Quote:
Originally Posted by Gordman
Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtyB
Sorry to hear this. Hoping for the best.
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gordman
Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtyB
Sorry to hear this. Hoping for the best.
Not satisfied with treating humans like animals. He's now treating animals like insects.
https://m.facebook.com/beaglefreedom...type=3&theater
Can see many Trump supporters not standing for this at all.
Can't imagine Trump ever stroking a dog in his life. Hopefully gets some blowback from his core support and reconsiders on the cruelty he's about to inflict.
That's a level.......right?Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord of the Fraud
Freeing up labor for the wall......prisoners first, then dog catchers
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord of the Fraud
As long as we nuke Iran, everything is good.
U.S. revokes all Nexus cards from Canadian permanent residents with citizenship in restricted countries: CBSA
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toront...cbsa-1.3966514
this is fine as it is just a convenience not a ban, muslims are still pissed as they will have to get in line with all the commoners while i will have to wait just a little less in the fast lane.
every one ok over there?
Nexus memberships have been revoked from all Canadian permanent residents with citizenship in any one of the seven majority-Muslim countries affected by the U.S. travel ban, the Canada Border Services Agency has confirmed to CBC Toronto.
Citing U.S. Customs and Border Protection, a CBSA spokesperson said in an email that FAST memberships have also been revoked from all such individuals. FAST is a program similar to Nexus that is meant to speed up commercial shipments across the border.
The email goes on to say that memberships of dual citizens have not been cancelled. But CBC Toronto has learned of multiple Canadian-born and dual citizens who have reportedly had their Nexus memberships revoked in the wake of a U.S. executive order barring entry to passport holders from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen.
Toronto-based lawyer Cyndee Todgham Cherniak said she has been contacted by at least two Canadian-born citizens with Muslim-sounding names who received notices.
And five others — a mix of dual citizens and permanent residents with direct connection to the restricted countries — have also reportedly received revocations from U.S. CBP, she said.
Wtf is wrong with you people.Quote:
Originally Posted by herbertstempleQuote:
Originally Posted by Lord of the Fraud
As long as we nuke Iran, everything is good.
Quote:
Originally Posted by herbertstempleQuote:
Originally Posted by DirtyB
Sorry to hear this. Hoping for the best.
They should nuke chicago too and get it over with, no ones gonna miss those idiots.
Hey Mr. "When you see hail that means a tornado is close by"... You seriously have an extremely uneducated, unenlightened, ignoramus view of the world.Quote:
Originally Posted by herbertstempleQuote:
Originally Posted by Lord of the Fraud
As long as we nuke Iran, everything is good.
It's not their fault, blame it on Rush L, Alex Jones, and fox news, these poor guys are just brainwashed sheep who don't know any better.Quote:
Originally Posted by vegas1369Hey Mr. "When you see hail that means a tornado is close by"... You seriously have an extremely uneducated, unenlightened, ignoramus view of the world.Quote:
Originally Posted by herbertstemple
You people can't let that go. Hell dude, I'm pro legalizing weed.Quote:
Originally Posted by vegas1369Hey Mr. "When you see hail that means a tornado is close by"... You seriously have an extremely uneducated, unenlightened, ignoramus view of the world.Quote:
Originally Posted by herbertstemple
Carter should have nuked Iran back in '79. But we sit on our asses looking like a bunch of pussies not having the balls to fight back. The world would be a much better place now if we had done it then. We have all this power but we act like our hands are tied because of it.
We nuked Japan in '45, ended WWII, and laid the foundation for Japan to become a financial power and one of our closest allies. The Middle East could be the same now but instead its a fucking mess there. And there will be more shit to happen.
The only time we used the nuclear bomb, it worked to perfection. Its time to do it again. The bombs are much larger so they will work even better now.
Unfortunately we have a nation of scared women that are afraid to fight back.
