Youtube Slot Community and SlotLady

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Small_Banana

You don't need a good looking girl to have a successful slot channel. The top 3 channels are run by males. The one with the most subscribers is homosexual. I have had friends give money to Victor in person while he was streaming from the El Cortez. They are not Sarah simps, they enjoy Victor's degeneracy and his bitching and complaining.

I believe the reason why All Casino Action is struggling is because they switched from slots to table games. I think most people prefer watching slots. That is why you rarely see the biggest channels playing table games.

---

I think it might actually be a little of both.

Tipping or not tipping, some of Victor's antics are a little much when we're talking about a casino dealer who is just doing his or her job and has to be there. If there was a person, who was not a Youtuber, doing the same...I wouldn't be shocked if a supervisor, or perhaps security, were to politely tell the person that they need to chill the fuck out a little bit. If anything bothers me at all about his whining, it's that the dealer has to listen to it.

He can say whatever the fuck he wants to a slot machine. I might even do a $1 super chat (in the highly unlikely event that I'm watching) if he incorporates, "Whore of Babylon," (a personal favorite of mine) into the rant.

My guess is that this will be closer to an Only Scams than a traditional Only Fans. It looks like what has been released is merely the stuff that was already leaked. It’s early, but do I think these 30 somethings all of a sudden going to start taping and releasing hard core sex scenes on the reg? No, I absolutely do not.

Much like with the slot channel, as long as they can keep enough subscribers they will promise a lot and deliver less. I would say some topless photos and the occasional whip cream or ice on the nips is where this will go. I don’t see them becoming a couple that does full blown porn together.

You wont’t see any other guys on there but Victor. Same as when Sarah was bringing in more Creators in the mix in the slot channel. No fucking way. The open relationship talk goes back to the number 1 commandment. “Though shall not inform Simpee that the Simpor is taken”. Even until this day they can’t just admit that Victor was hidden because it was good for business. I know others have made thst point but I agree 100%.

What’s missing from these two is any kind of real contrition. No real thanks for the paying members to stick through all their nonsense. But remember, they may being selling their souls, but these are cultured people. They spend their off time learning new languages and going to the gym. What a couple of intellectuals. Pure class through & through.

BTW EZ mentioned this just scrapes the surface. So they are probably using whatever other material they know is out there at first. So my prediction is when that runs out. Just wanted to be clear on that.

I got involved in this forum because I think Victor and Sarah are two scammers who need to be exposed for who and what they are. Any positive qualities / attributes that they have (for example, being nice to someone they meet in person for 15 seconds or showing the "real" side of gambling) don't justify what they have done and continue to do.

It's unfortunate that some people on here still don't understand the nature of the beast and seem to be indirectly simping for Sarah.

A few basic things we all know:
- Victor has been involved in the channel from the beginning
- Victor and Sarah are and always have been romantically involved (even if you believe the lie about an "open relationship")
- Victor was Jenny (if you still don't believe this, just watch any old el Cortez stream where Jenny directs Sarah to every game we know Victor likes like Wonder 4, Keno, etc.)
- Victor has no compunction about lying to their viewers and members - anything from saying there will be "additional creators" to "even more gambling" to "DAILY" videos uploaded. Whether it's outright lies or lying by omission or being evasive, it's dishonest and misleading.

If you think Sarah wasn't a part of all of this from the very beginning then I have a bridge to sell you. She is not some bright eyed, bushy tailed innocent lamb who met a modern day Svengali like someone on here said. She is rude to her viewers, attitudinal like a child and nothing about her behavior ever screamed "nice" or "pleasant" to me. And unlike others on this forum whose opinions about prostitutes / escorts seem to come from movies and TV, I can assure you that her real personality as we've seen it (snarky, nasty, aloof with a holier-than-thou attitude) is quite common among women who engage in sex work.

