Quote:
Originally Posted by
OSA
Landlords are still not really giving a fuck and refusing to renegotiate leases so I don't really get their strategy when it comes to keeping and acquiring tenants in their houses. Mine wont budge because there's an empty room in my house(been so for the past 4 months) so they cant afford to give me a break.
Something tells me that if they cant get the agreed upon rent, they would rather have the apartments vacant.
something i picked up in the bay area back in the early dot com real estate boom days.. and i dont know if this is the same situation as ny but i dont see why it wouldnt be honestly..
- there are weird tax advantages to empty apartments
- landlords will do this 'pass around the same dollar' thing where they just endlessly sell apartments to each other over and over to keep sales figures artificially inflated
- part of that grift is doing renovations on the apartment, which keep the apartments unoccupied and can also be weird tax shit, multiplied by how much they agree to mark up fees with their contractors
you get the idea hopefully. landlords know what they are doing and in NYC, where an overwhelming percent of real
estate is owned by hassids, you have the bonus of an insular culture based on under the table/off the record transactions already so working the system to lose a penny instead of a pound is burnt in. in the bay area, all the property was owned by chinese. exact same dynamic obviously.
watch; a lot of empty buildings are going to mysteriously start to have weirdly disastrous electrical fires soon.