Printable View
Sandy Hook and Pizzagate both were not good for Alex Jones.Quote:
Originally Posted by blake
Quote:
Originally Posted by abrown83
for starters, a biden supporter would never say "alex jones has been more right than wrong."
isn't this the guy that is on the verge of bankruptcy because of his insisting that the sandy hook parents were actors?
He did nail Epstein though and a ton of other smaller ones.
Quote:
Originally Posted by blakeQuote:
Originally Posted by BCR
some of my closest friends since childhood are huge trump supporters and they think the same way abrown does.
it's not that they can point to any specific fraud.
they just cannot believe that more people hate trump than love him. they simply don't think it's mathematically possible for trump hatred to be the sole reason for the biggest voter turnout in history. none of them do.
like abrown, for example -- there's no way he thinks that biden could have gotten more votes than trump in the swing states. just not possible because trump is great and the left is the side of black lives matter.
they truly don't see what the rest of us hates.
we are living in alternative universes.
I’ve always been complimentary of ABrown. I think he’s usually a sharp kid. I hate Donald Trump. If I had convincing proof that democrats committed widespread voter fraud and stole the election, I’d sell that shit and collect my $100 million today.
My opinion was always you get what you deserve. If you can’t muster up the will to vote him out and match their enthusiasm, then we will get what we deserve. If I had proof we couldn’t and needed to steal it, I’d collect my giant mountain of money and be a fucking hero to 70 million Trumpers until they bury me. They’d build me a statue and Trump and Anna Khait would take turns sucking me off on Twitter all day and I’d have a harem of hot hillbilly girls.
this is going to sound absolutely fucking crazy but i feel like this was probably one of the least fraud ridden elections in our history.
voter suppression? through the roof. but actual fraud? with this many people watching? like sure, we have a bunch of yahoos trying to vote with their dead moms write in ballot but actual institutional organized fraud? ehhhnnnn....
Quote:
Originally Posted by abrown83Did I say that? I never said anything about overturning an election. Actually I said the exact fucking opposite!Quote:
Originally Posted by BCR
Everyone gets their e-guns out so fucking quickly.
There’s always election fraud.
There’s a hilarious video where this lady is campaigning for Trump and talks about being on probation for voting twice in 2016.
Kennedy had 30,000 dead people vote for him in Chicago and made him President.
It’s actually insane to think that there isn’t. Just how much did it change the outcome?
well, you did say "To be fair it’s pretty clear from just raw numbers that there was widespread voting fraud."
we have no idea what "raw numbers " you're referring to. i assume you just mean that people would not turn out against trump in the magnitude they did. am i wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by abrown83Sandy Hook and Pizzagate both were not good for Alex Jones.Quote:
Originally Posted by blake
He did nail Epstein though and a ton of other smaller ones.
hmmm... you listen to a lot of alex jones, huh?
Nope, again I used it as an example about how the world is fucked and explicitly said that it’s an example of why.Quote:
Originally Posted by blakeQuote:
Originally Posted by abrown83
hmmm... you listen to a lot of alex jones, huh?
Everyone wants to classify people. I understand that’s human nature. It’s why we have two political parties.
Want me to give some of my pro-Liberal thoughts and reading to confuse your desire to put me in a box?
nah, i'm good.Quote:
Originally Posted by abrown83Nope, again I used it as an example about how the world is fucked and explicitly said that it’s an example of why.Quote:
Originally Posted by blake
Everyone wants to classify people. I understand that’s human nature. It’s why we have two political parties.
Want me to give some of my pro-Liberal thoughts and reading to confuse your desire to put me in a box?
I kinda doQuote:
Originally Posted by blakenah, i'm good.Quote:
Originally Posted by abrown83
Trump wants to start a digital media channel to take revenge on Fox News and usurp its audience when he leaves office, report says
https://www.businessinsider.com/trum...os-2020-11?amp
Because your not getting enough fake news already.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qwc0oB8ZlmY
You said :Quote:
Originally Posted by abrown83Did I say that? I never said anything about overturning an election. Actually I said the exact fucking opposite!Quote:
Originally Posted by BCR
Everyone gets their e-guns out so fucking quickly.
There’s always election fraud.
There’s a hilarious video where this lady is campaigning for Trump and talks about being on probation for voting twice in 2016.