Ask yourself: would any woman you know (wife girlfriend daughter) so readily engage in sex work for money on OF as Sarah is doing now? She isn't selling feet pics or nudes, she's selling "facefucking" and "facials from Victor's huge dick". In tonight's livestream she laughingly said that the pics and videos that were "leaked" didn't "really show what I'm fully capable of". So should we expect anal and gangbags?

I'm glad to see that their OF experiment is an abysmal failure so far with only 30 likes after the initial "HUGE" announcement. Maybe it would have been more successful if Victor didn't tank the channel.

Sarah has been an active and willing and equal participant in this whole charade from day one. She is just as big of a lowlife scumbag as Victor is. Victor's public involvement doesn't change the fact that she knew everything that was going on and joined in to make money. Losers might give those two money out of their own free will, but the decision to do so is not based on truthful information, which is scammy and shady.

well i thought Sarah's titties were bigger than that.... they are ok titties ... but i just thought they were bigger....

Victor's Huge Cock:

https://twitter.com/ClownWorld_/stat...TBB2UNpdw&s=19

It is my belief, that up until very recent, doing an Only Fans was not even a remote possibility. I think most of us would agree it was out of urgency.

I do believe if Sarah had launched an Only Fans prior to Victor being introduced, while the channel was in its prime, it would have been very successful.

There is a girl that goes by the name "Bhad Bhabie". This girl was made "famous" for going on Doctor Phil and saying some stupid ghetto shit phrase that went internet viral. Anyway, she started on Only Fans, and made over $1 Million in the first 6 hours, and has gone onto earn over $52 Million since from OF. However, the AVERAGE Only Fans account earns less than $200 per month.

As has been mentioned above, Sarah's (I guess Vic's as well) Only Fans has so far been a massive failure. As has also been mentioned, you need to be a subscriber to "Like" a picture or video.

All we can do is estimate "Likes" to actual paid subscribers. As an estimate, I would say 3 to 1. So 90 people at $50 each is only $4,500. There is no doubt that they thought their first few days would be much better than this. Even if sign ups are 10 to 1 to "Likes", it is still far less than I would think they expected, even on the lowest estimates.

Also, let's be honest Sarah is not a bombshell, and I think this is needed to get the reoccurring monthly income. I think most signed up because they were "curious". That is why I looked at the Reddit link, there was no sexual attraction for me.

I think for under $10k per month, she is going to have a hard time continuing making content to please everyone. Sarah will probably make her money with the "premium" OF as well as 1 on 1's for more money moving over to zoom or the other platforms the girls use. I see her angle will need to be giving simps attention 1 on 1 for $100 or so for 15 min.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Small_Banana

You don't need a good looking girl to have a successful slot channel. The top 3 channels are run by males. The one with the most subscribers is homosexual.

---

I somewhat disagree...

Being a good looking female absolutely helps a channel. Is it everything? No, but does give the creator a huge edge, everything else being equal.


Yes, 3 of the top channels are run by males, however Brian Christopher was one of the original pioneers of "Slot Channels". As with any niche on YT, if you Garner a massive following before anyone else starts to do it and YT will push your videos. Nothing against BC, I don't care for him - But I know a lot of people do like him. The thing about BC, he is a smart business man, unlike Victor. BC knows the business of a slot channel.

As far as the other 2 of the largest slot channels, they are where they are at for one reason, and that is betting huge amounts per spin. If they were betting $1 per spin, we would have never heard of them.

Look at 2 of the largest Female creators in say 2019. Lady Luck HQ and Slot Lady. Both very attractive females. Neither was betting super large at this time. If either of them were average looking females or male, I have no doubt they would be no where near where they are now. The "Big Jackpot", who would watch at $1 per spin? Not many.

There are literally thousands of these slot channels now. It is one of the very few niches where you NEVER run out of content (A major problem other niches have). As long as you have the money, you can crank out the content and try to fight your way into +EV territory as far as channels go.


In my opinion you have to have 1 of 2 things to have a very successful slot channels:

Be an attractive female
OR
Be a male that places LARGE bets.

Of course there are exceptions to this rule.

