Blatant Gambling Scammer Christopher Mitchell (YouTube/Baccarat/Roulette/Sportsbetting)

Regarding Good Ol' Scammy Charlie Brown, I don't think he knows any more than we do about the exact reason he was banned.

I posted the e-mail he got from YouTube (which I got from his Facebook).

YouTube are basically assholes. They tell you the absolute minimum, whether you're the channel owner or the reporter of violating content. This is even true if it's done via their legal department. They give a very general reason the video or channel was removed, and nothing more. If you ask them for clarification, they won't tell you. If you report something and they won't take action (again, even through their legal department), they won't tell you anything regarding the reason they are refusing to enforce their own rules.

Therefore, Chrissy has the same info we saw -- basically the category his channel violated, and that it was for "severe or repeated violations", rather than a third strike. That's it. He said that Stacy appealed it for him (because he's probably incapable of writing up a decent appeal without getting emotional), but all they're going to get back is "APPROVED" or "DENIED". They likely haven't answered yet, as Chrissy probably would have posted a video about it being denied, and clearly it hasn't been approved because his channel is still down.

The Carlos Maza versus Steven Crowder thing on YouTube was really interesting, even if you don't care about either of these two guys. It really shone a light on a lot of YouTube's attitdues and their secrecy/standoffishness regarding strikes and rule enforcement. Basically both sides were given very little info, told to eat shit, and both walked away unhappy. These were both major YouTube personalities, too. Now imagine how YouTube treats the rest of us, who are all nobodies to them.

The truth was that Maza and Crowder both had good points. Indeed Crowder was violating YouTube rules with some of the language he used about Maza, but at the same time, Crowder was continuously frustrated as YouTube would never clarify for him what was or wasn't allowed on the platform. In fact, Crowder's lawyer (who was a part owner of the show at the time) kept writing to YouTube, and they basically wouldn't tell him anything regarding the expectations of the channel. Eventually Crowder got demonetized, but they refused to take any other action against him.

If he had half a brain he would of always had up that disclaimer. More than likely would have saved his channel and his close to 40k subs. Degenerates and simps don't care about disclaimers they just want the dream you're selling---in this case to tell them its okay to gamble.

He is obviously not a details guy and why he eventually fails at everything he touches. He will be divorced and back on the streets by the beginning of 2023.(just teasing on this last part, i haven't the fainest clue what that marriage is like)

Anyway, as I said, provided he has time this week, my Bay Area attorney will attempt to get YouTube to take a look at Chrissy's revived channel, and hopefully remove it.

Now that lightning has struck once, it's time to put a nail in that channel's coffin.

In the meantime, I am going to see if I can find out if the inner circle jerk really is closed.

He is at what, 13 patrons? It will grow but that is not a good start. I would expected him to have 25-35 out of that group in a hurry. As he will get his biggest bump at the beginning then he will be a terrible slow down.

Will be interesting.

edit: looking at that patreon page---i am thinking he is confused and meant to open an onlyfans page. Looks like that "tired" picture of him from 15-20 years ago(shirt off, flexing) and another one of his old wife in a tank top along with another one of his selling supplements.

It truly has to be exhausting being him.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by crudebar

If he had half a brain he would of always had up that disclaimer. More than likely would have saved his channel and his close to 40k subs. Degenerates and simps don't care about disclaimers they just want the dream you're selling---in this case to tell them its okay to gamble.

He is obviously not a details guy and why he eventually fails at everything he touches. He will be divorced and back on the streets by the beginning of 2023.(just teasing on this last part, i haven't the fainest clue what that marriage is like)

---

You're right that the disclaimer would have been smart for legal/channel preserving purposes, but I don't think it would have saved him here. It also would have ruined a lot of the image he was trying to present to idiots -- that he is a gambling genius who effortlessly wins 99-100%. Once you create doubt by dropping disclaimers in there, the gullible potential customer base might be less enthusiastic.

