Quote:
Originally Posted by
mickeycrimm
One of the stories Tucker covered in Patriot Purge was that of Mark Ibrahim, a veteran and DEA agent who was at DC on Jan 6th. His story is that he was asked to attend by an FBI informant he knew from his military days to help him record the events for the FBI. Several pictures of Ibrahim were taken where his DEA badge and gun can be seen. He was fired from the DEA, the FBI filed charges on him for carrying the weapon on capitol grounds, walking on a statue, and trespassing.
CBS, who did a negative story on Ibrahim, used the term "friend" for the FBI informant that took the pictures, not letting readers know he was accused of being an FBI informant. Tucker Carlson called and talked to the person who admitted he was an FBI informant but said he was not acting for the FBI that day.
Ibraham said at one point the informant urged him to go into the capitol. He said he refused because he knew it was illegal.
My first question is who instigated the taking of the pictures, Ibrahim or the informant? Did the informant take the pictures to have evidence against Ibraham? Next question. They were close up pictures. The informant admitted to Tucker that he took the pictures. That meant the informant would be trespassing too.
SO WHY WAS THE "FRIEND" OF IBRAHIM NOT CHARGED WITH TRESPASS TOO?
You can google Mark Ibrahim and find many stories about him by the main stream media.
Skimming thread. I haven’t been following the story.
Why would a (ex) Government employee do the bidding of an informant/snitch? Informant/snitches usually do the busy work of surveillance or snitching. I think it’s in the informant union rules.
Is this a real news story? Why does anyone give a fuck? There were military, police and all matter of civil servants there. Who is the other side of this story that Tucker is sparring with? I don’t get it
Jan 6 was just practice. Buckle up.