiculing stupid sharps when they disagree with me and I use sharps to confirm my handicap. Give me credit for not blind following them.
In this instance, the sharps are the dumb money. Feel free to unload.
I’m officially annoyed now. Why do I have to correct all these mistakes?
perfect time to bet him now then?
he is +390 on live betting and the match is in rain delay... he's down 5-2 in the 1st set but they go best of 5 sets don't they? so plenty of time for a comeback?
early thoughts on the big game?
Thinking I like the KC -1 and over 53.5
well san we don't even get to bet against 'mr 5 cent head'...
shapo already lost his shit and his place in the tournament...
didn't even think to check if he was a big favorite in that match...
Quote:
Originally Posted by GambleBotsChafedPenisyup 5 sets in the majors...Quote:
Originally Posted by rollinx420
well in reality he's only down 1 break in the very 1st set... any idea why the live odds would be -703 for his opponent and +390 for him?
either way i already took it for a small bet, how can one go wrong taking a Sanlmar lock at +390?
Quote:
Originally Posted by gut
Lot of tomfoolery going on at the offshore books. I’ve read that not only was Bovada and sportsbook playing games with Sharp/square lines but so was BOL. All three were advertising “3” as the number but anyone who wanted San Fran it went to a review and then came back as +1. I know this happened with a few people.
For what it’s worth this is literally the sharpest game of the year by a magnitude of 100. I make San Fran the small favorite but Not demonstrably so. Early indicators said public flocked to KC and there has been professional money looking to take the 1-2 points or the +110 ML. I don’t think there will be much of a story on the line leading up to the game. I don’t see it hitting 3 and I don’t see it jumping the fence.
Now it’s hurry up and wait for the props..
I find it hard to believe BOL was doing that. That definitely is the profile for Bovada and Druff has written extensively about it. We KNOW that is their practice.Quote:
Originally Posted by DalyQuote:
Originally Posted by gut
Lot of tomfoolery going on at the offshore books. I’ve read that not only was Bovada and sportsbook playing games with Sharp/square lines but so was BOL. All three were advertising “3” as the number but anyone who wanted San Fran it went to a review and then came back as +1. I know this happened with a few people.
For what it’s worth this is literally the sharpest game of the year by a magnitude of 100. I make San Fran the small favorite but Not demonstrably so. Early indicators said public flocked to KC and there has been professional money looking to take the 1-2 points or the +110 ML. I don’t think there will be much of a story on the line leading up to the game. I don’t see it hitting 3 and I don’t see it jumping the fence.
Now it’s hurry up and wait for the props..
BOL originates it’s own lines. Interesting to me, they took a Pinnacle trader and a BWIN trader for instance. On some sports they are running their own live action and not using a service.
They are first overnight with baseball lines. Before Pinny. That was very important to me. I don’t follow NFL overnight so I’ll step back a tad there.
Bovada has small NFL limits compared to BOL. BOL will take $25k and $50k from some.
So when they are originating lines the amounts are low and BOL don’t give a fuck. They know who you are and what that bet means.
Bovada is a square book that copycats other books and does shading.
It’s impossible to conflate those two books. They couldn’t be more different.
Heads is +110 on my book. Suckers bet imo. I like Tails -120Quote:
Originally Posted by Daly
Hope everyone had a great weekend. Had the over in last night's GB/SF game and won easy but otherwise took it easy this weekend.
Hate paying this much juice on a puck line, but Detroit is awful and content to lose.
Colorado -1.5 -160
Bonus pick - I'm waiting/hoping for 230 but Raptors/Atlanta under 230.
Edit: Got under 230 just before gametime line went up to 231. Apparently should have took some Hawks ML or +10 as well.
tennis picks - one cancelled and another suspended. Those were the highlightsQuote:
Originally Posted by simpdog
Remember Druff mocking Searles & the Royals? Imagine Sizzle bet Druff the city of Kansas City would win another Championship before Los Angeles.
What a lock that would have been. How about them Rams?
Druff is getting old and it is pretty likely he will never see a parade before he dies.
Shapo,
Yeah, when the player is arguing with the ump that he didn’t break his racquet when he smashed it on the ground you know. I was trying to buy low on him but he is untouchable. He could never lose a set from this point on and I’ll have no regrets.
Canadians.... Why didn’t this Jew play hockey instead?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
OBV it is b/c i didn't tail.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanlmartennis picks - one cancelled and another suspended. Those were the highlightsQuote:
Originally Posted by simpdog
So what happens with the suspended one? My book's rules say as long as it is completed the bet stands. Is this going to be resumed later or what is going to happen?
I saw Fognini smashed his racquet too.Quote:
Originally Posted by TellafriendQuote:
Originally Posted by Sanlmar
So what happens with the suspended one? My book's rules say as long as it is completed the bet stands. Is this going to be resumed later or what is going to happen?
Edit
I don’t know which shitty pick you got caught up with.
Both Fognini & Lajovic are sched to finish @6:30pm EST (the only standard time that matters for sports)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanlmarI saw Fognini smashed his racquet too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tellafriend
Edit
I don’t know which shitty pick you got caught up with.