Kennedy had 30,000 dead people vote for him in Chicago and made him President.
It’s actually insane to think that there isn’t. Just how much did it change the outcome?
That's not the same thing as claiming there's there's never zero fraud when almost 200 million people vote.Quote:
Originally Posted by abrown83
And then you played the victim card.
Then you repeated the Kennedy voter fraud myth.
Whether you admit it or not, the sorting hat put you on team Trump long ago.
I’ve always liked you even though we occasionally disagree. Im certainly not quick to argue.Quote:
Originally Posted by abrown83Did I say that? I never said anything about overturning an election. Actually I said the exact fucking opposite!Quote:
Originally Posted by BCR
Everyone gets their e-guns out so fucking quickly.
There’s always election fraud.
There’s a hilarious video where this lady is campaigning for Trump and talks about being on probation for voting twice in 2016.
Kennedy had 30,000 dead people vote for him in Chicago and made him President.
It’s actually insane to think that there isn’t. Just how much did it change the outcome?
We clearly have different definitions of widespread voter fraud. When you say a glance at raw numbers is evidence of widespread voter fraud, and WI and NV are like 20k, and AZ and GA are under 15k, I assume you are questioning turnout and find it hard to believe?
I don’t know how else to read your post?
Then you use 30k for Kennedy as an example of widespread voter fraud, well that would overturn 4 states atm? That’s widespread. Not saying I know what happened in the sixties when votes were shoved into boxes or I agree with you, but anything of that magnitude is widespread and would be noteworthy. It would be front page news. Any actual proof of that changes everything.
I don’t think anyone could see you mention raw numbers and widespread voter fraud and not deduce you question turnout, and given the slim margins, question the election.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
Voter suppression was so bad there was record turnout.
You sound like an even dumber Yogi Berra.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexterQuote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
Voter suppression was so bad there was record turnout.
You sound like an even dumber Yogi Berra.
you.. havent actually looked at the senate race numbers in kentucky have you.
im assuming no because belligerent stupidity is your political brand, but far be it from me to tap the glass.
This is certainly proof the anti-smoking nazis are out of control. Girl had to walk over 24 miles to have a smoke.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
She’s a comedian I assume?
Something i thought about around the time it started to look like Biden was taking the throne.
Trump family has less to worry about from Dems than they have from Republicans.
For right or wrong Dems aren't that worried about going against anyone under the Trump brand. Republicans on the other hand see them as a real threat. Establishment Right sees them as a problem. Trumps are fucking with their money. They are more interested in enriching themselves than sharing the wealth. And they are pushing away donors. Burning bridges when there's no need for it. Drawing lines where they didn't exist before. The party isn't getting theirs.
They will wait 8+ months. They are not looking to lose voters for 2022, but they are not willing to let any of those go to anyone under the Trump brand. At this point it's worse than losing to Dems for them.
i dont know but personally, if i was president, and someones election software was handing a presidential election to my opponent, while the world was reading the forensic evidence proving it, armed DOJ agents would be kicking down doors and frog marched executives, engineers, secretaries, and their pets straight into the nearest dungeon.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCRI’ve always liked you even though we occasionally disagree. Im certainly not quick to argue.Quote:
Originally Posted by abrown83
We clearly have different definitions of widespread voter fraud. When you say a glance at raw numbers is evidence of widespread voter fraud, and WI and NV are like 20k, and AZ and GA are under 15k, I assume you are questioning turnout and find it hard to believe?
I don’t know how else to read your post?
Then you use 30k for Kennedy as an example of widespread voter fraud, well that would overturn 4 states atm? That’s widespread. Not saying I know what happened in the sixties when votes were shoved into boxes or I agree with you, but anything of that magnitude is widespread and would be noteworthy. It would be front page news. Any actual proof of that changes everything.
I don’t think anyone could see you mention raw numbers and widespread voter fraud and not deduce you question turnout, and given the slim margins, question the election.
yeah he's not giving you an answer as to what he meant by "raw numbers" being indicative of widespread voter fraud.
Yes please go through the basic instances of "widespread voter fraud" that you have discovered. This is an amazing achievement, being the first person to uncover any.Quote:
Originally Posted by abrown83
Let's hear it.
i discovered widespread voter fraud: