She got Bloomberged.Quote:
Originally Posted by duped_samaritan
Cory Booker is next.
https://images.axios.com/JyHhKn_eZI7...3862200662.jpg
She got Bloomberged.Quote:
Originally Posted by duped_samaritan
Cory Booker is next.
https://images.axios.com/JyHhKn_eZI7...3862200662.jpg
I think a lot of ppl who worked for kamala were on the Hillary 2016 campaign. just saying
glad she is out of the Pres runQuote:
Originally Posted by duped_samaritan
were it not for her appealing Peralta v San Diego to the full 9th Circuit Court, each county/city in California would be shall issue cc today
hope she gets voted out at the end of her senate term
good to know that tulsi -- who would be the most liberal president of all time -- is a republican.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatineQuote:
Originally Posted by blake
its not an anti-war stance, its an anti-intelligence stance. shes donald trump with tits and youre balls deep in her because you finally found a republican you dont have to be embarrassed to support.
blaming the cia for taking part in the cold war, neoconservative adventurism, and otherwise implementing policies dictated by sitting presidents exploitive, alarming, and nefarious.
fuck off my block with your cult of tulsi feelings.
this is what woke culture has done to us.
tine, bernie sanders is not a serious candidate. just stop with this guy.
Both Yang and Gabbard are one poll away from qualifying. But if they fail to get one more poll in time then the debate will be a white-out (prob 5% chance)Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedish
,
Bernie's on the right track--the wars the US fights are often for US Imperialism, not for defending/promoting democracy like the deep state peddles to the US public...so why not spread the wealth of the nation more evenly by taking away military money and speinding on social welfare programs?
careful, tine will think bernie's a republicanQuote:
Originally Posted by GrenadaRoger
Video of Trudeau, Macron, and Borris Johnson making fun of Trump:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1202054950664192001
(not letting me embed tweets)
plot twist, liz cheney just trotted out 'pocohontas' on twitter and is getting buried for using a racial slur.
im not sure if she just decided to go there, wanted to test the waters for trump, or wanted to invoke backlash and set precedent so he couldnt do it with a clean slate.
probably the first.
also for posterity:
I mean, she's married to this guy:Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmUnUoeLSIM
So embarrassing. Sonatine can't find actual policies of Tulsi's to criticize, so he resorts to baseless smears, designed to fool the lowest common denominator.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatineQuote:
Originally Posted by blake
its not an anti-war stance, its an anti-intelligence stance. shes donald trump with tits and youre balls deep in her because you finally found a republican you dont have to be embarrassed to support.
blaming the cia for taking part in the cold war, neoconservative adventurism, and otherwise implementing policies dictated by sitting presidents exploitive, alarming, and nefarious.
fuck off my block with your cult of tulsi feelings.
Here's who he claims is "Donald Trump with tits" (all the times Tulsi has criticized Trump):
Here are her "Republican policies":
You cannot debate her policies / actions with real substance, so all you can resort to are lies / innuendos. Again, you show no honor, and no allegiance to truth.
You are much tougher than Sonatine because I believe you argue in good faith and are also in search of the truth, whereas his posts are pure emotion and thus totally unedifying.Quote:
Originally Posted by gimmickBad math and shoddy physics isn't evidence. The theory that canisters couldn't have dropped from air wasn't publicized because a far more accurate and wider research found that theory to not be true.Quote:
Originally Posted by diggydow
From the first link i gave you...
"the final report devotes extensive and detailed discussion to the modelling of the impact of the two cylinders in pages 53-64. Three independent analyses by experts in three different countries were carried out, and all reached complimentary conclusions: the damage at the impact sites is consistent with the cylinders having fallen from height (Annex 12).
It should also be noted that the engineering studies were only received by the FFM in December 2018, well after the date of this letter. As such, any discussion about the point of impact on the date of this letter would have been superseded by the studies which came later."
...and the actual report...
https://www.opcw.org/sites/default/f...019%28e%29.pdf
...all peer reviewed, verified, corroborated and other sciency words.
