Time to get on the TRUMP train

Printable View

10-28-2016, 01:24 AM
sonatine

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mintjewlips

How hard will Barry take it when trump wins?

On a scale of 1 to 10, 1 being he just shrugs his jew nose and goes on with his life, 10 being that he goes into a rage, and crashes his effeminate prius.

Im going with like a 7, probably gets angry and forgets his change at the store, then drives back to pick it up.

Im guessing a 2 or maybe a 3; he has a few stiff drinks, shakes his head at what this country has become and what message its sent to the world, and then gets on with his life.
10-28-2016, 01:45 AM
big dick

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mintjewlips

How hard will Barry take it when trump wins?

On a scale of 1 to 10, 1 being he just shrugs his jew nose and goes on with his life, 10 being that he goes into a rage, and crashes his effeminate prius.

Im going with like a 7, probably gets angry and forgets his change at the store, then drives back to pick it up.

Just don't forget to quote all of the posts of mine you said you were gonna quote on November 10th
10-28-2016, 01:53 AM
Mintjewlips

1 Attachment(s)

Quote:

Originally Posted by big dick

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mintjewlips

How hard will Barry take it when trump wins?

On a scale of 1 to 10, 1 being he just shrugs his jew nose and goes on with his life, 10 being that he goes into a rage, and crashes his effeminate prius.

Im going with like a 7, probably gets angry and forgets his change at the store, then drives back to pick it up.

Just don't forget to quote all of the posts of mine you said you were gonna quote on November 10th

Oh i will.
10-28-2016, 02:38 AM
Dan Druff

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTNbY978YQU
10-28-2016, 02:38 AM
Dan Druff

Anyone still interested in defending the Clinton Foundation, or is it time to concede that it was a slush fund?
10-28-2016, 03:06 AM
gimmick

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

Anyone still interested in defending the Clinton Foundation, or is it time to concede that it was a slush fund?

Not a whole lot that indicates it was a slush fund. Completely separate issue from steering business to Bill's way. Or do you have something that shows there was fraudulent use of Clinton Foundation money?
10-28-2016, 03:22 AM
TheXFactor

Quote:

Originally Posted by blake

wow, chris matthews of all people just crushed hillary on hardball about the new emails about the clinton foundation. i guarantee you there will be articles published about this in an hour or two, but the cliffs notes version is that he told his viewers, you "could still vote for hillary," but you know what you're getting and that people don't change once they get in office. he didn't outright say it, but insinuated she was totally corrupt

and yes, i'll still vote for hillary cause of the reasons i said earlier, but wow what an awful candidate.

i think assange completely botched the timing of this, and wonder what bernie would have done with these emails if they came out during the primaries

Chris Matthews claims to be conservative and a Republican.
But of course he's not, he is a liberal Democrat just like the rest of MSNBC.
I guarantee that within a day or two, he will claim the emails released by Wikileaks actually show that Hillary Clinton is even more qualified to be President than he originally thought.

Watch Chris Matthews setup Donald Trump by asking him the same question over 12 times.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGSttcyn2RI

Michael Moore is a disgusting pig and wants you to vote for Hillary Clinton.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wsu_76NB_vE
10-28-2016, 03:59 AM
big dick

Quote:

Originally Posted by gimmick

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

Anyone still interested in defending the Clinton Foundation, or is it time to concede that it was a slush fund?

Not a whole lot that indicates it was a slush fund. Completely separate issue from steering business to Bill's way. Or do you have something that shows there was fraudulent use of Clinton Foundation money?

Of course not. They have no proof of anything ever. In gop fairyland you don't need proof, or facts. Say w/e, and say it enough, and it becomes true.
10-28-2016, 04:22 AM
BiffCo99

Quote:

Originally Posted by DirtyB

“And just thinking to myself right now, we should just cancel the election and just give it to Trump, right? What are we even having it for? What are we having it for?”

-Trump today in Toledo

If Hillary had said anything remotely similar, people would lose their shit. But at this point, it's just completely acceptable for Trump to say insane things.

He's also making accusations of massive voter fraud in Texas, of all places. I think that deep down he really knows that he's going to lose. Until recently, he could convince himself that the debates would turn everything around. And then he said "No puppet...no puppet...you're the puppet!"

I KNEW you of all people here would post this. DirtyB has for MONTHS just constantly taken Trump quotes out of context and takes Trump jokes and passes them off as being serious. You really think he's seriously proposing to cancel the election? You're being completely disingenuous or you have no sense of context or humor.