I don't think it would have saved the channel, though. YouTube wasn't looking at any of this stuff nearly as carefully as we were.

Someone at YouTube finally took a moment to examine the channel, and the whole thing looked really scammy to them. Obviously it doesn't take a genius to see this after just a few minutes. Combined with his previous strikes regarding Betonline and whatever else last year, they decided he was up to no good, and canned the whole thing. This is also why it's unlikely he will win his appeal. I don't think a disclaimer would have changed anyone's mind who made this decision.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by crudebar

If he had half a brain he would of always had up that disclaimer. More than likely would have saved his channel and his close to 40k subs. Degenerates and simps don't care about disclaimers they just want the dream you're selling---in this case to tell them its okay to gamble.

He is obviously not a details guy and why he eventually fails at everything he touches. He will be divorced and back on the streets by the beginning of 2023.(just teasing on this last part, i haven't the fainest clue what that marriage is like)

---

You're right that the disclaimer would have been smart for legal/channel preserving purposes, but I don't think it would have saved him here. It also would have ruined a lot of the image he was trying to present to idiots -- that he is a gambling genius who effortlessly wins 99-100%. Once you create doubt by dropping disclaimers in there, the gullible potential customer base might be less enthusiastic.

I don't think it would have saved the channel, though. YouTube wasn't looking at any of this stuff nearly as carefully as we were.

Someone at YouTube finally took a moment to examine the channel, and the whole thing looked really scammy to them. Obviously it doesn't take a genius to see this after just a few minutes. Combined with his previous strikes regarding Betonline and whatever else last year, they decided he was up to no good, and canned the whole thing. This is also why it's unlikely he will win his appeal. I don't think a disclaimer would have changed anyone's mind who made this decision.

---

No question you know the ins and outs of YT better than me. My thinking is he would of had the disclaimer plus the whole idiotic defense but still a defense of "no reasonable person would ever believe you win in a casino everyday." Obviously though YT isn't a court of law.

For the disclaimer he could always explain it away later. "You no my lawyers told me to do that to cover my ass against people who don't follow my instructions properly and lose." He isn't actually dealing with the Mensa society. Plus my take has always been people don't care about disclaimers if someone is selling something the buyer wants to believe in...

You're probably right though.

There's no question that he would have still gotten victims even if he had that disclaimer.

However, Chrissy likes the purity of just being able to come on and spew bullshit unchecked. He doesn't want anything there which can make gullible viewers think twice. His whole schtick is that he's a millionaire professional gambler, who is telling you how it really is, and wants to share his winning strategies with you, and help you become financially independent.

The message is pretty powerful to gullible people who don't engage in much critical thinking. You consistently get it hammered into your head that Chrissy doesn't work, travels a lot, goes to nice restaurants (and orders lavishly), stays in suites, and drives a Lexus. If you don't think about it too much (or lack the ability to think about it critically), you say to yourself, "Well, the proof is right there. The guy lives a great life, gets what he wants, and he doesn't have a job!"

Never does it occur to some of these people that Chrissy's lifestyle is mostly smoke and mirrors, and that what money he does have comes from THEM, not from the gambling.

Chrissy put the disclaimer very briefly at one point, then took it down because he hated doing it. I think Chrissy engages in a form of method acting, where he actually believes his own bullshit that he's a millionaire pro gambler.

The disclaimer is interesting because he had one on videos for about 2 days back in October from memory.
That was added due to BOL affliate issues apparently.
He probably would have avoided a lot of issues if he had just left it on.

The “GOAT” is now on RUMBL (whatever that is):
https://rumble.com/c/c-1378784

And he has a new video about setbacks, setups, comebacks (that I haven’t watched yet)

https://youtu.be/jdVxJljgflo

Good lord. That is pathetic. It's ironic how scammers always view themselves in the light of being the victim.