And maybe now we can get to the part why are rebels/CIA staging these attacks so they have an excuse to invade Syria but in the 8 years they have not? How does this Iraq 2.0 work out?
But you are incorrect w/r/t the claim that the canisters are now confirmed to have been dropped from the air. The most recent leak directly contradicts that + shows that the truth was redacted from the final report: "The report also included photographs of the alleged holes made on rooftops from what were claimed to be chemical munitions – but noted that adjacent buildings had similar craters and holes that clearly were not the result of chemical munitions. In other words, evidence suggests the canisters were likely placed into position, taking advantage of holes and craters created by conventional weapons."
They were staging this attack 8 years later (perhaps) because they knew Trump was itching to pull out, and they still hadn't gotten rid of Assad. They need to get rid of Assad to build the pipeline from Turkey -> Qatar.
Gimmick, can we move this OPCW / Syria thing to a new thread? I'm guessing most people don't care, despite its importance.
:lol2
Quote:
Originally Posted by diggydowSo embarrassing. Sonatine can't find actual policies of Tulsi's to criticize, so he resorts to baseless smears, designed to fool the lowest common denominator.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
Here's who he claims is "Donald Trump with tits" (all the times Tulsi has criticized Trump):
Here are her "Republican policies":
You cannot debate her policies / actions with real substance, so all you can resort to are lies / innuendos. Again, you show no honor, and no allegiance to truth.
ok mumbles
I have serious doubts about our Biden bet Druff.
Presidents have very little influence over domestic policy. The other branch of government does that.
What Presidents can do is unilaterally wage war and if they choose .. drop Nuclear Warheads.
I tuned out of the last debate. It opened with Trump bashing - which is just a high school pep rally kinda WOT. I wanted to find out about the differences between the candidates. I guess I kinda wanted a debate. I read that this didn’t particularly ever happen. So I didn’t miss much.
Anyway, I wanted to see what was said about foreign affairs and policy. Turns out almost nothing was said. The Middle East did briefly come up. Bernie proudly stating he was squarely and publicly against it.
Then I heard Biden speak to his position at the time. Biden was absolutely incomprehensible. Pure cringe. It was an intellectual seizure. He couldn’t even string together a plausible lie like Trump.
I started to listen to more Biden. One that sticks with me was his response to the issue of domestic violence. “We need to change the culture”. “We need to keep punching away at it.
He’s an idiot.
Biden is going to have a public seizure (gaffe) of historic proportions. Generations hence, folks will point to the moment Biden melted down.
Democrats should pray that happens in the Primaries. He will lose to Trump. That is absolutely incredible to me. The year the American Experiment died.
Maybe the Windsor’s have a spare royal. I hear Harry and Meghan Markle are looking for a house in the US. She’s blackish. It plays.
Yeah, the Biden bet is going to flame out like some backdoor cover on an interception. A moment of mammoth failure you will blame for your 3 day drunk
That money is gone Druff. Sorry buddy
I fucking love Bernie. He’s so earnest and forthright. I believe he is telling you exactly what he feels. That is so unique.
I don’t think he believes he can win. I believe he is just furthering a moral discussion. That’s important even if I don’t agree.
Booker T Washington is appealing.
I’m trying. I’m really really trying.
Druff said some nonsense about people pretty much already decided. I’m not the political wonk but that wasn’t true last election either at this stage
Yooou rannnnnnng?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanlmar
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DbE2SmV2bs
Sure, i'll reply in the Syria conflict thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by diggydow
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanlmar
the biggest red flag i have re bernie is trump saying he was glad he didnt run against bernie because bernie would have slaughtered him.
but im also starting to think maybe we are grossly overestimating trumps chances, period. a _lot_ of people gave trump a chance and it didnt go well for them so they are going to stay tf home in nov 2019.
and a _lot_ of people are going to vote for literally anyone else.
my biggest concern about bernie is going to be the martin shkreli wall street types deliberately tanking the market to prove some sort of point.
also how weird is it that fb/google are spazzing out over warren while not even mentioning how badly bernie's union agenda would be for them?
