Here's some of the women that Bill Cosby raped.
http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/...6197529958.jpg
Printable View
Here's some of the women that Bill Cosby raped.
http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/...6197529958.jpg
35 have come forward so far, so we assume the real total is what, 2x or 3x?Quote:
Originally Posted by SrslySirius
those are catholic priest type numbers
it blows my mind that it's taken this long for a serial rapist of his magnitude to get any kind of heat
15, 26, 21, ......
Quote:
Originally Posted by WillieMcFML35 have come forward so far, so we assume the real total is what, 2x or 3x?Quote:
Originally Posted by SrslySirius
those are catholic priest type numbers
it blows my mind that it's taken this long for a serial rapist of his magnitude to get any kind of heat
was hoping to spot a photoshopped addition to the cover, but I can not.
Keep in mind that Cosby was good friends with Hugh Hefner and was a regular at the mansion parties. The amount of women he roofied at those parties alone could be in the hundreds.
Also, heard on Stern this week that B Clinton might be the next big name to have rape allegations resurface. Not sure where Robin got that from though, I'm not really seeing any buzz about it on the net.
Oh believe me the republican candidates are getting ready for that one. May take a year before anyone lets it fly but it wouldn't surprise me to have Kathleen Willey show up at a presidential debate.Quote:
Originally Posted by vegas1369
'Have you been sexually harassed by Bill Clinton?'
Kathleen Willey launches anti-Hillary website
I believe. Only makes sense that's coming next. I'm sure Hillary and Co. are well prepared for that as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by 4DragonsOh believe me the republican candidates are getting ready for that one. May take a year before anyone lets it fly but it wouldn't surprise me to have Kathleen Willey show up at a presidential debate.Quote:
Originally Posted by vegas1369
Supposedly he has a thing for biting women's lips and forcing sex on them, which makes no sense to me whatsoever. Like what, he gets the woman's lip between his teeth and won't let go until he busts a nut?
Ha!!! Published 7 hours ago!Quote:
Originally Posted by 4Dragons
I was walking my dog last Friday and saw a massive cylindrical cloud in the sky. The rest of the sky was completely clear. Within this cloud was tons of lightning, firing like once per second. It was also completely silent, which I found very odd.
I just stopped in the street and stared at this thing for five minutes. It looked like something out of a science fiction movie. Then I went back home and told my gf to check it out. I wasn't sure if it was truly an oddity or if I was just one of today's lucky 10,000. She also remarked that she had never seen or heard of anything like it.
Turns out, we weren't the only ones mystified by it. I just started seeing photos and videos of it on Reddit and social media.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0WJlMwmqDo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsvP1T4AtqI
Does anyone know what the hell causes that? Is there a name for it? Have you seen anything like this?
https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/i...8PUOn0sj_XTOIZQuote:
Originally Posted by SrslySirius
i apologize for my last post
can't believe i went there i have no excuse just please understand i'm not in a good place right now
I understand the basic principles of lightning, which I guess is a good example of how knowing a little bit about something makes you realize how little you actually know. Because it just confuses me about this more. If it's being caused by air currents and friction, to be creating that much lightning, how could appear to be so still? Is there something unusual happening inside the cloud? And why wasn't there any thunder?Quote:
Originally Posted by WillieMcFML
Bottomset, what's the deal?
Quote:
Originally Posted by SrslySirius
Quote:
Scientists think they can control weather with lasers
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/inducing...eather-lasers/
For many Americans who wished they could change the weather -- whether it be in the Northeast during this past winter or in drought-stricken California -- researchers may have found a way to aim a high-energy laser beam into clouds to make it rain or trigger lightning.
The existence of condensation, storms and lightning are all due to the presence of large amounts of static electricity in the clouds. Researchers from the University of Central Florida and the University of Arizona say that a laser beam could activate those large amounts of static electricity and create storms on demand.
By surrounding a beam with another beam that will act as an energy reservoir, the central beam will be sustained for greater distances than previously possible. The secondary beam will refuel and help to prevent the dissipation of the primary beam, which would break down quickly on its own.