Why is he so depressed and signing himself up on all these sites? I thought this "helping people" was such a pain in the ass. Now he is free to gamble and make 500k a month.He should just donate all his extra income for not having the burden of the YT channel to charity, that way he will help those loser, selfish poor people he so loves to help.

On a serious note, it's nice to see that he can't sleep because of the burden of not knowing where is next scammer payment is coming from...This is actually pretty awesome. Scrambling like a manic mad man. Beautiful.

edit: Be humble, poor people have huge egos, you can't tell them anything. OMG. LOL. Well said, self pro-claimed GOAT. This has to be dark comedy, correct? I literally spit up my coffee laughing.(well almost, it stayed down)

It's just so funny i can't help but to keep adding on. Did BOL terminate his account and not let him gamble because he wins so much? Did all land base casinos ban him because he wins so much? No, all the ways he says he makes his millions is still open to him. But one with any critical thinking skills at all can easily see the only money he makes is the money that people send him.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by UtahDrone

The “GOAT” is now on RUMBL (whatever that is):
https://rumble.com/c/c-1378784

And he has a new video about setbacks, setups, comebacks (that I haven’t watched yet)

https://youtu.be/jdVxJljgflo

---

God I wish I didn’t watch this but a few things…

1) In the earlier rep I mentioned around 4:35 that he says that the person who took his channel down never met him. So he knows it’s not Lee. Why he continues to defame him is anyone’s guess. But he let the truth slip out.

2) What set back Jizz Rag? I thought you do all this stuff on social media to “change people’s lives”. You still can go play on BOL and print money right(LOL)? Just a pathetic admission that you are a scamming loser degenerate gambler.

3) I’m not religious but was raised Catholic Fuckhole. I think you need to go back and educate yourself on how Jesus viewed the poor.

That’s it for now. Go back to begging for change you dumb shit.

Holy crap!! I totally missed that bit. Hope someone has now captured the two videos and splices those two pieces together. @AHoosierA, there’s your lawsuit if you so choose to go after it. He just admitted that everything you went through was wrong…and yet he outed your name and your location again just 3 days ago. If you want this guy’s ass on a platter (legally speaking…I know you don’t want “his ass”) this may now be your opportunity

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by zealanddonk

The disclaimer is interesting because he had one on videos for about 2 days back in October from memory.
That was added due to BOL affliate issues apparently.
He probably would have avoided a lot of issues if he had just left it on.

---

I think the disclaimer was something commission kings asked Chrissy to do because of Kevin’s correspondence. It wouldn’t of saved his channel if he continued it imho.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JeffDime

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by UtahDrone

The “GOAT” is now on RUMBL (whatever that is):
https://rumble.com/c/c-1378784

And he has a new video about setbacks, setups, comebacks (that I haven’t watched yet)

https://youtu.be/jdVxJljgflo

---

2) What set back Jizz Rag? I thought you do all this stuff on social media to “change people’s lives”. You still can go play on BOL and print money right(LOL)? Just a pathetic admission that you are a scamming loser degenerate gambler.

---

There might be a clause on the BOL agreement that requires a large social media following for the highest percent of affiliate bonus money. Losing the YT channel would likely breach that agreement and cause him to drop a level or two from 35% commission to 25 or 20 %.

We all know he is desperate for every penny, so he needs to supplement that elsewhere!

My best guess why this human toilet continues to defame Lee is that Christopher Sniffell, ever the opportunist, was a beneficiary of an awful ruling in court. Even though time has passed and things have sorted out a bit, he still will take any angle possible.

So Sniffell is essentially still utilizing that awful ruling and conflating it with the YTSE channel to fit his narrative. He believes he benefits from making it seem like he won it court over the person who has made the most content exposing him.

Hopefully after the video this Cum Stain put out today we will finally not hear about this shit anymore. Lee deserves much much much better. Enough is enough. I’m hoping we can move on from this shit. Get back to the Afrin Sniffells.

