Quote:
Originally Posted by
BeerAndPoker
The only legitimate reason that places may not want to allow e-cigs is from a distance (especially in dark settings) they appear to look real. A place may not want to look around all over for someone who might light up a real one or think the law will allow them to since hey see other people vaping but don't realize it's just that and might think they are smoking if seeing the person from a distance.
In a heavily traveled area especially with a lot of International tourism such as LA politicians might think they are avoiding confusion by eliminating e-cig usage. Is this the right way to go about it? No, and I'm a non-smoker who was even against banning "real" smoking in bars and bar/restaurants but felt people shouldn't have to deal with that in family places like a McDonalds, Dennys, and similar places where you can be out in less than an hour.
Of course like you said lobbyists are a big part since they control politicians who will fight anything when money is thrown their way.
Agree with the bold part, and also I would toss in the smell from some of them can travel the same as a cig or cigar.
But really, it is L.A., is it that hard to step outside for nicotine? It's not like having to go outside in January in like Minnesota or something.
I'm also not a smoker (I do dip though) and I generally was in favor of the smoking bans at first. However, after xx amount of years of it going, most bars/restaurants have realized that their business has been unaffected by it, and in a lot of cases actually gone up. I'm fairly certain that if it stopped being a law now here where I live, probably 80-90% of places would remain non-smoking anyway, and the rest could have a niche market for people who enjoy the old smoke-filled pubs. Of course the issue there then is the staff working at the smokey places.....