Look at the top 10 channels on YT, virtually all of them fall into the above categories.


There is this one really goofy guy that reminds me of Beavis, and is always making these strange grunting/farting sounds, he is probably the exception to the rule. He is moderately successful and plays a reasonably low bet, but then again he's been at it along time. Also is gay. His name is SDguy1234. I will watch him for his antics once every few months.

Did a segment on SlotLady's recent follies on the last PFA Radio.

Go to the 2:45:38 timestamp

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBFjB10eAto

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bythecshour

I got involved in this forum because I think Victor and Sarah are two scammers who need to be exposed for who and what they are. Any positive qualities / attributes that they have (for example, being nice to someone they meet in person for 15 seconds or showing the "real" side of gambling) don't justify what they have done and continue to do.

It's unfortunate that some people on here still don't understand the nature of the beast and seem to be indirectly simping for Sarah.

A few basic things we all know:
- Victor has been involved in the channel from the beginning
- Victor and Sarah are and always have been romantically involved (even if you believe the lie about an "open relationship")
- Victor was Jenny (if you still don't believe this, just watch any old el Cortez stream where Jenny directs Sarah to every game we know Victor likes like Wonder 4, Keno, etc.)
- Victor has no compunction about lying to their viewers and members - anything from saying there will be "additional creators" to "even more gambling" to "DAILY" videos uploaded. Whether it's outright lies or lying by omission or being evasive, it's dishonest and misleading.

If you think Sarah wasn't a part of all of this from the very beginning then I have a bridge to sell you. She is not some bright eyed, bushy tailed innocent lamb who met a modern day Svengali like someone on here said. She is rude to her viewers, attitudinal like a child and nothing about her behavior ever screamed "nice" or "pleasant" to me. And unlike others on this forum whose opinions about prostitutes / escorts seem to come from movies and TV, I can assure you that her real personality as we've seen it (snarky, nasty, aloof with a holier-than-thou attitude) is quite common among women who engage in sex work.

Ask yourself: would any woman you know (wife girlfriend daughter) so readily engage in sex work for money on OF as Sarah is doing now? She isn't selling feet pics or nudes, she's selling "facefucking" and "facials from Victor's huge dick". In tonight's livestream she laughingly said that the pics and videos that were "leaked" didn't "really show what I'm fully capable of". So should we expect anal and gangbags?

I'm glad to see that their OF experiment is an abysmal failure so far with only 30 likes after the initial "HUGE" announcement. Maybe it would have been more successful if Victor didn't tank the channel.

Sarah has been an active and willing and equal participant in this whole charade from day one. She is just as big of a lowlife scumbag as Victor is. Victor's public involvement doesn't change the fact that she knew everything that was going on and joined in to make money. Losers might give those two money out of their own free will, but the decision to do so is not based on truthful information, which is scammy and shady.

---

Let's start with the things you say we all know:

- Victor has been involved in the channel from the beginning
- Victor and Sarah are and always have been romantically involved (even if you believe the lie about an "open relationship")
- Victor was Jenny (if you still don't believe this, just watch any old el Cortez stream where Jenny directs Sarah to every game we know Victor likes like Wonder 4, Keno, etc.)
- Victor has no compunction about lying to their viewers and members - anything from saying there will be "additional creators" to "even more gambling" to "DAILY" videos uploaded. Whether it's outright lies or lying by omission or being evasive, it's dishonest and misleading.

1.) Longer than advertised, anyway. I'd obviously have no way of knowing from the very beginning. It could well be that the two of them weren't even together yet. She's been going for some years, right? It appears that the oldest videos are 6+ years old, so I don't know that it's a mortal lock that she and Victor were together that entire time. I'm not saying they weren't. I'm saying six years is a long time and I don't know that.

2.) Going back to #1, but I would say that as long as they have known each other, they have been.

3.) I tend to believe that.

4.) Is that lying or is it overpromising? Perhaps they were in discussions with other creators that fell through. I'm of the mindset that there has to be deliberation in order for something to be a lie; in other words, he'd have to say that without that being his actual intent.

