Did you say Chrissy mentioned Poor People?
https://youtu.be/_Tav6CIjb8A
Printable View
Did you say Chrissy mentioned Poor People?
https://youtu.be/_Tav6CIjb8A
I appreciate you guys putting his new videos here (keep your enemies closer). I am now a little more embarrassed that I joined his group 2 years ago after seeing how STUPID he really is! He is getting 1k views max and he is saying the world. What a dummy he has no clue how small his world is. What 1 person in the Philippines 1 person in Australia checks your video out and boom I’m ‘Mr Worldwide’. What a douche!!!
Chrissy will lie about the stupidest, most insignificant things. At the 50 second mark in today's video, he says the sun isn't even up yet but you can see it clearly shining on the outline of the window/blinds.
Here is a perfect example of what I said earlier. CM doesn't mind if people go to KD's channel because KD is such an unlikeable character.
You had Bart from "This is my simple life" who didn't mind reaching out to CM because he thought KD was full of it. He reached out to KD and KD and Bart didn't agree on everything so KD lashed out at Bart, therefore driving Bart to CM.
KD has done more harm than good with anything related to CM.
https://youtu.be/n9yyMxi2lEo?t=222
LOL. Hilarious man!
Weigh your bank account against your ego and see which one weighs more....This is the best advice his "mentor" gave him and this is what stuck? WTF does that even mean? Must be what the "mentor" said as he was unbuttoning his pants for Chrissy to go down on him. Humble yourself and suck that cock for a quarter and a pat on the head. "Yes sir."
The guy is just sad and more than a little brain washed.
As far as the disclaimer, I am no lawyer, but I am fairly certain that a disclaimer doesn't give you a pass to say what you want, or to completely contradict what you say in the disclaimer and on the video.
A short story, I had an Elementary school teacher who's disabiled child lost many fingers due to an elevator accident at a Professional sports stadium while riding in the elevator. In litigation, the Sports stadium pointed to the disclaimer on the back of the ticket stub as them not being responsible. As you may have guessed, It didn't work. Girl received 7 figures.
Generally, there are no disclaimers that give a 100% free pass. Hit with a foul ball in the head at a baseball game can reasonably be expected. Losing 4 fingers in an elevator can not. Much of it has to do with "Reasonable expectation".
The main issue here is probably not even so much the legality. Yes, YouTube likely structures most if it's policies based around law, ultimately YouTube is a business and has a right to do business with who they want, and with whom they don't want. Same as a business having the "Right to refuse service"
YouTube knows it's not good to have a guy on their platform that will claim at times to win 100% of the time and win everyday. Even if that person happens to be protected legally YT is not ok with it since they want to protect the community as a whole. In this situation YT probably looked at Chrissy's intent. His "intent" is abundantly clear, and that is to scam, scam, and scam
It’s funny, I hadn’t heard of Rumble until this morning on the radio. Apparently they offered Joe Rogan $100 Million to change over from Spotify.
Smart move by Rumble, even if they had zero intention of signing him. The amount of publicity they got out of just a supposed offer to Rogan is incredible.
Rumble is an attempted competitor to YouTube, where they don't do ideological censorship. So you can post COVID conspiracy theories, 9/11 conspiracy theories, and any other crackpot theory to your heart's content.
Perfect for Chrissy. Kind of.
See, there is a misconception that Rumble is a free-for-all. It isn't. The platform forbids pornography, harassment, racism, antisemitism, copyright infringement, and illegal content.
Therefore, we might be able to get that channel taken down, as well. Probably better to wait a bit until enough content appears which makes it clear it's a scam. They won't be impressed if we simply say, "It was removed from YouTube for violations", because that's pretty much the reason Rumble exists in the first place.
The other problem with Rumble is that it just doesn't have anywhere near the reach of YouTube. So unless people are looking for you already, you're not going to be found very easily on Rumble.
According to Chrissy, he really thinks the dealer knew the outcome of this hand ahead of time because she turned the “Bankers” 2nd card sidewise by mistake. It’s clear it was a mistake and she didn’t know the outcome of the hand ahead of time. Just very monotonous work by these dealers.
Once again Chrissy, Clowns and Buffoons belong in the Circus Not pretending to gamble professionally.
At the 31:10 mark - You can see the hand from the beginning....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNQRZnaXqKE
PV, I actually do think they have the cards in order on the screen and she is watching it to know what to do. A lot of these dealers probably don’t know all the hit rules with baccarat, which can be very intricate to learn. I do think the technology used to be that the cards were scanned as they came out of the shoe, but now the RFID reader actually shows the dealer exactly what to do and what cards are coming.
She is watching the screen and not the cards. I do think she knew it was a tie and the Banker would not be pulling another card. I don’t see any other explanation for her turning the card sideways. Exactly what you would expect from such a “legit” website.
Bart, don’t be embarrassed man. Main thing is that you learn from it. I took such a bad beat in Golf this weekend that I steamed off a good chunk. We all make mistakes. I remember when I was betting with a bookie around 17 years old and I pushed a bet.
My “friend” told me that you have to pay the juice when a bet pushes. This was right before the internet exploded, but I will admit I paid that juice. It’s the smallest amount of money I’ve ever been rolled for, but it burns my ass even to today.
We all get bamboozled in one way or another in life. Don’t let the fact that you paid Chrissy define .0000001% of you. Lesson learned and you move on. We are all marks at one time or another. Don’t beat yourself up about it.
So I’m not up to date on these type sites but it appears you can actually sign up for a penny on a custom program. I don’t want to enter a CC but does a prepaid work for this? And will it give you access to comment on Chrissy’s page? Would be worth it to sign up and piss the loser off even more with comments. I would think he can ban people but being new to it he may not have it down yet.
Anyone has any experience with this site and what works?
Hmmm... not a bad idea.
I agree it would be hilarious to troll Chrissy's Patreon page, even if it meant he was getting a penny from each of us.
However, it's possible he would have to approve comments to be posted, or that he gets an alert and can delete them very quickly.
I guess it isn't much risk to find out.
I agree that they look at the screen in order to see what their next action is (Draw or Stand).
This is what I don’t understand:
Players hand is 0 and 5
Bankers hand is 0 prior to dealing a second card
For the screen to know the final outcome of the hand will be a tie (4), it MUST know the next card in the shoe is a 4, in addition to that it must know the card behind that card will be a 9.
I see there is a barcode in the center of the card and what appears to be a barcode reader on the table immediately as they come out of the deck. Now even if this is an RFID reader vs. a barcode scanner, I’m not sure if it changes much if both read a single card as it comes out of the shoe.
In order for her to know it’s a tie, she/system would need to know 2 consecutive cards in the shoe.
Prior to the cards being placed in the shoe, they were cut by the floor person. If the order of all 8 decks were known, cutting would change that order. The shoe itself looks completely clear.
Unless there is a technology that can read more than 1 card in a sequence?
I agree that the system tells them what there next move is, I just don’t see how it would know both the 4 and the 9 prior to comming out of the deck.
Maybe I am missing something Super obvious here?
Also, when the dealer draws a 3rd card on each side they turn it sideways as well regardless which side wins or if it’s a tie or not. Also, prior to her taking the bankers 2nd card, she takes a long pause as if she is side tracked. Even after she deals the card (before she deals the player the 9), she looks at something on the ground. I was just thinking she forgot it was the “dealing” round vs. the “drawing” round and the tie was coincidental. But, maybe I’m wrong and I’m missing something here.