Printable View
Looks like you re probably going to go 1-1 as Chicago is giving Denver the beatdown.Quote:
Originally Posted by jsearles22
Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
I do find it amusing you bet so small you are embarrassed to show. I am setting the O/U on $1.
Have Redskins game -2 and 2nd half -6 -110.
Lets go. Stop turning it over. K. Thanks.
You got me. I bet $.10 each......Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaardLooks like you re probably going to go 1-1 as Chicago is giving Denver the beatdown.Quote:
Originally Posted by jsearles22
I do find it amusing you bet so small you are embarrassed to show. I am setting the O/U on $1.
I don't see your bet amounts though?
I wish it was $0.10. I would be down a lot less money this year.Quote:
Originally Posted by jsearles22You got me. I bet $.10 each......Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
I don't see your bet amounts though?
Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daly
5-1 counting the Witten unders
:entertained
I tailed. many thanks. I cleaned up on Marshall total this year, so again, I owe you a nice steak dinner. Nevada should have gone over, but Rice wasn't close. And TMMLGAY - you owe me $500 for the Tampa Bay over.Quote:
Originally Posted by Daly
looks like the hurricane teams are gonna both go under...who woulda guessed 16 straight weeks of NFL football would be tough to get through without an off week...pissed I didn't fire on tampa...Quote:
Originally Posted by TellafriendI tailed. many thanks. I cleaned up on Marshall total this year, so again, I owe you a nice steak dinner. Nevada should have gone over, but Rice wasn't close. And TMMLGAY - you owe me $500 for the Tampa Bay over.Quote:
Originally Posted by Daly
Quote:
Originally Posted by GambleBotsChafedPenislooks like the hurricane teams are gonna both go under...who woulda guessed 16 straight weeks of NFL football would be tough to get through without an off week...pissed I didn't fire on tampa...Quote:
Originally Posted by Tellafriend
Yeah, I took Miami over 9 which covered easily but Ga Tech over 6.5 which barely went under - so it was a wash.
That Nevada loss to a D1a team while they were getting the QB situation settled haunts me. They replay the season now and they are a 5-6 win team. If the Queen had balls and all of that. Rice was a tremendous disappointment, they were fucking garbage.Quote:
Originally Posted by TellafriendI tailed. many thanks. I cleaned up on Marshall total this year, so again, I owe you a nice steak dinner. Nevada should have gone over, but Rice wasn't close. And TMMLGAY - you owe me $500 for the Tampa Bay over.Quote:
Originally Posted by Daly
Northwestern and NC State went over easily as well.
Miami is a non bet because they didn't play 12 games.Quote:
Originally Posted by TellafriendQuote:
Originally Posted by GambleBotsChafedPenis
Yeah, I took Miami over 9 which covered easily but Ga Tech over 6.5 which barely went under - so it was a wash.
Sometimes I really wonder if you guys actually bet sports or just pretend to.
Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaardMiami is a non bet because they didn't play 12 games.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tellafriend
Sometimes I really wonder if you guys actually bet sports or just pretend to.
And to think I defended you in the Trump thread recently.
Reread and notice that was my fucking point - neither team finished their season.
So, Vermin, I need to get my action in for tonight. Where we at with CFB?
I think I went 4-2-2 in college football O/Us. So won a little. My book hasn't released any of the money yet which is a little annoying as all the teams are done playing. I also had Miami O9 which will be voided when my book gets around to it. This is the 3rd winner that has been voided by hurricanes in the last 2 years where the bet would have won regardless of what happened in the missing game, which is annoying.
Unfortunately, I am going to give all the profit back with NFL. I had Seattle O10.5 and Houston O8.5 which I think could have won if the seasons played out a little different, but both teams got railroaded by injuries.
I guess I misread your post. Sorry.Quote:
Originally Posted by TellafriendQuote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
And to think I defended you in the Trump thread recently.
Reread and notice that was my fucking point - neither team finished their season.
Probably going to take USC. I have no strong opinions but I will watch the game, and I tend to bet games I watch, so here we are.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tellafriend
Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaardProbably going to take USC. I have no strong opinions but I will watch the game, and I tend to bet games I watch, so here we are.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tellafriend
holy shit this is fucking AWESOME!!
basically the guy who fired phil fullmer from Tennessee 10 years ago just got fired by fullmer going behind his back trying to ascend to his position...10 years of pent up shit and he got back at the guy...well played fullmer!!
I'm taking Stanford tonight. +165 and +4
Me too. GL. Vermin - stay on your side of the field with USC.Quote:
Originally Posted by Daly
love to hear BCRs take on this since he's an OSU guy as well...
man, it just seems like taking wisky +200 isn't a bad bet...basically betting that JT is either too hurt to play well or if healthy he just has one of those JT games where he plays like shit...OSU has beaten the hell outta all the cupcakes this year except when they got rolled by iowa...JT played poorly against OK and against PSU he had a shit first half and a Heisman-like second half to bring OSU back...and against MICH before he got hurt he was 3-8 for 30 yards, although he did have 67 yards on the ground...
I think at +200 you get a good price on JT shitting the bed or being too hurt to play well...daly, good price or bad price?