I've already stipulated that I don't think Sarah is the reincarnation of Agnes, Patron Saints of Virgins. I really wouldn't expect any gambling content creator to be. If I'm any example, I am certainly no saint and suspect that I sort of fell into this because of various mental imbalances. Actually, when I get good and truly interested in any subject, I just dive into it head first and go crazy until I get to the point that I feel like I either know, or could learn, anything about it.

I will say that I've had brief and private written correspondences with one/both (I don't know which one I was talking to and had no reason to ask) of them and found them polite and intelligent in that context. I'll stipulate that she has said some rude things, at times, but I don't really see the problem with that. If someone says something that you think warrants a rude response, then you give a rude response; sometimes you're in the right, and sometimes, you're in the wrong. If there's anyone who doesn't like what she does, then they can simply avoid the product which, until just recently, Youtube was the entire product and whatever Patreon membership is good for. As far as women who engage in sex work, I don't personally partake of any such services, so I have no reason to care what their attitudes are.

My fiancee and ex-wife wouldn't be inclined to do those things, and when my daughter is legally old enough to do any such---I 99.99999999999999% doubt she would, but it's certainly not for me to try to prevent an adult from doing what she wants to do. People are free to engage in sex work or not engage in sex work; Sarah is also not my significant other, or daughter, so what she does is immaterial to me.

Is your point that you consider her immoral? So what if she's immoral? Who gives a shit? We're posting on a forum about gambling, so I would suggest we're immediately far from being fucking saints. What are we even talking about here? Gray v. Dark Gray v. Black? I don't think Sarah and Victor are in the black.

I don't see the benefit of wishing failure on anyone, but you are certainly free to do so.

Okay, here's a simple solution for your last bit: Don't directly give people money unless they are providing you a tangible product or service for which you feel there is a mutual benefit. If the donators feel that there is a benefit for them, and want to give money, then they should. If they don't want to give money, then they shouldn't.

What do you want that they should do? Give retroactive refunds dating back to the time when people assumed Sarah was single though she wasn't? Money donated, by the way, out of some illogical belief that the donators had that such donations could eventually be parlayed into getting in her pants.

Please. This isn't a pyramid scheme. This isn't faking cancer. If someone is a simp, to the limited extent that a simp can ever be a victim at all, they are largely their own victims.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bythecshour

I got involved in this forum because I think Victor and Sarah are two scammers who need to be exposed for who and what they are. Any positive qualities / attributes that they have (for example, being nice to someone they meet in person for 15 seconds or showing the "real" side of gambling) don't justify what they have done and continue to do.

It's unfortunate that some people on here still don't understand the nature of the beast and seem to be indirectly simping for Sarah.

A few basic things we all know:
- Victor has been involved in the channel from the beginning
- Victor and Sarah are and always have been romantically involved (even if you believe the lie about an "open relationship")
- Victor was Jenny (if you still don't believe this, just watch any old el Cortez stream where Jenny directs Sarah to every game we know Victor likes like Wonder 4, Keno, etc.)
- Victor has no compunction about lying to their viewers and members - anything from saying there will be "additional creators" to "even more gambling" to "DAILY" videos uploaded. Whether it's outright lies or lying by omission or being evasive, it's dishonest and misleading.

If you think Sarah wasn't a part of all of this from the very beginning then I have a bridge to sell you. She is not some bright eyed, bushy tailed innocent lamb who met a modern day Svengali like someone on here said. She is rude to her viewers, attitudinal like a child and nothing about her behavior ever screamed "nice" or "pleasant" to me. And unlike others on this forum whose opinions about prostitutes / escorts seem to come from movies and TV, I can assure you that her real personality as we've seen it (snarky, nasty, aloof with a holier-than-thou attitude) is quite common among women who engage in sex work.

