Yeah Philly is dead.
I did my first parlay of the year, too... with the Philly under, which will likely cover.
Shit.
Printable View
Yeah Philly is dead.
I did my first parlay of the year, too... with the Philly under, which will likely cover.
Shit.
So far this isn't going well.
The only one of 5 games not on pace to lose is the Philly under, and I made that a parlay, so that won't help me.
Though NY under is a toss-up.
Celtics live
Went off -6.5
11/27/2017 8:59:20 PM
DESCRIPTION:
DETROIT PISTONS AT BOSTON CELTICS POINT SPREAD CELTICS PK
Some stellar 4th qtr Celtics stats
Quote:
Originally Posted by OSA
Should have went with the Pacers I guess. Meh. Better luck next time.
3-2 start to the day as Hou, NY, Phi unders cover.
Go Sac!
0-2 start to the day. Standard. Houston was up around 20 with 1:30 left and then scrubs came in and Brooklyn scrubs outscored Houston ones 6-0 and that was that.
Houston Texans has been covering the football game the whole way, and it is a little into the 4th, so that means Baltimore will score a TD at some point in 4th to cover.
Edit: As I type this Federowitz possibly fumbles the ball deep in Houston's side of field. Standard. Right on cue.
Houston promising drive setting for FG. Just like their last 4 drives. Savage just can't get it that last 15 yards. Baltimore up 4 and in prime spot to march down field to score a TD to cover.
Interesting stat of the day:
With the two Sac games pending, I am now 6-7 in the NBA since Friday. However, if all of these games maintained their expected totals/results at halftime (according to the lines set by the books), I would have gone 1-12.
Houston driving to at least cover and possibly win and right on cue Savage fumbles it away.
Standard.
Savage has played 3 games and leads the league in fumbles lost. So not losing a fumble for 3.5 quarters was running extremely hot for him.
Sac shitting the bed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Possibly going into halftime making that stat 1-14.
Houston down 7 points with 3 minutes left. This smells like a defensive TD for Ravens for the cover.
Edit: As anticipated Savage threw an INT. But instead of running for the defensive TD the defender just gave himself up, so may be ok. Need to sweat Baltimore scoring a rushing TD in last 2 minutes while killing clock.
Sacramento has a lot of guys that like the chuck it up in garbage time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan DruffSac shitting the bed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Possibly going into halftime making that stat 1-14.
Hield, Stein, Fox, etc. They are always live for a backdoor cover with a line that big.
How can we profit on this ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Took over 101 in the Kings game 2nd half. That is really low for these teams IMO, even with Curry and Durant out.
I liked Lakers for the Clippers game. I didn't get home from work in time to bet the game, but I will take Lakers 2nd half if I like the spot.
Fade Druff's game bet with first half bet and then go with his bet for 2nd half. You can win twice for every time he wins once.Quote:
Originally Posted by TellafriendHow can we profit on this ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Took Over 106.5 for 2nd half of Laker game.
So I have 2 2nd half overs. What can go wrong?
I guess nobody likes 7-1 nights anymore?Quote:
Originally Posted by Daly
Laker game both teams shooting bad. Missing open 3s and layups. Not looking good for over at all, minus OT.
NO.... NOONE CARES ABOUT GOING 7-1 ON FAIRYTALE LINES THAT YOU NEVER POSTED. I SEE ATLEAST 3 LOSERS BASED ON CLOSING LINES BUT I'M SURE YOU HAD SOMETHING THAT WAS 20YRDS DIFFERENT AS PER USUAL. KRAFT MAC&CHEESE DRESSING UP LIKE LOBSTERMACQuote:
Originally Posted by DalyI guess nobody likes 7-1 nights anymore?Quote:
Originally Posted by Daly
:LOBSTERGODQuote:
Originally Posted by Daly
I went 4-3 on today's 7 picks.
Sac game won outright.
It was over a 7-to-1 dog on the moneyline.
In hindsight, a ML bet would have been good value, because GS without BOTH Durant and Curry isn't more than a 7-to-1 favorite against any NBA team, even shitty Sac.
Anyway, under lost by 10, so that's a wash.
The 3 picks I liked the least (Boston under, Phi -2.5, Sac under) lost, and the other 4 won.
But sometimes it doesn't work out that way.
Record now 51-28-1.
all profit druff...keep grinding it out 1 unit at a time...
I've watched plenty of Pistons games in my life and Andre Drummond goes off at times but I've never seen him play as good as he did against Boston tonight.