Aside from the fact that dropping a nuke is straight up insanity, the fact that you think it's just that simple and that we just act like a bunch of scared women here proves my point.Quote:
Originally Posted by herbertstempleYou people can't let that go. Hell dude, I'm pro legalizing weed.Quote:
Originally Posted by vegas1369
Carter should have nuked Iran back in '79. But we sit on our asses looking like a bunch of pussies not having the balls to fight back. The world would be a much better place now if we had done it then. We have all this power but we act like our hands are tied because of it.
We nuked Japan in '45, ended WWII, and laid the foundation for Japan to become a financial power and one of our closest allies. The Middle East could be the same now but instead its a fucking mess there. And there will be more shit to happen.
The only time we used the nuclear bomb, it worked to perfection. Its time to do it again. The bombs are much larger so they will work even better now.
Unfortunately we have a nation of scared women that are afraid to fight back.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MintjewlipsQuote:
Originally Posted by herbertstemple
They should nuke chicago too and get it over with, no ones gonna miss those idiots.
ohh poor white trash guy in middle america won't be affected by a nuke going off in chicago?
lets just say, I wont be affected.........
You however....have fun cleaning up whatever mess is left behind, after you come out from your trailer. I'm sure there will be plenty of Cabela's left to raid for ammo, Obama didn't take it all.
if living in the backwoods of the south or whatever you're from has any merit, it's that you will not be affected by a nuclear strike. There aren't any places in the south that are important enough to be on anyones lists.
TRUMP IS GOD LET'S SMOKE & DRINK
Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedish
smoke that you fucking pedo lover
From Charles Sykes, conservative talk radio host in Wisconsin:
Quote:
MILWAUKEE — If President Trump’s first tumultuous weeks have done nothing else, at least they have again made us a nation of readers.
As Americans grapple with the unreality of the new administration, George Orwell’s “1984” has enjoyed a resurgence of interest, becoming a surprise best seller and an invaluable guide to our post-factual world.
On his first full day in office Mr. Trump insisted that his inaugural crowd was the largest ever, a baseless boast that will likely set a pattern for his relationship both to the media and to the truth.
At an event marking Black History Month last week, the president took a detour from a discussion of Frederick Douglass — he described the abolitionist as “an example of somebody who’s done an amazing job and is being recognized more and more” — to talk about the press. “A lot of the media is actually the opposition party — they’re so biased,” he said. “So much of the media is the opposition party and knowingly saying incorrect things.”
Mr. Trump understands that attacking the media is the reddest of meat for his base, which has been conditioned to reject reporting from news sites outside of the conservative media ecosystem.
For years, as a conservative radio talk show host, I played a role in that conditioning by hammering the mainstream media for its bias and double standards. But the price turned out to be far higher than I imagined. The cumulative effect of the attacks was to delegitimize those outlets and essentially destroy much of the right’s immunity to false information. We thought we were creating a savvier, more skeptical audience. Instead, we opened the door for President Trump, who found an audience that could be easily misled.
The news media’s spectacular failure to get the election right has made it only easier for many conservatives to ignore anything that happens outside the right’s bubble and for the Trump White House to fabricate facts with little fear of alienating its base.
Unfortunately, that also means that the more the fact-based media tries to debunk the president’s falsehoods, the further it will entrench the battle lines.
During his first week in office, Mr. Trump reiterated the unfounded charge that millions of people had voted illegally. When challenged on the evident falsehood, Sean Spicer, the White House press secretary, seemed to argue that Mr. Trump’s belief that something was true qualified as evidence. The press secretary also declined to answer a straightforward question about the unemployment rate, suggesting that the number will henceforth be whatever the Trump administration wants it to be.
He can do this because members of the Trump administration feel confident that the alternative-reality media will provide air cover, even if they are caught fabricating facts or twisting words (like claiming that the “ban” on Muslim immigrants wasn’t really a “ban”). Indeed, they believe they have shifted the paradigm of media coverage, replacing the traditional media with their own.
In a stunning demonstration of the power and resiliency of our new post-factual political culture, Mr. Trump and his allies in the right media have already turned the term “fake news” against its critics, essentially draining it of any meaning. During the campaign, actual “fake news” — deliberate hoaxes — polluted political discourse and clogged social media timelines.
