Hillary tweeting unfunny "covfefe" jokes, whether written by herself or her staffers, is not a good look.
While Trump has not been a gracious winner, Hillary has been an incredibly sore (and delusional) loser.
Printable View
Hillary tweeting unfunny "covfefe" jokes, whether written by herself or her staffers, is not a good look.
While Trump has not been a gracious winner, Hillary has been an incredibly sore (and delusional) loser.
I actually agree we need to hold some big polluting rich countries like China to the same standard as the EU/US and they should face real consequences for failing to meet their targets. But just pulling out and telling the world to GFY isn't the solution.
I've see this all Over the Internet
Countries not in the agreement. Countries in the agreement
USA Rest of the world
Syria
Nicaragua
How about this one?
Countries paying for the agreement Countries not paying for the agreement
USA Rest of the world
Why is it such an awful thing to say this is a shitty deal? It's literally the same argument as NATO.
In fairness to China, America was spewing out huge amounts of harmful emissions for decades long before China rose up the spew leader board.
America has created wayyy more pollution than anybody else since the industrial revolution.
America owed this to the world. You shower of cunts.
America led the industrial revolution in its second phase (and ever since), so that makes sense. Environmental concerns only began about 70 years ago.
The US has done a great job with curbing pollution in the last few decades.
If China doesn't play ball, much of what the US does on the environmental front will be largely ineffective.
It would be like a neat freak living with a major slob. Even if the neat freak does not contribute to the mess at all, the apartment will still be filthy.
China simply doesn't give a shit, though.
That's the elephant in the room -- one ignored by environmentalists for decades.
China lives for the moment. They don't care about the planet, and they don't care about the future. Their entire motivation is derived from succeeding now, and as quickly and efficiently as possible.
You can pass all the feelgood environmental resolutions you want, but if a major player is opting out, then ultimately the same problem will be staring us in the face.
MIT is pointing out that despite Trump quoting their research in his bizarre justification for leaving the agreement, his actual quote indicates had absolutely no understanding regarding what MIT's research actually was or meant.
Thats fucking super.
Rubbish. America for years avoided signing up to various climate treaties that were just waiting to be signed. Notably a major one in Brazil that would've changed everything. We begged, but you walked away because greed and corruption.
Also. China has 1.4 billion citizens and this agreement will start a snowball effect to wider green energy.
China also has a vastly superior education system, so when they look at the numbers and see the cost of millions and millions of preventable illnesses, they act.
They do not stand tall and say 'we are all doomed but Christ will surely save us'.
http://time.com/4800000/tim-walberg-god-climate-change/
All the biggest companies in America, who create the jobs Trump claims to be protecting, are pissed at him. Microsoft, Google, uber, Tesla, IBM, sales force, GE, even Shell lol. They all know this is bad for business and bad for America in the long run.
The regulations rolled back plus anything further Trump plans to do will nowhere near rival our environmental pollution situation in the '80s and '90s.
Keep in mind that environmental issues are where I break from the Republican Party line most often, but this time I cannot blame Trump for backing away from having the US shouldering most of the burden.
Every well advanced nation has improved their pollution situation through solar, wind turbines and other such means.
But it still doesn't change the fact that you're still the second highest contributors for spewing shit into the atmosphere. Yet have the cheek to walk away from this.
So yeah. Fuck America.
And Druff, no sarcasm intended. But its good to see you posting in this thread again.
Hopefully you will stay and discuss the issues coming outa the press and Republican Party.
Napping the whole Trump thing out is proper shithousery considering you got strong political opinions.
I imagine there's a Saudi angle and a Rex Tillerson angle to today's historic fail. When he was at Exxon they were funding all kinds of skeptic propaganda.
Factoid: Trump has granted more lobbyist waivers in 4 months than Obama did in 8 years
Violating his own ethics rules at a staggering pace.
How many trump supporters are literally looking for their next fix rn? Read an article in the New Yorker indicating heroin overdoses being commonplace at little league practice and that certain counties in trump country are out of narcane
Where has Tyde been all day?
I bet a few tards on here probably believe this garbage too.
It's the tens of millions of rational Americans I honestly feel sorry for. Imagine being governed and living amongst freaks who think like this.
"At the poker table of international negotiations, the US has become that unpleasant player whose utter lack of skill makes them unpredictable." -Wired
:lol
From IKEA
KATHY GRIFFIN TO PLAY THE VICTIM TMRW?? that should be worth 30 house seats in '18
Quick reminder, hurricane season is starting and we literally have no one in charge of NOAA or FEMA.
its all good tho because
just a guess, but i think this paris move will hurt trump in 2020, even though it will rally his base and help to get them to turn out for him in 2020.
i just think this move is so repugnant to liberals and independents -- so many of whom stayed home in 2016 -- that the turnout will be just overwhelming.
every young person in america will come out and vote against him.
that being said, if the economy is booming, trump will point to this move as part of the reason why, and he'll have a good chance of being reelected.
joe biden would likely crush trump. he has a similar appeal to the rust belt folks.
also don't discount bernie sanders running again. he's basically the anti-hillary. everything that trump used against hillary (i.e., the swamp, goldman sachs, trade, the establishment) would fail against him. if anything, he's farther out on those issues than trump is.
trump literally has a ton of goldman sachs people in his inner circle. do you think bernie would hammer him on that?
basically, bernie speaks trump's language when it comes to concerns of working class people, but has the added benefit of not being a clinically retarded person.
i think he's too far left on some issues personally, i'm just saying he would be a really strong candidate against trump.
Republicans wake the fuck up.. Keith really throws down the gauntlet in this one..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9VZTrtRhN0