Ask yourself: would any woman you know (wife girlfriend daughter) so readily engage in sex work for money on OF as Sarah is doing now? She isn't selling feet pics or nudes, she's selling "facefucking" and "facials from Victor's huge dick". In tonight's livestream she laughingly said that the pics and videos that were "leaked" didn't "really show what I'm fully capable of". So should we expect anal and gangbags?

I'm glad to see that their OF experiment is an abysmal failure so far with only 30 likes after the initial "HUGE" announcement. Maybe it would have been more successful if Victor didn't tank the channel.

Sarah has been an active and willing and equal participant in this whole charade from day one. She is just as big of a lowlife scumbag as Victor is. Victor's public involvement doesn't change the fact that she knew everything that was going on and joined in to make money. Losers might give those two money out of their own free will, but the decision to do so is not based on truthful information, which is scammy and shady.

---

It is too early to tell if their OnlyFans is gonna be a failure. The simps like to wait for there to be a lot of pictures and videos and then they will subscribe for just a month. Then they can screenshot or record whatever they want.

This came thru my youtube feed tonight. Vegas Victor is playing video poker. First thing I did was check out the paytable. I was surprised he was playing Not So Ugly Deuces, a 99.73% game with optimal strategy. Maybe he ain't as dumb as he looks, I thought.

But thoughts of him not being so dumb quickly faded when I watched him play a few hands. He ain't just bad at video poker. He's reallllllllllllllllly bad.

The bet is 5 units per hand. You want to hold the combination of cards that has the highest expected value.

So in the 2nd hand Victor is dealt:

5h-2d-6d-Td-Jd

The hold with the highest expected value, at 6.5 units, is 2d-Td-Jd. But Victor holds the 2d-6d-Td-Jd, worth about 4.7 units.

In the very next hand he is dealt:

3d-2d-2h-8d-9d

Victor held the pat flush worth 15 units. But the 2d-2h-8d-9d is worth 17 units.

He butchered some more hands before I got tired of watching. Dude turns a 99.7% game into about a 96% game.

The thing is, the NSUD strategy is easily found online. He could easily have it available on another tab to reference when he is playing. Dumb, dumb, dumb.

https://youtu.be/bkqJxFlTeR4

More Laughable Footage from Shithead Victor!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rv1TO04OePE


Dealer literally starts with an Ace on 4 of the "new decks" after Vic cuts the deck, but he still continues to play One hand like a Donkey. He pretty much whines for the last 12 minutes straight and donks off about $200 per hand to the point he Stops playing side bets, his only smart move! Enjoy!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BedWetterBettor

More Laughable Footage from Shithead Victor!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rv1TO04OePE


Dealer literally starts with an Ace on 4 of the "new decks" after Vic cuts the deck, but he still continues to play One hand like a Donkey. He pretty much whines for the last 12 minutes straight and donks off about $200 per hand to the point he Stops playing side bets, his only smart move! Enjoy!!

---

At 8:55 Victor spills the Beans...

Remember they got paid from YouTube on the 21st.

He says for this trip "A day and a half" and that he is "DOWN 10 GRAND!" Yes, 36 Hours and $10,000 is DUNZO! This is not counting the $1.1k he lost in this video.

This verifies he is in full DEGEN mode off camera, at least for the past 1.5 days.

-$11.1k in 1.5 days

Perhaps I will be able to gather some insight for a WoV Article.

I am scheduled to have an interview with ACA tomorrow; we've discussed things privately and I have informed them that I'll be asking any question that readers may find interesting. Of course, I made a point to say that they have the right to refuse any questions, as well.***

I intend to ask straight questions and am hoping for straight answers. Anyone looking for 'gotcha' moments will have to keep looking, but I do plan to at least ask substantial questions.

With that, it is probably appropriate for me to discontinue participating in this thread until such time that the interview has occurred and article released. If I am perceived as attacking them, then I am being terrifically rude to people who are graciously going to allow me to conduct an interview with them; if I am perceived as defending them, then I can be accused of bias.