Some outlets opened the door, by helping spread conspiracy theories and indulging the paranoia of the fever swamps. For years, the widely read Drudge Report has linked to the bizarre conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, who believes that both the attacks of Sept. 11 and the Sandy Hook shootings were government-inspired “false flag” operations.
For conservatives, this should have made it clear that something was badly amiss in their media ecosystem. But now any news deemed to be biased, annoying or negative can be labeled “fake news.” Erroneous reports that the bust of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. had been removed from the Oval Office or misleading reports that sanctions against Russia had been lifted will be seized on by Mr. Trump’s White House to reinforce his indictment.
Even as he continues to attack the “dishonest media,” Mr. Trump and his allies are empowering this alt-reality media, providing White House access to Breitbart and other post-factual outlets that are already morphing into fierce defenders of the administration.
The relationship appears to be symbiotic, as Mr. Trump often seems to pick up on talking points from Fox News and has tweeted out links from websites notorious for their casual relationship to the truth, including sites like Gateway Pundit, a hoax-peddling site that announced, shortly after the inauguration, that it would have a White House correspondent.
By now, it ought to be evident that enemies are important to this administration, whether they are foreigners, refugees, international bankers or the press.
But discrediting independent sources of information also has two major advantages for Mr. Trump: It helps insulate him from criticism and it allows him to create his own narratives, metrics and “alternative facts.”
All administrations lie, but what we are seeing here is an attack on credibility itself.
The Russian dissident and chess grandmaster Garry Kasparov drew upon long familiarity with that process when he tweeted: “The point of modern propaganda isn’t only to misinform or push an agenda. It is to exhaust your critical thinking, to annihilate truth.”
Mr. Kasparov grasps that the real threat is not merely that a large number of Americans have become accustomed to rejecting factual information, or even that they have become habituated to believing hoaxes. The real danger is that, inundated with “alternative facts,” many voters will simply shrug, asking, “What is truth?” — and not wait for an answer.
In that world, the leader becomes the only reliable source of truth; a familiar phenomenon in an authoritarian state, but a radical departure from the norms of a democratic society. The battle over truth is now central to our politics.
This may explain one of the more revealing moments from after the election, when one of Mr. Trump’s campaign surrogates, Scottie Nell Hughes, was asked to defend the clearly false statement by Mr. Trump that millions of votes had been cast illegally. She answered by explaining that everybody now had their own way of interpreting whether a fact was true or not.
“There’s no such thing, unfortunately, anymore as facts,” she declared. Among “a large part of the population” what Mr. Trump said was the truth.
“When he says that millions of people illegally voted,” she said, his supporters believe him — and “people believe they have facts to back that up.”
Or as George Orwell said: “The very concept of objective truth is fading out of the world. Lies will pass into history.” But Ms. Hughes’s comment was perhaps unintentionally insightful. Mr. Trump and company seem to be betting that much of the electorate will not care if the president tells demonstrable lies, and will pick and choose whatever “alternative facts” confirm their views.
The next few years will be a test of that thesis.
In the meantime, we must recognize the magnitude of the challenge. If we want to restore respect for facts and break through the intellectual ghettos on both the right and left, the mainstream media will have to be aggressive without being hysterical and adversarial without being unduly oppositional.
Perhaps just as important, it will be incumbent on conservative media outlets to push back as well. Conservatism should be a reality-based philosophy, and the movement will be better off if it recognizes that facts really do matter. There may be short-term advantages to running headlines about millions of illegal immigrants voting or secret United Nations plots to steal your guns, but the longer the right enables such fabrications, the weaker it will be in the long run. As uncomfortable as it may be, it will fall to the conservative media to police its worst actors.
The conservative media ecosystem — like the rest of us — has to recognize how critical, but also how fragile, credibility is in the Orwellian age of Donald Trump.
Turns out, the Koch Brothers aren't down for 45 either.
good luck gentleman. they own the republican party.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...-a7560706.html
When Dick Cheney, Michael Moore and The Koch Brothers find something to agree on, and that's that you're an asshole....
Given the choice between insulting Vladimir Putin and insulting America, guess which one Trump chose?
