someone please post the full chris wallace interview, as the clips i’ve seen are so fkn damning it’s unreal.
Printable View
someone please post the full chris wallace interview, as the clips i’ve seen are so fkn damning it’s unreal.
lol, man i would kill myself if i shilled for modern day democrat propaganda
Mediaite always does a great job picking out the most stunning things said in the interview.Quote:
Originally Posted by Krypt
https://www.mediaite.com/trump/im-no...chris-wallace/
lol cognitionQuote:
Originally Posted by JeffDimeMediaite always does a great job picking out the most stunning things said in the interview.Quote:
Originally Posted by Krypt
https://www.mediaite.com/trump/im-no...chris-wallace/
Gotta wonder why Fox News would allow Chris Wallace to expose him as the fraudulent inbecile he is to the Sunday AM audience.
Clearly Trump expected softballs. Maybe they decided to stop airing misinformation that literally kills viewership.
wow the freak is back. UNBAN TYDE
.Quote:
Originally Posted by limitleslol cognitionQuote:
Originally Posted by JeffDime
So clever. Give each other a Hand. Here’s the clip if Fox keeps it up on YT.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6XdpDOH1JA
Wallace displays quite a constitution as he doesn’t become frustrated or flustered by Trump’s scattershot answers. Wallace remains determined to stay on point after each of the 2 minute inane rambles.
This really is a remarkable piece.
I will fully concede that at this time Biden appears similarly mentally diminished. The difference for me is that Biden is not purposely divisive. As an example brought up in this interview, the reason the trouble in the liberal cities is worse than it was previously is that Trump deliberately stokes the fire. I won’t abide that.
Trump doesn’t possess the chops to lead a collective nation. His greatest strength in 2016 was that he wasn’t a career politician. That he was no politician at all was his downfall”.
As well, the extent of Biden’s criminal behavior is comparatively minute.
I have been recalling recently the Trump University argument in 2016. The evidence was pretty damning and I chose to overlook it. In the context of today I can’t abide the fraud regardless of ideology.
It might be hyperbolic but this Wallace interview has shades of the Roger Mudd interview of Ted Kennedy during his presidential campaign where Chappaquiddick was addressed. Ted was toast after that.
lol @ the media, government officials and politicians being infectious disease experts..even field leaders in the medical industry have been wrong from the start
lol @ 100's of covid graphs all saying different shit
lol @ dems saying and doing anything to the detriment of our country to try and bring down trump
Honestly, after seeing the entire interview in context it seems like Trump still was treated in a very soft manner. He let him ramble on for way too long, and Wallace was cucked for the majority of it. By the end of the interview, Trump had basically admitted to not accepting the results of the election if he were to lose, and there’s virtually no pushback from Wallace!Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanlmar
kinda like you guys haven't accepted the results from 2016, the irony is hilarious
gonna be even more hillarious when the dems control all 3 branchesQuote:
Originally Posted by dwai
Let the good times roll you fucking dickhead
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BDBzgHXf64
Exactly. When a Democrat sends in the Feds they're "jack-booted thugs" but when a Republican sends in the Feds that's a-ok.Quote:
Originally Posted by BCRI don’t have a huge problem with it either if people arrested are creating havoc.Quote:
Originally Posted by gut
The funny part is any time a Dem is President it’s all FEMA camps and fake pictures of shit taken in 2002 in Eastern Europe, that they’ll claim is some secret government program trying to herd them all into re-education camps or for some other nefarious purpose, yet they’ll have no problem with this.
I don’t even understand it politically. It looks shady and it doesn’t really help Trump. Had he had guys out bashing heads back when the riots were off the hook, it would have played for him. If those being arrested are actual assholes, it’s not some extreme overreaction. I won’t claim to know because I’m not there.
Not being a retard who believes Alex Jones level shit, I just look and say, hopefully they’re arresting actual assholes. I don’t assume they are being herded into makeshift fema camps like we heard about non-stop during Obama. It’s amazing how those people never come back and say, clearly I was wrong and an idiot for believing that nonsense. Never happens. They wind up the loons., nothing happens, then those people come back and claim crazy shit again ignoring their previous idiocy.
Remember Jade Helm and Obama’s brown shirts? No one ever comes back and says I was stone cold stupid.
That’s the amusing part. Feds on streets grabbing people is the plot line of every GOP fever dream, yet they won’t have issue with this.
I am going to be amused if this drug Daly thinks may be a game changer works, and we end up like AIDs where we have treatments rather than outright cures that chip away to the point we mitigate it, what the vaccine Bill Gates globalist takeover people will say then?