I'll be back to link the article when it is published and I will field any questions anyone might have for me. To be clear, I will not answer for them about anything, but I would be willing to entertain questions about how I perceived our interaction, etc.

***That is not special treatment, btw. This is my standard procedure. Anyone I interview is also given the option to read the transcript and delete things, if they choose, or to make minor corrections/clarifications. More flies with honey. Better articles, too.

DISCLOSURE: My post defending them Saturday was after I opened up a dialogue about interviewing them, but I had no idea if they would accept or not. I'd pretty much done the bulk of the talking, at that point.

@Mission146, i am sure you probably have this written down as a question.... but just in case.... could you ask what the thought process was for Sarah

to basically stop being the face of the channel and Victor to take over.... thanks

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 1dollarboxcar

@Mission146, i am sure you probably have this written down as a question.... but just in case.... could you ask what the thought process was for Sarah

to basically stop being the face of the channel and Victor to take over.... thanks

---

Yeah I don't know if Mission has questions established yet, but just in case he doesn't, here's three questions I'd like to see asked:

1) 1dollarboxcar's question above... what led them to Victor becoming the on-camera player instead of Sarah, especially given that an attractive female player will always have an edge in getting viewers?

2) Has the channel made more money than they have lost gambling?

3) What is the reason they have transitioned to Onlyfans porn, given that only a very small percentage of viewers were likely ever to see the "leaked" blowjob video?


Also, I assume Victor and Sarah are reading this thread. I want them to know that I am not against them, and have repeatedly stated on my show that they haven't scammed or harmed anyone. My only issue with them has been their deception of their audience at times, which is their right to do as channel content creators, but I don't think is good practice.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 1dollarboxcar

@Mission146, i am sure you probably have this written down as a question.... but just in case.... could you ask what the thought process was for Sarah

to basically stop being the face of the channel and Victor to take over.... thanks

---

Yeah I don't know if Mission has questions established yet, but just in case he doesn't, here's three questions I'd like to see asked:

1) 1dollarboxcar's question above... what led them to Victor becoming the on-camera player instead of Sarah, especially given that an attractive female player will always have an edge in getting viewers?

2) Has the channel made more money than they have lost gambling?

3) What is the reason they have transitioned to Onlyfans porn, given that only a very small percentage of viewers were likely ever to see the "leaked" blowjob video?


Also, I assume Victor and Sarah are reading this thread. I want them to know that I am not against them, and have repeatedly stated on my show that they haven't scammed or harmed anyone. My only issue with them has been their deception of their audience at times, which is their right to do as channel content creators, but I don't think is good practice.

---

Unfortunately, there will not be an interview. ACA has cancelled the interview with their stated reason being the fact that I post here. That's literally the reason I was given.

I'd normally keep such a thing private, but I'd already announced the interview, so I can't just not produce such an article without stating why.

What does my participation here have to do with anything if I don't work for this site? I have no idea. But, they can do an interview, or not do one, for any reason they want to.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mission146

Unfortunately, there will not be an interview. ACA has cancelled the interview with their stated reason being the fact that I post here. That's literally the reason I was given.

I'd normally keep such a thing private, but I'd already announced the interview, so I can't just not produce such an article without stating why.

What does my participation here have to do with anything if I don't work for this site? I have no idea. But, they can do an interview, or not do one, for any reason they want to.

---

Mission, I am sorry to hear about this and tbh I have had enough of these two. Canceling this interview with you is the last straw for me

My message to all patreons and OnlyFans subscribers. Do not give these two a cent. Here is why…

1. Onlyfans actually takes a little work and is about spending a good amount of time connecting with the subscribers. Actually having real access to the person is what you are paying for. That’s not what they are doing. They are simply trying to profit off the release of the leaked porn/photos.

Sarah wastes the FBI’s time talking about how violated she feels, and at the same time they are setting up a mechanism for profiting on the same violation.

Listen to Druff’s breakdown of their video response to the photos coming out. He did it perfectly. This wasn’t about introspection for either of them. It was about playing the victim, profiting to the max and having their cake & eating it too.