That's 10 times worse than anything Obama ever said, and I heard 800 times about how he hated America.Quote:
When O'Reilly said "Putin's a killer," Trump responded: "There are a lot of killers. We've got a lot of killers. What, do you think our country's so innocent?"
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/poli...nocent-n716906
So now France has a Trump like candidate for president, Marine Le Pen; she is leading polls currently for the April election with 25% of polled respondents backing her, but she is an underdog to win the run-off in May that matches the top two April vote getters
here are highlights of her platform as per Reuters (it may sound familar):
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-fr...-idUSKBN15J007
In 144 "commitments" published at the start of a two-day rally in Lyon, Le Pen proposes leaving the euro zone, holding a referendum on EU membership, slapping taxes on imports and on the job contracts of foreigners, lowering the retirement age and increasing several welfare benefits while lowering income tax.
The manifesto also foresees reserving certain rights now available to all residents, including free education, to French citizens only, hiring 15,000 police, curbing migration and leaving NATO's integrated command.
"The aim of this program is first of all to give France its freedom back and give the people a voice," Le Pen said in the introduction to the manifesto....
so the Trump Train may soon be hearing cries of "En Voiture!"
That's what people don't get about Trump. He can be honest when other politicians would give some canned feel good response.Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtyB
We do have a lot of killers. No issue here. But may be made one.
and one for pfa's village idiot. welching, lying piece of shit.
Why do Republicans hate America so much?Quote:
Originally Posted by herbertstempleThat's what people don't get about Trump. He can be honest when other politicians would give some canned feel good response.Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtyB
We do have a lot of killers. No issue here. But may be made one.
Besides the utter lack of pride in his country, Trump's claim isn't even true. They were talking about Putin's record of killing critical journalists and opposition politicians. America does not have a history of that. The fact that Trump seems to think it's ok should be terrifying to everyone.
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/21/w...cs-poison.html
Marine Le Pen has shadowy financial ties to Russia and loves to praise Vladimir Putin (it may sound familar).Quote:
Originally Posted by GrenadaRoger
http://time.com/4627780/russia-natio...-le-pen-putin/
Can I just be real here... the guy is nuts, but if his new tax plan saves an additional 4-5% on my taxes, gotta be okay with him like everyone should.
Also repealing dodd frank, or at least the portions that don't make sense (literally who wrote half that shit), would be amazinggggg and make life so much easier for me.
So yea, guy is nuts but really he hasn't done anything THAT bad and will actually make some things much better. All you liberals crying and screaming "REEEEEEEEEEEE" need to calm the fuck down.
Hey Barry, instead of posting on this site why not post on your bffl site? I'm sure Micon would love to hear from you.
TL;DR: Trump is nuts but he's not that bad.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtyB
LMAO just wow
Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtyBWhy do Republicans hate America so much?Quote:
Originally Posted by herbertstemple
Besides the utter lack of pride in his country, Trump's claim isn't even true. They were talking about Putin's record of killing critical journalists and opposition politicians. America does not have a history of that. The fact that Trump seems to think it's ok should be terrifying to everyone.
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/21/w...cs-poison.html
Barrys right here Putin is a monster and probably ordered many people killed because of personal grudge.
before this stuff happens Boris Yeltsin resigned and hands putin the keys to the kremlin probably to save his and his families lives. putin feels Yeltsin is week for letting chechnya break and others break away... Opposition journalists, especially those who dare to report on what it going on in Chechnya, suddenly start dying. In 2000 alone, reporters Igor Domnikov, Sergey Novikov, Iskandar Khatloni, Sergey Ivanov and Adam Tepsurgayev are murdered —
Pretty sure there is no one including Trump that is capable of this blatant slaughter of people.
Alexander Litvinenko: tea laced with polonium 210... he accused putin of ordering the murder of Anna Politkovskaya.
Anna Politkovskaya: contract killed for writing a book about putin.
Natalia Estemirova: Journalist who was critical about russian abuses in chechnya. Abducted and killed.
Stanislav Markelov and Anastasia Baburova: human rights lawyer and his friend killed near the kremlin. he represented people who were critical of putin.
