Printable View
JD Vance is just too millennial for older generations. Most of those interactions that seem awkward is just how most guys talk now. Obviously in his position he shouldn't be that casual though.
Compare this to closet case, stolen valor, IVF denier Walz clearly not being happy with his sperglord son breaking down in front of everyone:
https://x.com/ClownWorld_/status/1826834025924940030
more like Gay D vance (the word gay instead of J)
What is going on with JVs "haircut"? It is the same cut as the kid in my first grade class had that would wipe poop on the walls in the bathroom and kept getting sent to the Principals office for humping walls, desks, and that big TV on wheels.
I was too angered and depressed by the DNC to wanna delve into or respond to Vaughn’s post but I swear to god “sperglord” def got a silent nod from me.Quote:
Originally Posted by VaughnP
Now part of the PFA lexicon
There's literally no reason to vote Republican.
which is clearer.
https://www.vfw.org/media-and-events...-honor-remarks
I just watched Tom Cotton on This Week absolutely obliterate the ABC Host. Why was Cotton not a VP candidate? I mean he would maul the dork from MN in a debate.
i don't think anyone cares. it comes down to who pays and gets free shit.Quote:
Originally Posted by tgull
You're too dialed in, spending Sunday watching Tom Cotton instead of your family?Quote:
Originally Posted by tgull
Trump will win, or not. Go outside faggot.
More and more Druff energy on display..
:lol2
amazing what is newsworthy.
Part of what I wrote here was before they forced Joe out:
Quote:
Originally Posted by VaughnPHere is exactly what I wrote:Quote:
Originally Posted by tgull
Please lie some more and present more of your baseless opinions as fact. She was a worse choice than Joe in terms of having a chance at winning the presidency at that point. But again, look at the amount of shit that has happened since this post. You are a moron if you don't think the entire DNC is scrambling behind the scenes to find a way out of her being the nominee. Even Hillary would be better.Quote:
Newsom wouldn't do it, but they are absolutely opening the door. This would be a little different than typical Democrat shenanigans since it's a sitting President, but your CNN panel talking point will mean nothing if this gets much worse. Have you forgotten the 2016 and 2008 primaries? Nothing is off the table with Democrats when it comes to the assumed best interest of the party. Kamala isn't viewed as black enough by the vast majority of those who that decision would actually affect. She herself is actually a liability among black voters. If you can not clearly see the coordinated campaign that started 10 seconds after the debate ended you are blind. They have laid the foundation, if Biden's situation gets worse something drastic will happen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by VaughnP
https://x.com/TheBirdWords/status/1854981447070650390
Nancy Pelosi to the NYT: “had the president [Biden] gotten out sooner, there may have been other candidates in the race.”
“The anticipation was that, if the president were to step aside, that there would be an open primary. “
“And as I say, Kamala may have, I think she would have done well in that and been stronger going forward. But we don’t know that. That didn’t happen. We live with what happened. And because the president endorsed Kamala Harris immediately, that really made it almost impossible to have a primary at that time. If it had been much earlier, it would have been different”
When you've heard Trump say she was 11th or 13th on the list, he wasn't exactly exaggerating. They didn't want her, but no one else they wanted would step up. Some here were insistent that they wouldn't pass over her. Had any other candidate in the Obama/Clinton circle of trust decided they were ready for it, you'd have had an open convention. She was the worst candidate literally ever. Joe had the last laugh.
Quote:
Originally Posted by VaughnPThe only group that have embraced her are liberal white women. You are delusional.Quote:
Originally Posted by tgull
You are arguing with yourself. I said, correctly so Harris would be the candidate. She had to be, you are not going to remove a black female VP in the Democrat party, especially for a white woman like the MI Governor or some Jewish guy from PA. I was right about this election, 100%. You were also right but closer to 90%.Quote:
Originally Posted by tgullYou said she would never make it to the nomination. You were emphatic about it. Something about the Democratic party would run her out. Well guess what, she is sailing to the nomination, even the Obamas endorsed her. Just admit you were completely wrong. And I am not Nostradamus, but this was about an easy prediction since (fill in blank). You just got this one totally wrong. Just admit it and move on.Quote:
Originally Posted by VaughnP
Congrats on posting a bunch of polls. You were somewhere in between "Trump is going to win" and hedging with insisting routinely that it was close and that she was polling ahead of Trump by a couple points. I don't recall a single analysis of yours explaining why Trump was going to win, at best you were 40% right. This thread is a prime example. And again you are lying. The exact quotes are right there. And it would not have been passing over her if she decided to declare for it and lost a vote at the convention. I mean the thing speaks for itself. Obama didn't immediately endorse her. Jesus.Quote:
Originally Posted by tgullYou are arguing with yourself. I said, correctly so Harris would be the candidate. She had to be, you are not going to remove a black female VP in the Democrat party, especially for a white woman like the MI Governor or some Jewish guy from PA. I was right about this election, 100%. You were also right but closer to 90%.Quote:
Originally Posted by tgull
I don't have a crystal ball, nor do you, anything can happen in an election. I did correctly say based on my travels Trump would win WI way in advance, plenty on here said I was crazy, but I was 100% correct. I also won $9,500 on Trump so I really am not sure what you are talking about.Quote:
Originally Posted by VaughnPCongrats on posting a bunch of polls. You were somewhere in between "Trump is going to win" and hedging with insisting routinely that it was close and that she was polling ahead of Trump by a couple points. I don't recall a single analysis of yours explaining why Trump was going to win, at best you were 40% right. This thread is a prime example. And again you are lying. The exact quotes are right there.Quote:
Originally Posted by tgull
my mans vaughn sizzle just hit you with an AT BEST 40 percent son due to constant flip flopping right in your gook face rip mort
JDV really blew everyone away in that debate, gay dudes fell in love with him, Walz sounded like a dope. Imagine being 1 aneurysm away from that goofball being president.
What a wacky election.