Enough is enough. The photos and videos will all be leaked one way or another. I don’t know if everyone realizes, porn is free nowadays. No need to pay $50 bucks for a month for this.

I’m sure a large percentage of the Onlyfans subscribers are fugazi anyways. Onlyfans does a 80/20 split for the creator. Meaning you could spend a grand getting 20 subs and you will get $800 of it back.

2. Patreon/YouTube members, you are an after thought. You get a stream if Victor feels like it/has money left. Just watch their shit on YouTube for free. They got nothing to offer you for that extra money and just take you for granted. Neither has much of anything of interest to say. Their live chats are essentially the same boring nonsense over and over again.

Stop enabling these two and allowing them to take the world for granted. Mission was going to give them a fair interview but they couldn’t even accept that level of accountability. It’s time these two act like adults. Make them…

At the end of the day there has been a good share of negative comments on this thread. There has also been a good share of posters being more than fair. What Sarah/Victor have shown is they will always take the path of least resistance. They will always find a reason to justify that choice. In this case they went with Mission having posted on this thread.

They had a chance of actually being straight up with he audience. At this point it would have only served them well imho. Wow these people can actually be authentic? What a breath of fresh air that would have been.

But of course they take the easy road. Stay the course. What a surprise. I am just so tired of it. These two have profited greatly in the last 5/6 years and they take it completely for granted. In fact, they feel as if they have deserved all of it. In their eyes they owe no one. In fact, they believe they deserve more.

Unfortunately that is the world for people who make a living doing Yotube/OnlyFans/Patreon. The only rules they must abide are the Terms of Service of each platform. If they follow those, then they must be correct morally, ethically, etc. They get to position the goal posts themselves and move them as they wish.

Like most things it comes down to money at the end of the day. We all understand that. Change is very scary for these creators. Staying the course will always be the default position. I don’t know how Sarah really felt when the leak occurred. But what I do know, is that they had set up a mechanism to profit from it within a day.

I will say, when you zoom out on this whole Slot Community, it is really a cesspool. Not everyone can be Vegas Matt with the personality & bankroll to just put out good content every day. There is scam group pulls, gofundmes, guys making multiple channels/reposting old videos, a plethora of channels playing with funny money (*Not acknowledging it & hoping some naive idiots fall for it) and basically channels leveraging their audiences for money in any way they possibly can.

Channels that main purpose is to get viewers signed up on shady offshore sites or these poker apps where they are either going to get scammed/cheated or probably both. It is absolutely rampant the scumbaggery out there. Look, Victor & Sarah’s sins are on the lower end when you compare them to the other shenanigans that go on. Do they receive a disproportional amount of scrutiny because of their history? Yes, I don’t think anyone can say they don’t.

I am not backtracking from my last post. But as George Carlin said, “This planet is going to be one great big ball of shit one day”. But we only can deal with what’s in front of us at the time. For better or worse that is ACA right now. At the same time, they have certainly benefited from the scrutiny. Polarization sells. Their responses to EZ’s videos have been by far their highest viewed content. They have benefited from the scrutiny.

It really bothered me that they would sight Mission having been on this thread as a way to weasel out of the interview. So I let them have it. But wanted to provide full context. There is an incredible amount of shady shit going on in this “community”.

Unfortunately policing it is an impossibility. The gambling space is too large. We have the table game system sellers, the sports pick sellers and that doesn’t even scratch the surface. There is not enough time in the day to talk about it all. So the spotlight has to be shined on a few. It may not be fair, but that’s just the way it goes.

What someone wants to do with their money is their business. No surprise, I wouldn’t spend mine on ACA. But everyone is free to pony up for the “Pussy Pounding” (note the quotes please) if they so choose. Have at it Hoss!

Been busy with life and decided to log back in to this forum. Yea, I didn't expect the Slot gravy train to end with Victor's degenerate gambling putting them in such a hole that they decided to do adult content as an income source.