Although lasers can already travel great distances, it behaves differently than usual, collapsing inward on itself when a laser beam becomes intense enough, according to Matthew Mills, a graduate student at the UFC Center for Research and Education in Optics and Lasers.
"The collapse becomes so intense that electrons in the air's oxygen and nitrogen are ripped off creating plasma -- basically a soup of electrons," Mills explained in a statement.
Afterwards, the plasma tries to spread the beam back out -- causing an internal struggle between collapsing and spreading -- what's known as "filamentation." This process in turn creates a light string that lasts only until the beam disperses.
"Because a filament creates excited electrons in its wake as it moves, it artificially seeds the conditions necessary for rain and lightning to occur," Mills explained.
Previous work done by other researchers have led to some type of "electrical event" in clouds -- raising an added risk of a lightning strike when seeding clouds with lasers, according to the researchers.
"What would be nice is to have a sneaky way which allows us to produce an arbitrary long 'filament extension cable.' It turns out that if you wrap a large, low intensity, doughnut-like 'dress' beam around the filament and slowly move it inward, you can provide this arbitrary extension," Mills said in a statement.
"Since we have control over the length of a filament with our method, one could seed the conditions needed for a rainstorm from afar. Ultimately, you could artificially control the rain and lightning over a large expanse with such ideas."
Future applications of this method could be used in long distance sensors or in spectrometers for chemical makeups.
"This work could ultimately lead to ultra-long optically induced filaments or plasma channels that are otherwise impossible to establish under normal conditions," Demetrios Christodoulides, a professor that is working with the graduate students on the project, said in a statement.
Using this method, Mills, along with fellow graduate researcher Ali Miri, have extended the pulse seven-fold -- from just under a foot to around seven feet. Still, they're not done yet, with hopes to extend the filament even further.
Development of the technology was funded by the Department of Defense and the researchers' findings were published in the journal Nature Photonics.
One of the cooler videos Veritasium has put out in a while.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knDIENvBTgw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jw2rT76x7yg&oref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube .com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DJ w2rT76x7yg&has_verified=1
This is the ref (pink shorts). It's fairly disgusting.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...d-muscles.html
I don't see what is so amazing about that. It's a thunderstorm lol. Also, if you couldn't hear the thunder it's because you were too far away. Thunderstorms have updrafts (rapidly rising air) and downdrafts (rapidly sinking air). That causes ice particles to collide and create the friction that makes lightning. Even if a storm is stationary, there is still a lot of air movement going on.Quote:
Originally Posted by SrslySiriusI understand the basic principles of lightning, which I guess is a good example of how knowing a little bit about something makes you realize how little you actually know. Because it just confuses me about this more. If it's being caused by air currents and friction, to be creating that much lightning, how could appear to be so still? Is there something unusual happening inside the cloud? And why wasn't there any thunder?Quote:
Originally Posted by WillieMcFML
Bottomset, what's the deal?
Calm down BottomsetQuote:
Originally Posted by Muck FiconI don't see what is so amazing about that. It's a thunderstorm lol. Also, if you couldn't hear the thunder it's because you were too far away. Thunderstorms have updrafts (rapidly rising air) and downdrafts (rapidly sinking air). That causes ice particles to collide and create the friction that makes lightning. Even if a storm is stationary, there is still a lot of air movement going on.Quote:
Originally Posted by SrslySirius
Quote:
Originally Posted by SrslySirius
Looks like your storm made it all the way to Moscow
http://www.rt.com/news/310901-moscow...ary-lightning/
vids at link
had one of those lightning clouds over chicago about two weeks ago. It was pretty cool watching the cloud light up every few seconds, yet no lightning left the cloud to extend down to the ground. Its like it was kicking its own ass.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p92NfBoCprI
Quote:
A man has been arrested for stealing a Winnie the Pooh toy car from a supermarket. CCTV of the incident was released by police in Belarus, several days after the crime was committed on 6 May. The footage shows a man walking around the supermarket and taking a seat on the toy car while talking on his phone. The man then edges it towards the exit doors. He is then seen slowly but surely manoeuvring the toy car across the supermarket's car park.