Yeah Trump has said some stupid things along the way but you jump on and twist EVERY little thing he says.

I'm sure DirtyB used the same tactic throughout Bush's presidency. It's cheap and lazy but I expect nothing less from a pandering libtard Hillary supporter.
10-28-2016, 04:27 AM
blake

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheXFactor

Quote:

Originally Posted by blake

wow, chris matthews of all people just crushed hillary on hardball about the new emails about the clinton foundation. i guarantee you there will be articles published about this in an hour or two, but the cliffs notes version is that he told his viewers, you "could still vote for hillary," but you know what you're getting and that people don't change once they get in office. he didn't outright say it, but insinuated she was totally corrupt

and yes, i'll still vote for hillary cause of the reasons i said earlier, but wow what an awful candidate.

i think assange completely botched the timing of this, and wonder what bernie would have done with these emails if they came out during the primaries

Chris Matthews claims to be conservative and a Republican.
But of course he's not, he is a liberal Democrat just like the rest of MSNBC.
I guarantee that within a day or two, he will claim the emails released by Wikileaks actually show that Hillary Clinton is even more qualified to be President than he originally thought.

chris matthews (the one who got a "thrill up his leg" for obama) freely acknowledges he is a liberal and a democrat, which is why i thought his quote on hillary was notable.
10-28-2016, 04:40 AM
blake

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

Quote:

Originally Posted by blake

wow, chris matthews of all people just crushed hillary on hardball about the new emails about the clinton foundation. i guarantee you there will be articles published about this in an hour or two, but the cliffs notes version is that he told his viewers, you "could still vote for hillary," but you know what you're getting and that people don't change once they get in office. he didn't outright say it, but insinuated she was totally corrupt

and yes, i'll still vote for hillary cause of the reasons i said earlier, but wow what an awful candidate.

i think assange completely botched the timing of this, and wonder what bernie would have done with these emails if they came out during the primaries

Bernie would have done absolutely nothing.

He wouldn't even mention the initial e-mail scandal, and in fact indicated in one of the debates that he's refusing to discuss it.

Bernie knew he had no chance, so he ran a softball campaign only attacking her from the left, and still being careful to avoid giving the right any ammo they could use once the primary was over. Bernie's whole battlecry was, "Hillary isn't liberal enough and doesn't care about the little guy like I do", but he was careful not to attack her honesty, trusthworthiness, or credibility. He knew that the right couldn't repeat any of his criticisms of Hillary, because those were left-wing criticisms, and the Republican candidate clearly couldn't run attack ads from the left.

He just wanted to be part of the national conversation for as long as possible, and to get his agenda into the Democratic platform. He succeeded at both, at which point he slinked back into his hole and became Hillary's bitch, like he had planned all along.

you keep overlooking all of his attacks on her wall street connections and high dollar speaking fees, and that he demanded to see her goldman sachs speeches. for a long time, those attacks became the primary focus of his campaign against her. he based his comment that she was "unqualified" because of her ties to wall street. he didn't outright use the words quid pro quo or corrupt, but it's pretty obvious that's the message he was trying to convey.

this was a pretty damaging attack that has been 100% adopted by the trump campaign. i'm quite certain that hillary wishes he never went down that road.

also keep in mind that there used to be a time when it was truly frowned upon to attack primary opponents with any real teeth. obv that's out the window on the right, but wasn't it reagan who said the 11th commandment is thou shalt not attack a fellow republican? or something like that. too lazy too google this early in the morning.
10-28-2016, 04:54 AM
FPS_Russia

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

But yeah, you're correct about Assange botching the timing.

And what was up with the night he claimed he was going to drop a big bomb, and then rambled on about nothing?

What is wrong with this guy?

Speaking of that,quite a few lulz @ Alex
Alex his cohost and the studio guys decide to get in at 4 AM and cover this big leak from Assange live. Roger Stone blew so much smoke up Alex's ass on this leak and it didn't happen.

. They're just sitting there w 3 hours sleep watching a super low quality feed of Assange mumbling lol'
They start realizing there's no leaks. Alex laughs it off and starts making fun of juilian, pretty funny
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2aDWWyWc_Lc
Biggus Dickus lol 26:40
10-28-2016, 05:00 AM
BiffCo99

Quote:

Originally Posted by blake

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

Bernie would have done absolutely nothing.

He wouldn't even mention the initial e-mail scandal, and in fact indicated in one of the debates that he's refusing to discuss it.