What I know they won’t say is I was a damn fool who fell for conspiracy theory gibberish on Facebook and YouTube and no one tried to chip me. That would be honest. Those people are never honest. They’ll just move on to the next insane thing.
You shouldn't concede that, because he isn't.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanlmar
I'm focused on 2020. Keep investigating Hillary though, I'm sure that will help.Quote:
Originally Posted by dwai
:lol2Quote:
Originally Posted by Walter SobchakYou shouldn't concede that, because he isn't.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanlmar
why won't they let him debate trump? is it because he'll look stupid af?
There are currently 3 debates scheduled, same as the last several elections. Have you read something different?Quote:
Originally Posted by dwai:lol2Quote:
Originally Posted by Walter Sobchak
why won't they let him debate trump? is it because he'll look stupid af?
he will not debate trump, will never happenQuote:
Originally Posted by Walter SobchakThere are currently 3 debates scheduled, same as the last several elections. Have you read something different?Quote:
Originally Posted by dwai
wanna bet dumb fuck?Quote:
Originally Posted by dwaihe will not debate trump, will never happenQuote:
Originally Posted by Walter Sobchak
100 each that a debate does happen
I say it does you say it doesnt
bet?
Let's see.Quote:
Originally Posted by dwaihe will not debate trump, will never happenQuote:
Originally Posted by Walter Sobchak
you have a gambling problem sir, talk to your wife about itQuote:
Originally Posted by big dickwanna bet dumb fuck?Quote:
Originally Posted by dwai
100 each that a debate does happen
I say it does you say it doesnt
bet?
the new normal for american politics.
macaffee has a legit shot rn.
is it me or is it funny af to see walter and big dick argue about if there will be debates
Quote:
Originally Posted by mulva
small dick is arguably the biggest trainwreck tilt monkey on the site
It's you.Quote:
Originally Posted by mulva
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walter SobchakThere are currently 3 debates scheduled, same as the last several elections. Have you read something different?Quote:
Originally Posted by dwai
This article was in the NYT about a month ago when the Trump campaign was pushing for 4 debates rather than 3. I think it’s obvious the Trump campaign knows he’s trailing yuge and his aids know he needs the debates. I can’t see Biden’s team wanting him to be able to be portrayed in anyway as ducking debates.
Trump clearly wants packed houses where he can feed off the energy, no shot in hell he will get that. My best guess is the Biden campaign will negotiate either 2 or 3 debates, with very limited crowd size due to COVID. Trump will of course attack that directly, through surrogates or re-tweets etc. in the end, Trump will take what he can get. My best guess would be a reduction to two debates with a very limited (possibly just media) crowd. Trump’s (small) hand will be forced.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/18/u...ates-2020.html
lol @ trump trailing
Basically the same disapproval rating as Carter and Bush 1 on their 1,277th day.Quote:
Originally Posted by dwai
Quote:
Originally Posted by duped_samaritanBasically the same disapproval rating as Carter and Bush 1 on their 1,277th day.Quote:
Originally Posted by dwai
They might not even be in the same room.Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffDimeQuote:
Originally Posted by Walter Sobchak
This article was in the NYT about a month ago when the Trump campaign was pushing for 4 debates rather than 3. I think it’s obvious the Trump campaign knows he’s trailing yuge and his aids know he needs the debates. I can’t see Biden’s team wanting him to be able to be portrayed in anyway as ducking debates.
Trump clearly wants packed houses where he can feed off the energy, no shot in hell he will get that. My best guess is the Biden campaign will negotiate either 2 or 3 debates, with very limited crowd size due to COVID. Trump will of course attack that directly, through surrogates or re-tweets etc. in the end, Trump will take what he can get. My best guess would be a reduction to two debates with a very limited (possibly just media) crowd. Trump’s (small) hand will be forced.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/18/u...ates-2020.html
Because the debates are run by sane people, there's no way they allow a packed auditorium. Sparse socially distanced crowd at best, live by remote is possible. If Trump doesn't agree to that it's his fault and he will look like an asshole (again).
I know, it makes me laugh too, he really fucked everything up.Quote:
Originally Posted by dwai
I know you will just troll or say go fuck yourself but he’s trailing by 8.6% in the latest RCP average. There is no question he underperforms in (most) polls (shout-out Rasmussen). In the last election he was shown trailing in the final RCP average by 3.2% and he ended up losing the popular vote by 2.1%. So the final number was off by 1.1%.Quote:
Originally Posted by dwai
I can go through the unfavorables of Hillary being close to that of Trumps, the fact that he won by just the right amount of votes in just the right states and in general how shitty a campaign she ran. Biden is no powerhouse but his favorables are to the moon when you compare him with Trump. With a near double digit lead, even if we want to give Trump 2% or 3% above the polling rather than the 1.1% from 2016, he can’t win the electoral college with a 5% or so deficit in popular vote.