The keeping up channel is about to go over 1000 subscribers. I think Stacy had about 200 back when it was her channel. I forget how many views or watch hours have to go along with those subscribers before you can be monetized but it will now be interesting to see what happens if he attempts monetization. Will YouTube them go and connect the dots?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheRivers

The keeping up channel is about to go over 1000 subscribers. I think Stacy had about 200 back when it was her channel. I forget how many views or watch hours have to go along with those subscribers before you can be monetized but it will now be interesting to see what happens if he attempts monetization. Will YouTube them go and connect the dots?

---

Not sure if they’ll catch it right away. Chrissy may make some crumbs from it. But they will catch up to him and pound his ass and it won’t take that long. (At least in YouTube Time). Chrissy is never thinking about the long game. Short-sighted, dim-witted and dumber than dogshit. May get a few bucks now, but the pain will come soon. He’s basically still in caught in the denial/anger phase.

Denial, Anger, Bargaining, Depression and Acceptance. Come to to think of it, Sniffell is a combination of the first four, not a sniff of acceptance. Never a sniff of that for Sniffell. Never drop the con, cum stain. Even when you are conning yourself.

The waiting in limbo might actually be worse; and what keeps him up at night. Should i re-build this YT thing? Put all the time and effort into it again and as soon as i monetize, bam they terminate me again? This is obviously weighing heavy on his mind.

That's why the videos we are seeing are just him venting and whining and playing victim. He hasn't a clue what to do, but attacking the "haters" makes him feel good in the moment.

For his inner cult. I am sure it has been trying there also...should i refund them all their 1 time payment and hope they re-sign up under $50 a month. How many will get the refund and walk? Even if they re-sign up it will take numerous months or even over a year until i re-coup their initial payment. Are they dumb enough to let me keep their 1 time payment and also sign up for an additional $50 a month? If I just terminate the whole group will that end up costing me money, what will be the blow back?

The hard life of a scammer. The even harder life of a scammer with a low IQ.

Watching Chrissy's nonsense video now, along with what everyone else has said, around the 6:20 mark
"Poor people tend to have huge egos".

He really doesnt have a clue.
"You cant tell poor people anything".

His projection is amazing to say the least.

Chrissy forgets that while Jesus loved his fellow man, Jesus didnt tug them off [as far as we know].


12:36 "I've created a new inner circle jerk for those who want to get fit and healthy.
Its doing workouts from home. It was a rgeat idea two years ago, but ya know, I'm retarded."

He says this after telling the story about wanting to swig a case of Monster because "he likes the taste".

If anything, I think Chrissy is setting up a defense that he is either too stupid or too insane to have pulled off the scams he is accused of.

Anyone got a pool for when Chrissy starts with "So, Jesus, Trump and me were on a video conference together and then Tom Brady turned up....."

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by crudebar

The waiting in limbo might actually be worse; and what keeps him up at night. Should i re-build this YT thing? Put all the time and effort into it again and as soon as i monetize, bam they terminate me again? This is obviously weighing heavy on his mind.

That's why the videos we are seeing are just him venting and whining and playing victim. He hasn't a clue what to do, but attacking the "haters" makes him feel good in the moment.

For his inner cult. I am sure it has been trying there also...should i refund them all their 1 time payment and hope they re-sign up under $50 a month. How many will get the refund and walk? Even if they re-sign up it will take numerous months or even over a year until i re-coup their initial payment. Are they dumb enough to let me keep their 1 time payment and also sign up for an additional $50 a month? If I just terminate the whole group will that end up costing me money, what will be the blow back?

The hard life of a scammer. The even harder life of a scammer with a low IQ.

---

Persecution drives a lot of cults, he knows many of his followers are "former" broke douche bag haters and he is offering redemption.
So naturally the "big bad" is holding him down and it plays to his audience so well.

He does walk a fine line though, anyone college educated must be bad, construction workers are bad, anyone wtih a 9-5 job is bad....