They are not bashing Trump enough.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanlmar
I honestly don't give a shit about any of them.
If these Democratic candidates actually want to be President, they must threaten Trump and his family with torture as well as lifetime imprisonment.
If they did that their popularity would skyrocket.
Unfortunately, they don't have the balls to do that and they think that the people actually care about the issues. The people don't give a fuck. Trump knows this and he will continue to do whatever the fuck he wants.
https://static01.nyt.com/images/2018...isable=upscale
ya know, if this congressional coup etat vs Trump gets close to succeeding, a nationwide general strike by Republicans would be in orderQuote:
Originally Posted by TheXFactorThey are not bashing Trump enough.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanlmar
I honestly don't give a shit about any of them.
If these Democratic candidates actually want to be President, they must threaten Trump and his family with torture as well as lifetime imprisonment.
If they did that their popularity would skyrocket.
Unfortunately, they don't have the balls to do that and they think that the people actually care about the issues. The people don't give a fuck. Trump knows this and he will continue to do whatever the fuck he wants.
https://static01.nyt.com/images/2018...isable=upscale
don't work, don't buy, just stay home or protest rally peacefully
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrenadaRoger
wowwww, where ever will i get my dip and assault rifles
The sonatine / any typical coward move:
1. Parrot smear heard on DNC-controlled MSM
2. Have smear refuted / evidence to the contrary provided
3. Immediately abandon smear while refusing to explicitly acknowledge contradictory evidence, and pivot to childish insult or alternative smear
4. Repeat a week later (often the same, refuted smear, with no alterations)
That is the level of discourse I've seen from sonatine (and the rest of the lowest common denominator on Reddit, or Twitter) - essentially, playing the role of the sheep from Animal Farm.
---
All of it shows anyone reading this that you, sonatine, are not earnestly in search of the truth. Instead, you seek a specific narrative, with extreme prejudice and massive blinders.
ok diggydow, thanks for playing, youve been a great sport.
you have to understand sonatine doesn't really hate tulsi. all of her positions align with his. he's just concerned that she has no chance of winning and is damaging democrats in advance of the general election, which i kind of get. he doesn't want a repeat of 2016.Quote:
Originally Posted by diggydow
i just think we're in trouble if either bernie or warren are the nominees. they don't represent the majority of this country or even the democrats. we need more intelligent voices like tulsi's. also me and jim were the first people on this site to endorse her before she even declared she was running. so we're really smart.
i would also accept a living version of biden as a nominee.
placeholder post so i can say blake and diggydow are in a libertarian cult later
look i'll vote for any democrat nominee, but a shocking number of my neighbors/work colleagues who despise trump say they would prefer him over a socialist.
i'm officially scared.
For the record - and also for my ego - in December 2018 I also called Tulsi winning in 2020, before she even announced.
in november 2018 i called her a secret republican.
blaaaaaaaake bitter pill incoming:
either trumps going to win because there isnt anyone at all who can beat him or trumps going to lose because absolutely anyone could beat him at this point, including a socialist.
there really isnt a middle ground.
i'm surprised you think trump's unstoppable since he's a disaster. certain candidates would fare much better in swing states like pennsylvania. not sure bernie or warren meet that descriptionQuote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
The fact that he's had so many gaffes and it hasn't affected his poll numbers is a bullish indicator for himQuote:
Originally Posted by Avon Barksdale
im leaning towards the other side of the spectrum but when a majority of republicans honestly believe hes a better president than lincoln, i mean.. you want to go broke vs that?Quote:
Originally Posted by blakei'm surprised you think trump's unstoppable since he's a disaster. certain candidates would fare much better in swing states like pennsylvania. not sure bernie or warren meet that descriptionQuote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
oh you'll never get republican votes since he's their messiah but the goal is to have a chance at independents who might prefer a sociopath over a socialistQuote:
Originally Posted by sonatineim leaning towards the other side of the spectrum but when a majority of republicans honestly believe hes a better president than lincoln, i mean.. you want to go broke vs that?Quote:
Originally Posted by blake