Police in the capital Minsk made a public appeal for anyone who recognised the man to come forward. They also published screenshots from the video and promised confidentiality to those who could help identify the thief. Belarussian media said a labourer confessed to the crime, saying he was drunk and did not remember where he abandoned the toy car that night. It has yet to be found.
http://miami.cbslocal.com/2015/07/28...national-park/
Huge Python Captured At Shark Valley In Everglades National Park
https://cbsmiami.files.wordpress.com...0&h=349&crop=1
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/p...lice-shooting/
Seems like such a friendly guy on the video, amazed that he's such an ice cold killer.. wait.. no i'm not.Quote:
Of 558 fatal shootings by police so far this year, according to a Washington Post database tracking such shootings, the death of Dubose is only the fourth to result in criminal charges against the officer.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jf7fe9LbC_I
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4Dragons
Only one shot to the head at point blank? Drk will be so disappointed.
No clue why that cop felt he had to use his gun there. We will have to wait for more facts/evidence to come out, but that seems pretty fucked up there. Video got blurry at the most crucial point.
Cop will likely do serious time. Very likely deserves it.
thomas, how does this make you feel?Quote:
Originally Posted by SrslySirius
Pretty sure we don't have to wait for more facts to come out on this one. A lot of what you've said in this thread I agree with, and I have a lot of respect for you, but you kind of homered up this one with the "Video got blurry at the most crucial point" comment. You've got to call a spade a spade here my brother. The majority of the police brutality stories we've seen on the national news lately have been at the very least semi provoked by the victims actions, this however was DEFINITELY NOT one of those times. I know you said he likely deserves to do time, but likely shouldn't even be included in that sentence.Quote:
Originally Posted by DRK Star
This was 100% cold blooded murder. No evidence that comes out will change that, and nothing about the video being blurry at the crucial moment matters.
Dude even wrote in his report he was dragged by the car. Just that alone should be enough to tell you how full of shit this asshole is, and how those few seconds of blurriness don't mean a thing.
Quote:
Help A Reporter Out @helpareporter 23h23 hours ago #URGHARO: query-50jc@helpareporter.net seeks an M.D. or Ph.D. in a relevant field about how common it is to defecate during anal intercourse
Yes,, more facts. We still dont know everything that happened.
I still think the cop really fucked up and deserves some jail time, but in the event something ridiculous comes out, like:
Cop: I tried to open the door and he reached between the seats and grabbed something that appeared to be a gun/He tried to stab me with a concealed knife as he drove off.
Im not saying that those things completely justify what the cop did, but I want to find out what caused him to feel he had to use a weapon in that situation.
99% chance he fucked up.
I like making my decisions once I have facts, and I dont have enough to know what truly happened. If I have to make a decision just based on what I saw so far, he is guilty and should be punished. IMO, the cop was a bit concerned with this guy based on how he was behaving, and made a bad decision to pull his gun when the guy didnt comply because he was startled by the guy not opening the door.
Did they find a weapon in the car. Did the guy have priors for weapons or violence? How was he acting inside the vehicle? What are the laws in that state as they apply to confronting that driver? Did the officer have the right to open that door?
even if he had the right to do everything above, what makes him think a gun in that case is necessary? No clue. I dont know anything about that guy driving except he was dressed a bit on the pimp side, he handed a police officer booze (this is never something considered normal) and wasnt obeying some of the commands.
Once the cop said he was dragged, and video proved he wasnt, it crushes his story. It really points the finger toward him being guilty, however, maybe he said this because he was in shock and truly thought he was dragged (still guilty though).
dwai: more facts? black man white cop, do the math ginger
If that is truly how you feel, I dont need to have logical discussions with you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRK Star
You did a lot of typing and the only thing that needed to be put down was 'this guy got shot in the face for not having a front license plate'.
That you don't acknowledge that is worrisome.
You defended the cops in NY that choked a guy to death, when their own police force strictly forbids that exact maneuver from ever being used, when the video clearly showed they were totally full of shit in their police report. It somehow didn't crush their story in that incident.Quote:
Originally Posted by DRK Star