Im an OSU fan and grad and i always hate playing wisconsin with anything on the line. I hate the fact that OSU waxed them the last time they played. IF i were to bet this game (i rarely bet the Buckeyes) id probably put my money on Wisconsin ML and just be happy if we win. Haskins is going to be real good and if i knew he was going to play the entire game id feel better about the Bucks chances to win. Im not a JT guy though i think hes been good to great at times. i wont be sad to see him leaveQuote:
Originally Posted by GambleBotsChafedPenis
JT is the most maddening player ive seen in recent memory at OSU...I haven't been able to watch any games from start to finish this year because I couldn't take watching him play...Quote:
Originally Posted by lvpkr1009Im an OSU fan and grad and i always hate playing wisconsin with anything on the line. I hate the fact that OSU waxed them the last time they played. IF i were to bet this game (i rarely bet the Buckeyes) id probably put my money on Wisconsin ML and just be happy if we win. Haskins is going to be real good and if i knew he was going to play the entire game id feel better about the Bucks chances to win. Im not a JT guy though i think hes been good to great at times. i wont be sad to see him leaveQuote:
Originally Posted by GambleBotsChafedPenis
Done. Just fired on USC -4Quote:
Originally Posted by TellafriendMe too. GL. Vermin - stay on your side of the field with USC.Quote:
Originally Posted by Daly
Also bet Over in the NO/Utah game if Jsearles is feeling frisky and wants to let $0.10 ride again.
Since all the injuries to their big guys Utah is playing a lot faster and jacking up a lot more 3s, resulting in much faster paced and high scoring games IMO.
NBA (so far):
Detroit under 205 -115 (204 -110 ok)
Also
OKC Under 210 -115 (209 -110 ok)
Also:
Chicago +1
OKC dropped to 208.5 now, so bet that one at your own risk
I still think it will cover
You might have a good bet there.... I've seen a few 6's in the market, allthough the difference between 4.5 and 6 is small.Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaardDone. Just fired on USC -4Quote:
Originally Posted by Tellafriend
Also bet Over in the NO/Utah game if Jsearles is feeling frisky and wants to let $0.10 ride again.
Since all the injuries to their big guys Utah is playing a lot faster and jacking up a lot more 3s, resulting in much faster paced and high scoring games IMO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DalyYou might have a good bet there.... I've seen a few 6's in the market, allthough the difference between 4.5 and 6 is small.Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
Huh? Didn't you say an hour or two ago you were taking Standford??
Took Bulls +1 and Over 195.5. Both these teams are playing a lot faster and shooting more than they were early in the year. Unless shooting is very bad I think this easily goes over.
Point being the market likes USC.Quote:
Originally Posted by TellafriendQuote:
Originally Posted by Daly
Huh? Didn't you say an hour or two ago you were taking Standford??
I bet Stanford.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DalyPoint being the market likes USC.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tellafriend
I bet Stanford.
I see the line moving the other way; maybe my book knows I suck, but:
PAC 12 Championship Game - #12 Stanford (9-3) vs #10 USC (10-2) @ Santa Clara, CA (ESPN)
Stanford +3.5 now.
*
*
*
*
The market is batshit crazy on this game. Must be a lot of books with unbalances action on both sides on a night with only 1 major game.Quote:
Originally Posted by TellafriendQuote:
Originally Posted by Daly
I see the line moving the other way; maybe my book knows I suck, but:
PAC 12 Championship Game - #12 Stanford (9-3) vs #10 USC (10-2) @ Santa Clara, CA (ESPN)
Stanford +3.5 now.
*
*
*
*
Wow, what missed opportunity. But your def Right it's bc it's the only game. GL to us!
Bulls looking good so far, Detroit under looking good...
OKC is a disaster.
Sadly I was about to pull the trigger on the Indiana over and then Myles Turner was announced back, so I said fuck it, I can't be confident enough anymore. So I skipped it. This looks like it will win.
:gay
You fucking piece of shit liar. I just checked & can't get that line @ my book. Best I can get is -6.Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaardDone. Just fired on USC -4Quote:
Originally Posted by Tellafriend
Also bet Over in the NO/Utah game if Jsearles is feeling frisky and wants to let $0.10 ride again.
Since all the injuries to their big guys Utah is playing a lot faster and jacking up a lot more 3s, resulting in much faster paced and high scoring games IMO.
& don't try to tell me that lines move because I have it on great authority that they do not ever move after somebody posts them on the internet. It's kinda like a contract or something I assume.
Driving home from work. Haven’t seen any of the game myself yet but The usc commentators have done everything but say the refs are completely in the take. Basically 3 plays in a row refs just making shit up to get Stanford in the end zone.
Is this a fair representation of the game?
Dude. What the hell with the name calling? You know what, just don’t ever talk to me again. I am not going to be called a piece of shit by someone I don’t even know. I don’t know what your problem is, but I don’t even care. Have a nice life.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey GuyYou fucking piece of shit liar. I just checked & can't get that line @ my book. Best I can get is -6.Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
& don't try to tell me that lines move because I have it on great authority that they do not ever move after somebody posts them on the internet. It's kinda like a contract or something I assume.
It's basically what you said to Daly. That he was lying/cherrypicking about his lines that he was posting.Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaardDude. What the hell with the name calling? You know what, just don’t ever talk to me again. I am not going to be called a piece of shit by someone I don’t even know. I don’t know what your problem is, but I don’t even care. Have a nice life.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey Guy
I see you don't like being called a liar so what makes you think he enjoyed it?