Both Fognini & Lajovic are sched to finish @6:30pm EST (the only standard time that matters for sports)
are u resigned to defeat on the Lajovic pick?
Yeah.Quote:
Originally Posted by rollinx420Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanlmar
are u resigned to defeat on the Lajovic pick?
I was a smartass that day. I bought at +123 and it closed +180 really hard.....or something and I mocked the sharps instead of covering. Closing line was sheer ugliness. I was being stupid.
But I was transparent about my stupidity in my post
I need Fognini bad cause I double bet him by accident. I need to sit out a day or two and regroup. I got too much going on and am getting loose and sloppy
Shit. I tailed and worse, parlayed it w sf.Quote:
Originally Posted by SanlmarYeah.Quote:
Originally Posted by rollinx420
I was a smartass that day. I bought at +123 and it closed +180 really hard.....or something and I mocked the sharps instead of covering. Closing line was sheer ugliness. I was being stupid.
But I was transparent about my stupidity in my post
I need Fognini bad cause I double bet him by accident. I need to sit out a day or two and regroup. I got too much going on and am getting loose and sloppy
Well, he’s still live. He should/could mail in the last game current set and even it up in next set.Quote:
Originally Posted by TellafriendShit. I tailed and worse, parlayed it w sf.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanlmar
That should be a sweet return on your parlay.
We will see
Call me old school, but I just can't go with a line like over 243 in the NBA if it's not the All Star Game.
But that's the line today for New Orleans vs. Memphis.
I just can't.
I will go with an old school type under though:
Orlando at Charlotte - Under 206
I’ve had three different people tell me they tried to bet +3 at BOL but was told unavailable after a 15 second long spin.Quote:
Originally Posted by SanlmarI find it hard to believe BOL was doing that. That definitely is the profile for Bovada and Druff has written extensively about it. We KNOW that is their practice.Quote:
Originally Posted by Daly
BOL originates it’s own lines. Interesting to me, they took a Pinnacle trader and a BWIN trader for instance. On some sports they are running their own live action and not using a service.
They are first overnight with baseball lines. Before Pinny. That was very important to me. I don’t follow NFL overnight so I’ll step back a tad there.
Bovada has small NFL limits compared to BOL. BOL will take $25k and $50k from some.
So when they are originating lines the amounts are low and BOL don’t give a fuck. They know who you are and what that bet means.
Bovada is a square book that copycats other books and does shading.
It’s impossible to conflate those two books. They couldn’t be more different.
For a bit later:
Indiana at Utah - Under 216
22 points in the last 2 minutes of the ATL/TOR game...thought for a second I had a middle at 224/232...
don't know how you bet unders in the NBA nowadays...jesus...
I'm thinking the SB is going to be high scoring, a game much more similar to PHI-NE than last years snoozer.
Thus leaning over on some of the yardage props i've got:
Kelce 74.5
Tyreek 77.5
Sanders 40.5
all seem juicy at first glance. Might splash some on Watkins and/or Hardman to score a TD at +250 and +350
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanlmarWell, he’s still live. He should/could mail in the last game current set and even it up in next set.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tellafriend
That should be a sweet return on your parlay.
We will see
is this shit ever gonna re-start?
The whole Australian Open this year is turning into a pass.Quote:
Originally Posted by rollinx420Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanlmar
is this shit ever gonna re-start?
Imagine you’re a player. Adrenaline then wait ... rinse and repeat...
Celtics v Lakers. I’m late to the party but Kemba Walker is famously 0-28 vs LeBron
I’d take some Lakers down 32-40
They never gave anything but a point difference. Lakers tethered to opening line and so public.
I’m going to embrace this as more than something you saw on a message board. I know you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Daly
I may be the ostrich with its head in the sand.
I will always treasure this photo. It was Kershaw headed to mound versus Nationals. One of the greatest sports events of my life.
Assholes. I’ve seen it since too.
You offer a bet with a stated maximum and you flat out don’t accept it. They didn’t freeze the line for everyone.
I’ve experienced that many times since. It’s new to me this year. I’ve been hoping this isn’t the beginning of nonsense.
Thanks for the anecdote. I try to stay off message boards and remain pure of mind but maybe I need to plug in.
Guess I should stick to NHL. Bet smaller on NBA but now I know how Druff feels. Awful fourth quarter after it was well on pace to be under.Quote:
Originally Posted by simpdog
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanlmarWell, he’s still live. He should/could mail in the last game current set and even it up in next set.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tellafriend
That should be a sweet return on your parlay.
We will see
well he certainly didn't mail in the first set...........
Bump. Kinda brilliantQuote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
That’s gutsy in 2020
Fognini cursing in Italian would be funny if I didn’t have money on him
These 6’10” - 6’11” tennis players are blowing my mind. Kids today. Every college pitcher is 6’10” now.
Opelka is prolly 7’ really
2 - 0
no shame in just giving up Edmund!
Routine 131mph serves stillQuote:
Originally Posted by rollinx420
Love the hurry up offense, must admit .... so American. FML