Bernie knew he had no chance, so he ran a softball campaign only attacking her from the left, and still being careful to avoid giving the right any ammo they could use once the primary was over. Bernie's whole battlecry was, "Hillary isn't liberal enough and doesn't care about the little guy like I do", but he was careful not to attack her honesty, trusthworthiness, or credibility. He knew that the right couldn't repeat any of his criticisms of Hillary, because those were left-wing criticisms, and the Republican candidate clearly couldn't run attack ads from the left.

He just wanted to be part of the national conversation for as long as possible, and to get his agenda into the Democratic platform. He succeeded at both, at which point he slinked back into his hole and became Hillary's bitch, like he had planned all along.

you keep overlooking all of his attacks on her wall street connections and high dollar speaking fees, and that he demanded to see her goldman sachs speeches. for a long time, those attacks became the primary focus of his campaign against her. he based his comment that she was "unqualified" because of her ties to wall street. he didn't outright use the words quid pro quo or corrupt, but it's pretty obvious that's the message he was trying to convey.

this was a pretty damaging attack that has been 100% adopted by the trump campaign. i'm quite certain that hillary wishes he never went down that road.

also keep in mind that there used to be a time when it was truly frowned upon to attack primary opponents with any real teeth. obv that's out the window on the right, but wasn't it reagan who said the 11th commandment is thou shalt not attack a fellow republican? or something like that. too lazy too google this early in the morning.

When Bernie announced at the debates that he didn't care about her e-mails and it was a non-issue he made it very clear he had no serious interest in being President.
10-28-2016, 07:58 AM
DirtyB

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

at which point he slinked back into his hole and became Hillary's bitch, like he had planned all along.

At least try to pay attention.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...0a3_story.html

http://fortune.com/2016/10/24/att-ti...ernie-sanders/

He's also been out raising millions of dollars for Senate candidates. The GOP leadership is going to be so mad when Trump throws away an easily won Senate majority.
10-28-2016, 09:03 AM
thesidedish

Quote:

Originally Posted by DirtyB

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

at which point he slinked back into his hole and became Hillary's bitch, like he had planned all along.

At least try to pay attention.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...0a3_story.html

http://fortune.com/2016/10/24/att-ti...ernie-sanders/

He's also been out raising millions of dollars for Senate candidates. The GOP leadership is going to be so mad when Trump throws away an easily won Senate majority.

It's their own fault btw, they wouldn't have had any problems if they treated trump like he was the republican nominee, could have got every one of his supporters to vote R straight ticket for the most part
10-28-2016, 09:12 AM
ChipCounter

https://www.facebook.com/chad.david....54145264788510
10-28-2016, 09:16 AM
DirtyB

Quote:

Originally Posted by thesidedish

Quote:

Originally Posted by DirtyB

At least try to pay attention.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...0a3_story.html

http://fortune.com/2016/10/24/att-ti...ernie-sanders/

He's also been out raising millions of dollars for Senate candidates. The GOP leadership is going to be so mad when Trump throws away an easily won Senate majority.

It's their own fault btw, they wouldn't have had any problems if they treated trump like he was the republican nominee, could have got every one of his supporters to vote R straight ticket for the most part

Trump supporters that actually vote will mostly vote straight Republican. The problems for the GOP are that there aren't enough Trump supporters, and he's telling them that their votes won't matter- discouraging people from voting. Trump would rather have an excuse ready for how he lost to a woman than make any effort to help the party.
10-28-2016, 09:30 AM
ChipCounter

4 Attachment(s)
10-28-2016, 09:31 AM
gimmick

Besides being batshitcrazy Jill Stein also appears to be a hypocrite...

http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...s-another.html

...says she's against fossil fuel, big pharma, wall street and defense contractors, but apparently she's not that much against them that she wouldn't investment in them. It's mutual funds but she's already acknowledged she's aware how her money is invested and she's only going along because ethical funds don't pay enough.

Basically you peons do your sacrifices for environment and ethical business practices, my job is just preaching that. I'm not gonna take a personal hit.

Exxon, Chevron, Citibank, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Merck, Phizer, Phillip Morris, Raytheon etc. The classic friends of the Green Party list.

And obv none of this would matter if she didn't constantly spew this type of crap, “I have long since thrown in the towel on the Democratic and Republican parties because they are really a front group for the 1 percent, for predatory banks, fossil-fuel giants, and war profiteers.”.
10-28-2016, 09:41 AM
ChipCounter

1 Attachment(s)