Boris Nemtsov :former deputy prime minister of Russia, killed infront of the kremlin for talking shit about putin.
Boris Berezovsky: mobster killed after falling out with putin... he tried to hide in england but the goons found and killed him.
Paul Klebnikov: journalist killed by putins and his buddies via contract.
Sergei Yushenkov: politician with different views than putin.
just a few from a long list, If you ever been to russia you would notice there is no middle class and the upper class must conform to the oligarch or life will be short.
You don't foresee any form of wall tax? Yeah it's bad. The "muslim" ban was bad as in constitution bad, contempt of court bad and planning bad.Quote:
Originally Posted by handicapme
He's a very bad man
He also gets people to lie for him and they aren't nearly as good at it as he is.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMV1HA2O3x8
Something weird's going on, imagine a president involved in a nasty divorce while in office.
As time rolls on the evidence will become overwhelming, as if it isn't already
.
Bonus George hw Bush playing grab ass, the woman is a celebrity, forgot her name.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UwG54CxZcKM
Disclaimer: This does not mean we need Hillary, geez.
Don't forget the pope. Normally I wouldn't care what the pope says but this pope rules. He finally wants the church to take Jesus at his word and stop being a bunch of judgmental pricks.Quote:
Originally Posted by LarryLaffer
if Obama had said the same thing the Republicans would be calling for impeachment.Quote:
Originally Posted by herbertstempleThat's what people don't get about Trump. He can be honest when other politicians would give some canned feel good response.Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtyB
We do have a lot of killers. No issue here. But may be made one.
Trump and Melania's relationship may hold some prurient interest but is it relevant?Quote:
Originally Posted by FPS_Russia
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMV1HA2O3x8
Something weird's going on, imagine a president involved in a nasty divorce while in office.
Tom Brady's relationship with Giselle has zero correlation to his performance in the pocket. Lotta great football players, salesmen and programmers are total screw ups in their personal life while simultaneously being stars professionally.
I learned long ago to not be distracted by this sort of thing.
Trump's FDA pick wants to let drugs onto the market before they have been proven effective. WTF? Even Big Pharma doesn't want somethin that fucking nuts.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/05/h...e-iphone-share
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron Von StruckerQuote:
Originally Posted by DirtyB
Barrys right here Putin is a monster and probably ordered many people killed because of personal grudge.
before this stuff happens Boris Yeltsin resigned and hands putin the keys to the kremlin probably to save his and his families lives. putin feels Yeltsin is week for letting chechnya break and others break away... Opposition journalists, especially those who dare to report on what it going on in Chechnya, suddenly start dying. In 2000 alone, reporters Igor Domnikov, Sergey Novikov, Iskandar Khatloni, Sergey Ivanov and Adam Tepsurgayev are murdered —
Pretty sure there is no one including Trump that is capable of this blatant slaughter of people.
Alexander Litvinenko: tea laced with polonium 210... he accused putin of ordering the murder of Anna Politkovskaya.
Anna Politkovskaya: contract killed for writing a book about putin.
Natalia Estemirova: Journalist who was critical about russian abuses in chechnya. Abducted and killed.
Stanislav Markelov and Anastasia Baburova: human rights lawyer and his friend killed near the kremlin. he represented people who were critical of putin.
Boris Nemtsov :former deputy prime minister of Russia, killed infront of the kremlin for talking shit about putin.
Boris Berezovsky: mobster killed after falling out with putin... he tried to hide in england but the goons found and killed him.
Paul Klebnikov: journalist killed by putins and his buddies via contract.
Sergei Yushenkov: politician with different views than putin.
just a few from a long list, If you ever been to russia you would notice there is no middle class and the upper class must conform to the oligarch or life will be short.
its a complicated thing to assign judgement to putin over a lot of what we consider to be brutal acts of violence for two reasons;
1) hes one (1) person using his intelligence and police to hold together what was very recently a literal failed nuclear nationstate.