Drummond 22 rebounds. I thought I heard that’s happened 5 time in TD Garden and like 4 have been Drummond.Quote:
Originally Posted by BeerAndPoker
Guy hurt me but respect. I know why I lost.
The Celtics talk is that they are already looking to the rematch which will occur shortly. Can not miss that. What scheme will Opie come up with? Irving will be primed. Ought to be a battle.
Are the old days back?
wow giants benched eli...I mean not that eli is great or anything, but man I don't see that happening to too many guys who have won 2 super bowls...
ok I am 7-4 on Druff Ball picks. Think I will ride them some more, thanks for posting.
Not much else for me, I like the Rangers at home NHL. Thats about it. Great football weekend. BTW, bovada bitcoin cash out is working just fine. less than 24 hours and a Philippino payment processor didn't run off with my btc.
Small college basketball
MOBILE - BASKETBALL - NCAA - 515 BROWN +20 -116 FOR GAME
Rhode Island 75, Seton Hall 74Quote:
Rhode Island beat Seton Hall without E.C. Matthews and Cyril Langevine, as both are injured. And yet the Rams put up a good fight against Virginia and got a much-needed resume win Thursday over Seton Hall
I don’t know shit. Injuries, overachieving and a cruise game against third rate Brown. Look ahead to bigger issues.
Just seems a pretty standard bet. Buy now before that huge Brown public money lulz - liberal Ivy colleges get no love.
InQuote:
Originally Posted by Sanlmar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanlmar
From 7 picks yesterday.....
to one today.
NBA
Washington under 211 -115 (210.5 -110 ok)
Garrapolo announced for 49ers vs Bears
Jam it
49ers gonna go from +4 to pick or fav
Jam what? My book hasn't dropped a line yet, and I am sure any book that has already knew Garrapolo was playing and factored that in. You think any book really thought Beathard was going to start and posted an early line on that?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanlmar
I mean, if you think the books will underestimate Garrapolo that is fine. But don't think you are going to "get in on them" by jumping on this news.
I looked on Draftings and they have Garrapolo priced the same as Hundley. So they think Garrapolo playing a good defense on the road (Chicago) he will be as productive as Hundley at home against a bad defense (Tampa); when Hundley has way better pieces around him. I just don't see it. Maybe I am the one underestimating Garrapolo.Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaardJam what? My book hasn't dropped a line yet, and I am sure any book that has already knew Garrapolo was playing and factored that in. You think any book really thought Beathard was going to start and posted an early line on that?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanlmar
I mean, if you think the books will underestimate Garrapolo that is fine. But don't think you are going to "get in on them" by jumping on this news.
Yeah, I looked and it wasn’t there despite SBR listing a line history for BetonlineQuote:
Originally Posted by verminaardJam what? My book hasn't dropped a line yet, and I am sure any book that has already knew Garrapolo was playing and factored that in. You think any book really thought Beathard was going to start and posted an early line on that?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanlmar
I mean, if you think the books will underestimate Garrapolo that is fine. But don't think you are going to "get in on them" by jumping on this news.
Look, I got the news and gave it to you before acting myself
What other selfless acts you want from me other than logging off?
Ok, I accept that. Carry on.Quote:
Originally Posted by SanlmarYeah, I looked and it wasn’t there despite SBR listing a line history for BetonlineQuote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
Look, I got the news and gave it to you before acting myself
What other selfless acts you want from me other than logging off?
I would just say generally when a QB gets hurt and another QB comes in to replace him and it is up in the air who is starting next week you aren't ever going to gain an advantage on the books for the next weeks game by jumping on a line when ESPN releases who is starting.
Why are you of all people questioning Sanlmar? You’re single handedly the worst sports bettor this site has ever seen. Your opinions carry no weight. You’re an auto fade. Quit piping up. You’re to sports betting as KT is to PFA. You delusionally think you matterQuote:
Originally Posted by verminaardOk, I accept that. Carry on.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanlmar
I would just say generally when a QB gets hurt and another QB comes in to replace him and it is up in the air who is starting next week you aren't ever going to gain an advantage on the books for the next weeks game by jumping on a line when ESPN releases who is starting.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
now at 210 w/ my guy. what say you druff?
fucking epic francesa rant about the eli situation...mike is starting to grow on me as he nears the end of his tenure on WFAN...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7i9t24JEKvU
Got one at home too. Lets print.https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...3392092f8c.jpg