Things can change but have not for some time. This is just math. Refute it all you want but it looks like Trump’s Toast.
Polls don't take into account the Republicans cheating, foreign exploitation of easily hackable voting machines and lawsuits to shut down counting of absentee ballots or recounts that will be in front of a partisan hack Supreme Court. I'd say it's 60/40 in Trump's favor right now.Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffDimeI know you will just troll or say go fuck yourself but he’s trailing by 8.6% in the latest RCP average. There is no question he underperforms in (most) polls (shout-out Rasmussen). In the last election he was shown trailing in the final RCP average by 3.2% and he ended up losing the popular vote by 2.1%. So the final number was off by 1.1%.Quote:
Originally Posted by dwai
I can go through the unfavorables of Hillary being close to that of Trumps, the fact that he won by just the right amount of votes in just the right states and in general how shitty a campaign she ran. Biden is no powerhouse but his favorables are to the moon when you compare him with Trump. With a near double digit lead, even if we want to give Trump 2% or 3% above the polling rather than the 1.1% from 2016, he can’t win the electoral college with a 5% or so deficit in popular vote.
Things can change but have not for some time. This is just math. Refute it all you want but it looks like Trump’s Toast.
lol, moron, how quickly you forget what happened 4 years agoQuote:
Originally Posted by JeffDimeI know you will just troll or say go fuck yourself but he’s trailing by 8.6% in the latest RCP average. There is no question he underperforms in (most) polls (shout-out Rasmussen). In the last election he was shown trailing in the final RCP average by 3.2% and he ended up losing the popular vote by 2.1%. So the final number was off by 1.1%.Quote:
Originally Posted by dwai
I can go through the unfavorables of Hillary being close to that of Trumps, the fact that he won by just the right amount of votes in just the right states and in general how shitty a campaign she ran. Biden is no powerhouse but his favorables are to the moon when you compare him with Trump. With a near double digit lead, even if we want to give Trump 2% or 3% above the polling rather than the 1.1% from 2016, he can’t win the electoral college with a 5% or so deficit in popular vote.
Things can change but have not for some time. This is just math. Refute it all you want but it looks like Trump’s Toast.
What happened 4 years ago was that the polls were within the margin of error and Trump binked a one-outer winning 3 swing states by tiny margins to win the EC.Quote:
Originally Posted by dwailol, moron, how quickly you forget what happened 4 years agoQuote:
Originally Posted by JeffDime
I know you will just troll or say go fuck yourself but he’s trailing by 8.6% in the latest RCP average. There is no question he underperforms in (most) polls (shout-out Rasmussen). In the last election he was shown trailing in the final RCP average by 3.2% and he ended up losing the popular vote by 2.1%. So the final number was off by 1.1%.
I can go through the unfavorables of Hillary being close to that of Trumps, the fact that he won by just the right amount of votes in just the right states and in general how shitty a campaign she ran. Biden is no powerhouse but his favorables are to the moon when you compare him with Trump. With a near double digit lead, even if we want to give Trump 2% or 3% above the polling rather than the 1.1% from 2016, he can’t win the electoral college with a 5% or so deficit in popular vote.
Things can change but have not for some time. This is just math. Refute it all you want but it looks like Trump’s Toast.
Certainly he can do it again though, especially when you add in the cheating.
You really are something else, and your insults are so often and absurd they are meaningless. Did you read what I wrote? It is mostly about 2016. I’m not a even a partisan. You are tedious AF.Quote:
Originally Posted by dwai
Joking aside for a moment, my read on dwai is he is mostly a good person but a bit racist, and frustrated by what's happening in the country as most of us are. A lot of us get tribal on the internet, myself included sometimes.Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffDimeYou really are something else, and your insults are so often and absurd they are meaningless. Did you read what I wrote? It is mostly about 2016. I’m not a even a partisan. You are tedious AF.Quote:
Originally Posted by dwai
Whereas bottomset is either a tremendous piece of shit or he does a great troll job of pretending to be a tremendous piece of shit.
why would i read what some new clueless idiot posts about politics on an 8th tier poker forumQuote:
Originally Posted by JeffDimeYou really are something else, and your insults are so often and absurd they are meaningless. Did you read what I wrote? It is mostly about 2016. I’m not a even a partisan. You are tedious AF.Quote:
Originally Posted by dwai