2) a lot of the sanctions listed above were carried out 'autonomously' from him, eg without his blessing.
so as butthole puckeringly insane as his record of clipping opposition seems, at some point you have to carry into that equation what would happen if these ludicrously powerful minigarchs slipped free of the yoke of putin authority and began to go after each other. it would not remain in those borders long, nukes and biological weapons would flood the black market for example.
im not giving putin a pass, especially with recent events in crimea/ukraine, but there is a habit of americans discussing russian ultraviolence like putin gets off on it or is just a mad dog.
the sanctions & judgement are essential and right, but not all the evidence presented is as one dimensional as our media narratives would suggest.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatineQuote:
Originally Posted by Baron Von Strucker
its a complicated thing to assign judgement to putin over a lot of what we consider to be brutal acts of violence for two reasons;
1) hes one (1) person using his intelligence and police to hold together what was very recently a literal failed nuclear nationstate.
2) a lot of the sanctions listed above were carried out 'autonomously' from him, eg without his blessing.
so as butthole puckeringly insane as his record of clipping opposition seems, at some point you have to carry into that equation what would happen if these ludicrously powerful minigarchs slipped free of the yoke of putin authority and began to go after each other. it would not remain in those borders long, nukes and biological weapons would flood the black market for example.
im not giving putin a pass, especially with recent events in crimea/ukraine, but there is a habit of americans discussing russian ultraviolence like putin gets off on it or is just a mad dog.
the sanctions & judgement are essential and right, but not all the evidence presented is as one dimensional as our media narratives would suggest.
lol that said http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ip-Russia.html
If Obama had said the same thing, we would never know because the media would cover it up.Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkongerif Obama had said the same thing the Republicans would be calling for impeachment.Quote:
Originally Posted by herbertstemple
Besides, Obama is gone. Nothing but a novel footnote in American history. The first social experiment president has come and gone.
Time to restore America.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatineQuote:
Originally Posted by Baron Von Strucker
its a complicated thing to assign judgement to putin over a lot of what we consider to be brutal acts of violence for two reasons;
1) hes one (1) person using his intelligence and police to hold together what was very recently a literal failed nuclear nationstate.
2) a lot of the sanctions listed above were carried out 'autonomously' from him, eg without his blessing.
so as butthole puckeringly insane as his record of clipping opposition seems, at some point you have to carry into that equation what would happen if these ludicrously powerful minigarchs slipped free of the yoke of putin authority and began to go after each other. it would not remain in those borders long, nukes and biological weapons would flood the black market for example.
im not giving putin a pass, especially with recent events in crimea/ukraine, but there is a habit of americans discussing russian ultraviolence like putin gets off on it or is just a mad dog.
the sanctions & judgement are essential and right, but not all the evidence presented is as one dimensional as our media narratives would suggest.
Elimitating Putin would create a vacume much like what happned when they killed sadam husain, except Puten really does have WMD and may very well have a hankering to fire one or two of them off as a sighn of supreme power. Hopfully it will be directed somewere other than the commonwealth countries and northamerica. To say poten probably did not order or know of some or all of the assinations could be accurate, more like puten shows hatred or distrust in any one or group of indivudals.... they would be handeled apropreatly.
We better hope i guess that puten keeps taking his crazy pills and stays in power for the forseable future, some estimates are that russia has somthing like 30k nukes and lord know what else??
Imagine your President publicly begging a terrorist attack lol
I fully expect a fake attack to happen before March.... And when it does, his ratings will rocket and he'll be given free reign to bury his tiny cock into retarded arses even further.
Holy shit!! if you honestly believe this you are so fucking brainwashed it's beyond reproach.Quote:
Originally Posted by herbertstempleIf Obama had said the same thing, we would never know because the media would cover it up.Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkonger
#AmericanSheep
What's funny is a lot of his supporters are the same people that still swear 911 was a conspiracy set up by the Bush administration. Go figure that one...Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord of the Fraud
However...
I actually would not put it past this administration to set up an attack or let one slip through the cracks just to help push their insane agenda. In fact I feel it's probable.
Im starting to believe that if Hillary would have won this thread would not have gone past 500 pages.
I can't imagine Trump supporters obsessed with every little misconstrued thing the president said.